Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo. Mark Stedman
Wexford

Garda who quit force over alleged bullying launches High Court action after not being allowed rejoin

Garda Mark O’Neill said his colleagues failed to investigate crimes and perform alcohol testing checkpoints.

A GARDA WHO quit after only seven months of service because of alleged bullying and claims that his colleagues failed to carry out their public duties, launched a High Court action today against the Commissioner for refusing to allow him rejoin the force.

Former Garda Mark O’Neill has claimed in sworn documents opened before Mr Justice Richard Humphreys that his colleagues at Wexford Garda Station failed to investigate crimes and perform mandatory alcohol testing checkpoints.

O’Neill also alleged his former colleagues failed to record official records on PULSE the computer system gardaí use in their work.

He resigned from the force in April of 2016 having joined only seven months earlier in September 2015.

Bullying

As well as making complaints about the alcohol testing checkpoints he also said there had been a failure to respond to emergency calls, that there was a lack of supervision of probationary gardaí, bullying and that his personal property was damaged.

Mark Harty, counsel for O’Neill, told the judge his client had been a member of the Garda Reserve before joining the force full-time.

He had resigned after having become unhappy with regard to a number of issues.

Harty, who appeared with barrister John Berry and solicitor Sean Costellor, said O’Neill, from Kill, Co Waterford, had since been prompted to rejoin the force by a Garda Superintendent and he had applied again in June 2016.

He said O’Neill’s application to rejoin was not dealt with for 12 months, and in June 2017 he had been informed that his application had been refused.

Investigation

During the year-long delay he had been informed that the behaviour he had complained about would have to be investigated before his application to rejoin could be considered.

Harty said that O’Neill had not been given any reasons for the Commissioner’s refusal nor had he been informed of the outcome of any investigation that may or may not have taken place.

Counsel said O’Neill was entitled to know the reasons for the refusal and the Commissioner was obliged to give them. He had disclosed matters internally to senior officers “before such issues had come into the public domain”.

Harty said:

He has made complaints about behaviour which is criminal in nature and in which Mr O’Neill has been the injured party. He has a right to be kept informed of the progress of the results of any investigation.

O’Neil has taken judicial review proceedings against the Garda Commissioner and seeks an order quashing the refusal to let him rejoin An Garda Siochána.

He also seeks an order directing he be given reasons why the Commissioner refused his application to rejoin.

He has also asked the court for a declaration that a former Garda who has given a superior officer information leading to the launch of an investigation, the former member is entitled to be kept informed of the progress and result of the investigation.

Permission to bring the challenge was granted on an ex parte basis, where only one party was present in court.

Judge Humphreys adjourned the matter to a date in the new law term.

Comments have been disabled as the case is still before the court

READ: Fresh calls for Garda Commissioner to step down after latest revelations about false breath tests>

READ: Confirmed: Irish Water to refund water charges to customers by Christmas>

Author
Aodhan O Faolain