#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 3°C Wednesday 25 November 2020

Disclosures Tribunal: Garda whistleblower says he felt 'trapped' in 'most stressful job in station'

The tribunal is hearing from Garda Nicholas Keogh.

Garda Nicholas Keogh leaving the Disclosures Tribunal at Dublin Castle this afternoon
Garda Nicholas Keogh leaving the Disclosures Tribunal at Dublin Castle this afternoon
Image: Sam Boal via RollingNews.ie

Updated Oct 17th 2019, 8:04 PM

A GARDA HAS told the Disclosures Tribunal that he believes he was left “trapped” in “the most stressful job in the station” because he had become a whistleblower. 

The tribunal is hearing from Garda Nicholas Keogh who alleges that a senior member of the Athlone drugs unit, identified to the tribunal as Garda A, was in an improper relationship with a heroin dealer, identified as Ms B. 

The tribunal, chaired by Judge Sean Ryan, is investigating how Garda Keogh was treated after he made his protected disclosure in 2014.

On 22 October 2015 Garda Keogh was detailed for indoor duty at Athlone Garda Station by Superintendent Patrick Murray. 

“I was reduced to indoor duties and was confined to desk-bound duties in the public office carrying out the most stressful job in the station in circumstances where it was known to management that I was suffering from work-related stress,” said Garda Keogh in his statement, adding that the move was to be reviewed but that Superintendent Murray “never did”.

“I was put there because Garda A was now suspended,” Garda Keogh told Judge Ryan. 

Every Garda wants out of the public office and I’m under constant work-related stress all throughout this. 

“I thought that with Garda A suspended that they would back off but then Garda A’s friend is put into my unit. 

“I know my career is essentially over once I’m assigned as the permanent PO [Public Office].” 

The tribunal was shown a report of a meeting between Superintendent Murray and Garda Keogh, written by Superintendent Murray. 

The superintendent notes that Garda Keogh’s “hands were shaking” that he could “barely sign” a form Superintendent Murray gave him and that Garda Keogh’s condition had “deteriorated”. 

Superintendent Murray has stated that “as a result of what I saw I explained to him that I would have to assign him to indoor duty” and that he explained why to Sergeant Keogh. Superintendent Murray stated that Garda Keogh “seemed to agree with with the course of action”. 

Garda Keogh denies there was any agreement. 

Garda Keogh told Judge Ryan: “Why put the guy with the shakiest hands in the station into the public office when all you do is sign forms and put this person in full public view? Why would you do that? I thought they would be off my back but they don’t do that. 

It’s a case of ‘We are not going to allow this whistleblower to win. We are in charge and we are going to show who’s in charge. We are putting the whistleblower in the public office on public show’. That’s my belief.

“Once they put me there they had me trapped because I know I’m going to get nailed on something, it’s inevitable. I had nothing, ever, like this prior to making my protected disclosure.”

Additional evidence

Garda Keogh also states that he believes the reason he was refused leave to meet the the Garda Ombudsman in August 2015 was because of his protected disclosure the previous year. 

Garda Keogh said that he was asked for “comprehensive reasons” for requesting the cancellation of a day off taken on 31 August. He said he met officials from GSoc, the garda ombudsman that day. 

He subsequently wrote to the sergeant in charge in Athlone asking to have the leave retrospectively cancelled, stating that he had met Gsoc in Portlaoise that day. 

The application was approved by a Sergeant Monaghan but was refused by Superintendent Patrick Murray and a letter was sent to Garda Keogh asking for a “comprehensive report as to the reasons”.

Garda Keogh, in a statement, said: “Superintendent Murray was aware of the confidentiality of GSoc communications with members and countermanded this approval citing ‘absence of proper explanation’ … in circumstances where I could not provide any more specific explanations, given the confidential nature of GSoc disclosures.” 

Superintendent Murray, in his statement, said that he viewed the application as “vague in nature” and that he was “not aware of any further explanation being provided that allowed the matter to be revisited”. 

“The process is supposed to be confidential,” Garda Keogh told chairman Judge Sean Ryan, adding that Garda Commissioner Nóirín O’Sullivan had publicly stated that whistleblowers were to be “protected”.

“It was common knowledge that I had made a protected disclosure,” said Garda Keogh.

Diarmaid McGuinness SC, for the tribunal, said that, the day before, on 30 August 2015, Superintendent Murray states that he had no knowledge of the GSoc appointment.

“It wasn’t a major, operational thing. It was one day’s annual leave,” said Garda Keogh.

McGuinness asked Garda Keogh if he felt he was being “targeted” for making the original protected disclosure.

“Yes,” said Garda Keogh. “The sergeant [approving the day off as cancelled] proves it.”

Judge Ryan asked if Garda Keogh felt “victimised” and was told “Yes. It didn’t feel like it was proper”.

About the author:

Paul Neilan

Read next: