TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Interview: ‘There will be mass defaults, I guarantee it’ – David McWilliams

The time to take action on tracker mortgages is now or we will see another wave of mortgage defaults says economist David McWilliams.

Christina Finn

With the release of his new book, The Good Room, David McWilliams chatted with the TheJournal.ie’s Christina Finn on why Ireland needs to stand up for itself.

MOST ECONOMISTS LOOK at the likes of GDP and inflation, but they actually don’t matter. The only thing that matters is people’s lives. Every little decision that people make, add them all together and that becomes the economy.

My new book focuses on this new way of looking at the economy. It is written through the eyes of a pregnant 32-year-old teacher, Olivia Vickers. I came up with the idea last October in a coffee shop in Dublin. I saw a pregnant woman come in and she seemed quite hassled at the time, but she seemed very happy too. She was patting her baby bump and almost seemed like she was chatting to her new baby.

We are in a baby boom at the moment and I couldn’t help but think that the people that are most in trouble are the people that are having kids. I interviewed a lot of people and the most important thing I found is that life goes on – people fall in love, people have kids, but if you listen to people talk about the economy, it is as if the world has stopped still, as if people’s lives stop. But the world never stands still, people’s lives go on despite it all. The book is really about the triumph of life and the defiance against the cold economics of it all.

The Good Room

The Good Room, which is the title of my new book, is an Irish thing. My granny had a good room and it was was a tabernacle where everything was to be untouched. The idea is a metaphor for how Ireland positions itself and negotiates in Europe. We don’t stand up for ourselves the way we should, because collectively the leadership, not the people, don’t have the self confidence to see ourselves as equals. Years ago, when I was working in the Central Bank during the negotiations on the euro and the Maastricht Treaty I used to watch how other countries like the Danes, similar small nations and population, they would always be arguing and saying “well what about Denmark, why is this good for the Danes,” and in the end they decided to not go into the euro. Other Scandinavian countries were the same. They stood up for themselves and they said “hold on, this isn’t right for us”. While we are like, “Oh thanks very much, thanks for letting us get into the good room – which is Brussels”. Now that is very evident, more so than before.

There is a huge disconnect with life on the ground for the people of Ireland and the people who are in the negotiating position for the country. As long as we play the good room game, the more we say, “don’t worry about us over here in the corner”, then the more suffering the people are going to go through. It is a bit like my granny, where she pretended that we ate off the good china all the time, that is not the reality of the situation.

Politicians say  that we shouldn’t say certain things in case we damage the perception of Ireland abroad. It is all about reputation. But when a country is in an IMF situation, you don’t have a reputation – that is why the IMF is running the country.

80 per cent of of tracker mortgages given out over three years

The extreme urgency of now is a great expression to define where we as a nation are now. People have to get up and feel that tomorrow is going to be better than yesterday. They need hope but our leaders are all talking about four or five years away. Life goes on and it goes on quickly. Think of the the demographic of the people that read TheJournal, they are not reading newspapers anymore and are probably between the ages of 20-35. They are likely to be in terrible negative equity and these people cannot wait, they cannot wait indefinitely.

Ireland’s major issue is the mortgage debt crisis that is building up. There are over 120,000 people in arrears and 400,000 on tracker mortgages. 80 per cent of of tracker mortgages were given out between 2004 and 2007. The majority of those are in negative equity. When these interest rates rise, and they will, there is going to be a another wave of massive mortgage defaults and that could come in about four or five years time. In 2003, I said that the housing market was a scam, although not everyone believed me at the time. There is no evidence anywhere that austerity works, that is why I called it the scam of austerity. So if you are embracing policies that have never worked it is like being diagnosed with heart disease and prescribing chemotherapy.

I said that the housing market would fall, but it didn’t crash until a few years later in 2007. I think we have to prepare for this in advance rather than waiting for four years time and saying we should have done something. I can guarantee that is going to happen, I guarantee that if we don’t do something about it now we are going to wake up on the centenary of the 1916 Rising and have mass mortgage default on tracker mortgages.

Worried conversations

The anxiety of the people is what is being discussed around the kitchen table at night, not about whether Facebook is going to set up its headquarters here. People are talking about how much they have and what they are going to do to get by. Years ago, my father lost his job in the late 70s, around the same age that my own son is now. I remember listening at the top of the stairs, when my parents thought I was in bed, to my parents having really worried conversations about money and what they were going to do next and where he was going to find another job. That has had a lasting impact on me. Can you imagine how many of those exact same conversations are taking place every night around Ireland?

Hope is what we need. It is really what binds us all together.  The character of Olivia is an amalgamation of people I have met and her story ends up being a hopeful one.  It is a risk to write a book that is half economics and half fiction, but I think it is an uplifting story. Her child is born and life goes on. It is only money at the end of the day – unusual to have an economist say that, but it is only money.

David McWilliams is an economist, broadcaster and bestselling author. David’s new book, The Good Room, is out now.

VIDEO: David McWilliams explains why the world economy is still doomed>

‘Cautious optimism’, laughter and Mammynomics promised at Kilkenomics>

Read next:

Comments (145 Comments)

  • mcgoo 31/10/12 #

    I wish I knew what a tracker mortgage was back in the day….says the variable mortgage interest holder……

    Reply
    • Darren
      You made a comment about George Lee jumping ship on Fine Gael because they didn’t value his thinking.
      I understand that George Lee had jumped from RTE once previously when he joined a firm of stockbrokers for a weekend before he ran back to the shelter of that bastion of independence in Donnybrook. I think you will find that the problem isn’t in Fine Gael!

      Reply
    • ‘‘There will be mass defaults, I guarantee it’ – David McWilliams”

      Why wait for for another 3-4 years throwing good money after bad?
      Why not default now?
      and start saving those huge payments that you are making on your overinflated mortgage,
      and live mortgage free for a few years,
      jettison the debt through insolvency,
      then you can buy a house for cash when the market eventually bottoms out in 3-4 years.

      Reply
    • Or are The Celtic Tiger/NAMA’s ”superstars” the only ones who are entitled to do that??

      Reply
    • @ Darran i heard it from the horses mouth himself this year and he stated the you have to play the system of politics rather than bring about change for the better good.

      Reply
  • The bankers, the ECB, the “markets” (which is another name for “investment bankers with big fast computers who skim any profit they can from the world’s economies without contributing anything of substance”) have bought and sold your government. They own them, and the government is going to do exactly as it is told.
    The bankers and markets don’t care at all about banking. They care only about capital aggregation. McWilliams has some good ideas, but they are ideas that are not going to be implemented because the people who can implement them are working for the “other side”. He is preaching to a man with a straw up his nose and a mountain of coke on the table in front of him: “Hey, you could have a stroke if you keep doing that…” The man isn’t listening, David. You are wasting your wind and our time.
    You don’t have a democracy anymore. That myth is as dead as Finn McCool.

    Reply
  • Interesting article but one question. I was under the impression that tracker mortgages were the most affordable, being set at a rate just above the base interest rate. Why is it tracker mortgages that will default, and not, say, variable mortgages?

    Reply
    • They are at the moment, but if and when the ECB starts to put up the interest rates, which may not happen this year or next, but will eventually happen, then everyone who is just barely surviving that has a tracker mortgage will feel the effects. Then we have another major problem

      Reply
    • because the base rate will rise and people who are hard pressed at the moment with loans, kids is school etc. will be pushed over the edge.

      Reply
    • The variable rate ones are already defaulting now, it’s people on trackers that are in a better position at the minute because the ECB rate is so low.
      No doubt when the ECB rate goes up if anyone on a variable rate was already in trouble they will be totally screwed by higher rates.
      The ECB can’t keep the lending rate low for too long because of inflationary effects.

      Reply
    • Tracker mortgages are good at the moment because interest rates are low. Interest rates will not always stay low. Eventually, as we come towards the end of this depression and the European economy improves – whether Ireland is part of that recovery or not, the ECB will start to raise the interest rates and tracker mortgages will rise. Then you will have a lot of people, who are just managing to pay their mortgages at the moment, defaulting because the repayments will rise.
      In a fixed rate mortgage the interest rate is set so the repayments will not change. People who cant afford it are likely already in arrears.

      Reply
    • He s saying that the ECB will raise the base rate over the next few years and people on trackers will be forced into default. People on variable rate will suffer the same fate, just sooner.

      Reply
    • I’d say it’s because those on them paid peak boom prices for homes now worth less than half. A low interest rate pails in insignificance when it’s for say, 400,000 euro.

      Reply
    • He’s a very smart and impressive guy. You feel a bit depressed after his articles though, knowing that a bunch of school teachers are running our country instead of economists who appreciate the issues.

      Reply
    • Economists won’t get into politics they prefer to comment on the issue instead. It’s a shame really.

      Reply
    • Jason, you are right, Economists don’t usually go into politics. There are several reasons for this, the main one being, they usually speak perfect sense, and no one wants to hear that in the political landscape (Look at George Lee.. jumped ship, because FG were more interested in politics than solutions)… and most economists would be advocating capitalist approaches… especially in the corporate world. David McWilliams has said before that he would have liked to see the banks fail, in true capitalist fashion. This would also mean none of the left wing penalization of income that we see being called for from the likes of SF and ULA.

      If only we had experts creating policy rather than panderers..

      Reply
    • I don’t know what a tracker mortgage is…

      Reply
    • interesting article and accurate . as for all those saying that economists should become more involved in politics , who exactly do you perceive has been advising the Government to take the austerity route or who were cheer leading and advising the governments during the whole boom period . It is not a question of economists over school teachers running the country is a matter of the correct economic policies being employed and currently there are a huge amount of economists advocating the wrong policies of austerity . Look at Italy and Greece two countries that were/are being run by economists not exactly the porter boys for economic growth . Austerity doesn’t work yet many economists seem for some reason to think it does , this is due to a false political ideology that guides there economic view point

      Reply
    • Whenever I hear INDEPENDANT property experts talk about interest rates,
      they always use a 8-10% figure as they reckon this is the long term average mortgage interest.
      Low rates have only been the fashion in the recent past (and look at the consequences)

      Unfortunately for the people on trackers,
      when the interest rates eventually go up,
      they will be no doubt be disgusted at the amount of their hard earned money that they dumped into their un-savable doomed to fail (from day 1) mortgages over the previous years.
      However it is hard to blame them for this mistake as our fine ”leaders and protectors” are knowingly leading them towards this inevitable slaughter.

      Reply
    • Probably because there also the first hit with interest hikes.

      Reply
    • censored 01/11/12 #

      “80 per cent of of tracker mortgages were given out between 2004 and 2007. The majority of those are in negative equity”.

      This is why. When interest rates go up, it will be interesting to see who keeps paying.

      Reply
  • He’s right about the poor calibre of negotiators we have in Europe..we constantly seemed to be pushed back down the agenda. Even recently the German finance minster telling us it’ll be 2014 before our ‘special case’ is looked at. Surely the government should be banging tables to get this moved up the line sooner? These past 4 years and the next 4 to come will be looked back on as the blackest in our country’s history and the goverments present, past and no doubtedly future will be seen as the worst ever.

    Reply
    • What if the half a million+ (and counting) of us who are in mortgage distress,
      or who are inevitably on their way there,
      as a form of protest,
      decided today not to pay their Ponzi, Overinflated, Bondholder/Golf Expense Funding, Corrupt/Criminal, Bailed Out Bank Mortgage?
      How quickly would our government act to sort something out?

      It might be much more effective than a trip to Dublin.

      Your figures don’t stack up,
      in fact in most cases they never did,
      your government knew this all along.
      When do you think they are going to tell you this?

      They might shout it to you from the safety of their lifeboats?

      Reply
  • Can we just get on with it! Default restructure what ever. Generation denial will still be in power in 4 years time. Pissing and moaning about there kids emigrating and still believing there worth there high salary. David is right in what he’s saying I just wish it would happen sooner.

    Reply
  • He’s right about the level and caliber of the “negotiators” that we send to Europe on our behalf. Kenny et al see themselves as a European party rather than an Irish party and are willing to jump through hoops at our expense so that they will be accepted into the greater European family. Hence Sarkozy tussling Kenny’s hair like they were on the playground and Kenny becoming the Germans “European of the Year” …along with the Irish people (as an after thought). All FG/Lab want is for their parties to be seen as pro European and are willing to do anything to achieve it even if it is at the expense of the Irish people. Today’s TD;s are so disconnected to the person on the street that it is like getting an Eskimo to represent the right of an Amazonian Indian!

    Mc Williams mentions 1916 and that brings up a very good point. While the parities will all be vying for ownership of this event they will have forgotten the spirit of the 1916 Rising. This is when a small Nation stood up against an Empire and though the initial Rising failed it’s spirit ultimately brought about victory, Our “Leaders” of today don’t hold a candle to the Leaders of 1916, they all suffer from “small man syndrome”. They are afraid to rock the boat, they are afraid to use veto’s, they are afraid to fight for their country. They much rather to take a few crumbs from the table when other countries have hammered out deals and skip hope with soundbites like “game changer” and “turning the corner”. A Spanish person I talked to recently could not understand why the “Fighting Irish” had not taken to the streets like they have in Spain. I still don’t know how to answer that question.

    Do we have to wait 4 years as McWilliams predicts or do we wait until the next budget to come out en mass and show the Government that we have taken the pain and seen no gain. Why wait 4 years before we tell the Government to change tactics and to put Ireland first rather than their political parties aspirations of joining the European Big Boys Club. The next Budget will show the True face of the Government and whether it is serving the people of Ireland or their European Overlords.

    Reply
    • The next budget will be the tipping point for the nation…….the anger is slowly bubbling!

      Reply
    • @Ryan,
      Why will it be tipping point? People say that every year! I bet there’ll be the usual complaining then this time next year people will say the same.

      Reply
    • “The next budget will be the tipping point for the nation”

      Or the next one, or the one after that, or …

      Or we’ll all end up queueing for government bread and someone will go “If things get much worse the people will rise up.”

      Reply
    • Basically what is happening is that FG/Lab are using the old British tactic of Divide and Conquer. The public service is pitted against the private sector, the employed against the unemployed, the have’s and the have not’s. All the while while we are bickering the Government happily dance’s around and holds hands with their European brethren. You only have to read the articles here on the Journal to see some of the attitudes that either “side” has towards each other. People are sick of every second commentator blaming banks/bondholders/TD’s for every woe from the price of a mortgage to the price of a ham sandwich.

      The simple fact of the matter is that WE are to blame because we the people elected the Government and we are not calling them to task. There is no leadership from Unions or any other group for fear that they might lose out . It has all become about money, pure and simple. National pride, sovereignty and fighting spirit have been forgotten about and consigned to the history bools. The only time we become Irish is when we don fake leprechaun beards and hats and wave plastic hammers at Ireland soccer matches. After that we go home and become good little Europeans again.

      Perhaps if TD’s couldn’t go anywhere in the country without there being a protest outside every engagement then maybe they might realize the anger that is out there. I don’t mean mob mentality or direct action but things like stopping them from getting photo op’s and making it clear that as long as people are out of work that they the TD;s will have to put up with this everyday. Every press conference should have hard questions thrown in and make the TD’s squirm in discomfort.. As long as their is negative equity for the mortgage holder there should be negative publicity for the TD’s. Lets see how they like falling off their high horses and wallowing in the muck with the rest of us!

      Reply
    • Well said Brian. We should be on the street now.

      Reply
    • Well said Brain.

      There are also many financial weapons in our Armory.

      We don’t have to fund our own demise?

      Refusing to pay false criminal debts and contrived taxes to individuals who are nothing more financial dictators would send out a firm message.

      Reply
  • One of the few men in Ireland that talks sense! The strange thing is though, what he says isn’t complicated. During the housing boom when he was telling all and sundry what was likely to happen, he was lambasted by people who had invested everything in the stamp duty economy. When house prices were increasing 3 times faster than wages, there’s only ever going to be one outcome. Bertie and co became completely obsessed with this idea that Ireland was an economic powerhouse, to such an extent that nothing else mattered. This new government seem to think that by doing exactly as we’re told by the EU, things will eventually recover. We haven’t a hope of ever recovering unless mortgage debt is tackled. This has to be met head on. Houses in Ireland need to be completely revalued and then mortgages be adjusted in accordance with what houses are actually worth. Of course this will cause huge pain in the short term, but if we are not prepared to take this step, austerity will become a permanent fixture for hundreds of thousands of people in this country. Sadly I don’t think the men in power have the courage to make a monumental decision such as this, and will soldier on taking instructions from the troika. I accept that any form of debt forgiveness may be deemed as unfair by those that don’t have unmanageable mortgages or huge negative equity( I’m fortunate to only have a small mortgage left on my house) but this is the only viable option we have, if we want to get Ireland back on its feet.

    Reply
    • Rodrigo, well put, unfortunately people here get the whiff of a deal that isn’t going to share the same immediate credit to each household because of different borrowing scenarios at different times with different rates etc and straight away they get their back up and shout no way instead of looking at the bigger picture or greater good of the country and the economy.
      At the moment the economy is on its knees and after the next budget it will be flat on the floor, our taxes are being given away by our government on the promise from a foreign power that things will be better once they get all of their gambling debts paid off by us but the reality is that there is a massive shift in wealth distribution from the poor and the middle classes to the most wealthy in society.
      It’s time we demanded what is right for the people of Ireland as a nation and for the protection of our children’s futures.

      Reply
    • Spot on Rodrigo.

      Reply
    • And while they are doing that they can credit the average amount of revaluing of houses and debt write offs into every single account of the poor people who still pay massive rents right now around Ireland because they got priced out or decided not to pay stupid money for a tiny house. Either that or the keys of the house get handed back and the debt gets removed completely and the people then move on with their lives and go tent in a fair rental market which the goverment (Nama) cobtrolThe only fair way.

      Reply
    • As someone who didn’t buy during the boom, and paid extortionate rents and now emigrated – I do think that some debt forgiveness is needed to get the country on it’s feet.

      Whats missing from this whole debate is, who will pay for it?

      If there is a debt write down, the banks will need a further bailout. If that doesn’t come from the taxpayer, then it has to come from Europe. What can we offer in return? We won’t get money for nothing.

      So, would you be happy for the State to take some of the difference in price between the value of your PPR now, and the value of your house when you later sell it (adjusting for inflation) – in return for a debt writedown? For example, the State decides the best policy is debt forgiveness by taking an equity stake in your house of up to 50% – is that a fair and reasonable policy? (BTLs will have to go down the bankrupcy route I’m afraid).

      The combined equity stake would then be used as collateral for a national bond that will be issued to cover the write down. This would have to be a 50 year bond.

      Now if property prices continue to decline, then so be it. But at least people will have more disposable income to put back into the domestic economy. But an increase in domestic consumption should stabilse things and allow more credit to then flow from the banks to businesses again. Property prices should then stabilise as well.

      And what would be finally needed, as the very first step, would be strict regulation on how much someone can borrow, limit on salary multiples, etc – to stop banks from again loaning wildly on residential property but instead force them to devote more resources to business lending. Property should then rise with inflation.

      How to pay off that bond then, in 50 years time? I guess we’d have to invest in actual productive industries over the next half century….

      Reply
    • You are still only looking out for some people Darryl and giving the fingers to the other prudent people who have massive bills and rents and no disposable income left over too. What happens to these people? Is it tough luck to them? I’m afraid not people won’t stand for it. It unfair and morally wrong.

      Reply
    • Very fair point Martin. In my scenario householders would be giving up a large percentage ownership of their asset so it’s not a situation where it’s win-win for them. I totally agree that the those more prudent and those who were priced out of home ownership should not be penalised and in fact should benefit as well from any future arrangement. I don’t know – yet – what that could or should be. But Irish society needs to strike some kind of grand bargain if we’re ever to get out of this.

      Reply
    • Some of you guys are talking as if bankers are reasonable people and that our government are in intelligent and honest people.

      Most of the people involved in this travesty, just wanted
      (1) A reasonably priced home in their own country.
      (2) A decent mortgage product to purchase their home with.

      What they got was poisoned to the point where it has now nearly wiped out a generation.

      When a young and very fit victim (and his family) are on the floor in a full state of cardiac arrest,
      a longwinded lecture in health and fitness may be just a slight bit inappropriate.

      Reply
    • So what do you think should be done then, Harry?

      Reply
    • Darryl
      The first sign of trouble, and the ”Heroes” of the boom have walked away from their debts and responsibilities without hinderance from our fine ”leaders and protectors”.
      It does not seem to have done them any harm?
      Maybe it’s time the man in the street took a leaf out of their book?

      Reply
    • If the government are going to let homeowners asses the values of their homes for the property tax purposes, that is (lets be truthful) going directly to pay corrupt bankers gambling debts.
      Then they can let the homeowners asses the value of their home and pay a mortgage that corresponds to that value.
      The money is only going to pay the same corrupt/criminal banker’s gambling debts,
      that, in truth, has got nothing to do with the us anyway.
      In more distressed cases (where these ”banks” have gone to town on families and totally cleaned them out)
      these families should have a total (non interest incurring) moratorium (mortgage payment break) for a number of years if necessary, to allow them to get back on their feet.

      Sounds radical?
      Look at the state the country has been in for the last 5 years.
      Look at the number of native Irish emigrants.
      Look at the number of native Irish suicides.
      Etc etc etc.
      An all out war, or famine would have done less damage to our country.
      In a national emergency like this, we need a radical, practical approach that will save our country.

      Stop paying false, foreign negative equity and debt, to false foreign banks.
      Stop trying to blame every man in the street for the criminal acts of a few conmen.
      And don’t rely on our Europuppet, bought out ”government” to sort out this mess for you,
      or to tell you anything that resembles the truth about what’s going on for that matter.

      Just to put this into context.
      850 of NAMA’s ”finest” racked up €74 billion of debt (that according to our government we have to pay back for them)
      and as their ”punishment”
      they have been put on the €200k a year NAMA dole.
      Ask around and you will find out that these cowboys didn’t pay people even when they had money
      (although they obviously still seem to have plenty).

      You are looking at a fraction of €74 Billion to save Hundreds of Thousands of families whose only intention,
      was to put a roof over their family’s head.
      So what if a plan to save them goes a few billion over budget?
      These are the people who will, and who are, actually spending their money back into our economy.
      Is it not better giving money to them, than giving it to the NAMA Schiesters?

      Wake up people.

      At the first sign of trouble, with their Bentleys, Private Jets, Helicopters and Palatial Homes
      NAMA’s Goldenboys stopped paying their debts and the government stepped in and bailed them out.

      I’m afraid you are gonna have to stop talking and stop paying if you want to get your government’s attention.

      Reply
    • “You are looking at a fraction of €74 Billion to save Hundreds of Thousands of families whose only intention was to put a roof over their family’s head.”

      How much exactly? And who pays?

      Reply
    • How much exactly?
      We can write down all the distressed mortgages to a sustainable level (70/80% of their current REAL value) and deduct it from the combined amount of the original mortgages to give us the figure that you ask.
      (This may sound excessive ,but please remember the futures of hundreds of thousands of Irish families are at stake here)
      This financial loss/write down can be absorbed incrementally over time if necessary as these mortgages are paid on a monthly basis and over 30-40 years in most cases.

      Who pays?
      We can immediately stop any funds going towards the gambling debts of a few corrupt bankers and divert these funds directly to this much more worthy cause.

      Reply
  • This is a great clip about what David actually said in 2003 http://bit.ly/fPEQ5u

    Reply
    • MrMagoo 31/10/12 #

      Good clip. Why is that whingey Clown Austin Hughes still working for KBC Bank? Should have been fired years ago for helping inflate the property bubble and fooling people into buying. No doubt KBC lent to these people and are now chasing them to pay off the mortgage – blaming them!

      Reply
    • Who KBC bank?
      The artist formerly known as IIB Bank?
      The ”Bank” who ”famously” brought the interest only home loan to Ireland.
      What an achievement?
      What a mess they have created.
      I hear that they have turned into nothing more than a debt collection agency.

      Reply
  • If there is one book that is worth buying on the state of capitalism it is Stiglitz the price of inequality. Tells you all you need to know about why the majority are being screwed.

    Reply
  • My Nana had a good room as well, it was called the “Parlour”, we were never allowed into it really, only the very odd time, an excellent comparison though with what is going on today! Dying to read the book…

    Reply
  • So basically as long as Europe & Ireland are in financial crises,those of us on trackers are reasonably happy,but as soon as Europe & Ireland return to a sound financial footing,we are screwed……It’s a f**#ed up world

    Reply
    • Not quite, as soon as the ECB decides to put up rates, whatever state Ireland is in, then the sh1t hits the fan again, cue another bailout that the government will say was impossible to see coming.

      Reply
  • The man is calling it as he sees it without fear or favour. That elected people could operate on our behalf in the same way but they show plenty of favour to their own interests and fear is very evident in our dealings with the Reich.

    Reply
  • The Dead Horse Theory

    The tribal wisdom of the Red Indians, passed on from generation to generation, says that “When you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount.”

    However, in government more advanced strategies are often employed, such as:

    1. Buying a stronger whip.

    2. Changing riders.

    3. Appointing a committee to study the horse.

    4. Arranging to visit other countries to see how other cultures ride dead horses.

    5. Lowering the standards so that dead horses can be included.

    6. Reclassifying the dead horse as living-impaired.

    7. Hiring outside contractors to ride the dead horse.

    8. Harnessing several dead horses together to increase speed.

    9. Providing additional funding and/or training to increase the dead horse’s performance.

    10. Doing a productivity study to see if lighter riders would improve the dead horse’s performance.

    11. Declaring that as the dead horse does not have to be fed, it is less costly, carries lower overhead and therefore contributes substantially more to the bottom line of the economy than do some other horses.

    12. Rewriting the expected performance requirements for all horses.

    And, of course…

    13. Promoting the dead horse to a supervisory position

    Reply
    • You have it in a nutshell Victoria another good quote is…..
      “When faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.”
      Think thats the problem…we need our leaders to look at alternatives not try and plug the holes in a system that is broken beyond repair….the money has now gone full circle and its back with the people who lent it out in the first place, while we are impoverished and up to our necks in debt

      Reply
  • Hes right about one thing the shit is going to hit the fan when the real extent of the mortgage default is known…the banks and government have their heads in the sand over this one and it will be worse than the bank bailout

    Reply
  • If u are on variable mortgages, just pay them what you can afford. It’s all dead money anyway! Why should we live on the breadline for the next 10 years…for the banks to have the last laugh? I’m sorry I work way too hard for my cash to then hand every penny back to the banks at the end of the month. Like what’s the point in even working? As far as im concerned we’ve played by their rules for long enough. Why aren’t the banks taking responsibility for their actions? We all made mistakes…and boy have I learned from mine, but I’m f~~ked if I’m going to spend the rest of my life paying for it. I live in a 2 bedroom box apt, which is 200,000e in negative equity. There is no sound proofing, no ventilation in either bathroom (which has resulted in me having to rip out an ensuite because of dampness) and no insulation between me and the underground carpark, so my heating bills are astronomical every winter. I don’t lose sleep over it anymore, I don’t march down O’Connoll st protesting, I have just plain and simply stopped paying my ridiculous 2000e a month mortgage. It’s no longer my problem it’s their problem. Yes, my credit rating will be screwed for 7 years, do I care??? Eh no

    Reply
    • I would hand back the keys if I were you and go rent for 5/10 years.

      Reply
    • A very big and very sincere FAIR PLAY TO YOU JULIE.
      We were all conned.
      We were sold.
      Poisoned defective properties
      and poisoned defective mortgage products.
      By a buch of corrupt/criminal bankers,builders and TD’s.

      Where I live there are Schiesters of Collections Agents from these vile diseased ”Banks”
      knocking on doors and trying to shame families into giving them their last few Euro,
      to pay partial payments into long dead mortgages,
      knowing fine and well that they are going to repo them regardless.
      THIS IS HAPPENING WITH THE FULL SUPPORT OF OUR SPINELESS PUPPET GOVERNMENT.
      Disgusting!!
      The Blood is On Their Hands.

      Reply
    • @ Martin Mac
      Hand back the keys?
      (and what apologise to the ”nice” criminal bankers for paying them tens of thousands over the years?)
      (or apologise for being unable to continue being shafted? )

      What would she do that for?
      after being conned into paying an falsely overinflated mortgage for the last 5years or so?
      to a bank corruptly ran by conmen?
      on what turned out to be a defective property built by more conmen?
      all under the strict policing of a corrupt government of conmen?

      Hand back the keys?
      There should be a criminal investigation into this travesty and these conmen should be jailed.

      You are doing just fine Julie.
      Don’t pay these criminals another penny.

      As long as it is safe for you, live there rent free.
      It is the least that those pigs can do for you.
      From what you are saying, it sounds like you could be living in another Priory Hall.

      Reply
  • This is becoming a good thread, really excellent comments from posters.

    Reply
  • I’m almost as sick of the media as I am of the politicians. Journalists are either mouthpieces for official policy or harbingers of doom and gloom. This at least sounds novel?!?! But “it’s only money” is no solution to the problems of all who have been left with little or none!

    Reply
  • Yes we need hope so much it hurts but we have nothing to hope for when Our leaders who should be standing up for us are walking away from us and even pointing the finger at us and ridiculing us in Europe.

    Reply
  • People are only ‘in’ negative equity if they go to sell their home, not if they are just living in it.

    Around the same time as all theseortgages were issued, I borrowed €50k and bought shares which are now down the toilet.
    I am really looking forward to reading the rescue plan for me and my debt .

    Reply
    • you bought share. Tough. You gambled you lost. Buying a house that was overinflated by auctioneers and markets was not our “choice” we were conned into it. No comparison.

      Reply
    • Jim, you didn’t need to live in your shares.

      No one is claiming debt forgiveness is fair but it is inevitable.

      Reply
    • @christopher
      How long did it take for your arm to heal after they marched you into the bank and forced you to sign for the mortgage ?

      You took a gamble buying property, I took a gamble buying shares.

      You could have stayed where you were?
      you could have rented ?
      You can renegotiate your mortgage and push out the repayment term by adding 10 more years onto it ?

      Reply
    • People’s homes were never meant to be a financial instrument to be traded on a stock exchange but thanks to Wall Street Criminals who operate above the law it has certainly turned out that way.

      Someone borrowing unsecured debt to buy shares in the hope to make profit
      it is not the same as
      someone borrowing secured debt to buy a home for their family.

      Reply
    • @HARRY
      I’m confused.
      You are suggesting that it is our different motives that allows for forgiveness for you and not for me.

      So if people bought houses just for their family and with no ‘potential profit’ motive, then why are we having the chat ?
      They are indebted, so extend the term of the mortgage and get on with it.

      Why would we need to be talking about debt forgiveness in the first place ?

      Reply
  • Mario Draghi wants your house. Real estate gold and silver will be the only currency in town when they crash the Euro and the Dollar .The solution is simple start demanding that corrupt bankers get locked up and replace them with straight ones bring community banking back and loan to innovative ideas based on sound economics it will get business going and inject money locally. This country is a gold mine if it was’nt been held back by the top 10% who hoard the wealth for themselves and crush anyone that is not in the circle of greed and deception .Common sense is the solution identify and purge and start again all the evidence is there for us .We all know who’s holding us back.

    Reply
    • I hear what you are saying Jack.
      However you can demand all you like with this government and they wont do anything.
      They are so immune in their PR Cocoon that if half of the country were wiped out in the morning they would still come out with some Cut and Paste response.

      Actions speak louder than words.
      Hit them in the pocket as the wise man says.
      Stop paying their False Debts and Taxes today.

      Reply
  • No matter how much banging on the table you do things wont change. Germany control everything. There is a German election next year and Merkel and co are desperate to protect their own asses and will ensure that no big decisions will be made that might affect German voters until after the election. I would guess this is why we see these delay tactics about an EU wide banking supervisor having to be set up first. It is just an excuse for the Germans to stall until after the election. All we can hope is that Merkel is returned with a big majority that will give her the power to allow the ECB to print money to let the bank sort their balance sheets and allow for a certain amount of defaults. Whether inflation would go crazy who knows but maybe not if strict regulation is put in place to only allow the right amount of money into the European economy. The problem is too much money in one country might not be enough money in another like Ireland and Spain and Greece and thus you are back to the argument of whether all regions within Europe can prosper under one central bank.

    Reply
  • Surely defaults are not in the bank’s interest, or the mortgage holder’s interest, although possibly in the property speculator’s interest.

    So what are banks doing to eliminate risk of default to a mortgage holder on a tracker mortgage?

    Reply
  • I was at a Corporate event over Xmas 2003, where Mr McWilliams was a guest speaker. He did a fine line in twinkly-eyed, folksy guff, telling us all about how his earliest experiences at the Central Bank saw him bluffing & blundering his way through. We attendees, flushed with drink & a sense of our Celtic Tiger invincibility, lapped it up.

    The spell was broken slightly when one man directly asked for Mr McWilliam’s advice on whether he should buy a house. His reply was a classic fudge, giving the man no real direction. At no point were we told that the property market was a sham.

    Mr McWilliams now seems to be leaving his audience short again. He predicts mass defaults, playing to what is now a well-deserved sense of self pity, but doesn’t spell out the full consequences of defaulting on one’s mortgage – loss of one’s home & liability for the outstanding debt after your bank has disposed of your property in a fire sale. No solutions to the problem are proposed either.

    Reply
  • People like myself who are on a variable mortgage are already paying way over the odds. Tracker mortgage holders are riding the pigs back at the moment as far as I’m concerned . My Sister has the same mortgage amount as myself and is paying a little over €400 less than I am at present per month. I was not told about tracker mortgages by my Financial Adviser whilst buying in 2007. I will be in huge trouble when the interest rates rise again.

    Reply
  • What does David McWilliams want to happen regarding tracker mortgages and expected defaults?

    Reply
  • The famous Morgan Kelly article already says the next phase of the crisis for ireland is a mass mortgage default – but what I want to know is how will those of us who don’t have mortgages be affected.

    Reply
  • While Europe is still floundering from crisis to crisis surely the rate will be kept low?

    Are we likely to return to the 17% rates of the 80s?

    Reply
  • Kevin 31/10/12 #

    Jaysus, the McWilliams fanclub is out in force downvoting absolutely every even slightly negative comment. People of Ireland, you’re fecking sheep.

    Reply
  • But David, I don’t know what a tracker mortgage is!

    Reply
    • McWilliams is a TV Personality rather than an economist or a politician. He is also dangerous because he constantly talks down a market without any balance to what he says.
      In fairness he like a lot of others called the collapse in the housing market but that wasn’t very clever as it was merely observing the laws of physics ……what goes up comes down.
      If we were to listen to this guy now we would immediately seek another Bail Out for our banks and write off all mortgages !
      If that’s the case we might as well make for the sea ports and seek charity abroad as there would be no economic future for Ireland in the next thirty years.
      I believe he’s wrong and furthermore I believe he has to be part of the economic solution by joining with other thought leaders and building a positive image of economic recovery rather than concentrating where he can make the quickest buck for himself.
      Economic success is about sentiment and he currently contributes only negatively.

      Reply
    • So Garry what are you saying?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfjGSfuSQpA

      Reply
  • I’m a fan of McWilliams’s books. He’s a very good writer, and provides entertaining anecdotes to back up coherent and relevant points.

    However, the above piece is just a sales pitch aimed at affected Ireland.

    “Austerity hasn’t worked” + “We need mortgage debt forgiveness” = populism.

    David was right during the boom, and if the likes of him had been heeded, we could have cooled the market somewhat and limited the extent of the damage. However, now he’s prescribing tools we don’t have like stimulus and debt forgiveness. The wall of cash required for each simply doesn’t exist. David is, for me, our no.1 commentator on Irish economics. However, I find his solutions light-weight and unworkable.

    Think about what is needed for debt forgiveness – massive recapitalization. Europe is hinting at retrospectively recapitalizing our banks via the ESM. Think about it – what happened when the Irish state recapitalized our banks? They took an equity stake. Do you think the ESM will dole out cash without something going onto the other side of the balance sheet? We will be handing over the banks to the ESM in any deal, while keeping a portion of the debt ourselves.

    There will be no government led initiative for debt forgiveness – you will be told in about 18 months time that it’s no longer a matter for the government, and you will eventually dealing with a large European banking player, who will be handed the Irish loan book and deposit base with the really bad debts parked in the ESM. This will ultimately be the end of Irish-owned banks – they will be consolidated into European owned banks which will be regulated from Brussels.

    Personally? I think people should be able to hit the rest button and walk away. Jingle mail, 3 years of insolvency and walk away from everything. But it looks like that won’t happen. If you want debt forgiveness, talk to the UK legal system who can give it to you in a year. Don’t hold your breath for innumerate Irish politicians to provide it for you.

    Reply
  • Red Ed 31/10/12 #

    Democracy is dead! Ireland is now only a small province of Europe. The European powers have our government brainwashed by telling them Ireland is great and Enda is great. Our government has no power. We should be on the streets. We need out of Europe to get some sort of democracy back. Our crisis has only begun. im not in negative equity but im still considering jumping ship. Bail out after bail out will eventually lead to the ECB itself going bust

    Reply
  • Fair enough he might be right but this continued pessimism isn’t going to get us anywhere. I fully respect McWilliams’ opinion but this won’t get us on the road to recovery. If people continue to fear for the future consumer sentiment will worsen.

    Reply
  • is this not the same clown that advised the last government to guarantee all banks on night of 28 Sept 2008????….. got that spot on didnt you Dave!!!!!…. but of course he will say “sure they only half listened to my advise”……celebrity economists churning out waffle every couple of months.. how many books has this guy brought out since the banking crisis happened??? not including his dreadfully play “outsiders”….??

    Reply
    • This is a common misconception.

      McWilliams was asked for advice on the night of the bank guarantee, and recommended that the government DID
      NOT guarantee unsecured bond holders, only deposits.

      Lenihan went ahead and guaranteed everything, under pressure from Europe.

      Reply
  • a lot of what david mc williams says is true but i still get a bad feeling when i go into bookshops and see the price of books by himself and shane ross and all the other doomsayers who are benifitting from telling the rest of us where we went wrong.

    Reply
  • “With the release of his new book…..:
    LOL.

    Well, Christina, instead of reading David’s “new book”, I’m taking a walk on the Howth East Pier.
    At least I’ll get some benefit from that.

    Reply
  • Mc Williams was predicting a property slump in early 00′s. He was bound to be right at some point. I for one am glad I didn’t listen to him then.

    Reply
  • I wish this country could go “Capitalist” that would be a real turn around from the useless soul-destroying worshipping of medocrity and gombeenism which we have to endure. Is there ever going to be a march of the middle class on the Dail???
    David would you lead us!!!

    Reply
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxtkjZFfuZI ………….how david got it right …so right…

    Reply
  • Should this article not be about ” if ” the base rate go up rather than “when”. Why scaremonger?

    Reply
  • Maybe the book should have been called ‘The Bad Memory’

    Reply
  • is it just me or does anybody else get fed up with mc williams and shane ross and fintan o toole and their ilk smugly telling us where we went wrong and charging us for the privelige with expensive book prices.they even did a roadshow .

    Reply
  • Kevin 31/10/12 #

    It’s strange for him to focus in on tracker mortgages. If ECB rates increase, both tracker and variable rates will increase and eventually converge (almost) – so while a tracker mortgage’s interest rate will increase by more than a variable’s, they’ll both eventually end up at the same place, just the person paying the tracker will have paid an awful lot less in interest.

    Back when tracker mortgages were given out, they were approved based on the same formulas and income ratios as standard variable/fixed rate mortgages. They were given out on the same kind of properties. How then are rising interest rates going to result in a tracker mortgage debt crisis alone?

    David McWilliams loves to talk, but he very rarely likes to actually make reasoned, cogent and logical arguments.

    Reply
    • Kevin. What are you talking about? How do you figure out that the tracker and variable rates will eventually converge? Banks can basically do whatever they like with variable rates. So how do you think a tracker is going to rise faster? McWilliams is basically saying that those on variable rate mortgages are already a lost cause, and the next step is for tracker mortgage holders to fall in the same way.

      Reply
    • The vast majority of mortgages given out during the crucial period of 2004-2007 were trackers. These Tracker mortgages have been ‘coping’ for the most part, up to now. Tracker mortgages are generally the mortgages that have, been paid (assuming that the mortgage holders have been able to keep their jobs etc).
      In essence, these mortgages have not been flagged in any great numbers to date, but once the ECB starts raising its interest rates, these are the mortgages that will cause the most damage to the banks, as these, on average are the largest private home owner mortgages that are out there. (Tracker mortgages only came into existence in Ireland from 2003 onwards). With the ECB rates at historic lows, these ‘coping’ mortgages have not flagged in the same numbers as variable rate mortgages.
      But McWilliams is right, once Europe starts to recover (this could be 3-4 years down the line), Ireland will be in the unenviable position of being doubly screwed once the ECB makes the decision to start using interest rates as a deflationary tool once more. I doubt we will ever see the 18% interest rates of the 1980’s again, but we could see 5-6% within the next decade.
      In that scenario, it will be both Tracker and variable rate mortgages that will be in trouble. Unfortunately, as i mentioned above, most home owners who bought their homes between 2004-2007 will be faced with insurmountable payment hardship. This only makes sense.

      Reply
    • Kevin 31/10/12 #

      Rodrigo, the standard variable rate as stands is usually somewhere in the 4% range. The tracker rate is the ECB base rate +1% premium (so 1.75% unless the ECB changed their rate since I last checked).

      McWilliams talks about 2004-2007, so here goes:
      In 2004 the ECB base rate was 2% giving a tracker rate of 3%. This gradually rose over the following 3 years culminating in a base rate of 4% (5% tracker rate). The CSO’s average mortgage interest rate for those years ( http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/saveselections.asp ) rose from 3.49% to 5.39%.

      Do you see now? If the ECB base rate goes up to 6%, tracker mortgages will be 7%, but SVR’s will certinaly not increase to somewhere near 10%.

      As for him saying that SVR’s are basically already a lost cause…well, if people on variable mortgages are a lost cause and people on trackers are a lost cause, does that not mean that everyone with a mortgage is a lost cause and therefore we’re screwed?

      @Cal1 unfortunately there are no statistics on arrears by mortgage type, so trying to guess/assume isn’t going to work. I also don’t buy that mortgages that are already 5-9years old (and will be 9-13 years old by the time the supposed mass default happens) will struggle to cope with an increase in the mortgage interest rate to the extent that McWilliams claims.

      Reply
  • .. messenger?…. of the bleedin’ obvious!

    Reply
    • @Victoria Hall: I’d say there’s a lot of tracker mortgages up there in Carrick. If McWilliams is right, and he usually is, you might just find yourself trying to feed a ghost-town.

      McWillams shouldn’t be a focus of your ire, we know who was to blame (FF, Greens, PD’s, banks, builders). Unfortunately the current Government doesn’t seem to have any new ideas.

      Lenihan and Cowen called into McWilliams’ kitchen for advice and only half-listened to what he said. Maybe we should be paying full attention to him.

      He’s starting to write fiction to reach those who find his non-fiction too weighty, does he have to start writing his warnings in Ladybird style before we heed his warnings?

      Reply
  • I have no intention of ever buying a David McWilliams book. He seems to have moved on from predicting the demise of the Euro to tracker mortgages!
    He should go on a long holiday with
    Shane Ross somewhere near the san andreas fault!

    Reply
  • Economists cannot predict anything. There was an obvious property boom. You didn’t have to be an economist to see that. Germany always fights against high interest rates. Interest rates will probably remain low and afterwards the economists will tell us why they did like horse race commentators.

    Reply
  • padraig 31/10/12 #

    This was the man who mis-advised Brian Lenihan to save all the banks, and on the night, Anglo-Irish. Awful hypocrite who should stick to Bulmers ads.

    Reply
    • padraig 31/10/12 #

      Mr Bulmers told the late Brian Lenihan that Ireland’s credibility was at stake. It is really doubtful that he said only to guarantee only deposits. That would have likely happened anyway.

      Reply
    • I believe that without the guarantee, the Irish banking system would have failed in days and the Germans etc would be too busy fire fighting their own problems to rescue us. There would have been blood on the streets. Even if AIB and BOI were scaremongering that night, and Lenihan had taken no action, the very fact that the meeting occurred at all would have leaked quickly and would have the same effect on the Irish banking as if the banks were actually insolvent: boom!

      Worth reading: http://www.aaronmccormack.com/2011/02/the-truth-about-david-mcwilliams-the-irish-bank-guarantee/

      So, in an irish context, was the guarantee right? Its obvious that it isn’t because we’re didn’t (and don’t) have responsible government. Lenihan saw the guarantee as a stroke, then chose not to cleanup the banks and instead to sit on his hands for 2 years until the ECB had had enough. McWilliams was naive to think the government of the day would follow through on the whole plan.

      Reply
  • I don’t see any analysis of the impact of the economic conditions which will result in an increase in interest rates. The ECB have been pretty clear that a return to sustainable growth is a prerequisite to a return to more normal levels of interest rates, surely this will have a positive impact on the incomes of those on tracker mortgages. Many of those families will see themselves return to being dual income households as the employment rate increases again. It appears Mr. McWilliam’s is doing the old trick of moving just one variable despite the fact it’s highly unlikely that variable would move on its own.

    He also appears to be drinking from the fountain of Paul Krugman who has been vocal in his insistence that austerity doesn’t work and that counter cyclical policies are the only way forward. This may indeed be the case in Krugman’s home economy. The United States is a large economy with a well established manufacturing sector so increasing the consumers ability to spend can have a multiple impact on the economy as more US goods are purchased. We have a small, open economy, increasing the consumers ability to spend is more likely to result in him or her purchasing goods from abroad. The pump priming action is therefore limited.

    Reply
    • Bríd, …..or to put it another way….the economy is chaotic and they never seem to teach them that in Economics 101. Economics, Theology and Philosophy should all be dumped. They’re all pretty useless.

      Up to now Economics predicted that printing money caused inflation. Where’s the inflation? We’ve being printing vast amounts of money for years and still no inflation.

      Reply
    • The US manufacturing sector moved to China years ago.

      Reply
    • I thought that Obama recently saved the auto industry. They must have been talking about China’s then.

      Reply
    • The US remains the worlds largest manufacturer accounting for about 18% of total global output, China may well be catching up, but your comment is both incorrect and ignorant.

      Reply
    • censored 01/11/12 #

      It’s a little more complicated than that. Printing money only causes inflation if you run out of people who want to hold your currency. Right now the dollar looks safer than most other currencies, and don’t forget it’s also the global reserve currency.

      I think Brid makes good points. Look at Ireland’s balance of payments right now.

      Reply
    • Censored, but I thought the Yanks were pleading with the Chinese to buy dollars? The UK has been printing as much money as the Yanks, as has the EU and you are hardly saying people want to hold Euros?

      Of course it’s more complicated; it involves events that are unknowns, that’s why it’s chaotic. When economists predict the economy next year they are guessing as much as the guy in the local pub telling everyone at Christmas it’ll be a bad summer. One unknown is confidence. If the economy starts recovering and is seen to, then public confidence and business confidence will bounce back and that would be a game changer. Williams could be right but if he is it’ll be a coincidence.

      What odds will you give me he’s right? I expect good odds because he claimed he’s certain.

      Reply
  • McWilliams advised Lenihan to guarantee the banks. Catastrophic!

    Reply
    • Are you sure?

      Reply
    • I’ll cut’n'paste from above….

      I believe that without the guarantee, the Irish banking system would have failed in days and the Germans etc would be too busy fire fighting their own problems to rescue us. There would have been blood on the streets. Even if AIB and BOI were scaremongering that night, and Lenihan had taken no action, the very fact that the meeting occurred at all would have leaked quickly and would have the same effect on the Irish banking as if the banks were actually insolvent: boom!
      Worth reading: http://www.aaronmccormack.com/2011/02/the-truth-about-david-mcwilliams-the-irish-bank-guarantee/
      So, in an irish context, was the guarantee right? Its obvious that it isn’t because we didn’t (and don’t) have responsible government. Lenihan saw the guarantee as a stroke, then chose not to cleanup the banks and instead to sit on his hands for 2 years until the ECB had had enough. McWilliams was naive to think the government of the day would follow through on the whole plan.

      Just to finish my point off, what would have happened with the guarantee? A catastrophic failure of the banks and riots and deaths all over the country. But…we might have also destroyed our crony political system and perhaps, just perhaps, be emerging now into a new, more responsible, Republic. Or extremist elements in Irish society would have taken control. I think how Greece is going and where it ends up, will be instructive.

      Reply
    • Oops! Meant “Just to finish my point off, what would have happened without the guarantee?”

      Reply
    • Darryl. That’s not the only scenario. The guarantee need not have been to everyone. There was a limit of about €80k for deposits at the time. That could have been increased to unlimited but with a frozen period for withdrawals above that €80k limit but other investments/bonds could have been frozen for say two years and then negotiated based on keeping the bank solvent. At the two year mark we could have done all sorts of things, e.g. issued shares pro-rata to the bondholders, made all investments long term or offered a discount or even a mixture of the above.

      Even if the AIB collapsed, some other bank would have bought the assets and kept the bank open.

      Anglo’s shareholders and investors could have been told to take a running jump, with the exception of the €80K deposit guarantee. For years people invested in Anglo and some made a lot of money. They got higher interest, they took a gamble. It’s called Capitalism.

      Reply
  • padraig 31/10/12 #

    Whether the guarantee was a idea is beside the point. He advocated it in private and so publicly opposes it. Hypocrite.

    Reply

Add New Comment