TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

TD calls for NAMA to release housing to domestic abuse victims

Mary Mitchell O’Connor said that NAMA has a social objective that goes beyond its commercial remit.

File photo posed by model.
File photo posed by model.
Image: David Cheskin/PA Wire

A DUBLIN TD has called on NAMA to make some of the properties in its portfolio available to victims of domestic abuse.

Fine Gael Deputy Mary Mitchell O’Connor said that for those who find themselves in an abusive situation, “building up the courage to leave is frequently off-set by the reality of having no place else to go”.

The Dun Laoghaire deputy was speaking after the launch today of a domestic abuse awareness campaign by Sonas Housing and the Meath Women’s Refuge to highlight the impact of verbal abuse.

Mitchell O’Connor said that if NAMA could make housing available to the victims of abuse, then they could be supported to leave their abuser and live an independent life.

“Aside from its commercial remit,” she said, “NAMA has a social objective that aims to contribute to a better society and sustainable communities.”

The TD said that given that NAMA agreed to make 2,000 housing units available this year to people on social housing lists and to  give public bodies first refusal on the purchase of property which may be suitable for their purposes, she believes that a “provision should be made to address the needs of those in exploitative relationships to enable them to get away from their abuser and begin a more positive life in a safe and harm-free environment.”

Sonas Housing and Meath Women’s Refuge said today that they specifically launched their verbal abuse awareness campaign to coincide with Valentine’s Day because it is a particularly difficult day for women suffering domestic abuse.

Sonas Housing chairperson Rachel Mullen said that “verbal abuse can, in effect, slowly deaden someone from the inside out” and that it can have a “hugely debilitating effect emotionally and psychologically”. However, despite its impact, the lack of physical evidence means it is harder for women to show its effects.

Commenting on the launch of the awareness campaign, Mitchell O’Connor said that domestic abuse “comes in many guises” and it is important for women and men in abusive relationships to know they are not alone in their efforts to change their situation.

Read next:

Comments (21 Comments)

  • While I agree in principal that we need to provide housing for groups like abused women, we need to be very, very careful about politicians doling out NAMA houses for free. Because they’re not free, they cost money, and the state ought to be providing these services from current spending rather than robbing our children yet further.

    One big worry about NAMA is that it turns into a potential political lollipop, one of the few left to curry electoral favour. Every house or building given away, subsidized or similar lowers the return or deepens the loss we eventually take on NAMA.

    Reply
    • TD Michael Healy-Rae has tonight given his support to this proposal with one condition. His only condition is that no one is given a house with a number 13 on the door.

      Reply
    • Is it not a lollypop already? Let’s all have a lick!

      Reply
    • Spot on Aaron, Also, it’s just not good enough for a TD with all the allowances they have for research etc to spout out what “seems” a good and fair proposal without considering the cost or long run implications of such a proposal. If it were just on merit, then there are several potential uses for these properties but unfortunately as you point out there is a cost and to pretend there isn’t is either disingenuous or misinformed , either way MMOC ignores reality in favour of some populist self-promotion!

      Reply
  • There’s plenty of people on the dole from well before the current recession. These people didn’t want to work when there was work. New unemployed over the last 2 to 3 years are a different category than the spongers still milking the system

    Reply
  • When a government TD comes out with something that “should” be done isn’t there a little part of you that thinks “You’re in power, off you go and make it happen”?

    Reply
  • I have always supported the idea of NAMA properties being utilised as social housing, but I really do think that should be allocated from a far more neutral remit than the over funded, agenda driven NGOs that sprouted and flourished like weeds during the boom and have yet to die back to realistic proportions.

    If housing is to be made available to the victims of domestic abuse it should be made avaialable directly throught local councils (perhaps on a collaborative basis as sometimes a move across the country is necessary) and the HSE…not through NGOS…most of which, honestly seem to exist primarily to perpetuate their own existance and fund their own salaries at this stage.

    Reply
    • So true. Of course the same analysis can be applied to govt departments and especially politicians as is evident from the utterances from the govt td quoted…

      Reply
    • T ey should be made available to victims regardless of gender, and there should be PROOF of any such allegations of abuse. So often DV is cited to simply get the partner out of the family home……. often after family breakdown…… So yes make these houses available, but also jail anyone making false claims of DV

      Reply
  • Surely it would be better to get abusers out of the home? Why should victims have to move?

    Reply
  • The Nama portfolio should be used for low cost social housing and victims of abuse should have low cost social housing made available. The two should be split, as others are also deserving of low cost housing in this situation. It is more economic to the state to do this than to keep people in temporary accommodation. As it could be means tested rents can vary. On no account can this be given away, To make a leap, that is tantamount to having civil servants pay for peoples houses with their pay cuts.

    Reply
  • Can I have a gaff? I can outline in 150 words or less why I deserve one.

    Reply
  • Everyone that has accumulated 5 years of PRSI/Tax credits should be entitled to a housing deal.

    Reply
    • Bang on, houses for people that know what work is and don’t come with their hands out.

      Reply
    • Yeah half a million lazy bastards on the dole never worked eh ….

      Reply
    • I suggest you read eoins and my comment again. My point is the majority of people that are currently on the dole are on it since everything went tits up. Not to stereotype but they were workers and that work was taken from them. Unfortunately not everyone on the dole is like this. Some people, thankfully a minority of dole recipients, have never worked a day in their lifes and if they can get away with it never will. I for one would be fairly pissed off to see people receive houses that wouldn’t lift a finger to help themselves. Give the people that deserve a chance what they deserve, whether it’s a rent to buy scheme or another method. Just give them a chance.

      Reply
  • The problem is how to ensure that any scheme wouldn’t itself be abused (ie. false claims of domestic abuse to get a ‘free’ house). I’d rather see NAMA properties being converted to temporary refuges for abuse victims, which would be far less attractive to potential fraudulent claimants.

    Reply
  • Better give these properties away than let them rot and cost us more money to demolish.

    Reply
  • Fair play to the Deputy, worthy idea. Hope it gets consideration.

    Reply
  • I don’t think I’ll repeat Jimmy Carr’s joke here…

    Reply

Add New Comment