TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Reilly under fire for ‘unanswered questions’ after Dáil statement

Fianna Fáil has challenged the health minister to place his share of the debt settlement into a separate bank account.

James Reilly
James Reilly
Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

JAMES REILLY HAS come under fire after his defence in the Dáil last night, with opposition figures saying that significant questions remain unanswered.

The Minister for Health is facing criticism for delivering a single personal statement at the end of the day’s business, and declining to take questions from TDs.

Fianna Fáil justice spokesperson Dara Calleary said if Reilly was “confident in his case”, he would have answered queries from the opposition over his appearance in a debt defaulters list.

Saying that the Dáil statement had not resolved the minister’s problems, Calleary also urged Reilly to place money for his share of the debt into a separate bank account. He told Newstalk Breakfast:

The reality is this morning he is still in contravention of a High Court order, and we have no indication of when that is going to be resolved. We would challenge him to release his share of the settlement into an account, to show that he realises how serious that is.

Sinn Féin health spokesperson Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin said Reilly had “not dispelled the concerns of those who believe there is a conflict of interest” in his state in a nursing home.

The Minister has left questions unanswered. He chose to make a ‘personal explanation’ under Dáil standing orders rather than to make his statement and then give Deputies the opportunity to question him.

Speaking to the Dáil last night, Reilly strongly denied that he had a conflict of interest through his investment in the nursing home. He said he had acted with “complete propriety” in his business affairs.

Read: James Reilly tells Dáil ‘I have acted with complete propriety at all times’>

In full: James Reilly’s statement explaining his business affairs>

Read next:

Comments (54 Comments)

  • He stated last night that “my single interest here is the well being of our older persons.” – is that why he is closing nursing homes such as St Mary’s and the Cottage Hospital in Drogheda, Co Louth and pushing the inhabitants out?

    The man speaks with the forked tongue.

    As for just speaking five minutes before the end of business – I suspect, just to avoid questions, that says more than he can ever say.
    …And yes. I realise he was just back from yet another trip!

    Reply
    • @ United

      You’re obviously naive and don’t understand that older people must take the ‘tough medicine’ of austerity. The good minister does of course have their best interests at heart.

      Reply
    • Old Nokia Charger

      Are you for real, “The good minister does of course have their best interests at heart”
      The only interest this man has is for himself just like all the other feckers.

      Reply
    • I heard this morning on Newstalk, that Denis O’Briens employees think a line has now been drawn under this whole episode post the statement by Minister Reilly last night.
      The Endo has also written editorials and columns now, saying the same thing.

      I hate to say ‘I told you so’ , but Denis O’Brien has obviously instructed his entired media army (Today FM, Indo, Newstalk etc etc) to start calling this story dead, all before even one question has been put to Reilly by anyone.

      I had folks on Journal yesterday asking why i brought up Denis O’Brien in relation to this issue. The answer my friends is obvious, based on the Denis O’Brien media empire this morning.

      Last week, the entire army went after Joe Higgins over 900 euro, 3 weeks ago, the entire army went after Pearse Doherty, and this morning the same army thinks the story should be put to bed, or their exact phrase used on Newstalk… ‘A line has been drawn under this issue, and we should just move on’.

      There is censorship and propaganda at play in this country like never before in our country’s history. Pat Rabbit does not see an issue with Denis O’Brien holding onto the vast majority of news sources in this country, and the reason is perfectly obvious. Denis O’Brien owes FFg/Labour a lot from his dealing with East Digifone… Read the Moriarty report for all the details.

      Reply
    • Spot on as usual Cal.
      I also noticed yesterday a disgruntled commenter felt obliged to remark upon the effort and time you expend in researching your observations and the regularity of your contributions on this site. A rather fine compliment from one so adverse to your views I thought.

      Reply
    • Thanks John. i know we don’t support the same Political Party’s, but the enemy of the enemy of Ireland is my friend. I appreciate the compliment.

      Reply
    • Cal
      The enemies as I see them do not lie in one particular political party; they infiltrate the whole spectrum of Irish politics. Granted some parties, due to their prolonged periods in power, have a propensity to attract more deviants than others within which they are then defended to the last in the interest of party loyalty. FF is a particular example of this.
      On the other hand there are well meaning, decent types in all parties who are subsumed by this misplaced party (and corporate supporter) loyalty and forced to toe the line. I’m thinking here, for instance, of the likes of Peter Matthews or Joanna Tuffy (and even some in FF!) who are obviously uncomfortable with where they’re placed.
      I have observed politics at home and abroad and the while corruption is a feature of all political ideologies corruption in Ireland is unique in the devious ‘cutehoorism’ that prevails all strands. Business and politics will always be entangled but instances where politicians avail of their positions to further their own personal aims whether it is in investment opportunities in nursing homes or skulking in a tent in Galway has to be seen for what it is – blatant opportunism in conflict with their roles in public office.

      Reply
    • Jesus Cal!!! You and your conspiracy theories….

      Reply
  • See our Minister of Health is unavailable to the press today. So much for openness, transparency and accountability. Was not Kenny waffling on about a new political era when he took office? Seems nothing has changed to me.

    Reply
  • He made 3 points attempting to explain how there was no conflict of interest. There needed to be a fourth, clearly stating that he has no interests which could potentially gain from any decisions he could make as minister for health. That was the one thing that stood out like a sore thumb last night.

    Reply
    • So what you are suggesting is that he is closing down public nursing homes in order to fill the private one that he has a 9% stake in!!!! Just say Trueleft….
      I for one think thats complete b****x… This man has been independently weathy for a very long time and certainly did not enter politics to get rich…

      Reply
  • When a Ministers name appears in Stubbs, the only statement he should be making is about retiring from politics. He is now treating his office with contempt.

    Reply
  • I watched Dr. Reilly’s speech live on that Dail channel and it was not a very convincing defence, to be fair. He seemed surprisingly nervous and unsure throughout the speech. He lacked confidence and rushed to leave and go home, when his brief statement was given. Surely, given the fact he is a Minister, he should have respected the office enough to answer questions about this affair? I understand the restrictions in the Dail schedule, but in this day and age their are many ways to engage with the opposition, and the wider public. We live in a 24hour news environment, where the possibilities to give a rousing defence of your actions are endless. It is also likely that any request for more Dail time would have been facilitated, so rushing off like an annoyed child does not serve any cause. We should expect accountability from our elected officials, at the very least. They still work for us, albeit at the behest of our German friends.
    It is clear that FG’s attempts to ‘restore peoples confidence in Irish politics’ have been pitiful and sabotaged by their burgeoning egos, to say the least. Their is a palpable sense of unaccountability and entitlement in this government, which would sit well in any of the recent FF administrations. We have elected the most overpaid, out of touch, self righteous and, at times. Ignorant political class in the short history of our bankrupt state. It is sad that we are powerless to change that fact. We tried, but ended up with the same nonsense again. In order for our state to renew and achieve sustainability, we need a new approach and a fair and equitable ruling class. FG cannot provide that.

    Reply
    • So let’s have a combination of Joe Higgins group and Sinn Fein?

      Reply
    • Defense of what exactly?

      Reply
    • A defence of his actions Declan. I thought my points were pretty clear, but if they were unclear, or escaped you, please feel free to read them again. I was not happy with the defence that Dr. Reilly presented to the Dail yesterday. If you feel that he should not have to explain his reasons, or defend his actions, then we share different opinions about political accountability.

      Reply
    • Kenneth…your comment in short is some form of party political broadcast…There is no story in this…The Minister explain it perfectly…and thats why the media , and the politicians will let it rest…simple fact is there is no worm at the end of the hole…

      Reply
    • Also its a good job its not about making you happy Kenneth… I could care less if your ‘happy’ or not

      Reply
    • Declan- I am sorry if my comment touched a nerve. Unfortunately I am not a member of any political party, but perhaps in time wise people like yourself may encourage me to change that fact. It is clear from your many comments on this thread that you are frustrated by peoples unwillingness to tow the government line on this issue. Some of us question things Declan, which may annoy you, but we will continue to do it anyway. However, I am not sure getting wound up and bitchy with someone who does not agree with your FG outlook is going to serve any purpose, although feel free to throw the toys out of your pram, as the saying goes. I have thick skin.
      Also, as a voter Declan this fiasco should, and does, concern me and ‘making me happy’ should be one of the governments needs. In a democracy, THEY are accountable to ME. It seems you have let your FG arrogance shine through by making that remark. I am a tax paying member of the public and I question the Ministers actions. It is the governments job, therefore, to try and convince me, or at least answer my questions, and show me that the Minister behaved in a manner befitting his office. They have not done that. It is called accountability, Declan. You may have heard of it? And feel free to snap away at me! Having been called an IRA man recently, when I challenged another governmental apologist, their is very little you can say that will surprise me. I genuinely feel their are questions that need answering, as does the vast majority of people commenting on this thread. Feel free to re-read some of the many interesting questions Declan. You may find it enlightening. We, the people, feel their is more we need to know before we ‘are happy’. Are we all wrong Declan? Do you think we Should all just shut up and be drones? That is not a democracy Declan. It is something far more dangerous. Perhaps, as a FG apologist, you feel we should move farther to the right, and curtail such liberties, but I do not.

      Reply
    • Kenneth, stop writing essays and go do something useful…otherwise you will just become another one of those on this site…

      Reply
    • I think Twitter is more your style Declan. Nice short, digestible pieces of info. As for this page, I see nothing wrong with the people on it, and I have no intention of restricting my contributions to this site.

      Reply
    • Thing is Kenneth…I am too busy actually doing stuff… I leave you and your band of merry ‘contributors’ alone…

      Reply
  • I’m so shocked. corruption in politics?

    Reply
  • Wonder what would happen across the water, should he stay , or should he go…

    Reply
  • Paul 12/07/12 #

    How dare the rabble question his highness!

    Reply
  • I’m sorry, a clear conflict of interest, Mr O’Reilly please resign or else Mr Kenny please remove our Health Minister.

    Reply
  • The point he made about putting distance between him and the nursing home through two solicitors to avoid conflict does not stop him profiting I assume which would be the only thing that matters..

    It would appear on the face of it that he did this so as to give no visible connection upon any journalistic query, only this debters publication has exposed this..

    Would we know otherwise?

    Reply
  • Gotta love that picture!!

    Reply
  • Well I would expect ,after his speech,which he wrote personally to clarify all the doubts about his ability to do his job etc.. He should just draw a line in the sand and move on to the business of ruining …ooops, running this countries health service.

    Reply
  • Your career as a TD / Health Minister is a terminal Hospital case!
    Time to stop diggin’ and go Dr. O’Reilly!

    Reply
  • I phoned the FG press office on this making the point that there IS a conflict of interest when the Minister For Health has a stake in a nursing home.
    I got the usual political response ‘he has no part in the running of the nursing home’. This is to completely miss the point. He might have no part in the running of the nursing home but he runs the health service and as such can have influence in the future of this nursing home or more importantly their competitors.
    Before I get the attack of ‘preposterous to suggest he would do something unethical’, I am not suggesting he would but he needs to be removed from the situation where he has any interest in the home.
    The press office said he is doing all he can to dispose of it. Again, a separate issue, a side show. It doesn’t take from the fact that as minister there is a conflict of interest and it will remain until such time as he gets rid of his interest in the home or his interest in the health service.

    Reply
    • @Sean- I couldn’t agree more. His position comes with powers that he can clearly use for his benefit, so, regardless of the way his party will spin this, the conflict of interest is there. He knows this and arrogantly refusing to address this point is poor political practice, at best, and ignorant governance, at worst.

      Reply
  • Have pity on the man, he’s in debt and he’ll have to sell his wedding ring and anything else of sentimental value.

    Reply
  • He should resign.
    Surely this is a far bigger problem than the Mick Wallace’s tax, which happened **before** he was a TD. Reilly’s Stubs Gazette entry is one thing, but there is a clear conflict of interest between having an interest in a nursing home and being in charge of nursing home policy.
    (….. and btw FG, that is in no way similar to an agricultural minister who owns a farm.)

    Reply
  • only SF are saying it like it is, there IS a conflict of interest. He cannot make decisions about nursing homes while he owns one.

    Reply
  • He should be gone >:-(

    Reply
  • Before beginning to examine the (fully legitimate) question of the conflict of interest, it should be noted that it is an infinitely more serious issue that there is a Cabinet Minister who is ignoring a High Court Order to pay.
    This is particularly pertinent since he has the personal means to pay up!

    Concerning the issue of the potential for a conflict of interest was raised as early as the Govt’s first wk in office & was ignored.

    Reply
  • Did anyone one see that Labour TD on Vincent Browne last night, try to justify O’Reilly’s involvement in a private nursing home. I think that summs up the state of Irish politics. How anyone can say this is not a conflict of interest is beyond me, and if O’Reilly was so eager to dispose of this asset why was he trying to make a profit on it.

    Reply
  • His statement answered nothing. It was basically a convoluted account of legal proceedings taken by various parties to the ownership and management roles in this nursing home followed by a spot of personal preening.

    One question bothers me though. Is Minister Reilly stupid enough to involve himself with five other people in a business arrangement where he is jointly and severable liable for a €1.9 million debt in exchange for a 5% share? Now really!

    Reply
  • I’m sorry, a clear conflict of interest, Mr O’Reilly please resign or else Mr Kenny please remove our Health Minister.

    Reply
  • A minister, a member of both the executive AND the legislature cannot refuse or delay complying with an order of the High Court. Its contempt, plain and simple. The circumstances are completely irrelevant. He is in contempt of the court. He should be removed immediately if he does not leave.

    Reply

Add New Comment