Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Tetchy scenes between neutrality activists and politicians during Triple Lock abolition meeting

Neutrality advocates Niamh Ní Bhriain and Stephen Kelly met with the Defence Committee this morning.

THERE WERE TETCHY scenes during the Oireachtas defence committee meeting this morning discussing legislation around the abolition of the Triple Lock mechanism.

Politicians on the committee are hearing from experts on a government proposal to remove the need for formal UN approval from the existing triple-lock system for deploying Irish troops abroad.

Niamh Ní Bhriain of the Transnational Institute and Chairperson of the Peace and Neutrality Alliance Stephen Kelly appeared before politicians today to advocate for the retention of the triple lock.

The pair clashed with TDs and senators on many occasions, as it become abundantly clear that there were vast differences in ideology between some members of the committee and the invitees.

At one point, Fianna Fáil senator Diarmuid Wilson called out Kelly for comments he made regarding politicians’ ability to approve future military personnel deployments and Ní Bhriain for remarks about the deploying of Irish children.

In her opening remarkers, Ní Bhriain said: “I urge the members of this Committee to scrutinise this legislation as though it were your sons and daughters being deployed on EU battlegroup or NATO-led missions.

“For those who vote in favour of this legislation such that it is eventually passed, you should know that if Irish personnel are deployed to future wars from which they will return maimed, traumatised or in body-bags – because no one returns from war unscathed – your cards will have been marked and this will be your legacy.”

Speaking later, Wilson told her: “I speak as a father of a member of the Irish Defence Forces. And as I said to a number of people who came before us as witnesses, we take every piece of legislation seriously in this house.

“And we take it as if we’re talking about the sons and daughters or gender-neutral members of any family. No matter what the piece of legislation, I want to assure you of that.”

‘I do not appreciate those comments’

Kelly, in his opening remarks, questioned how effective a ‘double lock’, the deployment of troops following Government and Dáil approval, would be. He said the Peace and Neutrality Alliance reject it as an adequate replacement from the Triple Lock.

Both invitees refused to say what would be an adequate replacement to the triple lock, arguing that the existing framework is the closest thing to ensure the neutrality of Ireland in law.

Kelly accepted that neutrality and the triple lock were separate, but described them as “close cousins”. Many politicians challenged this view, claiming that the abolition of the triple lock was to provide more control to Ireland around Defence Forces’ deployments.

Addressing Kelly’s remarks, Wilson asked if Kelly had ever stood for election, to which the chairperson of the neutrality group said he did not.

“Well, it’s important that you realise the fact that the people who put themselves forward for election – in every election there are hundreds of people who put themselves forward, be it at local level or national level – some are successful, some are not, but at least they tried.

“I would suggest to you, you should try it yourself sometime before you make those comments in relation to public representatives,” he said.

Wilson continued to ask his questions to the invitees. Before answering, Kelly said: “I don’t particularly appreciate your comment.”

“I’m sure you don’t,” Wilson replied.

“I don’t appreciate it – at all. I’m a citizen, I’ve come here, I was invited to come here. I didn’t have to, I was invited, I took the day off work. And I don’t like the implication that you have to run for election to have an opinion on something,” Kelly said.

The committee today also heard from Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Andrews and Sinn Féin MEP Lynn Boylan.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
9 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ahhhhh Ted...... Tubridys going into comedy
    Favourite ahhhhh Ted...... Tubridys going into comedy
    Report
    Jul 3rd 2025, 5:49 PM

    It should go to the people not Dail committees and people and groups we’ve never heard of

    97
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute jn
    Favourite jn
    Report
    Jul 3rd 2025, 5:51 PM

    fffg need to call a general election now people have lost faith with their liars of TDs gaslighting the people every day nothing done for people since they got elected and 3 or 4 months holidays there racing to get to with fffg spin doctors trying to con people on media with suggestive sound bites

    100
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dominic Leleu
    Favourite Dominic Leleu
    Report
    Jul 3rd 2025, 6:32 PM

    they will do everything even jeopardise our neutrality in order to please another agenda and their greed . they need to be stopped

    60
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason Memail
    Favourite Jason Memail
    Report
    Jul 3rd 2025, 6:40 PM

    @Dominic Leleu: How will removing the triple lock jeopardise Irish neutrality? Serious answers only, please.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dominic Leleu
    Favourite Dominic Leleu
    Report
    Jul 3rd 2025, 10:12 PM

    @Jason Memail: nope it starts with that, and then the thin limit can be breach after. so let’s not go further.

    11
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave McFitz
    Favourite Dave McFitz
    Report
    Jul 4th 2025, 10:51 AM

    @Jason Memail: wake up and smell the coffee Jason!.We have been conned,cajoled and bullied into joining the European union.(Remember Maastricht and Lisbon?).the big lie was the European union was an economic project and we would remain neutral. How has that worked out?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute brian pope
    Favourite brian pope
    Report
    Jul 3rd 2025, 8:33 PM

    Triple lock was introduced in order to pass Nice and Lisbon Treaty referenda.
    It should therefore require a referendum to remove or replace the triple lock. There are constitutional issues at stake if a referenda is undone without another.

    In reality, it’s not really a Triple Lock, as Governments typically have a majority in the Dail. So really a Double Lock of Government of the Day, and U.N. mandate.

    This should really be about reforming UN mandates and for peacekeeping to be authorised by general UN resolution vs Security Council (the normal, but not only route open).
    That could happen without any need to change the Triple Lock.

    I’d urge the Government to apply pressure there first, before relinquishing a key safety cousin of Neutrality.

    28
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Clare McKernan
    Favourite Clare McKernan
    Report
    Jul 3rd 2025, 8:48 PM

    Ireland should let go of the Triple Lock now. It’s so outdated. The UNSC is literally mandated by the main 5. If one of the big 5 veto, that screws over Ireland. We should be allowed to deploy our soldiers for peacekeeping missions without being told “no” by the USNC. Of course Ireland will still work with the UN, but why should we be dictated by the UNSC. We can still maintain our “Neutrality”, but Jesus, we shouldn’t have to bring it to the UNSC to say yes or no.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ciaran Bolger
    Favourite Ciaran Bolger
    Report
    Jul 4th 2025, 12:28 PM

    We should still have a triple lock, but the third key should be the president, in keeping with our constitution

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds