We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
SAMSUNG HAS STOLEN a march its biggest competitor by becoming one of the first big tech companies to unveil a smartwatch.
At a highly anticipated event in Berlin tonight, the mobile giant showed off the Galaxy Gear watch, which comes complete with most of the capabilities of the average smartphone. However the watch is more of a companion than a replacement – it has to connect to a phone via Bluetooth to work.
Users will be able to make hands-free calls and check notifications for emails, text messages and alerts without having to look at their phone. The watch also has a 1.9 megapixel camera, and there are around 70 apps compatible with the device.
Samsung Mobile said that users will be able to “draft messages, create new calendar entries, set alarms and check the weather” on the watch.
The technical specifications of the watch are impressive: it has an 800 MHz processor, 512 MB of RAM and 4 GB of internal storage. It also has a microphone built in for making calls over a Bluetooth smartphone connection.
However – and there was always going to be a ‘but’ with a product as new as this – the watch will only work with Samsung’s Galaxy Note 3 phone. It looks likely that it will in the future work with other Samsung phones – including the popular Galaxy S III and S4 – but it does not look like it will work with other phones.
The battery of the watch is believed to last for about one day’s worth of use. It takes a charge from a dock via a micro-USB.
The watch, which is available in six colours, will be launched on 25 September around the world but the price is not yet known (although Bloomberg has estimated that it will be $300 – around €227).
People watch the unveiling of the smartwatch in Berlin this evening. (All pics: AP Photo/Gero Breloer)
So that’s what it looks like and what it does – what do you think? Would you get one?
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Off the smokes since last Saturday. Besides saving a small fortune I feel so much better for it! Went cold turkey – no patches, gum, spray, e-cigs etc. it is tough but I’m determined not to go near the cigs again. The craving do gradually subside. Stop talking about quitting people and give it a go.. “You can do it”..
Congrats, keep it up!
I found the worst part about quitting was anticipating quitting. Once I finally stopped I felt great. I welcomed the cravings as it meant I was off them.
Never looked back and never felt better. 5 years now. I think of all the damage I avoided doing to myself…
Has nobody asked why all the pressure from anti smoking measures including the banning of consumption in places of work has had no effect whatever on the numbers still puffing away?
Simple or basic psychology will tell you that where messages are negative either in the written or image form they simply cannot be seen.
This particular initiative is doomed to failure as well but along the way it’s going to cause unwanted and Ill considered side effects because the people who plan such a public Health Measures are too narrow in their thinking.
Firstly this campaign is doomed to failure for the reasons already advanced but we may see a commercial spin off in the form of attractive over sleeves that could cover the offending pictures for a few cents and they may even be sponsored with a facility for advertising.
Secondly smokers today tend to smoke much more in the home simply because this is one of the few indoor spaces where the law does not yet intrude on. Leaving a pack on a kitchen table is inevitable and the consequential damage done to the psyche of young children must be put squarely on the shoulders of the Government Department that introduced the idea and uses pictures that you and I would be unable to publish because they breach the Obscene Publications Act.
As the song goes…..when will they ever learn………
@Richard
Maybe the reason why the numbers still puffing away hasn’t reduced is that they are addicts.
Aside from that, I think the intention of the workplace ban was not to incentivise people to fight the addiction, it was to protect the health of the non-smokers who were being poisoned against their will by their smoking work colleagues.
You have to want to quit, plain and simple, some people just don’t want to, and that’s fine. All measures aside, if it gets a small number to quit, it can be deemed a success. And if the reality check prevents people from taking it up, then that is a win win. People who ignore the health impact are just in denial about it.
Good for you Aldo :) I’m nearly 14 weeks cold turkey, the first week or two is definitely the worst but it gets easier every week! Congrats to you, keep it up!!
Richard, you’re point is not that simple. If we hadn’t introduced anti-smoking measures more people may have taken up smoking. So instead of 29% smoking we might have had 40%.
Smoking is now largely the preserve of the poor where by far the highest % smoke. I think it’s as little as 5% in the professional/upper income brackets. It’s nearly 60% among SF supporters :)
Good on ya of them 2years next month and have managed to get fit again done 2 triathlons last year.
Why don’t make the bold decision of banning the sale of cigarettes altogether?
Agree with ya but there excuse will be “a new black market” also they would lose millions on taxes..and the big billion dollars companies that “treat” cancer would also lose custom due to lower cancer rates in the next generation so it’s a lose lose for the big boys!!
That’s a brilliant idea!! Ban them altogether! We can use the U.S Volstead act and the Prohibition era as a template. That worked pefectly if I remember my history correctly and there were almost no vast, unprecedented criminal empires built on the back of it. Have you considered running for office? With innovative and insightful musings like that you’re talents are wasted here on the Journal.
Smoking kills over 5,200 annually, so we should just sit back and let it continue to happen? I smoked over 20 a day and if the smoking ban didn’t come in I still would be.
A picture of Cowen with a fag in his gob, would have been more affective.
Smoking – bad for individuals, but good for society.
Smokers contribute large sums to the public purse & typically die of lung cancer or heart attack, rather than chronic illnesses associated with old age which can go on for decades. We have to die of something, and those of you selfish enough to live healthy lives on the expectation of living into your dotage, will put more strain on the health services in your latter years than us smokers, who will most likely keel over pretty quick. No Alzheimers for me thank you very much.
Also as smokers, we typically die in our 60s, so no draining of the state pensions for us!
I think we should stop wasting time and money discouraging this civic activity, and applaud smokers everywhere as this generation’s true patriots and heroes.
@Jim
But I thought the nice people from the (tobacco industry funded) Forest UK group who hijacked the thread two days ago were telling us that cigarettes don’t cause cancer and that smokers don’t die younger?
Jim,
Smokers don’t die of heart attacks, they die of pneumonia.
Smokers do suffer from chronic conditions, COPD anyone? Emphysema?
Smokers don’t die in their 60′s, a good anaesthetist can keep a smoker alive into their 80′s, meaning pensions are paid out (more is the pity).
Smoking contributes about 1.5bn directly to revenue, the HSE spends 1-2bn treating smoking related diseases each year (that we know).
Any more incredible myths you’d like me to dispel Jim?
0/10 for trolling
Smoking is a cure for Alzheimers? Since when?
You think smoking has a benefit to the government….I’m sorry Jim think again
Smoking related illnesses costs the HSE approx 2 billion euro a year.
Tobacco products bring in 1.5 billion euro in tax, so instantly non-smokers are having to pick up the tab.
So if the government banned Tobacco products in the morning it would likely take at least 10 years for the knock on affects to be felt properly by the HSE (massive drop in smoking related illnesses).
In the mean time the government would be down 1.5 billion euro a year and the HSE would likely continue to spend around 2billion each year for the next 5 years before we start seeing drops.
So, sure they can ban it, but they’ll need to make up the short fall atleast for the next few years before it continuously to properly drop. This shortfall would have to be done with other taxes on likely non-smokers.
Instead the government is trying to phase out smoking, so for example these images are an effort to try stop new smokers. (something the smoking industry really doesn’t want to happen)
Sure its not ideal but as time goes on they’ll get more expensive, employer’s won’t want smokers as much as they are off sick more often and health insurance will go through the roof.
Claiming smoking is good for society is like claiming excess drinking is good for your liver, its not and never will be.
Source: http://www.diabetes.ie/living-with-diabetes/frequently-asked-questions/smoking/
Source: http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/tax-take-goes-up-in-smoke-200835.html
Barry where did you get €2 billion from? Here http://www.dohc.ie/issues/smoking_ban/smokekey.html is what the Dept of Health has to say “It costs us €1 Billion per year to provide health services for smokers”.
James, Some smokers die from heart attacks. Some even die in traffic accidents.
Brian, 1bn is the lowest figure spent on obvious directly related illnesses, so COPD, emphysema, diabetes, kidney failure, lung cancer, respiratory conditions…
There are indirect illnesses associated with smoking, so smokers are far more likely to have to be admitted for various cancers that wouldn’t be seen to be directly related to smoking, so bowel cancer, stomach cancer, smokers are far more likely to have UTI’s, renal infections, chest infections, more prevalence of flu pneumonia, asthma…
Also, the figure given by HSE doesn’t take into account the fact that smokers take more time out of work due to longer recovery periods, generally are out of work more often than their non-smoking counterpart.
Damocles, most won’t die from heart attack, or car crashes, as is evidenced by fact that most money spent on smokers isn’t spent on trauma care.
Really? According to The British Heart Foundation “Smoking is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease, and smokers are almost twice as likely to have a heart attack compared with people who have never smoked.”, http://www.bhf.org.uk/heart-health/prevention/smoking.aspx
Damocles, most smokers won’t die from a heart attack. Heart attacks don’t kill as much as they used to.
@ Damocles
“Most smokers won’t die of a heart attack”
True.
“Smokers are almost twice as likely to die from a heart attack as non-smokers”
Also true.
The two are not mutually exclusive.
Brian Ward, did you not even bother to read my comment.
I gave my sources,
Have to admit the images on the boxes over here in Oz are way more off putting than black and white text.
@Conor Mc from WA, have asked at many outlets re sales and have been told sales are not down
Probably because the anti-smoking legiation and campaign is still relatively recent and Australia is like the 1980s in regards the massive levels of smokers (disgusting to see so many pretty 20 year olds smoke) so it will take 10/15 years to get awareness of the dangers etc to European levels.
@Patricia Martin. Not saying it will be successful. But from a personal point of view i find it more off putting.
I’m off them 93 days today. It’s great. I really feel the difference health wise and financially. Anyone thinking about doing it, give it a go. The first three days are hell but after that, it gets a little easier. This last month has been the easiest of all. I’m free now.
Smoking is disgusting. Some people have no respect for them selves
Fool and their money are easily parted!Actually paying for disgusting yellow teeth and wrinkled skin,not to mention the internal health effects is beyond me.One day people will look back and be perplexed as to what people were thinking.
I see a new market opportunity in cigarette cases here
Couldn’t agree more with you Jason but that would mean actually doing something pratical about it rather than talking about it. There also making too much money out of them and if they did bring in a ban think it would have to be a world wide ban.
An outright ban on anything has never worked. Wasnt effective with alcohol and created a massive crime wave, isnt effective with drugs and causes a lot of crime, wouldnt ve effective with cigarettes and would cause a whole new wave of crime. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Bought myself a lovely new cigarette case yesterday in anticipation of the new packaging! Can’t wait to try it out!
Where did ya get it?
Awww thats lovely Amanda,
Trying to hide the affects that smoking has on your body and health, just keep those fingers in your fears and the fag in your mouth and you’ll be justtttt fine :)
Will do thanks mom!!
Barry you were bleating away before about anti-abortionists using graphic pictures of aborted foetuses, what’s the difference?
I gave up 17 days ago – looks like it was good timing!
My tip: If you decide just to have the one, don’t. Instead decide to buy a packet and decide to go back on them. That will stop you.
off em since last saturday
This won’t help to decrease the number of smokers, as we all no smokers are just dumb asses, who love the smell of stale smoke on their clothes, their hair and don’t forget the fag ash breath.
do you drink?
Trying to compare smoking to drinking is laughable.If i drink in front of a baby the baby isnt harmed,drink in a bar the most thats gonna happen is shite talk,alcohol related violence isnt purely because of alcohol there are underlying factors in all arguments (mainly women!!) Internal health aspects such as liver cancer are undeniable BUT they are solely inflicted on the drinker,not their children or partner.You may as well compare smoking to the other taxable consumer product of petrol as they have more in common.
The problem here is that the same tired old solutions are applied when they simple do not have any meaningful effect.
I gave up smoking on the 11th of November and instead took up Vaping which is essentially an alternative way of consuming nicotine minus the crap produced when smoking. I have not had one smoke since and I can safely say I will never, ever, smoke again. Not many non smokers can say that. I enjoy all the health benefits of a non smoker and do not smell like an ashtray anymore.
The fundamental issue here is we are mixing up the addiction (nicotine) with the delivery mechanism (cigs). Nicotine in reasonable quantities is no worse for you than coffee, it is the delivery mechanism that is killing people.
There are plenty of alternative methods of Nicotine delivery from vaporizers to Snus, all of which are much safer and much more acceptable to consume around others (no second hand effects). Unfortunately Pharama and the Tobbaco industry have so far done a great job in lobbying the EU to have these products either banned or in the process of being banned.
If the government had any sense, for the good of the people, it would encourage the use of Snus and Vaping as alternatives or treatments instead of NRT’s which are ineffective and make it’s revenue on taxing nicotine products which would cover all basis.
I have a great idea for a line of ironic packet covers, with the very same graphic images on them.
I would like €100,000 for 8% of the business.
I’ll give you half the money but I want 40%
Wonder will the pipe come back into fashion? They way things are going with fashion I can see a new craze in pipes just like them big black glasses these days..could ya imagine if some famous celeb was seen smoking a pipe, it would be viral!
I know a few people who do/did that. It wasn’t hipsters surprisingly enough.
I was sure The Lord of the Rings movies would have caused a resurgence. Perhaps The Hobbit will have more luck.
It’s terrible, I’ll probably die young, we all smell bad costs to the state etc etc. Fair play to people who have chosen to give up. personally I enjoy smoking though for simple and probably pathetic reasons but sick of having to apologise for it? My bad
Don’t apologise for it then. The worse smokers are the ex smokers , a lot of them are holier than thou about giving up and never shut up at smokers to give up.
Smoke if you want and don’t if you don’t want.
Would one of those graphic images be Enda Kenny? I think smokers would have major issues of buying anything he’s selling?
No doubt some, if not many, of those purchasing these newly designed packets will just do what a friend of mine, in England, has been doing for many years. Once the large printed messages about how smoking kills was added to packets of cigars, he merely removed the newly purchased cigars from their tin, and placed them into an older tin, one that had no such messages on it. In his mind, problem solved.
The pictures have been on Carrolls the last while. Well apart from the pack I got yesterday . Kind of sickened , They look fair plain without the pics .
Wow more pictures to collect,do they come with a free scrapbook?
Haha I’m the same. I’m after getting two wrinkly apples :(
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say