TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

In numbers: the first half of Budget 2012

A numerical breakdown of where the government has cut €2.2 billion in spending,

Image: TaxBrackets.org via Flickr

THE GOVERNMENT has today broken with decades of political tradition by announcing its Budget measures over two days instead of the usual one.

Today in the Dáil, public expenditure minister Brendan Howlin announced cutbacks of some €2.2 billion in public spending – which will tomorrow be joined by another €1.6 billion in tax increases announced by Michael Noonan.

Here, in numbers, are some of the measures announced earlier today.

€2,200 million – the difference in government spending between last year’s Budget, announced by Brian Lenihan 363 days ago, and this year’s Budget as initially announced by public expenditure minister Brendan Howlin today.

€19 – the fall, per month, in child benefit payable in respect of a parent’s third child – which, from January, will fall from €167 per month to €148. Payments for fourth children will fall from €177 each month to €160. From 2013, payments will be standardised at €140 per child.

€250 – the increase in the student registration fee payable by third-level students next year, pushing the fee from €2,000 this year to €2,250 next year.

25 per cent – the cut in the back-to-school allowance payable to the parents of children aged between 4 and 11. The payment will be cut from €200 to €150 next year.

26 weeks – the ‘season’ covered by the fuel allowance payment, as of next year. Currently applicants can seek an allowance to help cover the cost of home heating for 32 weeks of the year, but this is to be reduced.

5,965 - the number of whole-time equivalent staff to be removed from the public payroll next year. This will bring the number of people employed by the State down to 294,265.

3,200 – the number of staff to be cut from the HSE payroll next year, making up over half of the numbers to be cut from the public payroll in 2012.

40 per cent – the amount of government spending allocated to Social Protection, by far the highest portion of government expenditure. Gross expenditure in social protection will be cut by €404 million next year, but the government will still spend over €20,500 million in this sector.

5 days – Jobseekers’ benefit will now be paid out on the basis of a five-day working week and not a six-day week. This means that someone with a job for two days a week can only receive welfare payments for the other three days, rather than the other four days as present. This should save €5.9 million next year.

€132 – the amount, per month, that a person will now have to spend on prescription drugs before qualifying for the drugs payment scheme. This was previously €120 per month.

31 – the number of currently functioning Garda stations which will close during 2012. Four of those are in Dublin, eight in the West, ten in the South, eight in the Nirth and one in the south-east. Eight more stations which are currently ‘non-operational’ will not re-open. Another 10 stations in Dublin will lose their 24-hour public service and be closed from 10pm to 8am.

€114m – the amount by which the overall Garda budget will be cut next year. The budget of the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions will be cut by €3.71 million.

€315m - the amount by which the HSE’s budget will be cut in 2012. The Department of Health’s budget will be increased by €42m.

€337m – the amount by which the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government’s budget will be hit in 2012.

€336m – the amount by which the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport’s budget is being cut.

€100 – the amount each household in the state will be expected to pay under the new ‘household charge’ regime, as outlined by legislation published today. The government hopes to raise €160m each year through that levy.

€55m – the amount the government hopes to save in cutbacks to rent supplement.

€8.1m - the amount by which spending on sports and recreation services have been cut in this Budget.

€0 – the cut in the Budget to the ‘Centenarian’s bounty’ – the cheque of €2,540 that each citizen in Ireland gets when they turn 100 years of age. This costs €1.04 million a year – slightly over a third of the entire cost of running the President’s establishment.

€1,600 million – the amount of income to be raised through various taxes and levies, of which details will be confirmed by Michael Noonan tomorrow.

In full: TheJournal.ie’s coverage of Budget 2012 >

Read next:

Comments (43 Comments)

  • It’s probably being done over two days to allow for the time it takes for the budget to be translated from German to English.

    Reply
  • Most sickening thing they INCREASED allowances, expenses etc for themselves. Unvouched expenses don’t forget. Along with enda’s advisor’s wage increase, Its a real 2 fingers at the Irish public.

    Reply
  • Phew! for a moment I thought they were going to order the death of all 99 year olds. Whatever way you look at it people are going to die and cry because of these measures. But remember folks as our leader stated “YOU ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE” Why o why do we keep voting for Lying, bastards.

    Reply
  • On the back to school allowance, just a couple of points;

    -Why are we subsidising the likes of Folens and CJ Fallon, year on year, as well as breaking our kids backs by accepting a situation where they need, by the time they vacate transition year, a couple of dozen different publications? Far better to subsidise the purchase of an e-reader with a colour screen, and they can download the publications they need each year for a small fee, if necessary. As technology moves on, they can move to tablet pcs or whatever. It’s still bound to be cheaper than what we have now.

    -In relation to uniforms, I understand that they need to be crested with the school logos or whatever, but I know of many schools where Penneys or Dunnes generic items with the crests sewn on are simply not accepted by schools, thus pushing up the cost even further.

    These are the kind of proactive measures the DoE need to be looking at.

    Reply
    • Exactly schools need to relook at uniforms and not expect parents to pay €35 for 1 jumper

      Reply
    • SO agree on this point. The whole school book system is a joke. I have 3 girls and recycle all their clothes and toys downwards. This year I have a child in Junior Infants. Next year her younger sister will be there. Not one single book will be reuseable. All have to go in bin.. Shocking waste.
      Uniforms the same way. I will have to buy a new one for the younger child. Navy jumper in Dunnes or Tesco costs average 5 to 8 euros; but I will have to fork out 40 for the mandatory school one with encrypted crest.
      There are so many things that could be done to make school a lot cheaper for families.

      Reply
    • You are absolutely correct !!!

      Reply
    • So true and an excellent idea about the e-readers.. This would save families so much money each year and make the cuts to child benefit etc far more bearable.

      Reply
    • howe121 05/12/11 #

      brill and then whose going to lose jobs then!

      Reply
    • Oh right sorry.

      Forget I said all that, let’s keep borrowing money so that we can push parents to the brink every September just to keep a couple of publishers with an unfair market advantage going. It’s not as if they could still produce the publications to the same high standard they have done, and sell them through online methods.

      Jeez, I don’t know what I was thinking, my apologies fellow readers.

      Reply
    • When I was in Primary and secondary school we had textbooks and copy books. The textbooks were bought second hand and the copybooks were bought in quinnsworth as cheap as possible.
      Now my sister has 4 kids in primary and one in secondary. It’s all single use workbooks, they could just about afford it all when my brother in law was working, now it’s utterly ludicrous..

      The move to workbooks was made because the text book printers were losing revenue to the second hand book sellers. So yeah, if the industry is artificially propped up then it’s going to fail eventually – have we not learned that lesson yet?

      It is not good if anyone loses jobs, but other jobs could be created by the extra cash circulating in the economy.

      You have no need to apologise Ryan, your comment was the sort of fresh thinking we could do with in government!

      Reply
    • It was tongue in cheek, Shanti.

      Anyway, I’d add to your gripe about the workbooks, in that the publications themselves change, not yearly but often enough that the hand me downs usually become obsolete at least once a cycle.

      The only constant is change, and certain sectors of our society and economy seem to embrace it when it suits, and in the case of technological advantage, discard it when it does not.

      Reply
    • I figured it was tongue in cheek Ryan, I was playing along – lost in text I’m afraid!

      It could be an opportunity to create a new more environmentally friendly industry, one less reliant on paper and therefore saving trees and reducing carbon. CJ Fallon would probably still retain the monopoly over schoolbook production, but they could change them every year, charge less, and still make the same profit due to increases in the number of children and the reduced costs of production. The staff could up skill and new idea could be pushed forward, like you said, change. For the better, and better for children’s spinal health too – remember the weight of all those schoolbooks!!

      Reply
  • absolutely horrific really when you consider they will be doing the same again next year and the year after and………

    Reply
  • nooooooooooooooooooo oh shit its only part 1

    Reply
  • Ok myself and my husband are working are we luck to have a job. We now have even less money we will have to 100 euros household tax, pay for the bus for our children to attend school, we dont have medical card we dont get back to school allowance so we pay for books and uniform. We have 3 children in 2 weeks I spent about 200 euro between bringing them to the doctor and then the chemist. and I hope and pray that nobody eles gets sick because we cant afford it.We have to run two cars as my husband leaves so early to go to work and then I drop kids to bus and then I head to work.. SO ARE WE LUCKY TO HAVE JOB. I dont think so. And next time you say to somebody that they are lucky have a job think before you open your mouth.

    Reply
    • I feel sincerely sorry for you, youre caught in a trap.
      Youre suffering and will suffer more, Id like to see some of the people who think this is all ok because ‘we all spent like no tomorrow’ etc..(who write knowing they have a pillow in the bank to sleep on) managing your plight.
      However hard you work, you get hit..they have you strangled.

      Reply
    • I appreciate your situation totally, I’m lucky enough to not have children but my income from work is severely limited. I consider myself lucky to be working, but completely appreciate what you are saying. If I made the comment that offended you then please accept my apologies.

      Reply
  • Breaking News!!
    Its ok….
    The Government has found a way of controlling the Seasons… its cut Winter by 6 weeks. Good news to everyone who needs help getting fuel to keep warm! Bad news fro all those robbing the fuel though..it just wont be there to take.

    Anarchy can now rule with Garda stations becoming a rareity…

    Child benefit cuts, a new contraceptive…compliments of Mr Kenny.

    Prevent students education, keep people ignorant (then they wont rebel at future cuts)

    Can anyone please explain why …if we are not responsible..why are we being punished?
    Usually (but then maybe Im stupid) I thought that the guilty were punished BUT NO! The guilty here are given massive salaries and bonuses. OMG I got it all sooo wrong.

    Reply
  • Are there that many people Turing 100 in Ireland every yr???

    Reply
  • [Quick correction: those child benefit figures are *monthly*, not weekly - unless I'm being done out of a heap of cash!]

    Reply
  • howe121 05/12/11 #

    how about cutting children’s allowance going to non nationals ,

    Reply
    • bikedude 05/12/11 #

      Not all non nationals are out of work, or clamming any benefit from the government. Many are skilled workers who speak more than one language and therefore have jobs that couldn’t be done by other people. And these non nationals spend most of their income back in the economy, paying rent, buying food and all. So better not to point fingers before knowing what you are talking about.

      Reply
    • Si Mon 06/12/11 #

      What’s a “non national”?? I don’t know anyone, in Ireland, that is not a national of somewhere. Ignorant terminology by an ignorant individual within an uneducated comment.

      Reply
  • Child benefit is monthly guys, not weekly. Otherwise I would be rather better off than I am now.

    Reply
  • I could be wrong but I think what @howe121 was talking about was the children’s allowance that foreigners can claim even though their children don’t live in this country.

    Reply
    • Si Mon 06/12/11 #

      They cannot claim for children not resident in the country – it is pure tabloid media hype, scapegoat comes to mind… There are more Irish people fiddling the system than foreign nationals, why are we always so reluctant to point the finger at ourselves?

      Reply
  • it’s scary..if they keep cutting us we will be living on the streets:(

    Reply
  • shouldn’t get ANY support for your 4th child.. stop having Fucking kids

    Reply
    • What if you had the kids before the EU payed your employer to move to another section of the EU?? You don’t really get to hand the kids back just because you lost your job, nor would you want to.
      If you’re on state aid and you keep getting pregnant then yes, I totally take your point.. But in the current climate we can’t rely on those stereotypes anymore..

      Reply
    • I am referring to people eternally on state aid and keep popping out kids.. NOT someone who has kids and loses their job

      Reply
    • That’s cool, it’s just there’s been some other far more blinkered comments on here the past few weeks..

      Reply
  • Department of agriculture?

    Reply
  • howe121 05/12/11 #

    well we all enjoyed and spent as if no tomorrow ,well done ff and fg have to clean up the mess that could have avoided as they were warned .

    Reply
    • Hey not all of us spent like no tomorrow some if us were extremely good with their money but now pay the brunt, did not get heavily in dept or even had a credit card nor went on a holiday

      Reply
    • Utter ‘Bullshit’ to state that ‘We all!’
      Speak for yourself. Youre very insulting.
      Not everyone had the funds to do it in the first place, obviously you were one but dont class us all in the same bracket.
      Because some were frivolous and some were stupid, some just had it all come too easy (and the Banks greed fed a lot of it all) the rest of us shouldnt have to suffer.
      FF and FG are still lining their own pockets and living far beyond the means of the country so neither have any claim on cleaning up the mess!

      Reply
    • Speak for yourself mate.. I wasn’t raking it in and spending frivolously during the boom. Never got in debt, always pay my bills on time, and still suffering for the excesses of others..
      Less of this “we” business thank you :)

      Reply
  • child allowance in northern ireland is roughly

    Reply

Add New Comment