Take part in our latest brand partnership survey

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Alamy Stock Photo

AIB pushes office return Ireland needs to stop reacting to remote mandates and start competing

Tracy Keogh of Grow Remote says the AIB return to the office shows that employers are lacking guidance and a real understanding of the shift in employment trends.

LAST UPDATE | 29 Jul

AIB’S DECISION TO mandate three office days a week from 2026 sparked a predictable reaction — union pushback, media noise and staff frustrations. But the biggest problem isn’t AIB.

The real issue is that Ireland still has no national target for landing remote jobs. In the absence of clear benchmarks, employers are making decisions based on what their peers are doing, not what the economy demands or what talent wants. That’s how return-to-office (RTO) becomes a default, not a strategy.

Meanwhile, other countries are actively competing to attract remote-first roles. Ireland isn’t, and we need to start competing.

We’re not maximising the opportunity

There are over 100,000 remote jobs available every month across Europe. If even 10% of those were directed into Ireland, we’d gain 10,000 high-quality roles, attracting at least €180 million in tax revenue, boosting regional economies and supporting long-term resilience in the labour market.

But there’s currently no target, no campaign and no structured plan to attract these jobs or to grow the remote sector intentionally. Yes, Ireland has a strategy for remote work, but it lacks structure.

Employers need direction, not criticism

Most employers aren’t opposed to remote work; rather, they are uncertain. In the absence of competitive pressure or tangible benefits, they revert to what feels familiar: in-office work.

AIB, which reported profits after tax in excess of €2 bn last year, has argued that working from a central office “enables greater collaboration, connection and innovation that supports our customers, the economy and communities in achieving future success”.

It is now more expensive than ever to rent office space in the city centre (€700 per m²). Reports that office vacancy recently declined for the first time in three years suggest that only the most affluent companies are in a financial position to welcome employees back to a city office. Indeed, many SMEs have embedded remote-first models to avoid ballooning rents. However, there is a significant body of evidence that suggests RTO will cost these companies more than they expect.

Research from McKinsey shows that RTO mandates do not improve innovation or team connection, and can actively weaken morale and increase attrition. In a 2024 study tracking over three million finance and tech workers, RTO led to 14% higher staff turnover, with high performers especially inclined to leave.

The productivity question

Looking a little deeper at the data can help us understand the widespread transition to remote. Stanford economist Nick Bloom found that hybrid employees who work from home two days a week are equally as productive as fully onsite colleagues.

They are also more likely to be promoted and less likely to quit their job. This is backed by research by the Western Development Commission with NUIG, which found 88% of team managers felt remote working had no negative impact on productivity.

According to the recent CIPD report, nine out of ten organisations believe hybrid working to be the most impactful tool for recruiting and retaining talent. We are seeing companies like AIB moving backwards in spite of evidence showing that flexibility improves retention, satisfaction, and access to talent.

To change this, we need:

  • A clear national quota for remote-ready roles
  • A strategy to attract remote-first employers into the Irish market
  • Support systems to help domestic employers adopt and lead on remote, not merely follow under pressure.

Ireland has the tools — it’s time to use them

Ireland has spent the past several years building the foundations; we have training programmes, guidance and policy frameworks.

However, we still have no measurable quota, no consistent tracking of locationless jobs available in Ireland, and no national leadership to push remote employment forward as a strategic priority.

Remote work isn’t about lifestyle. It’s about competitiveness, resilience and economic opportunity. If we treat it that way, we’ll stop reacting to each new mandate and start shaping the future of work in Ireland.

Tracy Keogh is Co-Founder and Chair of Grow Remote.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 82 comments
Close
82 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds