TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Thailand clarifies position on English language teachers from Ireland

The Teachers’ Council of Thailand has clarified that Irish citizens are not required to prove their proficiency in English through testing before being allowed to teach in the country.

Image: seetefl via Creative Commons/Flickr

THE TEACHERS’ COUNCIL of Thailand (TCT) has clarified its policy regarding English language teachers from the Republic of Ireland.

At the beginning of April, the TCT updated its the rules of eligibility regarding provisional teaching permits, which identified a list of countries from which citizens were recognised as native English speakers.

Citizens from nations not included on the TCT list would be required to undertake – and pay for – a series of proficiency tests (TOEIC) to prove they can communicate in English before being allowed to work as a language teacher in the Thailand. Fees for TOEIC tests vary from country to country, with one centre in Bangkok charging about €40 per test, with  prospective teachers having to take several in order to prove a range of language skills (ie listening, reading, writing and speaking abilities).

Citizens hailing from only five countries were considered “native English speakers” under the changes made last April and, therefore, entitled to TCT provisional teaching permit – those countries were named as: “The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, The United States of America, Commonwealth of Australia, New Zealand and Canada”.

As the Republic was not included on the list, it indicated that Irish citizens wishing to teach English as a foreign language in Thailand would have to take a TOEIC test to prove their proficiency – apart from having to gain any teaching qualifications required for a position.

However, the TCT has since clarified its position, stating that citizens from the Republic are also considered to be native English speakers and therefore do not have to prove proficiency.

A spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs told TheJournal.ie that the clarification was made in late July.

Read: Irish citizens not recognised as ‘native’ English speakers in Thailand>

Read next:

Comments (45 Comments)

  • I mite go their to teech Inglish myself now.

    Reply
  • The Teacher’s Council of Thailand? Is there only one teacher in Thailand?

    Reply
  • Sometimes schools and colleges want their students to practice English with native speakers.
    Some Thai English teachers are very capable of teaching the grammar but can never give quality practice.
    For this reason, perhaps, Native speakers are sought after.
    Not always to teach English but to help English language students practice.

    I agree that Native speakers hired to help students practice should be trained for this task but teachers in Thailand are paid peanuts so they take what they can get.

    Reply
  • @Cathal:
    Don’t go jumping to conclusions there. Here in Spain, I get 30 CV’s a day from natives looking for a job off me. 80% of applicants have no qualification coupled with bad grammar. If these exams were required, at least there would be a chance of weeding out the people who haven’t got the competence for teaching. Would you want a teacher that suffers from Your-You’re Syndrome? :P

    Reply
    • @Sean – I can only speak of my own experiences in Thailand and the number of times I was offered teaching roles simply because:
      1. I’m white
      2. English is my first language

      Granted you won’t get a role in a gov school or one of the internationals but plenty of language schools would hire you on the above criteria.

      Reply
    • @Sean: It looks like you’re suffering a bit from Your-You’re Syndrome yourself. 30 CV’s? Ow, my eyes!

      Reply
    • Exactly. I used to run an EFL school, and it was painful to read the CVs and application letters of potential teachers. And then they’d get stroppy when I replied to their demands on why I wouldn’t employ them. There are skilled teachers, but it’s the chancers who drag down standards and, as standards plummet, so does income for schools and for teachers.

      Reply
    • Karswell 04/09/12 #

      @ Cathal – then your not a teacher. I have teeth. I brush them. I floss. I’ve paid attention when I’ve visited the dentist. But this doesn’t make me a dentist and I wouldn’t have the brass neck to claim to be a dentist. But, sure, teaching isn’t a real job.

      Reply
    • Karswell 04/09/12 #

      No one picked up on the “your”. What a pity.

      Reply
    • Karswell 04/09/12 #

      @ Emma – try plowing through 30 CVs a day on top of a fully-filled teaching schedule.

      Reply
    • @karswell: I do plough through plenty of teachers’ CVs every day, with misplaced apostrophes that would make your eyes water, but I wouldn’t lose any sleep over it -it’s just punctuation folks – I just couldn’t resist the irony.

      Reply
  • @karswell: An overly entitled backbacker? LOL. You are so far off the mark with that one it is staggering. :D

    Reply
  • Is there any chance the government of the Republic of Ireland might recognise that its citizens are native English speakers and desist from its silly and pointless attempt to convert us all to gael goers?

    Reply
  • You have to have a TEFAL certificate to teach english abroad so you won’t just walk in off the street and get a job teaching English.

    Reply
  • @karswell – I never claimed to be a teacher nor was I looking for a teaching role, yet that did not stop the offers coming my way.

    Reply
  • Regardless of nationality, anyone without a teaching certificate should have to take exams. Where’s the logic? Being English, Irish, Australian etc.. doesn’t make you a teacher. You need to know your stuff and spew buckets of charm daily.

    Reply
    • Another great example of someone not reading the article before heading for the comments.

      Reply
    • There’s a difference in proving your proficiency to speak English, and your ability to teach. This issue was in relation to the need for first, and not the second.

      Reply
    • Hi Seán,

      Just to clarify, the issue here is whether a person is recognised as a native English speaker (as those who aren’t are required to prove they can communicate in English by taking a series of tests).

      Someone wishing to teach would have to gain teacher training/qualifications on top of a language proficiency test.

      Hope that helps.

      Reply
    • It not exactly a victory for the EFL industry that teachers are not obliged to take either a teaching exam or a language proficiency exam. For those who are not aware, there is no practical regulation of teachers, as teachers are not legally required to have any qualifications, and the vast majority of schools do not verify that teachers have the qualifications they claim to have. Imagine if the same standards were applied to medicine, nursing, law, electrical and plumbing trades, etc. no wonder that TEFL is often looked down on as not really being a “proper job”. This is bad for students and for serious teachers.

      Reply
    • Kars,

      You’re not wrong, and you posted some very sensible comments on the previous thread on this topic. That said I think it’s fine for schools to take on a teacher who has a recognised ESL qualification (min. 100 hours + teaching practice) as long as they monitor them for the first while to make sure they’re up to it. A lot of exams are just an expensive racket.

      Reply
    • Karswell 04/09/12 #

      @ Petr – a little known fact, but in many countries schools are not allowed to monitor or observe teachers in the classroom if they are working as freelancers and not staff-members. And almost all EFL teachers work on a freelance basis, at least within the EU. It sounds crazy, but I was involved with an EFL school on Germany that was taken to court over this and lost.

      Reply
    • Incredible. Did not know that.

      Reply
    • Karswell 04/09/12 #

      It is more than a little insane, but it’s true. I agree with you, if schools had an active policy of verifying a teacher’s credentials and properly assessed the skills of that teacher, then there would be absolutely no need to charge teachers to be assessed by an outside body. But it’s a business with a damaging lack of oversight. It’s a huge pity, because it is a challenging and rewarding job, and it should be respected as such.

      Reply
    • Totally agree with you. I only do it now and then but it is an important job and those winging it give the good teachers a bad name.

      Reply
    • No the issue here is nothing more than an internal Thai issue.
      Also not a bad way of them getting more much needed money into their country.

      Reply
  • @karswell: Convince you? Didn’t realise that was necessary! As I said in an earlier post I can only speak from experience in Thailand when I was living and working in there some years ago (not as a teacher!). Almost on a weekly basis I would be approached and offered teaching roles in several language schools within the city, simply because I spoke English and looked the part, that is a white face to put up in front of the class. Sadly at the time that was the only criteria many of the language schools adhered to when hiring staff. Maybe it has changed since then though I highly doubt it.

    Reply
  • TCT were probably glued to ‘Brod Club’ earlier this year and were overwhelmed by the response it received.

    It was an astonishing success and really emphasised our justification in spending €1 Billion each year teaching and promoting our national language.

    Reply
  • I used to work in a school that trained individuals to TEFL. We had an entrance exam and you would be shocked by the lack of grammar knowledge of at least half of the applicants. I might add that all applicants had to have a third level
    Qualification at the very least.

    Reply
  • I agree with a lot of the comments on this board. As a TEFL/TESOL course provider we consider citizens of the Irish Republic as native English speakers. Neville :-)
    ITTP TEFL Prague: http://www.tefl-prague.com
    ITTP TEFL Online: http://www.tefl-tesol-online.com

    Reply
  • I agree 100% there. Those 2 factors got me my first job in Spain! I only got into the good stuff after doing TEFL. I was outraged a week ago when this came up a week ago. I completely agree that we should be considered native speakers like the rest (minus South Africa) are. I just wanted to put out there my idea that there should be a cheap exam for everyone.

    Reply
  • @karswell: No need to reread my post, the ‘can’ was capitalised for emphasis, not to advertise the fact that it is possible for a non-qualified individual to walk into a teaching role in Thailand. As someone who,I assume works in the education sector I really thought you would have picked up on that!

    Reply

Add New Comment