TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Poll: Should there be a united Ireland?

A new poll in Northern Ireland has shown that a majority of Catholics want to remain in the UK. What do you think?

Queen Elizabeth of the United Kingdom and President Mary McAleese of Ireland, during the former's visit to the Republic last month.
Queen Elizabeth of the United Kingdom and President Mary McAleese of Ireland, during the former's visit to the Republic last month.
Image: Maxwells/PA Wire

A NEW POLL has shown that a clear majority of people in Northern Ireland want the province to remain part of the United Kingdom  - with 73 per cent of respondents favouring remaining part of a single state with Britain.

Perhaps surprisingly, however, the majority of the Catholic community in the North – which has traditionally been perceived as being in favour of unification with the Republic of Ireland to form an all-Ireland sovereign state – now also seems to prefer remaining in the UK.

Just a third of Catholic respondents to the Northern Ireland Life and Times survey said they wanted to join the Republic – down from 56 per cent five years ago – while 52 per cent of Catholics wanted either to be directly ruled by London or to retain the status quo of devolved power within the UK.

But what do you think? Irrespective of your background, or location, today we simply ask: should there be a united Ireland?


Poll Results:





Waning support for united Ireland among Northern Catholics >

Read next:

Comments (147 Comments)

  • Folks, just a couple of points:
    - This website has an all-island (and, indeed, global) readership, which is why we did not simply direct the poll at people in the Republic: we’re simply asking whether people still feel that a united Ireland is a notion or concept they favour, regardless of where they live. It’s not seeking to enforce a wish on anyone, it’s simply hypothetical.
    - If Northern Ireland decided, as well it might or mightn’t, that it wished to unite with the Republic, the Republic would have to vote to accept it anyway.

    Reply
    • Ireland, Gavan, the name of our country is Ireland. Not the republic, not the free state, not the 26 counties … Or if you prefer, Eire, which is the term used as Gaeilge.

      Reply
    • Adrian – I’m well aware of Article 4 of the Constitution, I’m simply seeking to make it easier to discern between the two for the case in point.

      Reply
    • Fair enough, Gavan.

      Reply
    • I was just expressing my opinion as a former resident of Northern Ireland. I fully understand and appreciate that the article poses a hypothetical question, but I do feel that there are many here in the Republic of Ireland who have an ideology of an Irish Nation that involves the entire Island of Ireland which is rooted in history and not in the real world of today. History has not taught people that one persons ideas cannot be enforced upon another although history is full of examples of this. I was also simply pointing out that the people of Northern Ireland should have a say, not us down here. The people of Northern Ireland should get the first say in this and then, and only then, can we be asked to go to the polls to accept and ratify their decision. If it goes to the polls down here t then people are going to be voting for a proposal that they know very little about on a personal level. It is their decision to make, not ours, not our politicians and most certainly not the radicals who still, in their minds, live back in a war torn island. There is a danger in the hypothesis that the word “people” is missed or glanced over. It’s a minefield with plenty of bar stool heroes and bar stool experts ramming their uninformed and ignorant opinions upon others. We are not in any position to say whether or not there should be United Ireland because in this particular instance the majority do not know best and speak on behalf of a minority.

      Reply
    • @ Gerri – I think its been brought up in that traditon that is behind most of the “Yes” votes. Its one of those things that, till recent decades, was part and parcel of being Irish. Woe betide anyone who differed!

      Reply
    • Keeping the above comment in mind, I note Jr Mccarthy’s thoughtful, erudite, reasoned response to one of my posts!

      Reply
    • You’re a little confused, 26 Counties does not constitute the ”Country ” or the ”Nation ”of ” Ireland”

      Reply
    • @ Adrian, you know as well as anyone that the 26-county political entity which you call ‘Ireland’ is confusingly given the same name as the island upon which it sits, undoubtedly as a reflection of the republican hopes of the framers of An Bunreacht na hÉireann and its constitutional predecessor. Therefore, the terms ‘Republic’, ‘Free State’ and ’26 counties’ and inconceivably, ‘the South’ are conventionally used when discussing this political entity minus those 6 counties that are part of the UK, to avoid confusion with the geographic entity which bears the same name, whether you prefer to say it in English (Ireland) or in Irish (Éire). No matter how outdated the terms ‘Republic’ etc. may seem to you, the reality is that we will go on calling the political entity by these names to distinguish it from the eponymous geographic entity until the day comes when the two are one and the same. If there never was a case for a united Ireland, then perhaps there is now!

      Reply
    • @ Shawn – Thanks for the reply.

      All I’m doing is pointing out that the terms Ireland, or Eire, is the correct legal name for our country. I’m tired of hearing all the other designations been used, especially as if they are right name. If Ireland is too offensive, then use Eire. What’s wrong with it?

      If its okay to use all those terms, why not use the correct ones?

      Refer to us as Ireland or Eire, the north as Northern Ireland, and the island as “the island of Ireland”. Not difficult.

      Reply
  • Sorry, cant vote in this poll as I need to check with the IMF,ECB & “Our European Partners” first…..

    Reply
  • EMacA 17/06/11 #

    Jaysus ppl relax. No ones forcing anything on anyone, it’s simply a poll asking if you think there should be one eventually. OBVIOUSLY in such a scenario it wouldn’t happen without the constent of all involved, Governments and citizens alike.

    Reply
  • It would put the WolfeTones out of business.

    Reply
  • Kevin 18/06/11 #

    It’s a hard subject.

    Reply
  • If asked 3 years ago I’d have rejected the idea of a united Ireland out of hand. I come from a very hardline unionist family and was a member of the Alliance party which remains on the fence when that question is asked.

    I now live in Cork and frankly I love life here in Ireland. I’ve discovered the facts Sinn Fein don’t want the north to know. There are Protestants living in the south. Those Protestants live quite well. I’ve also seen how much contempt the major parties here have for Uncle Gerry.

    The Queen came to Ireland and now everyone is a closet royalist.

    The north and the south have more in common than they have apart. All the unionist side needs is a little education.

    I also feel that a united Ireland would be an end to the divided society of northern Ireland, the dail can’t afford to maintain it so they’d be forced to grow up and move on.

    In a generation or 2 it might even happen.

    Reply
    • I’m glad you’ve seen that we are not so bad after all steve! :-)

      Reply
    • Fair enough, Steve. As a democrat, if an overwheleming majority both in Northern Ireland and Ireland supported it, I’d abide by it. Its just that I cannot see what good it would do to either districts, at least not for quite a long time yet. Maybbe two or three generations?

      Can I ask a few questions?
      1 – What was your prior views on life south of the border?
      2 – “I’ve also seen how much contempt the major parties here have for Uncle Gerry. ” Surely everyone up north realises this?
      3 – You think UI will put an end to divisons up north. Fair point; if I thought it realistic, I’d support it. But, maybe I’m too much of a cynic. Tell me how and why I’m wrong.
      4 – What did you make of the Queen’s visit?

      Cheers!

      Reply
    • Not to point out the obvious, but the Shinners know there are Protestants in the South, there is no shortage of Protestants in Cork SF, especially in West Cork and Bandon. Also o’Snodaigh T.D. is a Protestant (a lapsed one), SO actually per capita SF would have the largest % by some degree of Protestants in the Dáil.

      Reply
    • Hi Adrian.

      1 before moving to Cork I believed the propaganda that the Catholic Church ruled Ireland and that southern Protestants were driven out during the rising and following civil war.

      2 they really don’t. Since even before the agreement was signed unionists have been badgered into working with Sinn Fein. Little did they know that FF and FG wouldn’t touch SF with a bargepole.

      3 I feel that the major problem up north is that from a young age the communities don’t mix. When I was younger my school had lessons with a school from the other side. Sadly my school was the exception not the rule. I learned from a primary school age Protestants and Catholics aren’t that different.

      Belfast city council has 6 leisure centres just to pander to those who refuse to mix. If the money tap was turned off Northern Ireland would just have to grow up.

      4 I think the Queens visit was brilliant, better than I imagined it would have been. Elizabeth made a great effort and in fairness Philip was in rare good form. A lot of people I know were expecting the worst and ended up pleasantly surprised. Anglo Irish relations do seem to be at an all time high.

      Reply
    • Cheers for the reply, Steve.

      I love playing Devil’s Advocate! Always very instructive, and every now and again, I learn something, so thanks!

      1 – Well, they had what we might call “a strong advisory role” but even since my own childhood (at the height of the Troubles) that was on the way out. I’m not even sure anymore who in my fairly wide circle was raised Catholic, Protestant, or the “Whatever-yer-having-yerself” category. Some Protestants did leave, and some, especially in Cork, were deliberatly murdered, but most stayed. They were Irish; they were already home.

      What I’d love to know is how prevelant those former views of your still are in the north.

      2 – This baffles me. Did they not see how badly SF preformed down here until the IRA (slowly) got off the stage? Sure it took the state’s worst economic crisis for SF to get its current 10% (!) of the vote. Anyway, the only way forward for SF down here has been to become Fianna Fail Nua …

      3 – “Belfast city council has 6 leisure centres just to pander to those who refuse to mix. If the money tap was turned off Northern Ireland would just have to grow up.” THIS might be the most original argument for a United Ireland I have ever heard! Seeing as I don’t agree with any of the offical ones, this might be the one that might (!) get me to vote Yes, lol!

      4 – I was delighted she was here but was tense all the time in case some amadhan did something stupid. I wonder what people up nort, in both communities, made of it.

      After reading though all the comments, its one’s like yours (too few!) that have me a wee bit more inclined towards unification. But it can’t happen in 2016 or anytime soon. The two jurisdictions have no business as one state until major internal problems are sorted.
      I love the complexity of our history. But then I come from a family whose members included an M.P. who voted for The Union AND a president of Sinn Fein (shush! keep that to yourself!).

      Reply
  • Nuke the site from orbit, it’s the only way to be sure.

    Reply
  • Let’s analyse a few things.

    Firstly, this is just a discussion. Let’s not just on people for expressing their views, whichever their view may be.

    Secondly – To understand the aspiration for Irish unification requires one to sit back, and give serious deep thought to it. In the 1918 Irish general elections, only 4 counties in Ireland had a unionist majority. (That has slid to 3 counties today). Despite this, Britain decided that it was best to create a 6 county state, which would still have a sizeable Irish nationalist presence.

    This, under any circumstances was unequivocally wrong to do. It left the historical natural population of Ireland (not that unionists are any less Irish in today’s context) living under a banner of a nation with which they did not associate with. They were treated as second class citizens in their own country, under routine harassment and lived with civil injustice – while their southern counterparts broke free of Britain’s iron grip. They felt betrayed by the status quo, and justifiably so.

    Since this event, Irish nationalists have sought under many different means to remedy the situation in Ireland. Renowned British author, Christopher Hitchens said it best when he said “I think the injury of partition done to the Irish people is a terrible one, and is the root cause of the present discontent.”

    With that being said – we now must look forward. Ireland is united in many forms. We are united in bringing peace to the island. We are united in many aspects of sporting events, in political agreements, and uniting in living in mutual respect.

    If a united Ireland is to come (and I believe at some point down the line, it inevitably will) – It must come with acknowledgement that Unionists are friends, and not foes. We must not make the same mistake Britain made, and ensure that their civil and cultural aspirations are protected. I believe a deal on citizenship would have to be made with Britain, to allow anyone born in the north to retain a British passport if so desired.

    Nobody is under the illusion that unification could happen overnight. It is something that is an ongoing process, and will take many years to reach a conclusion. It starts with peace and mutual respect. From there, we can achieve anything together.

    And finally – let us be clear about what a united Ireland is. It is not the ‘north joining the south’. It is the nation coming together as one, to create a new state – with a new constitution which reflects all of the communities of Ireland. The technicalities of it might include devolved parliaments to give ensure that local affairs are resolved at a local context. This is key to ensuring everyone has a voice.

    That’s about it for now! :)

    Reply
  • I am outraged by the arrogance of some of the posters. I am from the North and consider myself 100% IRISH, not British, not Northern Irish, just IRISH! The partition of Ireland and the formation of Northern Ireland was never a solution. Before it is said by someone, that I must be a supporter of the IRA, I am not. I am simply a proud Irish man. A united Ireland might not happen for a while but we are already United in mind. Let us never forget that Ireland is a country with 32 counties!

    Reply
    • Dear Richard – sorry, posted the reply meant for you to Mark, but to reiterate – I never said you were not Irish. I just don’t believe Northern Ireland has any business becoming part of Ireland now or anytime soon.

      Reply
  • Who are we to impose a ruling on people currently under another jurisdiction? Should there be a united Ireland? Not if the people in the North don’t want it.

    Reply
  • The majority of Northerners haven’t a clue about the South – even in Newry just 15mins up the road from Dundalk the average person had no idea about the boom that was Ireland in 2007 now all they hear is doom and gloom and presume – that’s all there is to it – in spite of Irish topping the polls consistently as the happiest Europeans. All that Southerners know is the violence of the North – it’s about time there were reciprocal visits between adults just like there used to be visits from teenagers to the South in the 70′s/’80′s.

    Reply
  • I want a united Ireland alright……a united Republic of Ireland that we once had before we were divided and conquered by the banks,the political classes and petty consumerism!Unison in our local communities is where it begins…..lets get the community spirit back…start feeling proud of ourselves again……. :)

    Reply
    • … and when was this, exactly, Derek?

      Reply
    • Before the celtic tiger.I grew up in Dublin..everyone was relatively the same…..not wealthy but just getting along.People could afford things if they saved for them or if the credit union was obliging enough.People were not afraid to ask their neighbour for help.A bottle of milk etc.People helped out in their communities for no gain or prestige with football teams and summer camps.A foreign holiday was a massive thing.A new car was even more massive.Everyone knew everyone where I was from.Everyone knew everyone elses dog!!!!

      I dont feel that today.Alot of people are up their own arses.If something doesnt have a monetary vale its not worth doing!Pride and Vanity are rife.I know less than half the people in my area now.This is my sole experience and opinion Adrian.

      Reply
    • Well, I want to do better in life than just get along. I want to make something of myself.

      But honestly, before, during, and after this Tiger bull, I found people acted just the same, and as well, as they ever did. If people get up themselves or are the type to see things just in monetary terms, then neither you nor I lose much by not knowing them!

      I understand where you’re coming from, though; I just don’t want things to get as bad as they were when I was growing up. At the end of the day, all you do is be responsible for your own actions.

      Reply
    • I’m in a really good mood today Adrian and was trying to be ever so slightly positive and inspiring in my own coarse way!:)

      Id rather get along and be a happy, contented person than miserable and rich!I know this is not what you were alluding to but anyway……..Im done talking for today :P Have a good weekend!

      Reply
    • You too! Be good – and sure if ya can’t, have fun!

      Reply
  • Sean OBrian has nailed it to a T! Well done Sean! I agree 100%

    Reply
  • If the 6 counties become part of the republic does this mean that all the well structured roads and road signs are going to become as crap as they are in the republic. Also is everything going to be outrageously overpriced? Oh yeah they will also get roaming charges when they go over to the uk. Less tourism as it will be more expensive. Sorry folks but I can kinda see why they don’t want to be a part of the republic

    Reply
  • People have disliked my previous post and I find that baffling. I can’t make myself feel British when my whole being tells me that my nationality is Irish. Others have already said it and I agree that a new Ireland of 32 counties would differ greatly than the two entities that currently exist. Fluctuating exchange rates have done harm on both the North and the South over the years as we purchased in one zone or the other dependent on perceived value of the coin in our pocket.
    Those individuals who now claim support for the status quo due to the current chaos in the Republic’s economy show a fickleness that frankly does not surprise me but definitely worries me.
    We all know that the world suffered a recession and the only reason we (and I say we) are in the mess that we currently are in, originated in the sub prime market in the US. We also got greedy but so did most of the world. We just didnt have the colonised money behind us like the UK or the size of the US.
    Yes, there still is division in the North but it is changing. My wife is from the Unionist tradition and I have no intention of forcing her to become Irish. We must accept that there is two cultures on this island (and not just in the North as was clear during the Queens visit).
    I am an economist by qualification and I must say that a recent comment by a UCD professor that “economists are like a cross-eyed javelin thrower, we dont win many accuracy prizes BUT we always keep you interested!”
    As sure as the sun will rise again tomorrow, good times will return to our island. I have no doubt that an island economy working together would realise this quicker!
    I am just back from portugal after a two day business trip with English and Irish attendees. We all worked great together but the natural connections materialised each evening. The Irish, North and South tended to socialise together whilst the English did the same.
    Seamus Heaney once said “My passports green, no glass of mine has been raised to the queen”. He can’t say that anymore after her visit but more and more in the north (despite the survey), are choosing an Irish passport before a British one.

    Reply
  • The way it is now is just fine by me.
    Things seem normal in the north, except when you see the “peace wall”, silly name for a barrier to stop the belfast folks slaughtering each other in the streets.
    They will decide for themselves what they want to do in the future, but for now let it be.

    Reply
  • Dan D 17/06/11 #

    You forgot to add the “dont care” option

    Reply
  • Personally it doesn’t bother me whether or not there will ever b a united Ireland. If I was from the North I would b very sceptical about joining the South. Another point I would make is that I have always found ppl who sing rebel songs, wax lyrical about 1916 etc reprehensible, in the sense that if u asked a lot of them to name the six counties in the North they wouldn’t be able to.

    Reply
  • Reunification makes economic sense. Having two seperate economies on such a small land mass costs us millions, possibly billions, a year.

    Reunification would also be beneficial for the unionist/protestant communities in the north as unionist parties would make up a large block in an all Ireland Parliament (Probably around 20%), unlike in the British Parliament where they make up less than 2%, thus giving them a substantial say.

    Finally as an Irish Republican I believe that a united Ireland where everybody is treated equally, Protestant, Catholic and Dissenter is something which will benefit everybody in Ireland.

    Comments like those from Adrian Martyn, saying he doesn’t want a UI until “every last IRA supporter is dead” is nothing short of moronic and neo-unionist.

    Reply
  • Thomas 17/06/11 #

    People forget that Northern Ireland is a complete economic basket case. It flatters to deceive thanks to the British who’ve been bank rolling that mess for decades. Throw in their horrible sectarian problems to the mix. Some day it might become an independent state but I don’t ever see or what any unity with them.

    Reply
  • Cpm 17/06/11 #

    No thanks. It’s a sectarian mess, why should we inherit it?

    Reply
  • Who are we to say how the people of Northern Ireland should live? What gives us the right to dictate what the people living in Northern Ireland should do? It is their choice, not ours and let’s face it, who in the right mind would want to be part of a country that is crippling the poor to give to the rich?? Get rid of your pie in the sky ideologies and live in the real world. Unless you walk in someone’s shoes, you cannot know what their lives are like. These are real people we are talking about here, with real lives and real families to provide for, not some little cartoon caricatures from the history books. If they have decided that they do not wish to be part of this Republic, then in all honesty, who can blame them???

    http://ie.linkedin.com/pub/gerri-hynes-doonan/34/672/60b

    Reply
    • Gerri, you seem to be unaware that the UK is also “crippling the poor to give to the rich”, as is happening in the USA and numerous other places. Bankers and banks are all that matter, you see. And I don’t see anyone “dictating” to anyone here. Don’t forget that the people of the Republic voted for the Good Friday agreement also – 94% in fact said Yes.
      This here is just a hypothetical question.

      Reply
    • I am well aware that the UK government is operating in the same way as other governments, as is the case throughout the world in neo-liberalist and capitalist societies especially since the 1980’s. However, the cost of living is on a completely different level in Northern Ireland. What I attempted to convey is that it is really not our choice down here in the Republic to say whether or not the people of Northern Ireland should be ‘integrated’ into the Republic without hearing and accepting their view and their feelings. I fear that if it ever happens it will be a deal done by politicians without resort to those who will be affected by such change and that the only thing we will be doing is simply rubber stamping a decision that really does not reflect the opinions and lives of a minority of people. The thread of my comment is a simple one really and that is, that there are people involved here, real human beings and not just statistical numbers on a page or in the clouds. Another hypothetical question is, will their voices be heard and do they count for anything?

      Reply
    • Gerri, in 1998, the people of Northern Ireland and the Republic voted the Good Friday agreement into law through a referendum. A resounding majority (71% of Northern Ireland and 94% of the Republic) voted “yes”.
      Why would you assume that any future decisions would be made any differently? Nobody is proposing that here. Relax!

      Reply
    • Gerry, why can’t we have the right to have an opinion? Remember, if they choose to join the Republic, that is going to have an effect on us, one way or another.

      Reply
    • what republic i dont see a republic

      Reply
  • Should there be unity? YES.
    Should it be unity (as per Germany unification) where the Irish state simply ‘absorbs’ Northern Ireland? NO.

    Ireland is naturally a single political unit. That was recognised pre-partition by all, incl Unionists. They simply had different ideas of how that single political unit should be configured.

    Unionists wanted it as part of the UK.
    Nationalists as a separate state.

    There is no way unity will come by the ‘absorption’ model.
    If unity is to come, it will be by a totally reconfigured arrangement, i.e. an end to the Irish state and an end to the Northern, and some new system emerging.

    What would it look like? Don;t know.

    But being honest, it is very unlikely to occur in the next decades as life in Northern Ireland is simply too good.

    Perhaps the unionists were right all along.

    The best arrangement might have been to be a ‘united Ireland’ within the UK & follow the (long game) Scottish model.

    That way the entire island would benefit from the strength of the UK exchequer but get many local benefits.

    Reply
    • I cannot thing of a single good reason why Northern Ireland should become part of Ireland.

      Never in its history has the island been a united soverign political unit.

      If anything, disunity has been the regular theme in Irish history. The unionists have been saying for 400 years they do not want to be part of an Irish state. Before that, the Old English wanted to keep the link with England because they did not wish to be absorbed into any of the Gaelic kingdoms or lordships. And before 1169, not a single Ard Ri had managed to unite all the kingdoms into one.

      A United Ireland is a dogmatic ideal that has no place in the current day, and has not stood a chance of existence since the summer of 1649.

      Ireland is Ireland, and Northern Ireland is Northern Ireland. Sin-é

      Reply
    • We did get a chance at a Scottish-like scenario with the passing of the Home Rule Bill a very long time ago via Westminster but Unionists feared what they perceived would be Catholic domination by a Parliament in the old capital of Dublin. But we all know what happened, I won’t dig up the past and here we all are today.

      Reply
    • Adrian. An usual way of looking at it, even Paisley and Edward Carson view/ed themselves as Irish men and from Ireland. Is it not time to move on, your thinking has been rejected by a very large no. of Unionists, never mind anyone else.

      Reply
    • @Thomas – if a majority of people, both in Ireland and Northern Ireland, want a united Ireland, okay.

      People in NI can be Irish and I never said any different. How else could we have a President born and raised in another country? I think the Irish of NI have a great boon in being able to claim Irish citizenship (as well as being part of the Irish nation), and I wouldn’t dream on taking that away from them.

      My point is – unification, at present, would cause more harm than good. Give it a few generations yet.

      Reply
    • So you dont conisder people in the 6 counties iriah then? southerns dont have a monopoly on who gets to be Irish. Your arrogance and ignorance on the matter should be tonned down, remeber your only 90 years a republic and the north was gerrymandered to create a unionist hovel.

      Reply
    • @ markmaximus finnegan – Thanks for the reply.

      Of course they are Irish. Otherwise, how else could we have a head of state from Northern Ireland? Where did I say that they were not?

      Reply
  • It would be nice. But I know it might never happen nor does it have to happen. Who knows Britain might yet get sense and become a republic too ;-) (Had to be said!ha!)

    Reply
  • Honestly Cannot see anyone wanting to be part of the republic right now we owe loads of money to europe. maybe we could sneak a couple of counties north of the border while europe isn’t looking.

    When i give the signal I want everyone in waterford to moon europe.

    in the ensuing confusion we sneak donegal (renamed greater Derry/Londonderry) across the border in a lorry.

    keep it under your hat.

    Reply
  • Ireland couldn’t afford to keep the North if it was to become one nation. We would just have another 30 something years of carnage and murder to deal with only we in the south would have to pay the untold billions to police it. I lived in Belfast for ten yrs and my wife is from there, i am in fact English but we live in county Cork. Personaly I wouldn’t wish a United Ireland on any of my friends down here. Many of my friends and family in the north although from a nationolist background know they are better off being part of the United Kingdom. Whatever happens in the future regarding the north and the south i only hope it happen in peace.

    Reply
  • Good God why would anyone with a brain want to have anything to do with this Fianna fail controlled communist regime. Even when they’re out of power their minions run the civil service.

    Republic my arse, the people of this so called republic can barely spell the word let alone grasp its meaning.

    When the Queen was here we should have begged her to take it back with an apology for the condition its in.

    Reply
  • I’m English and lived in the Republic for last 14 years. I came here to get away from the Westminster crowd who I thoroughly despise. But that is entirely my choice. And any constitutional change to the north-south balance must be by the choice and will of the people. An opinion poll is not a proper referendum. A proper referendum will be held at some time in the future, I expect. I think it needs a little longer before that time is right. For the most part relations between the two governments and former adversaries is improving and hopefully will continue to so do.
    When we exist side by side in friendship and with tolerance and good humour the politics matters little to most of us, the majority of us are probably all sick of the politicians anyway.

    Reply
  • For all our problems, Ireland is a united country. I’m not in favour of Northern Ireland becoming part of Ireland till the death of the last supporter of the IRA dies. They don’t deserve to live to see it.

    Reply
  • Fair enough, who can blame them, I can’t imagine any country in the developed world wanting to be part of this mess.

    Reply
  • Glad to see the majority in this poll still wish to some day see a united Ireland, for a while there I was starting to think we’d abandoned our northern citizens.

    Reply
  • partition is a waste of money. we have to education systems two health systems two road authorities two justice systems two of bleeding everything for an island with such a small population.

    culturally ireland is united through the IRFU the GAA the anglican catholic and presbyterian churches etc it makes scence to unite it politically . charlie haughey once described the north as a failed political entity. think we can say the same about both states in ireland now. the south is in hock to europe for billions and dosn’t have the balls to say no to them. the north still needs the stableizers of cross community government with no opposition. think we have got to the stage where everything has been tried except a united ireland. well past the time for it to happen in my opinion, start something new.

    Reply
  • How long would the argument go on for as to which city was the capital? Dublin or Belfast? Who would take the top jobs?, oh it would go on for years!

    Reply
  • A united Ireland should have happened long ago, before anyone died for it. When a united Ireland happens, and it will, those who died are the reason and the peoplethat supported them. Its as simple as that and those facts can never be changed. Its part of the history.

    Reply
    • But it never happened, and people did die. And partly for those reasons I don’t support unification. Stuff the dead who wanted it – they’re dead, and so have no futher role to play.

      Reply
    • you don’t support a united ireland because people died? where bullets not flying the other way as well, do you oppose the status quo because people died to maintain it.

      fair play to you it must be hard living my your moral compas. don’t support things that are a consequence of violence. what would that include, the ending of apartite in south africa, probably you could say the eu is a result of two world wars in the 20th century. the emanipation of slaves in america. the creation of the usa the rights that came about from the french revolution the rights that came about from the holy wars in the reformation the rights that came about from the magnacharter and so on back to when the men of cave no 8 stood up to the tyrants of cave number 11.

      of course violence is horrible but its a tactic what where talking about here is an idea. its possible to support the idea and a multitude of other tactics to achieve it. the two don’t have to be automatically linked.

      Reply
    • I’m not South African. What they do in their own country is their business. Ditto much of the rest of what you brought up, most of which happend way outside our lifetimes.

      The Troubles, on the other hand, did occour in my lifetime, and over 95% of the Irish nation never supported the IRA and their murder campaign to force the north to become part of Ireland.

      The day after the last IRA supporter dies, I’ll be happy to see a united Ireland. Heck, I might even vote for it. One of the reasons I don’t is because I do not believe they deserve to see it, ever. I have a major problem with people been murdered, whatever the excuse.

      Reply
    • so the enemy of my enemy is my friend. how far do you take that logic. i heard before that IRA supportors like to breath oxygen. no to everything that IRA supporters want. people where murdered in yourlife time for a united ireland and against a united ireland. both sides in that conflict appear to have put you in a terrible morral position. maybe if all supporters of the status quo are forced into an enduced coma are kept on life support till after the last ira supporter dies then the last IRA supporters doesn’t get to see it and the status quo supporters get to suffer your form of justice.

      A united ireland is a legitimate democratic idea. its about placeing the control of this country in the hands of all the people of the country. how thats achieved has had people scratching there heads for a long while. your problem is with the tactics employed by one group to attempt to achieve it. if 95% opposed the ira as you claim and support for a united ireland on this poll is at 54% then surly the two are not inexricibly linked in the publics mind as they are in yours.

      Reply
    • Sure, I’m all for such a vote. Northern Ireland first, then Ireland. If there is an overwhelming majority in favour of a united Ireland, I’ll support it.

      Reply
    • By the way, have you ever supported the IRA?

      Reply
  • Absolutey not. They should always remain a part of the UK and be united in peace and live side by side.

    Besides we can’t afford to run our own country let alone two.

    Reply
  • Why dont we unite by by firstly rejoining the commonwealth, makes huge economic sense…and an interesting debate would be whether we should rejoin the uk…we wouldn’t be in the mess we are in if we remained in it, after all put a beggar on a race horse and he will ride him to hell, think it sums up what has happened to our country

    Reply
  • All of the 1916 leaders fought for the whole island not part of it , democracy wouldent have excisted in the country if the Irish republican army hadent of proclaimed the 32 county republic.

    Reply
  • Some how I doubt the legitimacy of this poll.

    Reply
  • I’m from America and my family is Irish, but a United Ireland is better together than divide my brothers and sisters. As well in power making for the country’s industry for goods and services. A lot of country’s are not in the same place Ireland is, and have the means to do so as Ireland has in the past.

    Reply
  • I was born in Belfast and came here with my family in the early 70 s .I left and went to London in the 80 s durring that recession and returned in the 90 s ,got married and had 2 wonderful children, I have a great trade and had a business to which i lost 3 years ago having traded for over 12 years.NOW to the upgrade……I have a grandchild who has been given a debt by the State at the age of 3 and my children who i think will leave ,never to return,in the foreseeable future, so my answer is why would the catholic people of N I want to become part of this country to be given what myself and my family have been given by the great irish state as part of your conditions to live here……

    Reply
    • those conditions where imposed by the emu/imf. does it make the idea of a united ireland unatractive? suppose its all in the eye of the beholder. iam 30 years of age and have no intention of leaving bar the odd adventure if possible, they will have to force me out and they won’t have an easy job of it. for better or worse this is my country the last 3 years aren’t the final pages written in our history. i believe where capable of better and will see better days ahead.

      Reply
    • p.s if your kids have the same adventurous spirit as there father then iam sure they will do alright.

      Reply
  • @markmaximus finnegan Newry people were well aware of Southerners arriving at the shops certainly, but aln of the ones I visited or brought back home to Dundalk – the were VERY unaware of the boom South of the border. Having grown up in Dundalk and travelled extensively as a musician I’m all too aware that most in South didn’t even know that Dundalk was in South – Northerners couldn’t differ between Cork and Dublin.
    The lack of real knowledge between North and South is abysmal.

    Reply
    • @ Peter – To what do you attribute this mutal ignorance? Indifference? Insularity?

      Reply
    • @Adrian….. don’t actually think there is mutual ignorance etc. …. but as a former resident of NI, having lived in Manchester now for about 40 years,however, I am constantly amazed by the number of people I have met from ROI who have never been to NI (Apologies for the shorthand NI/ROI … saves on typing) but i don’t think that the reverse is true … I think that NI people are well acquainted with ROI. I think that a United Ireland, National question etc.. are last century’s issues … they carry too much baggage. Basically, I like things as they are which is an Agreed Ireland (with two jurisdictions) … for myself I am perfectly happy with my dual British/Irish identity. I agree with your postings.

      Reply
    • @ Desmond – dammit, your profile icon is cooler than mine!

      Maybe not. Its one of those subject that are bound to give rise to more passion than sence. As can be seen from some posts, there are some who judge you as less than Irish if you diverge from their view on the ‘national question.’ I’ve been asking “Why?” from a Devil’s Advocate point of view, and have never been given a reason I could support it. Calling people like me a west Brit, neo-unionist, etc, is not going to help. It has not been a burning issue south of the border for decades – if it were so, SF’s support would long have passed the 10% it currently enjoys. We’re happy with the situation as is.

      Well, **** it. It carries too much baggage. Everyone here has lived with two Ireland’s all their lives. We can manage a few generations longer. Let those future generations make up their own minds without the deadly dogma of the past. After all, exactly how has the pursuit of unification benifited anyone?

      Reply
  • JG 19/09/12 #

    Both opions matter. In life it is important to have a balanced view.
    Both sides are neither right or neither wrong.
    Both sides have had done bad things so there is no right or wrong.
    In Northen Ireland thousands of people were killed for no reason.
    The IRA killed hundreds of people which most of them their own people.
    Unionists did the same.
    I come from a nationial backround and wave the tri-coulor flag but I know that Im equal to a unionist who waves the Union Jack. So I think if no one can agree on something both sides should have a say. Yes, mabye catholics were treated badly but that was the past. I used to favour the national side because thats where I grew up. But when you are educated and no all the facts. Im sure you will agree with me. Go raigh a maith agat

    Reply
  • Of course, so long as things like this – http://www.u.tv/News/Sectarian-gangs-riot-in-east-Belfast/93477fab-1c46-4f3b-81b8-085d7180ca28 – continue to be a part of life in the north, the less support unification will enjoy.

    Reply
  • JG 19/09/12 #

    Yes, for a United Ireland though. Respect any other peoples opinons.

    Reply
  • A very interesting range of views and accounts on this issue as well as the expression of certain “inconvenient truths” that would never have been expressed by members of the Nationalist Community so as not to “let the side down” Whether the current status quo prevails, or it is at some stage replaced by new structures, there is a a challenge there for us all. A full sovereign 32 county state is a legitimate political aim for those who consider it so and within a democracy, are entitled to seek to pursuade a majority as to the legitimacy of that view. This poll is the latest indication that the re-unification of Ireland by the sanction of an eventual nationalist/ catholic majority (otherwords by a higher birthrate). To my mind there is still a very significant argument to be made in support of the development of an agreed “all island” political structure, the bare-bones of which I think we can see beginning to emerge in the plethora of protocols and understandings being agreed between Belfast and Dublin on a range of socio-economic platforms; business, transport infrastructure healthcare etc. I was also particularly struck by Steve Herron’s view of the world as a resident of Cork in his new role as a Unionist “Mythbuster” Truth is, as island peoples, living of the west coast of Europe, we will always have a love/hate relationship with each other, but which also unites us much more with each other than with our nearest European, or further away American neighbours!!

    Reply
  • The I.R.A is at peace- for a long time now- whilst the war loving brit army bomb and kill across the world- only nutters want to bomb in 2011-only nutters want to be in the brit army-

    Reply
  • I’ve never met a Northie I liked, so no.

    Reply
  • Not too many Northern residents in this comments section? Gav, do we still want a united Ireland? That presumes we ever did, since partition.

    Reply
  • Best way of uniting would be to join the Brits, we need them

    Reply
  • The brits will still have to pay reparation money many years into a United Ireland- they are getting of with nothing-

    Reply
  • British passport or Irish passport … no such things exist … we ALL have EU passports and it doesn’t matter where they were initially issued … if in trouble … just go to ANY EU embassy, consulate etc..

    Reply
  • JG 19/09/12 #

    As you can see above this is my opinon of the matter. But I guess I have not really awnsered the question.
    Yes, I think there should be a United Ireland. If there is a United Ireland, everybody would still be able to vote, just a different goverment. But the thing is, isn’t British rule when the goverment decides what goes on? Is that really a democracy? This is just an opinon, I still respect any other persons view. So dont take offence to it. If you disagree dont hesitate to click the dislike button.

    Reply

Add New Comment