TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Column: Alcohol doesn’t make us drunken idiots – that’s society’s fault

Research shows that drinking alone doesn’t make people flirt and start fights. So the answer must lie in ourselves, writes Shane Leavy.

Shane Leavy

I DIDN’T START drinking alcohol until I was 24, extremely late for Ireland. Most of my peers were drinking by 15 or 16, social life in college was strongly focused on a binge-drinking culture where students seeking the cheapest alcohol swarmed to pretty horrible night clubs with sticky floors.

When I did finally start drinking I was working in a high school in the south of Japan. There my colleagues would gather roughly once a month for an enkai, a ‘drinking party’ which involved speeches, lots of raw fish and endless booze. I noticed two things about these enkai.

First, the mood tended to be boisterous, cheerful and noisy, even before teachers started to get drunk. Many teachers had to drive home after the party, so they sat among the rest sipping green tea. Yet these sober teachers were no less merry than the drunk. It made me wonder if it was not the alcohol itself that was making people behave differently, it was the very presence of alcohol – a cultural signal that we could let our guards down and make some noise.

Second, while I initially eased myself into drinking quite slowly, on one occasion I found my cup being constantly topped up by a colleague with shochu, a potent Japanese spirit. I knocked back quite a bit of shochu, even reaching a point where I started drinking beer instead in an attempt to sober up.

So I got drunk. When I walked I found it difficult to keep a straight line, when I talked my words were trying to blur at the edges. The typical physical consequences of drunkenness, then, were all there. But my mind was also there, struggling to control my less obedient body – I told people later it was like trying to control my body with chopsticks – but I lacked the decreased sense of inhibition and bloated sense of self worth that people always describe as going hand in hand with heavy alcohol use.

‘Why did I not go shouting and laughing and dancing?’

In fact I felt completely clear-minded, even a little self-conscious over my degraded balance. As I walked back to my hotel that evening, I was extremely cautious to cross the streets at pedestrian crossings, very aware of any threats that would be heightened because of my difficulties with balancing – fight or flight.

So what happened? Why did I not go shouting and laughing and dancing about the place like some other drunk people do? Social anthropologist Kate Fox writing on BBC may have an answer:

In high doses, alcohol impairs our reaction times, muscle control, co-ordination, short-term memory, perceptual field, cognitive abilities and ability to speak clearly. But it does not cause us selectively to break specific social rules. It does not cause us to say, “Oi, what you lookin’ at?” and start punching each other. Nor does it cause us to say, “Hey babe, fancy a shag?” and start groping each other.

Fox explains that people who drink behave the way they expect alcohol to affect their behaviour. That is, in Mediterranean cultures drinkers consider alcohol a ‘morally neutral, normal, integral part of ordinary, everyday life’, much like tea or coffee here, and as a result they do not behave wildly when drunk. When Irish or British people get raging drunk and lose all inhibitions it is their cultural expectation that is changing their behaviour, not the action of alcohol as a drug.

When in these experiments we are given what we think are alcoholic drinks – but are in fact non-alcoholic “placebos” – we shed our inhibitions.We become more outspoken, more physically demonstrative, more flirtatious, and, given enough provocation, some (young males in particular) become aggressive. Quite specifically, those who most strongly believe that alcohol causes aggression are the most likely to become aggressive when they think that they have consumed alcohol.

I grew up in a household with low alcohol consumption, I never saw my parents drunk and the occasional beer or wine consumed was treated in much the same way as tea or coffee – drunk for the pleasure of the taste and not for any behavioural changes it prompted. So perhaps I simply had not absorbed the same cultural message as many of my peers, I hadn’t concluded that alcohol necessarily led to wild, uninhibited behaviour.

All interesting, though the point that astonishes me the most is that people were apparently able to get hammered drunk on placebos. Why do they bother buying expensive booze at all? Just have their friends present them with flavoured water and convince them it is vodka – free obliteration.

Shane Leavy is a freelance journalist studying for a master’s in applied social research, and blogging at The Harvest, where this post first appeared.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (32 Comments)

  • Why is everyone so down on this article? I thought it was really interesting, loads of food for thought. Has me examining my own behaviour when drunk. How anyone could come to the conlusion, like some commenters have, that it is a pro alcohol argument is bizarre.

    Reply
  • It’s not society’s fault… it’s our fault. Take responsibility for your actions.

    Reply
  • Other countries often consume alcohol in outdoor relaxed scenarios often in more community environments, a less stressful environment from the get go. The whole irish thing of drinking like an arse, ending up in some club jam packed full of strangers…environments dont get much more unnatural than that. Very interesting article though.

    Reply
  • An interesting article, no idea if its true or not so maybe some studies should be done on this, it certainly sounds plausable and there’s no doubt that people react differently to drink in various parts of the world, why is the question. If it is accurate what does that say say about Irish culture, that our A&E Departments a full of the results of drink every weekend, fights, sexual assualts etc, the usual results of a nights drinking that we as Irish people have just grown to accept.

    Reply
  • Never blame the drink. Totally agree. Just like a bad hangover is more about the kebab. Never the fault of the 20 pints. Brilliant. All that was missing from this article was— ‘sponsored by diageo’

    Reply
    • I also agree here! Some people are quiet and alcohol gives them dutch courage also some people may be hiding a deep pain, and unfortunately when mind altering drugs like alcohol are consumed, they lash out! This article is dangerous in that it blames society for over-consumption of alcohol and how it affects people and not the alcohol or any other killer drug!

      Reply
  • BJ 20/10/11 #

    ‘Research shows that drinking alone doesn’t make people flirt and start fights’

    Well if you’re all alone who are going to shag and punch!?!

    Reply
  • Some people think that ‘comment’ means ‘sarcasm’. I have read some research, which I’m afraid I can’t remember where, that the true character comes to the fore when drink is excessively consumed; in other words if it isn’t in there it won’t come out.

    Reply
    • Definitely agree with you there Sheelagh. I’ve never known anyone to get in a fight after a few pints who wasn’t a tad on the violent side to start with. It lessens inhibitions, that’s all.

      Reply
    • THAT, I can agree with Sheelagh. Alcohol is a depressant which is why it lowers inhibitions, and lets out the real you.

      Reply
    • sheelagh, first of all i must point out the irony of your first sentence. second of all, i have three sisters, drink was not necessary for them to lash out randomly. third of all, surely it is healthy to let go sometimes and just let whatever emotion your feeling out. fair enough anger is percieved as a bad emotion but it is also essential for survival and passion etc i think its perfect that in the event of angry people getting drunk and being angry, at least they incapable of causing any real damage, easily subdued and in the event of hitting someone, chances are the other is drunk and wont feel it. drink is essential to the human race. i dont understand why women cry so much but i dont condemn it- let it out . you’ve seen the mental health adds on tv and i dont think its shame that people feel i think its that society expects us to supress these feelings instead of just going nuts every now and again. society constantly expects us to pretend we are not animals. im sure you’ve heard the saying ‘i need a drink’ isnt that just someones way of saying life has gotten to me slightly and i need to let go for a while in the company of other people letting go for a while. in reply to your quote, which i like by the way, i simply think some people control it better than others however ‘better is the word i would contest.

      Reply
    • Sheelagh, I believe it was called “In vino veritas” in Latin meaning in wine is truth…….. The drink causes the veneer of respectability to crack and fall away. So a nasty drunk is more often than not somebody who can hide the nastiness sober…… and a nice guy … not !
      So ( as an ex bartender ) I would suggest some people get an alcohol ban in public because it would save a lot of taxes spent on policing and medical bills. We might even be at a stage where a revival of the Temperance movement could be considered as an ability to drink is not a prerequisite in these difficult times. When did the BS arrive that it is a cultural thing ? as I recall reading that drunken hooliganism at wakes was caused by the advent of porter because before that a little whiskey was given and after that only as a reward for singing or dancing or storytelling – and on an empty stomach that was enough for a good night to be had by all.

      Reply
  • Very interesting article, if the research stands up, whoever the research is done by. Should always be wary when problems are blamed on inanimate objects or liquids. ‘it was the drink’ is a cop out.

    Reply
  • I beg to differ with the writers comment. In my opinion, different alcoholic drinks affect people in different ways. Some people are able to hold their own and some can’t. Whether one is used to drinking copious amounts or not. We are all individuals, unique in our own way.

    Reply
    • @Jacinta – alcohol doesn’t drink itself. How come people in Italy are far more responsible with their alcohol consumption than we are here. Alcohol is the same here as it is in Italy. It’s about time people took personal responsibility.

      Too much of the ‘it’s the drinks fault’ attitude in this country. That’s why our nanny state thinks it’s ‘protecting’ us by not selling alcohol until 12pm on a Sunday. People need to grow up

      Reply
    • @Paul, the reason we are less responsible with drink here than Italy is that we grow up with different attitudes to it. A lot of young people start drinking just to get drunk, and this continues into adulthood in a lot of cases. On the continent (and I’m generalising here, I don’t know specifics) children grow up around adults who drink responsibly. It has also been shown that one gets less drunk drinking the same amount of alcohol if it is taken with a meal rather than on its own, eg., down the pub.

      Reply
    • well paul, i think your very wrong. drinking in ireland is culturally important. we by nature are very different from the italians and the french etc so how could one compare us when we under the influence. alcohol lowers your inhibitions which is a fact and also has different effects on everyone, depends on your mood, depends on what you’ve eaten. it also brings out the truth- hard to trust someone youve never seen tipsy. how many laughs, kisses and interesting conversations would i have missed out on had i not enjoyed a social drink where inhibitions had been left at home. i would imagine and i dont even think its possible to do the maths but i reckon 99.9 percent of people cause no trouble when having a drink and its a bit unfair to generalise. on any given day it will be a different 0.1 percent causing the chaos and in which case there will be 99.9 percent there to rectify the matter. drink like all of lifes other variants should not be dismissed over 0.1 percent. ‘people need to grow up’ some of the people i love to drink with are the oldest, wisest and most fun people i know- there is a time and place for responsibilty. paul its immature comments like yours that would drive me to drink…

      Reply
  • Very interesting… I think there’s a lot of truth in it. Why do some people get mellow and others explode?

    I was liable to go either way when I drank heavily. I think it depended on what emotional/psychological set I had before drinking. I could get very chilled and friendly, very grandiose and pumped, or occasionally completely explosive. Or I’d sing, which is something I’d normally be self-conscious of.

    So I think the alcohol lowered the inhibitions to acting out whatever I had going on anyway.

    …and yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if the cultural/societal conditioning is a large part of that. It usually is in any given event. Most people either reduce everything to either the personal or the collective. I think they are going on simultaneously. To understand anything, you have to look at both together. For instance, the people here talking about responsibility also have a piece of the puzzle – it’s not *all* social setting. It’s both.

    Reply
  • I wonder of people in out countries are as negative and miserable as so many contributors here (even without alcohol)

    Reply
  • An almost identical article on the BBC website a week or so ago.

    Reply
  • The only persons who make us drunken idiots is ourselves The ‘drink’ doesn’t cause anything. Yes, it lowers your inhibitions but that doesn’t make it the drinks fault. So tired of people not taking responsibility for their own actions and behaviours!

    Reply
  • I’m sorry, but I don’t think this is going to fly with reforming alcoholics or the families of those afflicted with alcoholism. I personally have some friends who have been in recovery for years, who cannot drink; not even one drink. These people would say ‘I am an alcoholic because I am an alcoholic. I drank because I am an alcoholic. I cannot drink because I am an alcoholic.’ They would not say ‘I am an alcoholic because of my culture.’

    I think that how we behave when drunk contains a cultural component, but how alcohol affects the brain and opens the ‘addict pathway’ in certain people is scientifically verified. Check this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcoholism for a brief review of the many professional theories and stats on the subject.

    It is far to complex an issue to be solved in one short article.

    I also beg to differ on the rosy Mediterranean wine sipping vision extolled here – I have met and known French, Spanish and Italian alcoholics, or people affected by alcoholics from these nations. Some of these alcoholics were / are violent or sexually abusive.

    This article by a virtual non-drinker is merely exploring the idea that the particular symptoms of alcohol intoxication can vary culturally, but it does not offer any definitive studies to answer the question.

    Reply
    • Well, I’m a recovered alcoholic, and I think there is something to this. I don’t like the word ‘reforming’, as it has criminal undertones . I don’t like the word ‘recovering’ either because it assumes even years after getting sober and healthy that I am still running for a monster, or climbing out of a hole, which isn’t the case. A lot of die-hard 12-steppers will think that that is the undermining of my Step 1 – my acceptance of being an alcoholic. That’s not the case. It’s more that I don’t want to load my subconscious with a script about disease, when I seem to be perfectly healthy now.

      I’m a big fan of integral theory, which says that every even has inner/outer and personal/collective aspects.

      This article was maybe a rare example of someone talking about the collective dimension. People then jump down his throat because they take it as a negating of personal responsibility, and blaming culture exclusively. I think he did neglect that, but he broke a bit of ground in expanding the lens beyond the personal. In order to understand anything, you gotta look at it from all sides.

      You said this was far too complex to be resolved in one short article. You’re right.

      Reply
  • BORING!

    Reply
  • Hummmmmmmmmmmmmm

    Reply
  • Lynsey 20/10/11 #

    Well done, phantom duck Nibbler. What a load of codswallop this article is. Yes, we can all relax after work and have the craic without alcohol, and become less inhibited as those around us become less inhibited- this is news? Alcohol is a drug however, and the author’s individual reaction to it is not science by any stretch of the imagination. Anyone who has lived with the nightmare of personality changes that can be caused by alcohol in a loved one will be sickened by this irresponsible ‘journalism.’ I’m delighted it doesn’t cause him grief, but there are plenty of lives it has ruined, and livers it has rotted, both here in Ireland and throughout the Mediterranean as well, wherever he is getting his ‘everyone is a happy drunk in Italy” information. Codswallop I say. And I am being polite here. Go back to journalism school sweetie, and do some real research, which is NOT funded by the people who have a vested interested in obfuscation.

    Reply
  • I highlighted above who the research was done by.

    Reply

Add New Comment