TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Govt backs sanctions against Iran on nuclear issues, but not Israel

Speaking in the Dáil this week, Eamon Gilmore ruled out Irish support of military action against Iran.

Inside the uranium conversion facility near Isfahan, Iran which processes uranium ore into gas for use in enrichment at a separate facility.
Inside the uranium conversion facility near Isfahan, Iran which processes uranium ore into gas for use in enrichment at a separate facility.
Image: AP Photo/Vahid Salemi/PA Images

THE TÁNAISTE AND Minister for Foreign Affairs Eamon Gilmore says that the government has no intention of pushing for sanctions against Israel over nuclear proliferation, but that the cabinet supports sanctions against Iran over its nuclear development programme.

Responding to questions from Sinn Féin TD Pádraig Mac Lochlainn in the Dáil this week, Gilmore said that “international community, including Ireland, the EU and the US, is united in the view that sanctions must be maintained” until Iran comprehensively addresses concerns raised by the International Atomic Energy Agency over its nuclear programme.

In a 2011 report, the IAEA voiced concerns over intelligence suggesting that Iran was developing nuclear weapons under that programme, and that it had already engaged in activities which could lead to the development of weapons.

However, asked if he would support military action (including the US or NATO use of Shannon Airport) against Iran over its nuclear activities, Gilmore said the cabinet supports negotiation, but “no other means”:

It is the firm conviction of this government, and its EU partners, that the grave and valid concerns about Iran’s nuclear programme must be resolved through diplomatic negotiations alone and by no other means.

He said the main aim of EU and US sanctions against Iran is to persuade the state to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme, and he hopes Iranian officials will attend a Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty review conference later this year.

Gilmore also said that he hopes Israel will attend that conference, but that Ireland is not considering sanctions against Israel over nuclear issues – and that such sanctions are unlikely to be pursued by the EU:

I have made clear that, like all previous Irish governments, the government does not support such sanctions, and further that there would be no possibility whatever of achieving an EU consensus in favour of such sanctions.

The Tánaiste said that Israel had never officially announced its possession of nuclear weapons and Ireland continues to push for it and the other states who have not signed up to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty to do so. He added that the government considers the establishment of a WMD-free zone in the Middle East “as a particularly important objective”.

On Wednesday, the US assistant secretary of state Philip Gordon said that the US will continue to pursue it’s two-track police of sanctions and negotiations to urge Iran “to abide by its obligations to the international community” under the UN security council resolutions on nuclear enrichment in Iran.

Until that happens, Gordon said, the US is “determined to continue to rally international support to raise the costs on Iran for failing to abide by its obligations.”

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (42 Comments)

  • Ir recent history dictates, sanctions are often a prelude to invasion. If I was Iran, with enemies all around, I would be trying to produce a very strong defensive capability right now, Including nuclear. So who is forcing whom to do what? Chicken and egg etc. There is more to this than meets the eye!

    Reply
    • Iran and Saudi Arabia are at war. Although they fight little proxy wars (Syria, Lebanon, Iraq…) instead of taking each other on! Unfortunately for Iran the US are allied with the Saudis (despite them being the most fucked up Islamic law enforcers in the world and supporters of Wahhabism and to a degree al Qaeda ) which means Iran are screwed either way. And in the meantime both sides will continue to drag the whole middle east through the mud!

      Reply
  • I bet Iran are shitting themselves now that we are involved!

    Reply
  • You have got to laugh at the hypocrisy of us calling ourselves a nuetral country. Iran have every right to have nuclear power. Israel are the real threat in the region and they have nuclear weapons, vast amounts of them. Unfortunately if we accept that Israel are entitled to have such weapons, there is no moral basis on which to sanction Iran for developing nuclear power. They are only doing what many other nations around the world have already done in relation to nuclear development. Our focus is on Iran whilst the West Bank is colonised by an occupying force that has absolutely no legal right under international law to be there. And Gaza is under oppressive blockade that collectively punishes all of its unfortunate citizens.

    Reply
  • Israel are the real nuclear rouge state. Not Iran . They have approx 200 nukes

    Reply
  • The Journal I have looked for coverage of the Palestinian man on his 62nd day of hunger strike but can’t find it. Maybe I have missed it?

    Reply
  • Sanctions are an act of war. Amazing how very little people know that Japan attacked Pearl Harbour because America banned the import of oil into Japan. Now it’s the other way around, we’re banning Iran from selling it’s oil.

    Reply
  • I couldn’t have put it better myself Ed..

    Reply
  • Neutrality?

    Reply
  • Who gives a monkeys what this insignificant no mark state thinks? We think whatever it takes to get the cash in.

    Reply
  • For Susan Ryan and everybody’s information here:

    While developing what by all objective criteria seems to be a burgeoning nuclear weapon programme (if you’re unclear on that, see the IAEA’s report from last Nov. which basically says that what Iran – particularly testing-wise – seems to be doing is incompatible with a domestic nuclear fuel programme), Iran has said that Israel:

    - must be “wiped off the map”
    - is a “cancerous growth” that should be cleansed from the region.
    - can (insinuation: should) be “destroyed in nine minutes”
    - and has just sent its navy into the Suez Canal to display its “might”.

    Does this not speak for itself?

    Reply
  • Actually Gilmore did answer the question. He said that Ireland supports negotiation but NO other means. That seems to me like an answer and that answer was NO

    Reply
  • The Prime Minister of Canada says Israel is the only nation in the world whose very existence is under attack

    Speaking at the Anti-Semitism Conference in Ottawa, Ontario, the prime minister of Canada said the Jewish nation of Israel is the only nation in the world whose very existence is under attack and is consistently and conspicuously singled out for condemnation.

    Prime Minister Harper said that history shows the world and the ideology of the anti-Israel mob tells the world that those who threaten the existence of the Jewish people are a threat to all of the world. The prime minister said that we should not forget that there are those who choose evil and would launch another Holocaust if left unchecked.

    Iran with nukes and a repeatedly stated and clear ambition to destroy Israel fits PM Harper’s description above.

    Reply
    • well said kieran

      Reply
    • Harper is very pro-Israel and makes that very clearly known. Of course this would be his stance.

      Reply
    • If I use your argument, Dhansa, I could write the following:

      “Ed Kavanagh (who also responded to this post) and Damsha Dmf are very anti-Israel and make that very clearly known. Of course this would be their stance.”

      Facts and opinions are what make debates. We all have biases and stances we adopt. You do too. Does that exclude you from the debate? No, but it does colour your contribution. And mine. And everyone’s. But harper’s points are still valid, as long as you know where he’s coming from.

      Reply
    • Sorry I am anti Zionist. Big difference. Don’t try hide behind the Anti Semite smoke screen that’s always thrown up when the government of Israel is criticised which is what you trying to imply. I would argue that the US is a far bigger threat to peace in the world than Iran ever was or will be. The last 50 or 60 proves so

      Reply
    • Funny you should mention the Holocaust, because you don’t seem to recognise Nazi style propaganda when it is served to you.
      This time it’s not the Jews who are in danger, it’s the Muslims.. But I guess that’s ok, because the Ministry of Truth in America and Israel have said that they are bad people..

      Reply
  • As if Pink But Perfect was going to stand up and say anything else………

    Reply
  • This all boils down to keeping the Moslem world at heel. The survival of ” western democracy and culture” is based upon the abilities of American and Israeli capabilities to keep the hordes of Moslems from getting the upper hand. In other words to you want a Big Mac or a prayer mat. ” in god we trust ” does not mean ” in Allah we trust ” Globally American influence is slipping . We , although in the EU are culturally more aligned with the USA and we have picked sides. Unfortunately you cannot sit on the fence in this issue. I agree with the remarks about Israel, I also know Iranians to be a well educated and cultured people dominated by a nut. But I want a society where you can if u wish paint a derogatory picture of the Taoiseach without being executed. I want freedom of speech and choice. Western ideology is not utopian but it’s a no brainier when it comes to taking sides.

    Reply
  • That last reply was for McCourt above…

    Reply
  • Are you telling us this as if its meant to be true. Are you a robot or just devoid of any original thought. Or maybe u are being ironic. Sorry can’t tell from your tone..

    Reply
    • Can’t you google the prime minister of Canada yourself?

      Reply
    • The manner in which you ask your question leaves no doubt that you will be dissatisfied with any answer that does not conform to your opinion.
      Would it please you if I answered yes I am devoid of thought or yes I am a robot?

      Do you know how to ask a question without stating what you think the answer ought to be?

      Reply
    • Its true because a Politician says so. Are you serious?. We all know the fountains of truth are the politicians . You gotta have something better than that. How any pro Zionist fund raising events versus pro Palestinian events do you think Harper’s been to Hardly an example of impartiality.

      Reply
  • What a bunch of anti-Semites.

    Reply
    • Its not anti Semitic to criticise Israeli policies . Are they immune to criticism?
      They have nukes. It’s a fact . There is nothing anti Semitic about that!

      Reply
    • Ah yes. That old chestnut might work on sheeple matey but I personally have no issue calling out the bigotted apartheid racist governments when needs be. So stick your tired old tactic where the sun dont shine. If i want to crticise the Israeli government I will do so and people like you can piss off and bully weak minded people..

      Reply
    • If criticism of Israeli nuclear weapons is anti Semitic then surely criticism of Iranian nuclear weapons must be Islamophbic.

      Reply
    • Calling people anti-semites in order to silence criticism of the state of Israel is the resort of those who know how morally bankrupt that state is. If they had a real persuasive argument they’d use it instead of simply intimidating critics.

      Reply
    • Iran is a borderline psychotic theocracy that hangs gays, stones women to death, executes children, and runs elections that are farcically corrupt. Israel has nothing to do with the discussion, unless you have a traditional Irish problem with Jews.

      Reply
    • Andrew 17/02/12 #

      Jeremy, they have everything to do with a discussion, particularly since the title of this is “Govt backs sanctions against Iran on nuclear issues, but not Israel” Besides, Israel are leading the ‘sabre rattling’ propaganda campaign for war along with the US. It’s Iraq all over again.

      Reply
    • Traditional Irish problem with Jews, WTF are you spouting on about? Thats possibly the most idiotic comment ive ever heard on here. Iran certainly has its problems and they need sanctions and need to be brought to the negotiating table, Ahmadinejad and his regime are dangerous. Most seem agreed on this.

      As for the isreali’s (and it is part of the discussion as sanctions on isreal are mentioned above).
      It makes no difference to me what religion the people of isreal are. Their Government are possibly the most dangerous on the planet, The carry neuclear weapons and tell noone, The murder indiscrimnantly, The Use other countires identities, passports and soverenty for their own benifit. The couldn’t care less about Human rights or anyone but themselves. The Massacre aid workers looking to support Starving people. They have no respect for any other beliefs other than their own.

      And then people are Ignorant enough to pull out the “Anti Semetic” card, Please. It has nothing to do with being Jewish. Its all about whether you support isreal as a country for its actions or not. And if you do, Well your anti most things but Isreali.

      Reply
    • “Traditional Irish problem with Jews, WTF are you spouting on about?”

      Like most Catholic countries, Ireland has an unhealthy anti-Semitic streak. That this is a “tradition” should be perfectly obvious from the (in effect) expulsion of the Jews from the city of Limerick in 1904 (supported by the founder of Sinn Fein by the way, and completely ignored by the state broadcaster) and Ireland’s doing practically nothing to help Jewish victims of the Nazis during Word War II. At present, Irish anti-Semitism is most obvious in the double standards assumed when a liberal democracy is regarded as morally equivalent to an anti-liberal theocracy. It is also evident from the deafening silence over routine mistreatment of women and minorities in many of the countries that actively threaten Israel.

      Israel has had nuclear weapons for decades. There was never any question of its using them except as a last resort. It is not part of the current wave of nuclear proliferation, and is no more part of the present discussion than the standard “old guard” of nuclear powers such as US, Russia, UK, France, or China. It is an irrelevance except to people who are looking for some sort of half-baked justification for Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.

      Reply
    • And whilst all your hardship was going on the British were shitting all over us.. So that means they are all anti-irish so they better not criticise use or else I will immediately assume the whole British empire is inherently racist to all Irish,nor maybe all countries in the world that don’t agree with us, especially the dark skinned Arab/Persian ones are anti irish… Maybe I am being a bit paranoid there. Maybe the Irish should arm themselves to the teeth with Nukes, build a wall up north and slowly bulldoze the north evicting families and take our land back. Better stop before I am accused of being anti Semitic again..

      Reply

Add New Comment