Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo. Survivor Steve Travers with family members at a press conference. Julien Behal/PA Images
Northern Ireland

'This is an appalling situation': Judge furious by delays in Miami Showband legal case

Mr Justice Paul Maguire gave lawyers two weeks to sort issues around disclosure of sensitive security documents.

A BELFAST JUDGE has said he is appalled by delays to an eight-year-old legal case involving the Miami Showband ambush.

He gave lawyers a fortnight to sort out issues surrounding disclosure of sensitive security documents to a relative of one victim.

Three members of the band were shot dead by loyalist paramilitaries after a concert in Banbridge, Co Down, in July 1975.

Belfast High Court judge Mr Justice Paul Maguire said: “This is an appalling situation where this case has been going on from 2012.

“We are at a stage in 2020 where an obligation to make discovery within the police force has not been complied with. It does make me angry because it shows so much disrespect to the court.”

The band’s lead singer Fran O’Toole, trumpeter Brian McCoy and guitarist Tony Geraghty were killed after their minibus was flagged down by members of the Ulster Defence Regiment (UDR) north of Newry, early in the morning while returning to the Republic from a gig.

Two other band members, Des McAlea and Stephen Travers, were injured but survived.

Donal Sayers, barrister for the O’Toole family taking the action, clarified that the PSNI had complied with its general duty to disclose material.

One sensitive bundle remained outstanding.

The judge queried whether an order, signed by an armed forces minister and preventing full disclosure in case it revealed sensitive security information, could apply to PSNI material.

He gave lawyers two weeks to make progress.

Justice Maguire added: “I just find this incredibly frustrating. This obligation of discovery has not been attended to properly by the police.”

He acknowledged security forces’ concerns, saying: “They may well feel that they don’t wish to have paramilitary organisations gaining access to material that would explain the way they go about their business.”

In 2011, a report by the Historical Enquiries Team (HET) raised collusion concerns around the involvement of an alleged RUC Special Branch agent.

It found that now-dead UVF commander and suspected police mole Robin “the Jackal” Jackson had been connected to one of the murder weapons by fingerprint analysis, the lawyer told the court.

2.9507159 A stamp commemorating the Miami Showband An Post / PA An Post / PA / PA

Sayers said: “It is clear that the issue of subversion within the UDR was debated at a high level.”

He said issues with how Jackson was dealt with by police on discovery of the pistol caused concern to the HET in 2012.

Sayers added: “It is notable that they said that the HET accepts from the outset that collusion is established by the involvement of UDR people and access to UDR equipment.

“I ask you to order that the bundle of Public Interest Immunity (PII) material be disclosed to the plaintiff with the appropriate redactions.”

Kevin Rooney QC, for the security forces, has recently been assigned to the matter.

He said: “There was a huge amount of work involved in providing discovery. The documentation is voluminous.”

He added that the outstanding documents were almost ready: “The police can have that done by the end of next week, perhaps sooner than that.”

Comments are closed for legal reasons