Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Alamy Stock Photo

Automatic pension scheme should not invest in fossil fuels, Government told

A new auto-enrolment pension scheme for workers has undergone scrutiny as the government prepares to put forward legislation.

A COMMITTEE OF TDs and senators has advised the government that a new automatic-enrolment pension system should not allow funds to invest in fossil fuels.

The Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection has published a report scrutinising Government plans to develop an auto-enrolment scheme for pensions that would apply to around 750,000 workers between the ages of 23 and 60 who are employed but not signed up to an occupational pension scheme.

The current plan for the scheme is that employees’ contributions to their pension would be matched by their employer as a percentage of the employee’s gross income, which would then be topped up again by the State. Workers would have the choice to opt out of the scheme.

Among the committee’s 21 recommendations for the government are that investment funds in the scheme should not be allowed to invest in fossil fuels and that a minimum percentage of the funds should be invested in renewable energy development.

“The committee recommends that the investment funds be prohibited from investing in fossil fuels or the arms industry,” the report states.

“The committee recommends that a minimum percentage of the funds should be invested in Irish renewable energy developments in order to ensure our Climate Action obligations. As with without achieving these, the future of all pension funds will be at risk from climate change.”

The committee also advised “that investment ‘good practice’ should include consideration of sustainability and environmental, social and governance factors and this should be explicitly stated in the Bill”.

Back in 2019, one goal in the Climate Action Plan at the time was to consider how a new requirement could be placed on pension providers to give savers more information on whether their money was invested in fossil fuels and options for alternatives.

However, a working group tasked with examining the action concluded it should be considered in “broader terms” than a “strict requirement” on pension providers, and the proposal was not progressed further in subsequent climate action plans, Noteworthy investigation found.

Humans’ use of fossil fuels is a primary driver of greenhouse gas emissions, which are trapping heat in the atmosphere and causing average global temperatures to rise.

With that comes disruptions to climate systems that are already impacting humans and nature and which are expected to grow significantly worse unless the world substantially reduces its greenhouse gas emissions. 

Diverting finance away from fossil fuel companies – a strategy known as divesting – is seen as one way of dis-empowering those companies and encouraging the industry to turn instead to renewable energy development. 

Speaking to The Journal, Green Party TD Marc Ó Cathasaigh, a member of the committee behind the report, said it is important that where money is allocated has “values” behind it.

“When you set up auto-enrolment, you’re going to be putting a lot of Irish taxpayers’ money to one side. There’s values that should be attached to that, that how you invest your money isn’t valueless,” Ó Cathasaigh said.

“If we’re doing that, we should make sure that the values that are expressed through how that money is invested match the Irish state.”

On whether the recommendations are likely to be adopted in the final legislation, the TD said it is “difficult to say”.

“We had two engagements with officials in the Department of Social Protection in the course of the pre-legislative scrutiny and I thought they were really constructive,” he said.

“From here, the report goes to the minister [for social protection]. We have to see how many recommendations included in the report the minister is prepared to incorporate in the second stage. Then beyond that, if we feel they fall short in any of the recommendations, it will be open to us to put down committee stage amendments.

“I hope the minister will engage constructively with it.”

Dr Jane O’Hara of Divest Ireland, which is campaigning for fossil fuel divestment, told The Journal: “We’re very happy to see that those particular recommendations were included in the report.

“It was really good to see that not only do they want them not to invest in fossil fuels but they want some of that money, some of which will be public funds, to be invested in renewable energy. We think that that will help us get closer to our climate targets, so we really support that,” O’Hara said.

“They still need to go further to actually be legislated for. We would want to focus our campaign now on making sure that the Department of Social Protection implements those recommendations and that they understand how important people really think that they are.”

She said that a fossil-fuel free pension as a default option under the scheme would allow people to invest ethically without needing to spend a significant amount of time on researching a multitude of choices.

“Most people probably would go for the default option and probably wouldn’t have the time or perhaps the financial literacy to get into all the different options, so we would support the idea that at least the default fund, but if possible all the funds, would not be allowed invest in fossil fuels,” she said.

“If you look at it from the point of view of where your money is invested, if it’s invested in fossil fuels, then not only are the fossil fuel companies profiting from your money, but it also means you’re profiting from the destruction of the planet.

“It’s very important to know where your money is going.

“We would like people to be able to have these conversations with their pension providers but we know sometimes those are difficult and the information that is provided isn’t very transparent or it isn’t accessible, so we think if people are going to be automatically enrolled in a pension fund, it should be made possible to have the option to not invest in fossil fuels, or for that to be the default option.”

Climate Action Plan

Later today, Cabinet ministers will hear a progress report for the first quarter of the Climate Action Plan 2023. The Department of Taoiseach report will say that 27 of the 36 actions scheduled for delivery were completed on time. The remaining nine actions will be added to the quarter two action list as Ireland continues to play catch-up on climate action.

Ministers will be told that the Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications, which had the greatest number of actions, had a delivery rate of 71%. The Department of Agriculture, which the second highest number of actions, had a delivery rate of 91%.

Cabinet will hear that one of the largest actions was the launch of the €1.5 billion Agri-Climate Rural Environment Scheme (ACRES) which aims to improve biodiversity, climate, air and water quality and that in the first quarter, there were over 46,000 applications to the scheme which accounts for a third of the 135,000 farms in the country.

The first Electric Vehicles (EVs) charging infrastructure strategy will also be mentioned, with a 31% increase in sustainable travel rates observed in the first three months of the year, while electric vehicles accounted for 24% of all new cars sold – surpassing diesel sales for the first time – and bringing the total number of EVs on Irish roads to just under 85,000.

In electricity, just under 35% was produced from renewable sources in 2022 and Ireland met half of its 2030 onshore wind target.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
18 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Visitacion Macaraeg
    Favourite Visitacion Macaraeg
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 3:39 AM

    When are the Government going to reverse the inheritance tax threshold back to pre-Celtic tiger era when it was €500,000, the cost of a house today. If you leave your home to your only child the house will have to be sold to pay the taxes. It is a disgrace. We need a new political party in this country and out with ff, fg, green and sf.

    288
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Collins
    Favourite Kevin Collins
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 9:24 AM

    @Visitacion Macaraeg: the tax bill in this situation would be about €50k. You will easily get a loan to pay this off and remain in the house. Paying only €50k for a house worth €500k seems like a pretty good deal to me.

    Not sure why everyone seems to be in favour of taxing the rich but opposed to inheritance taxes. Inheritance taxes disproportionately impact the wealthy and rightly so.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pat Mcleran
    Favourite Pat Mcleran
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 10:32 AM

    @Visitacion Macaraeg: What sort of loser would not be able to stump up 50K in such a scenario? Its not like its going to be a surprise after so many years.
    The next Govt. will likely lower this threshold of 335K lifetime allowance.

    6
    See 5 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ronan Meagle
    Favourite Ronan Meagle
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 11:59 AM

    House owners have already paid tax when buying the property and every year they owned the house. Why should the state impose further taxes after death ?

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Collins
    Favourite Kevin Collins
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 12:34 PM

    @Ronan Meagle: The house owner does not pay any further tax after they are dead, neither does their estate. Any taxes due are imposed on the persons receiving valuable assets as it is tantamount to income from their perspective. Your argument is like saying why should I have to pay PAYE on my job when my father paid taxes on his job for many years.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ronan Meagle
    Favourite Ronan Meagle
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 1:02 PM

    @Kevin Collins: no, it’s like saying my father paid tax on the house , The family home , why should the family pay further tax on the same property , paid for with a salary which was also taxed. Illiquid assets are not the same as salary imo

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Collins
    Favourite Kevin Collins
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 1:14 PM

    @Ronan Meagle: Because getting rid of all inheritance taxes simply preserves generational wealth which ultimately keeps the rich rich and is of no benefit whatsoever to most normal (i.e non-super wealthy) people. The current thresholds allow EACH child to inherit €335k, so a house worth €1mn can be divided among 3 children without a single cent of tax liability arising.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ronan Meagle
    Favourite Ronan Meagle
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 2:20 PM

    @Kevin Collins: and that’s where we differ , I don’t see a problem with preserving generational wealth , the super-rich don’t pay inheritance tax at the moment anyway , they usually have financial instruments for estate planning , like trust funds

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Colette Kearns
    Favourite Colette Kearns
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 12:27 AM

    Oh god I don’t know anymore, are we all been lied to and been fleeced? Report out that Ireland has purchased more private jets than ever before!! Why are these billionaires NOT bothered with climate change? And could this be part of the reasons our electricity bills are so high? extortionately so!!

    179
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Swan
    Favourite Swan
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 2:23 AM

    Maybe if they changed the ridiculous deemed disposal tax rules on index funds we could invest a few quid ourselves every month without being forced to pay 40% tax on your gains after 7 years even if you don’t sell. Daylight robbery.

    152
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fi Wyse
    Favourite Fi Wyse
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 7:07 AM

    @Swan: it’s vile ain’t it?

    49
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Dineen
    Favourite Michael Dineen
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 9:42 AM

    The government should ignore this “advice”.

    The only consideration it should have when investing our money (it is our money, yours and mine) is to maximise return.

    Our money needs to be invested wherever it makes the most money. If that includes fossil fuels then so be it. Maximum return is the only legitimate goal here. Period.

    53
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Donal Ronan
    Favourite Donal Ronan
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 8:50 AM

    ‘Speaking to The Journal, Green Party TD Marc Ó Cathasaigh, a member of the committee behind the report, said it is important that where money is allocated has “values” behind it.’
    This is your money and these clowns want to make the decision where it’s invested. If you depend on their advice, you will not have a pension.
    If they want to talk about value, they should cap the fees at a monetary value for the insurance companies and not percentages, where you get ripped off.

    65
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Steven Schulz
    Favourite Steven Schulz
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 12:44 AM

    Unless you buy newly issues stock or give them loans you’re not actually giving the companies any money. In that case, by all means invest and use their ridiculous profits for the public good.

    54
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute thesaltyurchin
    Favourite thesaltyurchin
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 7:46 AM

    @Steven Schulz: Opus dei Ireland.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Carrickview
    Favourite Carrickview
    Report
    May 4th 2023, 10:16 AM

    Ireland has this wonderful maritime climate for its latitude so with the bulk of the Atlantic Ocean to the West, we experience really lovely conditions compared to that of a similar latitude on the Eastern side of the American continent. A similar latitude in Eastern Canada has a subarctic climate with very short summers and severely cold winters.

    The people engaging in climate change modelling are well-meaning but they lack the perceptive balance to know what their limitations are by virtue that they are following the disruptive scientific method. Erasing comments that nail down where the real problem of a modelling subculture is hardly helping our society.

    It should be enough that environmentalists concentrate on clean air, oceans and countryside along with less waste rather than try to shove a way of living down people’s throats at the expense of genuine climate research.

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tighe
    Favourite Tighe
    Report
    May 5th 2023, 11:18 PM

    @Carrickview: apparently there is absolutely no funding unless climate crisis is included hence all scientific modelling has to include the crisis narrative otherwise the researchers won’t get paid.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tighe
    Favourite Tighe
    Report
    May 5th 2023, 11:15 PM

    Co2 is essential for life, at present it is 0.04% of the atmosphere, this is the lowest level for 500 million years, if it drops to 0.02% we will be in serious trouble. Also during the lockdown and economic downturns it didn’t change, even though industry and cars have slowed/stopped. From examining the ice cores it was discovered that the temperature rises first followed by a 200 year gap co2 then rises. So it is known that increased Co2 does not increase the world temperature, it is the other way round. Also the UN Livestock Long Shadow report, that is still being used to condemn livestock farming, is actually factually incorrect and this has been admitted by the authors, and cattle farming is not unsustainable as claimed. So where is this 2 trillion and rising business going? And why is it going there?

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a comment

 
cancel reply
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds