TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Poll: Should religious orders pay compensation for the Magdalene laundries?

The State has set up a compensation fund for survivors of the Magdalene laundries – but questions have been raised about whether the religious orders should pay up too.

The site of the former Magdalene Laundry on Sean MacDermott Street in Dublin
The site of the former Magdalene Laundry on Sean MacDermott Street in Dublin
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

AS THE ISSUE of redress for survivors of the Magdalene laundries continues to be thrashed out, the amount of compensation to be paid to the women remains unresolved.

The government has set up a compensation fund in the wake of Taoiseach Enda Kenny’s apology to the women who suffered in the institutions run by religious orders, after the McAleese report found the State was “directly and fundamentally involved” in the laundries.

However some survivors groups have suggested that the religious orders should also contribute to the compensation fund.

One survivor said she believes the government may ask the orders to contribute, following an interview in which a nun involved in the laundries said that a potential figure of €200,000 in compensation would be “excessive”.

So what do you think? Should the religious orders involved pay compensation to the survivors of the Magdalene laundries?


Poll Results:





Read next:

Comments (172 Comments)

  • surprised by the amount saying no

    Reply
    • Yes they should pay for the abuse those women suffered

      Reply
    • Block voting?

      Reply
    • Older people wake up earlier on Saturdays

      Reply
    • Miley and Biddys, would rather pay for the Church’s failings and protect them. These are the same crowds, that vote for FF or FG and they’ll protect their pensions! It’ll take another few generations, to flush this ignorant and greedy bunch out!

      Reply
    • Me too! They were the primary abusers in these cases. They should at least contribute.

      Reply
    • Don’t be surprised. Votes on religion-related stories and polls are often wildly out of kilter with the opinions shown in the comments, at least for the first couple of hours. Seems like either organised block-voting or scripting. The effect is usually reversed as the day wears on. It’s not very sophisticated though: when the question is whether religious orders who grew rich through enslaving humans should now compensate them, and the answer is a resounding “no”, it’s pretty obvious it’s the work of a very small but very motivated group of people. Especially on a fairly secular, liberal-leaning site such as this.

      Reply
    • Colman, older people remember what the accepted norms were back then. I was at school with the Christian Brothers and lay teachers combined in the 40′s and 50′s. Beating with a leather and/or cane was accepted as the best way to treat children who gave incorrect answers when questioned on any subject. Lay teachers were just as committed to this form of treatment as the religious orders. I believe that the social order was changed by people like me who experienced this treatment and insisted that changes be made to the way education was given to our children. Our generation was responsible for the laws which banished corporal punishment in our system.

      Just as I believe that society of the time was cruel and largely uncaring, I am of the belief that the religious orders of the time were a reflection of that society. They were probably a lot less cruel than our society.
      Colm, do you think that people like me would have a case for an apology and compensation?

      Reply
    • Tom I remember those times too…harsh and very cruel, thank goodness we have come a long way since.

      Reply
    • They provided a service. The government imposed no regulation. They didn’t have to use them. Therefore, the government, not the religious orders should pay.

      Reply
    • Catholic brigade are out in force today – lets abuse women and children then issue a lame apology and all will be forgotten

      Reply
    • Religious orders yes, tax payer No. Let the church sell land and property to pay. It’s all well and good for Kenny to apologise but why should every taxpayer in the country pay?

      Reply
    • Andy it’s the religious orders who made money from the hard work of these women so they should pay

      Reply
    • The Vatican are busy clicking no

      Reply
    • Damn right! Who would vote no to this?!! Polls like this are always skewed by vested interests.

      Reply
    • As a former catholic and professed religious, I feel I have the right to pose the following questions to certain conservative commentators here. In all of the Magdalene Laundries, just exactly where was the “love of Christ” when these innocents were being abused? Were these so-called “holy and religious” abusers never taught the real, full meanings of the basics of Jesus’ teachings and principles? If they had been taught them, well, then who do they think gave then the right to behave in such an abominable and totally unchristian manner? (I wonder just how many red thumbs I’ll be getting for these hard, but completely true comments! What justification can there ever be for disagreeing with unpalatable but totally true comments? Or, are any of my initial comments untrue? If so, please refute them – from a totally christian point of view, of course! Please do not attempt to insult my knowledge with pathetic excuses like ” in those days, Ireland was a very hard and difficult place in which to live”).

      Reply
    • Mark 09/03/13 #

      Rarely would I pay much attention to Internet polls but this is shocking. Holy crap!

      Seriously starting to believe half of Ireland are completely deluded and that’s putting it mildly.

      Reply
    • Sure look at how many people were out supporting the poor Quinns… Muppets…

      Reply
    • Sorry Andy, you’re only partly right. The nuns did not pay wages or PRSI for the women, and even in cases were women were remanded for small crimes (e.g. petty theft) and given minor sentences, say 2-3 weeks, the nuns kept them long beyond that, sometimes for life. Yes, the State should have had oversight and are responsible, but that in no way gives the religious a pass for the slavery, enforced incarceration and rampant abuse these women suffered (despite that the McAleese report attempted to whitewash much of that). And to suggest they didn’t make a profit is an outright lie. We have ample evidence to suggest otherwise. There is equal blame here, and actually the nuns are right in pointing a finger at society as well (which would be covered under the State’s pot). But let’s not forget that the Church created the template and code for Irish societal behaviour and the architecture of containment designed to hold those who didn’t ‘fit’ that template. The apologist nonsense on behalf of the Church just doesn’t wash anymore. If the religious orders don’t want to pay their portion, how about we set up a system where the Irish public can send their laundry to the nuns to be done by them for free? Oh, and one final thought: where were Sisters A, B, etc. during the recent Magdalene graves memorials in Cork, Galway and Dublin? Conspicuous in their absence is where they were. A sincere attempt at remorse instead of the usual blame the victim and everyone else would be a nice start.

      Reply
    • Hopefully no red thumbs, Garth. Well said! And for those who claim their were ‘good nuns,’ then why didn’t they speak out or act out? All it takes for evil to triumph is that good men (or women) do nothing. At the height of the Laundries (1950’s), we were post-WW II, post-Holocaust. No one can tell me the religious didn’t know it was wrong and evil to treat human beings this way.

      Reply
    • The amount of no votes doesn’t tally with the first comment, something is wrong here

      Reply
    • Mark 09/03/13 #

      Because they can’t handle the truth?!! :D

      Reply
    • Graham
      The enslavement of women within the Magdalene Laundries was with the consent of the people and the State.

      Reply
    • Of course they should pay, and should pay dearly as well….

      That would send a very clear message to all religious institutions..

      Reply
    • Nuns, My mother was left handed and they slapped her with a ruler till she wrote with her right!

      Reply
    • Religion short-circuits reason and compassion.

      Reply
  • There was a time when this country were friends of the church; speeding tickets torn up, drunk driving charges quashed, even a blind eye turned to the odd murder

    Reply
  • Compensation should be simply taken legally from the orders; their land should be confiscated to pay for years of wages, plus stolen lives; most of those they enslaved are dead now, but after compensating the living and those whose childhoods were impoverished by their mothers’ deprivation of education and ruination of character and personality, perhaps scholarship funds could be set up to help young women to gain third-level education and apprenticeships.
    These wealthy orders are going to fight tooth and nail to hang on to their money and prevent any compensation going to their victims, or the children of their victims.

    Reply
    • Why should the taxpayer pay,Yet again the taxpayer is asked to foot the bill,something they had nothing to do with.
      The same as the banking mess was loaded on to the taxpayer.If the Government went after the Bankers,Developers,Bondholders/Gamblers,the religious orders and others their would be no need to be strangling the ordinary people with Water rates,property tax,septic tank charges and all the other Austerity measures taken over the last number of years.

      Reply
    • Sinabhfuil
      I totally agree with what you say. Lives ruined – terrible. It’s only right that the religious orders pay. The idea
      of scholarships to gain 3rd level education and apprenticeships is a good idea.

      Reply
  • I believe all church property should be sold to pay for compensation
    for all the victims. The church should go back to it’s roots, back to poverty and basics. When it does that, it might, just might get it’s congregations back.

    Reply
  • If you work then you should be paid .. These women were treated as slaves in these laundries & they should be paid for the hours worked not to mention compensation for the torture . It amazes me that so many are saying they should not be paid and not paid in years after another 30 reports but paid Now.

    Reply
  • All the no votes ahhh sure the poor tax payer will pay as usual while the rich catholic church escapes with the loot

    Reply
  • I’ll tell you what Religious orders should pay: tax.

    Reply
  • Of course they should pay, not that money will undo the damage but they should pay!

    Who voted no on this poll???

    Reply
  • As a catholic,I believe that they should.

    Reply
  • I smell a rat with all the no votes – I think this poll will see a large swing towards yes over the next few hours….

    Reply
  • Oh my god, 67% no! What the hell is wrong with people? They were under their care and were the Churches responsibility. It happened on their watch so they are guilty as hell.

    Reply
  • AD0099 09/03/13 #

    Shouln’t the Criminal Assets Bureau seize their assets as with any other criminal organisation who benefit from crimes committed?

    Reply
  • This shouldn’t even be a question, of course they should pay compensation for the lives they’ve ruined, the people they’ve tortured and traumatised, anyone that thinks otherwise is sick, and wrong, it’s as simple as that.

    Reply
  • How can someone vote no? Why should the tax payer pay this burden when the catholic church is worth billions.

    Reply
  • I am hoping the huge percentage of people saying NO will go down in size when all members of the Iona Institute have finished voting on this poll and normal rational people have started voting. Of course the religious orders should be paying compensation!

    Reply
  • The problem with internet polls is you can vote as often as you want, as long as you keep clearing your browser history in between votes. I would say the orders are having a voting fest.

    Reply
  • Give the Church an ultimatum. They pay a hefty sum of this, or the Government will remove their charity status, from a tax point of view. Make them pay a property tax on their assets, income tax etc.

    Reply
  • I’d like to read how some of the No voters justify their vote. There is something very wrong with this result if the No side wins.

    Reply
  • They should be held accountable, yes. and.they ought to pay tax like any other business

    Reply
  • Who on earth would say no? I notice all the comments here are in favour of YES. Maybe those who say no are too cowardly to put forward why they think the church should not be held accountable for the torture and abuse of so many women and children?
    Of course they should be responsible for compensation. For the time working, and for the years of agony, for the loss of everything, and the trauma they had to live with every day in the laundries and the rest of their lives. No one should have suffered like these poor people.

    Reply
  • I smell something fishy going on with the voting here. The no vote has consistently stayed between 65% and 68% yet 99% of the comments and thumbs on comments are in favour of a yes vote. Seems like a group may be sending this link to each other in order to manipulate the poll in their favour.

    Reply
  • Who should pay then? The government with taxpayer’s money? Anyone who voted no should be named and shamed. Absolute morons

    Reply
  • Slavery is slavery even when the traders in human flesh are priests.
    Make the Church pay these women’s estates what their labor would have earned. Plus compound interest. Plus penalties enough to break the slaving monsters and their orders.

    And if any of the perpetrators are still alive send them to the Hague. Then hang them so high the crows get nosebleeds trying to peck out their eyes. Because if this isn’t a crime against Humanity I don’t know what is.

    The apologists will say “It was different then” or “It was the Church”. Slavery has been illegal in the UK and Ireland for over a hundred years. Atrocious crimes are atrocious crimes even when the government is complicit.

    Reply
  • Would any of the people on here who disagree with the women being compensated have liked to have traded places with any of the women in the Laundries….In a normal working job a person went to their job did a day’s work 6 days a week,got paid on a Friday/Saturday if living at home they gave some money to their parents,if not many paid their rent,bought food,bought clothes,perhaps went to the cinema,maybe saved a little,met a boyfriend and went on to get married and buy their own home……….none,not one single woman ever came out of a laundry with any savings from any wage ever paid to them because there were no wages, no insurance stamp,no medical card,nothing and regardless of whether or not their families put them there it did not warrant the treatment so many recieved at the hands of the religious orders who vowed to care for them…………………I bet you will find the older Nuns with the best medical treatment available while many of the older women who spent years in the Laundries are living alone and isolated and Ill.

    Reply
  • I’d like to see the No voters explain why this corrupt and cruel institution should get away again especially as they were making money out of these poor women.

    Reply
  • Yes,of course the orders should contribute. They have already saved a fortune on the non-payment of deceased Magdalenes like my birth mother Margaret,who were never and will never be compensated for her work and enslavement

    Reply
    • yes ,of course thy should pay, my dear aunt was a slave for them for 21 long hard years, of physical and mental abuse and brainwashing, i would like to ask the fund for the money to put a headstone on her grave, thy owe her that and much more.how can anyone say thy should not pay,

      Reply
  • Of course they should be compensated.let the catholic hierarchy pay….. I’m sure all those rosary beads and religious items for sale by the vendors in KNOCK shrine weren’t all made in China! Probably quiet a few of them were made by the survivors of the laundries while in captivity .

    Reply
  • I for one would like to hear what the Iona institute have to say on the matter. Putting the word charity in the name of a religious order is like putting the democratic in the name of country

    Reply
  • That money is required to fund the anti choice campaign,
    Protect post conception, abuse post birth, sound familiar?

    Reply
    • Eamonn, spot on! Unfortunately, I inadvertently downvoted your post when I meant to upvote. Even more unfortunate, since you’ve hit 80, you apparently cannot be upvoted further. I suspect there are many, many, many more people who thought they were upvoting when they downvoted your awesome post!

      Reply
  • I read the question wrong, orders should pay

    Reply
  • Of course they should be paying…not the taxpayer again !!

    Reply
  • its a money making corporation that built lavish churches while people starved and fled the country
    theres no morality in the church, its been abusing women and children for generations selling places in heaven to the highest bidder
    best of luck to anyone lookin for compensation
    heres to a new dictatorship

    Reply
  • I believe that the catholic church hierarchy should be compelled to sell their assets to compensate all victims of their abuse.

    Reply
  • That poll says a lot about the level of intelligence in this country.
    The more I see how easily people are swayed through social media, the more I realise direct democracy would not work here.
    Destined to be run by self serving clowns.

    Reply
    • To be fair, I think the majority of the population would agree that the church should pay, it is the same small but well funded minority that drags its heels as we try to make Ireland a modern country, one that won’t accept the amoral actions of previously protected institutions.
      They can slow progress down, but they can’t stop it, eventually their obsolete views will be consigned to the dust bin of history, where they belong.

      Reply
  • Eh …. Is the sky blue ????? Most shocking poll results I’ve seen in my life .Where have people been for the last few weeks, months , years , decades ..?????

    Reply
  • Ireland’s Catholic Church-run institutions have a lot to answer for all the lifes they sexually physically and emotionally abused Compensation should be paid to the victims !

    Reply
  • Yes!!!…..Eh…I mean NO!!….GO IN PEACE!..and leave your money on the way out & you will get the fast lane to heaven!

    Reply
  • 65% of The Journal readers are in favour of slavery apparently?!!!

    Reply
  • If this poll reflects the attitudes of the Irish people towards slavery, I may have to rethink my upcoming holiday in Ireland. Make these horrible nuns pay.

    Reply
  • This should not be a question, of course they should bloody well pay for all the lives they ruined. To think even one single person would vote NO is beyond my thinking!!

    Reply
  • How about we just TAX the Catholic Church; rich freeloaders who for too long have lived off the goodwill of others.

    Reply
  • Who are these no voters and why are they not commenting?

    Reply
  • Well its a big YES from me :)

    Reply
  • It can’t be just me that’s thinking this: it seems that this poll exposes the way that some people are manipulating Journal.ie polls. The huge majority of commenters are in favour of compensation by the church, so where are all those ‘no’ clicks coming from? This goes further than the one question posed in this poll, and very strongly suggests that the church are being underhand. It makes me want to discredit all religion-associated Journal polls.

    Reply
  • So people think people who abuse other should be let away with it. talk about been morally bankrupt. No wonder ireland is in the state it is in and will never improve.

    Reply
  • I think that yes the religious orders should absolutely remunerate these ladies for the work which they carried out. I don’t understand why anyone would think otherwise and I would genuinely like to hear the reasoning behind those voting no. I believe everyone is entitled to an opinion, but as I say I really would like to hear the other sides argument here because maybe I am missing something. The only reason I could think of was that the McAleese report was set up to identify the state’s involvement in the laundries and that is why any redress originating from it should be paid by the state. The state were found to be involved and therefore the state should compensate. The tax payers are the state – they are not two different things. But even using that argument I still believe that the religious orders should be held to account financially for the slavery of these women. If that, legally, has to happen through a different means then fine, organise that different means. Bar anything how any of this “Christian” orders can in all good conscience refuse to make amends to those they have harmed and still call themselves “Christian” baffles me.

    Reply
  • Surprised at the level of “no” votes, but here is why I think they should compensate the survivors- the nuns and religious orders were paid by local and national businesses for the work done by these women, who were placed in these centres. Where did all that money go to? How much was taken in as income during the life of a magdalene laundry? Even taking accomodation out (which in the 1960’s-1980’s would have been a very small amount, further decreased by multiple occupancy rooms), the adjusted pay should be given to these women. It is easy to compare salaries at that time for a day or a weeks work. A simple actuary calculation would detail how much adjusted wages were due per year and interest applicable from that date to now. In a most recent case in the UK, travelling community members were jailed for 4 years for forced labour activities- it’s not unreasonable or illogical to afford these women and their families this basic level of social equalisation. I don’t know of it needs a tribunal etc but an actuary-based scheme would be a simple and transparent way of accurately addressing the issues and compensating the women

    Reply
    • Justice for Magdalenes submitted a simple proposed scheme to Minister Shatter in October 2011 (http://www.magdalenelaundries.com/JFM%20Reparations%2014%20October.pdf). And you’re right, it is neither unreasonable nor illogical. And no, it doesn’t need to be a tribunal, or adversarial or anything remotely resembling the fiasco with the Residential Institutions Redress Board. I realise I’ll continue to get thumbs-down from the ignorant and the apologists — that’s to be expected. But facts are facts, and we’ve amassed thousands of pages of them. That can’t be refuted. I just cannot believe that after witnessing the abject failure that every attempt by the RCC has made to whitewash, blame victims (or society) and otherwise shove their failures under the carpet has met with, that they still don’t get it. Be remorseful, compassionate and own up to your failures — you might even get a few souls back into the pews. That’s how we move forward and progress as a society and as a people of faith. But these current attempts at deflection just further show how out of touch the Church is

      Reply
  • There is nothing religious about the church of Rome ….

    Reply
  • It’s really interesting to note all the anger that is directed at the Church and a lot of it is truly justified. People are talking as if the Church invaded the country and brought with them Priests and Nuns from foreign lands. It wasn’t the case. What really happened was that the Church’s members were taken from the population of Ireland. IRISH men and woman carried out these atrocities against other IRISH men woman and children. It’s too easy to point the finger at Rome and say it’s all your doing. It’s about time Ireland looks at them selves as a nation and asks themselves how this happened!

    Reply
    • Eamonn 09/03/13 #

      It’s not just an Irish problem, abusive Bishops and priests have surfaced in Catholic communities all over the world.

      Reply
    • I think that the RC Church is ultimately to blame. The acts of the Irish in the past and their morals and values were for most part formed by the church and religion. I don’t believe that people in that time were so heartless, but I do believe a lot of people lived in fear of reprisals from the Church.

      Reply
    • First off – yes, they should pay.
      Secondly, in days gone by many girls were packed off to be nuns whether they liked it or not, some went of their own volition, but not all. Same goes for priests. I guess that’s why it’s true to say some weren’t in it for the right reasons..

      I’ve met Magdalenes. Some of the stories are shocking, but they aren’t all bad. There were some nuns who weren’t sadistic bitches (as well as the ones who were). Many of the women who were in the laundries are being cared for now by the orders (and they are being cared for as opposed to used as slaves this time).

      The orders should pay their share, that’s a given, and in some senses the orders are already paying by providing care for the women that were wronged by them, but these women deserve more than the basics – because they were deprived of so much in these institutions.

      Reply
    • And who created the moral template for Irish society? Who created the architecture of containment to hold those who didn’t fit the template? And who abused those so incarcerated? Yes, the State failed miserably in its oversight of these institutions (as did society). But just because the police fail to arrest the murderer, does that mean we let the murderer off scot free?

      Reply
    • You are aware that for those women still residing in the nuns’ care, the nuns are taking any pension payments the women may be entitled to and any other monies the women may get? They’re not ‘paying’ for their care, meager as that is in many cases. The women paid for that years ago with their slave labour.

      Reply
    • I can’t speak with authority on that as the women’s financial situations was not something that they chose to speak of when I met them.
      Having said that, if they are cared for in the nursing homes then whether their pension would cover it is another matter – those places are pricey to live in. A state pension wouldn’t come close.

      Reply
  • At the time the church was running the country and to a large extent it still is. Our kids are poisoned by catholic ethos in most of our schools. Daily, Seanad and local government meetings and sessions are opened by prayer….

    Reply
  • sakipol 09/03/13 #

    I think the McAleese report showed that there was a lot of sectors of society complicit in this shocking state of affairs. It indicates a society rotten to the core, where people were more comfortable locking away people who might cause society to question some of its principles. Yes the religious orders were culpable, but to lay it solely at their door is a simplistic scapegoating exercise. I would argue that they should contribute, but that the State which presided over this should be held to account.

    Reply
    • If you ask the religous orders to pay it would be a closed chapter in the history of a shameful era of Irish history and a missed oppertunity to raise the standards of duty of care(Note: not duty to care) by Irish society as a whole. It’s surely a contradiction that as 1916
      approaches there will be many celebrating another chapter of Ireland’s history and there will be no doubt that the mathamatics of the day will dictate the views of us all . So this been the case there are those whom will feel hard done by ,and for thier own reasons rightly so. Here is the bit I have had to fathom out who should pay the answer to me clearly is that society should pay rather face up to history than moving foreward just for the sake of moving foreward. p.k

      Reply
  • Better the church orders pay than the taxpayers. They did the damage after all… perhaps all church property should just be confiscated and used by the state instead of getting innocent taxpayers to pay for the sins of the church in general. .. and if they don’t like it just send them to live with their buddies in crime in the vatican….

    Reply
  • I think the No voters should pay if they think the holy nuns (haha) should’nt

    Reply
  • Hands down …..YES!

    Reply
  • Laundries were a business that obviously made profits at the expense of vulnerable girls and used them and in some cases abused them they must be made accountable along with the church and government for all the wrong doing and be open and transparent and admit their part in this Elaine

    Reply
  • If the orders don’t want to pay cash, they should sign over some of the land that so many of our schools and hospitals are built on. That way we’d have a shot of prying some of these services out of religious control going forward.

    Reply
  • government and church should pay,, child labor no one checking conditions on children, 2 wrongs don’t make a rite,, its really not about money ,, as they will all be judged on last day,, and where will the church and polititions elevator go,,, down down down,, but its the truth , these kids went thru hell on earth already under these people and if a bit of money will make life a bit easier,, they do deserve some happiness .

    Reply
  • I cannot believe the number of “no” votes in this poll. After all the chicanery, lying and covering up of the abuse and inhumanity in these institutes how can any sane person with a normal ration of humanity say that the orders should not be penalised? The treatment handed out to the women (and the industrial school kids) is so far removed from christianity that I’m surprised Christ himself hasn’t sent a sign of disgust.

    It saddens me that so many voted “no”, because if people who think that is OK are in the majority then what hope for the country? Financially destitute, stripped of sovereign powers, the only treasure left are the young, who are on the next emigrant boat as soon as they are schooled. What a mess.

    Reply
  • So I guess the people voting “no” think women deserve to be imprisoned and abused, for being women basically.

    Reply
  • Yes both government and Church should pay both benefited from laundries many people used the laundries from the rich to the government and the order them selves , These women were not free to leave they were held like slaves worked and got no pay , to all of you who say no they should not be payed , why dont you work for free , you dont have to look far to find every second house hold across Ireland who were either in these laundries or Mother and baby homes it has effected many people . To say 200 thousand is too much its not enough these same nuns are living in the laps of luxury all tax free yet you who strike no on above post begrudge there women a payment ? why ??? the same 2 nuns choose to remain hidden behind a fake profile rather than come out and make apology this is living proof they still in denial and have no remorse for what they did . To say this what a different era and much has changed ….WRONG nothing has changed the products of these laundries and mother and baby homes in Ireland are still being denied there rights /.

    Reply
  • Who the hell are the Ion(a)ites? There’s something rather peculiar going on here re the poll itself….. or maybe we haven’t really changed? If it’s the latter why hide? Just give me one NO voter to post their thinking on the matter. Most unusual thing I’ve seen on this debate platform to date…….

    Reply
  • Those c*nts of nuns running the laundries should be jailed for cruelty, should pay huge monetarily and pay morally forever. The complicit government were not much better

    Reply
  • Yes 100 per cent. Evil.

    Reply
  • Ugh.. I think they left off like.. 4-5 zeros on that number, or is all a slaves wages over their entire life time worth a mere $7 (which is roughly what this travesty adds up to per victim). I haven’t seen anything this big of a joke, or howls of protest at being charged at all, so loud since the last time Microsoft got sued over something, and had to, “Give out $10 discount vouchers for new Microsoft products.”, to people that just wanted the damned money back. Hmm. Ok, yeah, I suppose it could be worse, they could have gone that route with it, and said, “Its horrible that they are making us do this, but we did spend all that money printing up vouchers for a discount on new Bibles for all of them!”

    At least actually money is involved, not fictional money, like it is with some trials. But, again.. you have got to be kidding me that this is thought to qualify as “compensation”.

    Reply
  • I found this comment very interesting from earlier

    “…People are talking as if the Church invaded the country and brought with them Priests and Nuns from foreign lands…”

    Er! That is exactly what happened!

    Reply
  • Kimberly 13/03/13 #

    Actually the nuns and priest involved should all be turned over to the world court and face charges of crimes against humanity. When convicted they should face life imprisonment or death for their crimes.

    Reply
  • YES. HELL YES.

    People are definitely idiots to vote no on this. Bloody idiots. This time no amount of sweet-talk and guilt transferring can help. Hypocrites.

    I am glad people are less and less quiet about these things. Make noise, people.

    Reply
  • Also just to add clarity one thing the government were involved in the Laundries .

    Reply
  • This is truly bizarre. I’d estimate about 95% of the comments call for the nuns to pay…yet the poll sits at 60% against. Are there banks of computers with the Catholic faithful in front of them set up in churches across Ireland for the sole purpose of skewing polls?

    Reply
  • Gonna be unpopular for this but think the old should pay, why should the earners of the future (today youth) keep paying for the errors of the past…. Society of the past handed it’s issues to industrial schools, laundries, asylums, voted in crooks and schiesters, and want the future to pay … All state paid compo should come off the old age pension …

    Reply
  • I voted no. Sorry I must not of being brow beaten enough. I though we lived in a democracy where people were allowed an opinion regardless of whether every agreed or not. Shame on me

    Reply
  • Yes and so should the government!

    Reply
  • 20130308_rteradio1-thegodslot-magdalenel_c20168181_20168182_232_ (1) 24:46

    Reply
  • Of course they should pay the money made from the laundrys was invested in schools and hospitals which the irish tax payer is now paying money to them, they should not have to pay twice Let the orders pay if not take the schools and hospitals from them and run the lot of them back to Rome you can vote no to this that is what a lot of people done when the abuse was going on,here no evil see no evil

    Reply
  • The poll results may represent the weariness people feel when the C word is used. Eventually these things always come down to the C word.

    Reply
  • We have had the survivors view. Has anyone thought of getting a balanced view and get the view of the religious

    Reply
    • No! we’ve listened to their views for long enough and look where that got us!

      Reply
    • We at Justice for Magdalenes tried…they refused to engage in dialogue with us (even when Cardinal Brady called our campaign “fair and balanced” and urged them to). They’ve not been to one Magdalene graves memorial to date, have shown no remorse or concern (except for their own reputations), only upkeep their own gravesites at former Magdalene sites, and now anonymously go on radio and in print to mete out further blame and abuse on victims. So what other side are we missing? How they loved and cared for these women? How they fed them well and let them come and go as they pleased? How they paid them equitably for profitable laundry work and sewing? Paid into their pensions? Kept them from being injured or dying from equipment and harsh chemicals? I’m sorry, what story are we missing here? They got a chance to tell their story through the McAleese report, and even that was missing huge chunks of records, testimony and financial data. I’d love to hear the truth from a nun who witnessed the Laundry experience and is willing to go on record by name. Oh wait — that’s right — two did: Sr Stan Kennedy documented Magdalene abuse in her 1980’s book and Patricia Burke-Brogan documented it at the Galway Laundry. Neither testimony was used in the McAleese report. Hmm.

      Reply
    • sakipol 09/03/13 #

      Patricia Burke Brogan has been someone who has consistently tried to raise this issue. It’s a pity she hasn’t got more recognition for her attempts to raise the profile of the abuse survivors.

      Reply
    • Very good point Powerabbey.

      An interview with the two unnamed nuns who were involved in running the laundries, dubbed Sister A and Sister B, featured on RTÉ Radio 1 programme The God Slot last night. When asked about an apology from the religious orders, Sister A said: “Apologise for what? Apologise for providing a service?” Later in the interview one of the sisters said:
      It’s easier for these women to blame the nuns than blame their mammy or their daddy.

      Reply
  • Isn’t apology and peace of mind better than all the money out their, why is it money solves everything.

    Reply

Add New Comment