TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

SIPTU calls for suspension of ‘unfair’ household charge

The country’s largest trade union said that the €100 household charge penalises low and middle income families and called on the government to suspend it.

TDs earlier this week calling for a boycott of the household charge
TDs earlier this week calling for a boycott of the household charge
Image: Photocall Ireland

THE COUNTRY’S LARGEST trade union has called on the government to suspend the household charge, calling it “unfair and regressive”.

The National Executive Council of SIPTU this morning passed a motion asking the government to stop the rollout of the household charge until it is replaced by a “fair and progressive property tax”.

The NEC said that the €100 charge is a flat tax which subsidises wealthy people at the expense of middle and low income families.

It said that the charge is “playing into the hands” of vsted interests who have successfully resisted the introduction of a fair property tax in the past.

“The way the tax is currently being implemented is playing into the hands of those wealthy and vested interests who oppose the very principle of a fair and progressive property tax system,” the NEC said in a statement.

The Council called on the government to instead bring in a property tax which recognises that wealthy households can afford to pay  more and making people on lower incomes exempt from payment.

In pictures: TDs take to the streets to urge boycott of household charge >

Who exactly has to pay the €100 Household Charge? >

Read next:

Comments (59 Comments)

  • Jack O’Connor was at a SIPTU meeting at Trinity College a couple of years back and he stood up and said, the reason I haven’t taken a pay cut is because it would look bad for everyone else not wanting to take a pay cut. Now we are few pay cuts later. How many cuts has Jacke taken? If any. Why haven’t the Union Subs been reduced? Is this to keep Jack well financed?

    Reply
  • Pay for services ? Not one cent of this is going on local services, it’s going to bondholders! I pay over fifty percent tax already this is just another tax on ordinary people dressed up as something else

    Reply
    • You pay 50% tax? How exactly do you manage that? Do you mean 50% income tax or are you including all taxes that you pay directly and indirectly? Because if you are talking about income tax and direct taxes alone – like TV licence, VRT etc – then I find it hard to believe you pay 50% of your income to the tax man. Maybe 50% on overtime but on your average income I doubt it is 50%.

      Reply
    • He didn’t specify what kind of tax but anyone with half a brain can work out what he means!!!

      Reply
    • Work it out so Dec…
      I presume you have 50% of a brain (as you imply)…

      Reply
    • The implication is that you have less than half a brain my mono chromatic friend!

      Reply
    • I understood the implication…but to help you out, with my less than half a brain (as you state Dec) I will give the calculation a go.
      Since I do not know Charlie I will take an imaginary person with an income of 50000 (chosen so as to make the maths easier, just in case my half brain struggles)
      I will make this imaginary person single (so that he pays the maximum income tax).
      Income levy: 2820, PRSI: 1740, PAYE: 7990, Property Tax 100, Motor Tax 400, TV Licence 160
      Total tax: 13210
      Remaining Income 36790 (of which 5660 goes to a pension, leaving 31130 euro)
      Lets say all this money is spent: 5000 at 0% VAT, 5000 at 9%, 5000 at 13.5% and the remainder (16130) at 23%
      Total VAT: 0+450+675+3710=4835
      So in summary
      Total Income: 50000
      Pension: 5660
      Taxable Income (T.I.): 50000-5660 = 44340 (we can call this 100% of T.I.)
      Total Tax: 18045 (40.7% of T.I.)
      That is over 40% not over 50%…
      Have I forgotten 4123 euro of tax (9.3% of T.I.) somewhere?
      Of course if Charlie buys a lot of fuel (e.g. if he is a truck driver) or if Charlie smokes and drinks a really serious amount then we could find 4000 euro of duties etc but even then it would be a push so I guess that it is fairly unlikely that he pays more than 50%.

      Reply
    • Wow, ok so maybe you have more than half a brain, but you are missing my sacasim! He’s generalising, your assuming figures that suit your statement… Go back and try work it out some figures to suit his statement and get back to us! Big Brains Brad! :)

      Reply
    • Neil 17/02/12 #

      The government is spending 13bn more on PS pay, SW and Capital spending than it gets in taxes.

      This idea that people cling to that Irish Taxes = Paying debt interest + PS pay + SW + Capital spending is just bullshit.

      Irish Taxes + Troika borrowing (13bn) = PS pay + SW + Capital spending.

      All the debt stuff is paid for out of yet more borrowing from the troika.

      And of course people think all Irish debt is bank stuff, when it´s something like 70bn banks, 110bn from the government spending more than it can afford.

      Take away the troika borrowing and you´ve got an interesting black hole to fill.

      Reply
    • :) Thanks for retracting the insult Dec, it is much appreciated. Unfortunately even with more than half a brain I do not think I know enough about the high flying lifestyle etc of a person that would be paying 50% tax. Nevertheless I tried my best to find such a virtual person and you will be glad to know I succeeded :)

      They would have to earn a lot and spend a lot but it is possible. Using a similar calculation as above the person would have to be earning something like 100,000 euro per year. Assuming total pension payments of 14112 that would leave them with a taxable income of 85888 on which they would pay 35081 in income taxes (incl. PRSI etc; i.e. 41% of their taxable income) leaving them 50800 euro to spend as they wish. And, if they spent all of it then they would indeed have paid almost exactly 50% tax with respect to their income.

      Now, if such a person exists, then God bless them since they are driving this economy selflessly. However, I guess that such people are not at all common. Not just because of how much they would have to earn but because of how much they would have to spend and how they would have to spend it. If they owned a house with a mortgage (which I guess would be very likely) they would only be paying tax of about 49% of their taxable income (even when you include the stamp duty etc.) and this % would decrease even further the larger their mortgage is and even more rapidly if they are placing any of their money into savings or shares.

      So, back to my original point, I find it hard to believe that someone is paying tax which is equal to 50% of their taxable income.

      Reply
    • If you add up all the taxes you pay every year , you would pay over 50% to the state . The property tax would be fair if we didn’t pay so many other stealth taxes . Yes we are one of the only countries that don’t have a property tax but we are also the highest payers in other taxes .

      Reply
  • Does anyone else find it a bit strange that Mick Wallace is standing behind a sign asking for the rich to pay for ‘their’ crisis considering his bank debts.

    Reply
  • made 17/02/12 #

    Everyone is saying the €100 is unfair, which i totally agree it is, but yet some people are looking for a “fairer propery tax”, how many people can afford to pay a “fairer propery tax”, i know i can`t. If people can`t afford the €100 how are they suppose to afford a few Hundred. Property tax will not work cause people don`t have any money for it.

    Reply
  • The leader’s allowance handed to each independent would pay the charge for 400 houses. Let’s start with that.

    Reply
  • Am I alone in believing that this issue has nothing whatever to do with the Trade Union Movement who have had their snouts in the trough (to coin a phrase!) for some years now with memberships on State Boards and other quangos.
    Is this the same Movement with a strange bank account that had millions transferred to it for overseas junkets to heal minds and strengthen souls.
    With the rate of unemployment and the obvious decline in membership it looks to me as if these guys have too much time on their hands and ordinary union members should have their contributions reduced and their leaders working shorter hours……..perhaps three day weeks to keep them out of this type of mischief.

    Reply
  • We all know that taxes must be paid to provide for services. I think most people realise this. If services were more efficient and the waste was cut there would be a better chance of bringing people along. One size fits all is not right. Ability to pay needs to be factored in.” Means testing”. This should also apply to all entitlements and benefits. I know it’s expensive to get up and running but it needs to get started.

    Reply
  • ahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaha

    Reply
  • this is legal robbery with more to come-make a stand dont pay-fu hogan

    Reply
  • Well well well at last some word from the jacks army.
    While they have called for it’s suspension have they advised their members not to register ?
    A foot still in both camps ?

    Reply
    • How is that a foot in both camps? They digagree with it, thertefore they want it suspended. They disagree with it, there fore the encourage non-registration/non-payment.

      Reply
    • A union can’t advocate law breaking. Is there a belief that the government will not pursue people who don’t pay? I would not count on that. Having said that siptu makes a good suggestion.

      Reply
    • jrbmc 17/02/12 #

      @toorkeel
      Mick Wallace is an MIP special agent

      Reply
    • Why are they jumping on the bandwagon now? SIPTU are nothing more than a well organized gang! Their hasn’t been a peep out of them for months! This of course is all related to Croke park. A proper workers union should have been first in line protesting against the household charge. Private sector SIPTU members are wasting their money. Unions, especially SIPTU are only interested in the handy work that the public sector provides! They’ll be begging private sector workers to march and protest when the Croke park agreement’s eventually torn up. SIPTU have finally woken up to that inevitability, hence the sudden rush to support the little people again!

      Reply
    • Neil Kettles
      You said it . They are afraid they will be left behind ….
      They are an absolute disgrace to the name UNION.
      Why are they not supporting the workers of this country ,
      And the pensioners, andthe unemployed.?
      Sitting on the fence still.
      Maybe they should come out and give a definitive answer ,.
      God forbid they should lead from the front .
      They make me sick , Useless shower of Cowards . They
      should have been the first to condemn this charge as out of order.

      Reply
  • Would somebody tell the unions to go hide their heads in shame. We need a replacement for the unions that don’t have millionaires leading them. A volunteer movement for everybody not in a union ie people in the private sector who are unemployed or in need. As these people don’t have a voice lets start a movement.

    Reply
  • Why should Trade Union leaders earn more than one hundred thousand Euro a year from members who have declined in numbers and where average wages have also dropped. These people should not be diverting trade unionists attention from their own cosseted position by attacking the beginnings of a property tax. This is total hypocrisy.

    Reply
  • Agreed, the way this tax is currently being implemented is unfair. Everyone that owns a house should have to pay this tax, the tax should be charged as a percentage of house value, and the percentage should increase as house value increases (for example, 0.1% per year on the first 100,000 euro value of the house; 0.2% per year on the second 100,000; 0.3% per year on the third 100,000 and so on until 0.5% on all values above 400,000). Of course 50% of this tax should go to the local authority (but there should be fewer and larger authorities – ie they should be more regional; centred around a city like Cork or a region like the Mid West (Limerick/Clare/Tipp) – so that they could be more effective) and the remaining 50% should go other local authorities that are less well off. In addition, these charges should allow the owners of houses to have influence on local policy by allowing a rebate of the he tax where local services are not supplied – where there are no street lights or footpaths leading to the local town or where the house is not connected to the local mains or sewage system – encouraging local authorities to provide services so as to increase their tax take while acknowledging that houses of the same value but in different locations benefit to a different extent from local services of roads, footpaths etc. (There should also be refunds for people that just cannot pay but that should be a separate issue and also where the bank owns the house the bank should be paying a fraction of the charge)

    Reply
  • With the ” fairer property tax ” nobody will be paying less than one hundred Euro unless they are exempted and as a progressive tax linked to values and income many will be paying a multiple of this figure.
    Introducing the tax was always going to be difficult and the idea of a nominal one hundred Euro to register each householder makes a lot of sense. None of us like paying taxes of any sort but the only alternative for the State is to stop borrowing and live within its means while also repaying its cumulative debts.
    Most of us are unaware as to what that would mean but probably reducing all Social Welfare payments by fifty percent including pensions and doing the same with Public Service pay and pensions might just about get us there. Eliminating the Free GP service together with the Free Medicines Scheme would definitely bring us to our target.

    Please sign below;

    ———————–
    ———————–

    Reply
  • In wonder have SIPTU addressed why most countries on the planet have some sort of property tax? Is it because they are all unfair? or perhaps it has to do with having sustainable taxes? Sustainable taxes which would make it harder for a country, say like Ireland, to go mad spending stamp duty money and keeping nothing for a rainy day.

    Reply
  • Property tax is one of the fairest methods of raising taxes. Household charge is just a begining in creating a database/register of property. As a trade unionist and Labour Party member I am disappointed at SIPTU’s position on this one.

    Reply
    • It’s a sustainable tax on wealth so I totally agree.

      Reply
    • The household charge is not a property tax.

      Reply
    • I see… so how many people outside of those who own a property pay it?

      Reply
    • God David your a brave man admitting your membership of both the Labour Party and Jacks Army!

      Reply
    • David, are you as disappointed with the Labour Party?

      Reply
    • Why would he be, for all rhetoric a property tax is a tax on wealth. As a lefty he should applaud that. I think the issue with some lefties is they think the magic fairies will pay our bills.

      Reply
    • Good of you to answer for him Gary. In an ideal world property tax is a tax on wealth. This is neither. The first thing to do when paying off bills is to prioritise them in order of importance. Anglo bondholders don’t make my list.

      Reply
    • I’ll quote Neil’s post below as it explains it quite well.
      “The government is spending 13bn more on PS pay, SW and Capital spending than it gets in taxes.

      This idea that people cling to that Irish Taxes = Paying debt interest + PS pay + SW + Capital spending is just bullshit.
      Irish Taxes + Troika borrowing (13bn) = PS pay + SW + Capital spending.

      All the debt stuff is paid for out of yet more borrowing from the troika.

      And of course people think all Irish debt is bank stuff, when it´s something like 70bn banks, 110bn from the government spending more than it can afford.

      Take away the troika borrowing and you´ve got an interesting black hole to fill.”

      Reply
    • Janey Mac
      they are All crawling out of the wood work tonight ….
      Do they not understand that we wont register and we wont pay .
      No amount of insults will persuade us. Jack O ‘Connor is a self
      serving idiot who unfortunately got where he is today because the
      rest of us took our eyes off the ball and he got in…
      Come up with better solutions , stop paying the troika , stop borrowing.
      Reduce taxes , increase spending, Increase CE schemes,Get people off the dole.

      Reply
  • David 17/02/12 #

    Some miserable looking bunch in the photo. Wouldn’t know what a days work is between the lot of them.

    Reply
  • David you say it like it is! How refreshing to have my thought echoed as loudly and as accurately as that.
    In their sartorial elegance they look every inch a leader…………….leading us over the precipice because collectively they are the most miserable bunch I have come across in an age!

    Reply
  • Eileen I believe your intellectual contribution has gone over my own head! :) love you too!

    Reply
    • Mark
      I don’t love you at all. . :)
      I find your comments derogatory patronising and in many ways incorrect in their assumptions and insinuations. Of course you are allowed have opinions , but please refrain from being so familiar with me in future !

      Reply
  • Pay the charge it’s only a hundo…

    Reply

Add New Comment