Take part in our latest brand partnership survey

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Taoiseach Micheál Martin Leah Farrell

Taoiseach suggests referendum on changing 'restrictive' process for getting on presidential ballot

One in eight votes were spoiled.

TAOISEACH MICHEÁL MARTIN has said the Oireachtas may have to look at changing the process by which a person gets on the ballot in presidential elections, which he described as “restrictive”.

Martin was speaking to reporters yesterday evening in the wake of independent Catherine Connolly’s resounding victory in the presidential election, in which she won 63% of the vote. 

While Connolly won by a historic margin, another record was broken yesterday, more people than ever spoiled their votes (one in eight). 

Martin said: “It’s a worry, because I think, first of all, people are entitled to vote, people are entitled not to vote, and I suppose people are entitled in our system to spoil their votes.”

He said that this would need to be interpreted.

“I think there’s probably an issue with the restrictive nature of how one gets on the ballot, and that’s something that, collectively, the Oireachtas can look at,” he said.

There was a concerted campaign by people who supported the socially conservative would-be candidate Maria Steen, who did not make it onto the ballot, to encourage people to spoil their votes in protest at the nomination process. 

“A lot of parties didn’t nominate candidates this time, so hence, by definition, you were going to have fewer candidates,” Martin said.

Changing the nomination process – whereby presidential hopefuls need 20 Oireachtas members or four local councils to back them – would require a referendum. 

“Ultimately, that’s the only way you could do it,” Martin said, adding that it would require “some work between the political parties in the intervening period”. 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
107 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds