Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

In an internal memo, the Google CEO was critical of the comments. Sachelle Babbar/Zuma Press/PA Images
Sexism Row

Google sacks worker who said women don't fill tech jobs due to 'biological issues' in internal memo

US media reports have said that the employee was removed from their position after violating the company code of conduct.

GOOGLE HAS FIRED the author of an internal memo defending the gender-gap in Silicon Valley tech jobs as a matter of biology, according to media reports.

The move was not officially confirmed by Google. It told AFP that the company “can’t comment on individual employee cases”.

In an email to employees, Google chief executive Sundar Pichai supported the right of employees to express themselves, saying that much of what was in the memo is fair to debate, according to a copy of the message obtained by AFP.

“However, portions of the memo violate our code of conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace,” Pichai said in the email.

To suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK.

Pichai noted that the company code of conduct calls for ‘Googlers’ to do their utmost to create “a culture free of harassment, intimidation, bias and unlawful discrimination”.

However, Pichai defended the author’s right to criticise Google training, workplace ideology, and whether programmes promoting workplace diversity are adequately open to all.

“The author had a right to express their views on those topics,” Pichai said.

“We encourage an environment in which people can do this and it remains our policy to not take action against anyone for prompting these discussions.”

Recode, Bloomberg and other media outlets reported yesterday that the author of the controversial internal document was fired.

“Biological causes”

The leaked internal document that triggered the controversy claimed “biological causes” explained the lack of women in tech industry leadership roles.

The screed – dubbed sexist by US media – went viral, reviving the simmering debate over a culture of sexism and lack of diversity in tech sectors.

“I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership,” read the 3,000-word memo.

According to the author, natural aptitudes of men allow them to become better computer programmers, while women have more “openness directed towards feelings and aesthetics rather than ideas” – meaning they “prefer jobs in social or artistic areas”.

In response to the leaked memo, Danielle Brown, Google’s new vice president of diversity, told employees in an email that “it’s not a viewpoint that I or this company endorses, promotes or encourages”.

“I found that it advanced incorrect assumptions about gender,” she said.

The controversy comes as increasing numbers of women are going public with complaints of gender-based discrimination in Silicon Valley.

Currently some 69% of Google’s employees are men, according to the company’s latest figures, a proportion that rises to 80% when it comes to technology jobs.

In 2016 at Facebook just 27% of senior executives were women. At Apple, around 30% of total employees are women.

- © AFP, 2017

Read: EU and Canada’s attempts to fight terrorism by sharing airline passenger details deemed illegal

Read: Ireland is looking for someone to hold onto the €15 billion from Apple’s tax bill

Your Voice
Readers Comments
138
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.