This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 18 °C Monday 1 June, 2020
Advertisement

A majority verdict will be accepted in Patrick Quirke murder trial, judge says

The jury has been deliberating for over seven days.

Image: Sam Boal

THE JURY IN the trial of a farmer who denies murdering his alleged love rival may return a majority verdict or write “disagree” on the issue paper if they can’t come to a verdict.

Justice Eileen Creedon at the Central Criminal Court told the six men and six women that they have been deliberating for 18 hours and 24 minutes and therefore she will accept a verdict if at least ten of them agree.

If they cannot reach at least a ten-to-two majority, they can write “disagree” or “disagreement”.

Patrick Quirke (50) of Breanshamore, Co Tipperary has pleaded not guilty to the murder of Bobby Ryan, a part-time DJ going by the name Mr Moonlight.

Ryan went missing on 3 June 2011 after leaving his girlfriend Mary Lowry’s home at about 6.30am. His body was found in an underground run-off tank on the farm owned by Lowry and leased by the accused at Fawnagown, Tipperary 22 months later on 30 April 2013.

The jury of six men and six women have been considering the evidence put before them during a 13-week trial which was followed by five days of closing speeches from barristers for the defence and prosecution.

The prosecution claims that Quirke murdered Ryan so he could rekindle an affair with Lowry (52). The defence says the prosecution has failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt and that Quirke should be acquitted.

In her charge last week, Ms Justice Creedon told the jury they must not be influenced by emotion, sympathy, anger or disgust, and they must treat circumstantial evidence against the accused with care.

Comments have been closed as the case is ongoing.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Eoin Reynolds

Read next:

COMMENTS