TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Talks on extending Croke Park Agreement begin today

The Government seeks savings of €1 billion over three years by agreeing on significant changes to working conditions and pay in the public sector.

Image: sheff via Shutterstock

TALKS ON AN extension of the Croke Park Agreement will get underway today, with pay and pensions in the public sector being examined.

Representatives of 26 worker groups will meet to discuss potential changes to the existing agreement before moving to the Labour Relations Commission.

The Government seeks savings of 300 million for 2013 and €1 billion over three years by agreeing on significant changes to working conditions and pay.

Such cost-saving measures could include staff working longer hours for the same pay, with an additional four hours a fortnight on average being suggested for those who do not work a full 40-hour week at present.

Premium and overtime payments, such as extra pay for working on Sundays, will also be targeted in the talks.

The possibility of cuts to higher pay grades and increments will be discussed, and the possibility of voluntary redundancy packages offered to workers unsuitable for redeployment has not been ruled out.

However, if a deal is reached by union leaders today it will still need to go to a ballot.

Read: Graduate nurses should not accept ‘insulting salary’ – INMO

Read next:

Comments (62 Comments)

  • Do pro government supporters not see the irony in that our leader who is the third highest PM in Europe is negociating on our behalf a debt writedown/writeoff from people who earn considerably less than he does.
    Not a great starting point!

    Reply
    • The high levels of pay in the PS has been noted by the Troika and is IMHO the reason no substantive deal on debt is forthcoming.

      If we’re over spending by 15 billion a year to pay PS what is the point of giving us debt relief? In 5 short years we’d be back where we started

      Reply
    • True Frank,and its the elephant in the room ,any cuts enda has already taken are obviously way too small .any one on lower wages in the public sector should be standing up for themselves and the public by demanding that some semblance of reality be imposed on the higher payed in public services ,nobody wants someone on 35000 being shafted by someone on 175000 ,and in a democracy it would never have gotten this far out of hand,so i think if public sector wants public support,they must show their loyalty to the tax payer,name and shame those incompetents on mega wages because,if they want the higher payed jobs ,someone will have to move over at the trough,we can’t simply keep making the trough bigger and bigger!

      Reply
    • I wouldent blame it solely scrap but I just think we have some cheek looking for a writedown when we are paying TD’s and top and I make the distinction TOP civil servants obscence salaries and pensions.

      Reply
  • 16,000 Managers in the HSE.

    8,000 Mandarins in the Department of Health.

    Problem solved if we could

    - but turkeys don’t vote for Christmas…

    Reply
  • Fair play to howlin mad howlin and the boys keep on cuttin morale is the worst it’s ever been. Even the aul bucks in our job have said it wasn’t even as bad in the 80s when charlo and the boys were on the thieve. Cut Sunday allowance and people will use leave toil etc there’s no incentive.

    Reply
  • Start with politicians, they should demand big cuts in their pay/perks and pensions. Before any agreement is reached and agreed!

    Reply
  • DB 14/01/13 #

    Not been a public service worker it is a disgrace seen the majority of public service workers on medium to low wages been sacrificed.

    Reply
  • CPA should be torn up it was never designed to protect the lower paid…Drawn up by FF/Green govt and was passed by FG/LABOUR…what does that tell you ??..by the way today 14th jan 2013 PTSB paying 1.3bn to bondholders just thought you would like to know seen as your money

    Reply
  • I’m about as right wing as it goes on the Journal, but taking money out of the public sector pay bill may be the stupidest move done so far by the government. Taking 1 billion from the economy through pay cuts and not replacing with spending else where is bizarre. By all means stop pay increases as a matter of solidarity but cutting pay will only wipe morale clean from a depleted service. You could make any who earns over 85K reapply for the job they do at the moment, to see if they are value for money.

    Reply
  • DB 14/01/13 #

    It also worth pointing out the big hits on wages all ready. If we cut services too much the cost of re building the service a few years from now possibly will cost far more.

    Stupidity in the irish government is not even funny anymore. Mr Bean wouldn’t be as bad.

    Reply
  • Problem with croke park agreement is they WILL cut the frontline again, not the guys that we want them to hit. The managers, and wasters on fat wages will be grand, they’ll look after themselves. My mother on law is a low paid clerical worker in the Mather, she has 3 bosses who do the exact same job, when something needs approval she has to go through all 3! It’s ridiculous. She also says its not uncommon for nurses to faint from lack of lunch breaks and long hours on the hot wards so why should they be cut again!

    Reply
  • Theres a very simple way for the state to save money on the public service paybill without breaking the terms of Croke Park. A third rate of tax on high earners would instantly save the state money while bringing in extra from the private sector high earners as well. This would have little effect on the domestic economy and would help prevent further suffering of the vast majority of public servants who earn less than the average industrial wage.

    Reply
  • “The possibility of cuts to higher pay grades and increments will be discussed” Only the possibility of cuts to the higher paid?

    Reply
  • The ” cuts” such as they are will come by 1. extending the standard working day/week thereby reducing premium payments for unsocial hours; 2. increasing hours worked to 40 per week thereby cutting overtime payments; 3. defering or cancelling annual increments. 4. Hiring freeze and 5. compulsory redundacy for those unwilling or unable to re-deploy if their job ceases to exist.

    As a sop to the lower paid they will create ceilings at the top end and end bonus payments, attempt to re-negotiate hospital consultants pay, introduce limits on legal fees and promise, again, to put limits on political advisers pay.

    Reply
    • DB 14/01/13 #

      Ben. They need to go for the middle managers there are too many plus too many on too good of money. Administration is another problem. There is far too many administrators and too many over complicated process.
      For every stupid over complicated process it costs alot of money. We need to streamline how we get services by better process improvements

      Reply
    • “there is far too many Managers”
      It would be fair to say that a ratio of workers to supervisors or some form of line authority at a ratio of six to one is not unreasonable. Probably fair to say that someone with the identified level of English is unlikely to be in Management and the observations provided may have more to do with subjectivity rather than a structural thesis.

      Reply
    • Our union have pretty much told us that extended working hours are off the table as there is no cost reduction in real terms, just more value for the existing money being spent. That said we have had 4 weeks of overtime in 5 years so i suppose that doesn’t really apply to my grade.

      Reply
    • DB 14/01/13 #

      Michael a grasp on English does make a good manager. Yes I am a manager so up yours sonny boy.

      Reply
    • Very mature DB. Keep setting a good example there as a manager.

      Reply
  • CPA was awful from the beginning! No one should have taken a 14,000 pay cut as a frontline worker! Maybe 7000 cut to help restructure! If this Gov touches anymore of my families gross income strike action must be callled by the INMO prior to any extention of the CPA/successor! Increments is core pay! ECB/EU mafia better stop sticking their nose into everybodies bussiness… They already cost our family 14,000 x 4 years! Increments! What stinking increments they keep taking it in property tax, gas/electric, water etc… Everytime you get ahead the system lambbasis you again! It’s got to stop!
    10000 was the first year cut..USC was the second year, Gas electric/year is the increment this year…

    Reply
    • Michael I have a long standing qual allowance since late 90′s I did a hdip during which they stopped this (fair enough wasn’t working in the field) when it was due to start again “someone” put it in as a new allowance and it was stopped waiting review. I have a letter from hr saying I would be in receipt of it for duration of my employment (gotten when applying for mortgage) they person who wrote and signed the letter on headed paper denied point blank they had written it in a union meeting. That’s what we are up against. We study and do courses to improve care I’d be getting the same amount of money if I never opened a book after qualifying at least teachers get remuneration for post grad courses.

      Reply
  • All the frontline staff will assume any comment posted here today is a direct attack on them,even when commentators clearly offer the example of the PS elite.Those on 75k+ a year.

    Reply
    • The problem is that I’m a frontline worker (ANP) and I’m on a salary that’s not very far off that when you take into account overtime.

      Reply
    • James i’m a private sector worker i get O/T as well but like you it is not core pay and that is what i’m refering to.Maybe i should have been clearer but i thought it was obvious.

      Reply
    • Yeah. The problem is that this week I’m working a 72hr week. I don’t get allowances (contrary to what some quarters would have you believe, these are not being paid). The overtime that I do get will be taxed to the hilt making it almost financially worthless to me.

      Reply
    • Again James myself and i’m sure countless others are not refering to frontline staff and those on less than 75K a year.

      Reply
    • James
      Are you trying to tell us that the higher marginal rate of tax in Ireland is so high that the nett income is worthless? You would thus not countenance any increase in such a rate where it was being proposed for the super wealthy ?
      Given that view I’m sure that you would thus surrender all such payments at that rate so that junior colleagues can be given a higher starting salary or alternatively, the necessary monies to employ more nurses could be made available.

      Reply
    • Michael, read again. I did not say that it was worthless, I said it was almost financially worthless.
      My overtime (any and all, regardless of amount) is taxed at the higher rate. II have no problem with the higher rate on my standard income, however I disagree with it for overtime, due to the fact that for me, overtime usually means a string of 12hr shifts, or 36hr shifts. The average working day in Ireland is nowhere near this, and the effects on personal life is so much more than were I working a string of 8hr shifts.
      I am writing this at the end of hour 6 of a 36hr shift, I will possibly get 2-4 hours sleep tonight (maybe, depending on workload), and I will go straight into the day shift. The recovery from such a shift is longer than recovery from an 8hr shift, as it will take me until Wednesday night to get a proper night’s sleep, and then Thursday night I will be preparing for yet another 36hr shift, which means yet again, sacraficing my weekend because of the fact that the HSE cannot hire new recruits.
      Besides, with the overtime that I do get, Revenue take half back, so I’m not seeing the point of your argument.

      Reply
    • Norman the above article is an attack on frontline, who do you think works Sundays, and unsocial hours that they want they want to cut. It isn’t the people sitting in offices working 9-5 , the same people who would prefer to cut these allowances because it doesn’t effect them

      Reply
    • I’d hate to be a low to middle paid public sector worker right now! Would you trust those Cosy Senior Union Officials to negotiate on your behalf??!!! No chance

      Reply
    • Nigel , dead right

      Reply
  • Croke park should not be extended, all it has do is to protect the best payed civil servants, without the treat of strike , workers cannot protect the vulnerable amongst them, mgt have showed that the status quo is their priority

    Reply
  • See thats why CPA should be torn up James deserves every cent he gets if not more cosidering the hours he works alot out their who dont truly know the meaning of doing a good efficient job..under CPA James is carrying those useless usually pen pushers on his back…James you deserve better

    Reply
    • Breda
      Where do you get your razor sharp objectivity from?
      According to you , a Nurse , of whom we know nothing , other than the prolific contributions he makes on this site at all times of the day and night, is doing a “good and efficient job” and you go on in such a sycophantic way when you add that ” he deserves every cent that he gets if not more. He is carrying useless pen pushers.”
      So basically Breda you wouldn’t touch any of this guys arrangements as part of the Croke Park Review even though he says he earns nearly seventy five thousand a year?
      So on the basis of some attachment to male nurses you decide that a review of this section of the Public Service is unnecessary?

      Reply
    • I think what Breda is saying Michael is that there is no point touching CPA if you are not going to go for proper systemic (as opposed to mere “pay” reform). You are not paying me for my worth, you are paying me to stay here. I can take a flight to any other country on the planet and be respected for the job I do. Yes, earn less, but at least I would not be viewed as the reason for the downfall of Ireland.inc.

      Reply
  • Yes they do and yrs of hard work to become 1…we must not have enough them like nuses..thats what im saying its the ppl in charge not doing their job..we all know HSE top heavy if could scale them down and hire more nurses,Drs we would prop have a more efficient heath service and no1 would have to work 75hr week or 7 day wk

    Reply
  • 14/01/13 #

    James, sounds like u spend a lot of time looking for information and patient files. Seems hugely inefficient in that it probably adds 20+ hours a week to ur schedule.

    I dealt with a hospital recently and each visit I had to fill out a form. Name. Address. Mobile. Next of kin. List of current ailments. And so on. Everytime.

    In this day and age can we not come up with a system where u pass over ur PPS number and your electronic file pops up. Nurse asks u to confirm verbally the details. Would save time and money.

    Sure there are data protection issues but they can easily be overcome with use of access control lists and/or a pin number similar to banking.

    Just imagine for one minute the amount of paper the HSE goes through in a year

    Reply
    • M Bowe 14/01/13 #

      It has long been my opinion that lots of public service jobs have been created to keep some ppl in work for work sake. How often have we seen applications/ double and tripled. Almost each query is dealt by different personnel or even departments. And each time it back to square 1 with the paper work.

      Reply
    • DDI, it should never be easier to reorder a new test/X-ray than it is to check up on reports/results of the very same thing you are looking for that was carried out in another hospital quite literally 4miles up the road.
      We rely on a half decent referral letter from the GP, and the grace of a good verbal Hx from a patient who may or may not know what it was that they actually had carried out on them. Very often we rely on our own good intuition and gut feeling of the services that a patient is engaged with.
      Duplication leads to redundancy of information.

      Reply
    • James for the record, while I support DDI and intend to vote for them given the opportunity, my views are my own and I am not mandated to express views on their behalf.

      Having said that the reason I support the concept of Direct Democracy so strongly is because I believe there are enough people like me who want to see serious PS reform, not tinkering around the edges. DDI would provide the platform for this to happen provided enough people felt the same way

      Reply
    • Apologies SCP, I could only see the logo, not the rest of your title! Thought it was you alright, but didn’t want to take the risk!

      Reply
    • No problem James

      Reply
  • I hope the Trioca are still here in 5 years as it seems they are sorting things out.

    Reply
  • Well good luck with that.

    Reply
    • By all means cut my pay by 10%, heck go for 20%.
      Make my job 20% better though. I’ve spent the guts of 12 years studying full time/part time, and this very moment I’m trying to locate patient X-ray results and reports by phoning another hospital up the road that is the exact same hospital on paper, of the exact same organisation.
      I’m an expensive secretary, that’s all I’m saying.

      Reply
  • Michael what i am saying is the system is all wrong…James working 75 hrs is actually unacceptable no person should have to work that many hours obviously administration whos appointment to job in 1st place is not very clear are not doing their job properly or they would not have any1 working a 75hr week,they mainly are the pen pushers im referring to and they are the people who James whos work is scrutinised on daily basis unlike theirs is carrying on his back and they are the vry people CPA protect..we have great nurses Australia crying out for them we keep this up we lose them..

    Reply

Add New Comment