TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Syrian rebels claim capture of infantry base in Aleppo

The fall of the army installation in Syria’s largest city is the last blow to the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

A Free Syrian Army fighter takes cover from sniper fire in Tal Sheer, Aleppo province.
A Free Syrian Army fighter takes cover from sniper fire in Tal Sheer, Aleppo province.
Image: Manu Brabo/AP

AN ISLAMIST FACTION of Syrian rebels claims to have captured an infantry base in the northern city of Aleppo, as forces fighting to topple President Bashar Assad advanced on the country’s largest city.

Also today, Syrian warplanes blasted a Palestinian refugee camp near Damascus, killing eight people and wounding dozens, activists said. Some Palestinian groups in the Yarmouk camp have been backing Assad’s regime.

The base was the second major army installation taken by rebels in a week in Aleppo. Its fall is the latest blow to the Assad regime.

Last week more than 100 nations, including the US, recognised the new Syrian opposition council as the legitimate representative of the country, a boost for the opposition forces that have been bombing regime targets in and around Damascus, once an impregnable stronghold of the Assad regime.

A statement by the al-Tawheed Brigade said the rebels “fully liberated” the military facility in Aleppo on Saturday.

It was posted on al-Tawheed’s official website on Sunday and said the Islamist rebel brigade’s commander was killed in the battle.

The complex, known as Hanano Barracks, includes an army base, a recruiting center and a military school.

The Al-Tawheed Brigade is one of the largest rebel groups operating in Aleppo, Syria’s largest city, which has been a major front in the civil war since July.

Read next:

Comments (19 Comments)

  • Don’t know what to believe about Syria anymore. Dodgy regime vs Islamic militants. West Vs East. America Vs Russia. Can’t trust / believe any news source.

    Reply
    • padraig 17/12/12 #

      Gulf Arab funded Jihadists are a growing rebel element. Mostly they are Syrians who fought in Iraq with Assad’s connivance, ironically. Most are Syrian peasants who were wiped out by drought. Assad did nothing. They did something for themselves. The foreign rebel troll is weak and supported by only Presstv, Russsiatoday and other dodgy sources.

      Reply
  • Wow, an article posted yesterday about the middle east with Palestinians getting massacred and we get 16 comments. It seems the IPSC only care about the Palestinians when Israel are involved.

    Reply
    • Nice to see at least on Irish4Israel type has done Barry’s bidding and is here to engage in some whataboutery.

      Gold star for you, Paddy.

      Reply
    • “whataboutery”? A Palestinian refugee camp was attacked by the Syrian government, that is entirely relevant to this discussion as is my comment that the IPSC crowd on here are silent unless the blame can be put on Israel.

      I express my own opinions and your pathetic attempt at deflection earns you no stars.

      Reply
  • Mark 16/12/12 #

    I hope the so called ‘rebels’ are defeated. They are tools of NATO and the United States who have a totally different agenda. Syrian people do need a democracy and regime change but like Libya it’s falling into the hands of terrorists.

    Reply
  • B Lowe 16/12/12 #

    Another propaganda article. Are there any standards for news agencies. I mean just look at the sub title.
    From what I’m reading and hearing the Syrian Army yet again expelled forces from Aleppo on Saturday killing a top commander of the foreign Islamic jihadists. I have been heating for months and months about the final battle for Damascus or Aleppo and how the so called ‘rebels’ were on the verge of victory. If that ain’t propaganda I don’t know what is.
    Let’s look at the facts.
    Syrian security forces are battling mainly on the whole foreign Islamic jihadists trained in Turkey, paid by Qatar/Saudi Arabia and armed by US/NATO. They are commiting terrible war crimes and cannot be described as rebels as rebels do not indiscriminately kill innocent civilians on a grand scale. The vast majority of the Syrian population support the Syrian government yet all we are told us that there are rebels battling a much hated oppressive government.
    Why are we not being told the truth about these foreign religious fantastic being sent into Syria to cause mayhem.

    Reply
    • You speak about propaganda articles yet quote a Russian state news agency as your source. Can’t really talk mate.

      The real truth is that there are mix of both foreign Jihadists, local religious extremists and true Syrian freedom fighters operating in the country. What the real mix is nobody can say. What is also true is that civilians are suffering as a result of this long and drawn out conflict. That suffering is caused by arms from Russia, China, NATO and Iran. So rather than pointing fingers we should be pulling them out and helping those in need. Peacekeepers, free medical aid and housing for those who have lost them due to conflict is what Syria needs.

      Reply
    • B Lowe 16/12/12 #

      Good to see you gave admitted to foreign Islamic jihadists and religious extremists masquerading as rebels in Syria. You have been denying that for a long time.
      Interesting you mention peacekeepers. Russia has called for international border monitors in Syria for over a year now and has called on the West and other countries to stop arming the so called ‘rebels’. It was the US/Qatar/Saudi Arabia(and hence Turkey, since the only country they can get funds from is Saudi Arabia) and other countries who said they were going to ignore such peace plans and keep arming and financing the pro democratic ‘rebels’.
      Well, as it is nearly impossible for anyone with even a brain cell to deny that the rebels are pro democratic we will have lots more indiscriminate killings by mainly foreign Islamic terrorists.

      Reply
    • I’ve never once said that there are no foreign fighters in Syria, nor have I denied that there are religious extremists there. I only ever criticise you for claiming that all of the fighters in Syria are.

      I also only criticise you based on your sources which are just as biased and slanted as Western media is.

      Reply
    • B Lowe 16/12/12 #

      Jason, I never said all the so called ‘rebels’ were foreign Islamic fighters, merely the majority of them are foreign Islamic fighters. There is a difference.
      Anyway, debate is good and I respect your right to voice your viewpoint as do I.

      Reply
  • padraig 17/12/12 #

    The only massacre of Alawites in the village of Aqrab appears to be the work of shabiha or pro government militia, according to Human Rights organisations. Motivation unclear. Assad can bomb Palestinians as happened in Damascus recently, and his troll followers still worship him.

    Reply
  • padraig 17/12/12 #

    The casualty ratio appears to be 2:1 government:rebels with a huge total of civilians killed with mines, cluster bombs and bullets in addition. Few of them are pro government. The 40,000 is a total count of all that. The 15,000 state losses are from a pro government businessman and might be bunk.

    Reply
  • The Assad family’s reign of murder is nearly ended. 20,000 murdered in Hama city on the early 80s and 40,000 now. Bashar al Assad ignored a disastrous drought and slaughtered unarmed youths in response to minor protests. A fool and a wicked man will shortly earn the wages of his crime, most likely death. The best he can hope for is exiled disgrace.

    Reply
    • B Lowe 16/12/12 #

      and 40,000 now? Where did you get that figure from? Surely not the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights?
      With regards to the 20,000 defenceless and innocent who were slaughtered. You should listen to Fisk who says that among the slaughtered were armed fighters.
      I am not saying that innocent people were not slaughtered, of course there were many. But what I am saying is that it was not just a one sided massacre as portrayed on media.
      By the way, only for Fisk we’d have people like yourself padraig claiming chemical weapons were used at the time which was repeatedly claimed in Western media until Fisk set the evidence straight again last week.

      Reply
    • padraig 17/12/12 #

      You cite you use Iranians, Russians and Chinese as sources regimes responsible for even larger totals like Chechnya. The 40,000 is a common estimate. A small part are Syrian soldiers, a very small part. Robert Fisk recounted the massacres of Moslem Brotherhood activists and civilians in Hama in the early 80s. They were literally crushed by tanks in many cases. Bashar is finished. He now barely controls Damascus, Latakia and various tiny enclaves. He blew the lives of around 15,000 of his own Alawite men in his blundered and brutal response to the war. All your trolling is for nothing.

      Reply
  • Why the photo of a rebel taking a slash against the wall?

    Reply

Add New Comment