TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Ombudsman: shift attention from ‘third party abuser’ to put children first

The Ombudsman for Children says the focus of the debate needs to move to abuse which takes place within the home.

Ombudsman for Children Emily Logan
Ombudsman for Children Emily Logan
Image: Photocall Ireland

Updated 2.45pm

THE OMBUDSMAN FOR Children has said that the issue of the child abuse that occurs outside the home has been given a disproportionate amount of attention and the debate needs to shift to put the child first.

Emily Logan was speaking during a visit to the Mayo Children’s Initiative (MCI) this morning. The Castlebar-based project aims to prioritise the needs and rights of children living with domestic abuse.

The Ombusdman said that the public debate has focused too much on the issue of the third party abuser. She said:

It is crucial that this public debate reflects the reality of children’s lives and that includes the sad reality that 20% of children are subjected to abuse in the context of their home environment.

Logan also said that domestic abuse and family conflict was one of Ireland’s most serious child protection issues. Helen Mortimer, MCI’s manager said it is vital to ensure that children are “protected by the adults mandated to ensure their safety”, and that often in domestic violence situations the appropriate services address the needs of the women first, rather than the children.

Mortimer said that it has worked with hundreds of children and young people, and said that another issue of concern was what she called “dating abuse” where young people become involved in unhealthy relationships. She said that there is a gap in the post-primary school curriculum in terms of providing information on what constitutes abuse.

It is important that young people understand that controlling or irrational behaviour in a relationship is not acceptable.  If young women in particular know and understand this, it means that they may be safer in relationships down the line.

Wednesday saw the publication of a child protection bill aimed at closing a loophole in sex abuse law. The proposed legislation will make withholding information in relation to serious crimes against children a criminal offence, punishable by imprisonment for at least five years.

Yesterday it emerged that the proposed new laws may not be adhered to by Catholic priests amid confusion over whether or not members of the clergy will be bound to report incidents of child sex abuse heard during confession.

Poll: Should priests be forced to break the Seal of Confession?

Child protection bill published to close sex abuse law loophole

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • Catholic priests SHOULD be bound to report allegations of child abuse during confessions. No exemptions allowed.

    Reply
    • Agree. Look at how much children have suffered already in this country thanks to a church that deems its priests to be only answerable to the vatican. The law of the land should apply to everybody.

      Reply
    • AlMar 27/04/12 #

      Too Trueloft – let’s stick to the facts. The church does not believe that priests are only subject to the Vatican. The Church in Ireland has a long standing policy that abuse must be reported to the civil authorities. In the rare cases where this hasn’t happened it has been contrary to the policy and those responsible should be punished accordingly.

      Reply
    • Brilliant Almar…will ya tell us another one?!

      Reply
  • All very well and good implementing all these laws… It’s enforcing them that’s the problem, how the hell can you prove somebody ‘knew something’

    Reply
  • Totally agree that the needs of children need to come first. The statement in the article “in domestic violence situations the appropriate services address the needs of the women first, rather than the children” really annoyed me cause it paints male as the only “baddies”. Sorry for the rant but I’m getting fed up of being a stereotype.

    Reply
    • The fact that they automatically address the woman’s needs first over man and child is worrying.. As you rightly pointed out, men can be victims too. In situations of abuse it should be that the victim receives attention first, regardless of gender, age or anything else.

      Reply
    • Thank you, I just have a strong dislike to gendered stereotypes. In the world there are good people and bad people, I dislike it when the brush comes out and tars an entire gender. I believe in people and give everyone an even footing, I’d hope others would give me the same courtesy.

      Reply
    • Me too Mick. I’m a woman, and I guess to a certain degree I’m feminist, but I also realise that in our struggle for balance the scales has tipped rather unfairly in places. Stuff like this and fathers rights for example. That episode of South Park where they were pointing out the “savage hypocrisy” of hate crimes springs to mind, because it does seem that domestic abuse is only taken seriously when it’s committed by the male – which is ludicrous.. I’ve known some pretty scary women in my time, who’s husbands were more typically the meek one of the relationship (the role thought of as the female one). People are people, each one is the product of their life experience, their gender is only one part of that.

      Reply
  • Put children first not Canon law. Methods of enforcement can be duly created. First an attitudinal shift needs to occur.

    Reply
  • If the stats of 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 4 boys are correct……then there’s a lot of people out there saying nothing. Keeping silent for whatever reason only ends with the same result: continuation of a very nasty cycle of child abuse.
    Say something if you suspect something, if there’s nothing to it then there’s nothing to it.

    Reply
  • Does it really happen that a perp out of conscience would really place himself within the sanctity of the confessional to be absolved of his sins by God with a penance of a few hail marys etc ?

    Reply

Add New Comment