Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Duane Buck Texas Department of Criminal Justice via AP

Court orders new trial for death row inmate who psychologist said was more dangerous because he is black

“Our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are.”

THE US SUPREME Court has ordered a new court hearing for a black Texas prison inmate whose death sentence may have been tainted by disturbing references to race.

Lawyers for inmate Duane Buck said the result of the court’s 6-2 decision is that Buck must either be given a sentence of life in prison or a new sentencing hearing.

“Our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are. Dispensing punishment on the basis of an immutable characteristic flatly contravenes this guiding principle,” Chief Justice John Roberts said in his majority opinion.

Buck had tried for years to get federal courts to look at his claim that his rights were violated when jurors were told by a defence expert witness that Buck was more likely to be dangerous in the future because he is black.

In Texas death penalty trials, one of the “special issues” jurors must consider when deciding punishment is whether the defendant they’ve convicted would be a future danger.

Roberts wrote that the testimony of Dr Walter Quijano “was potent evidence. Dr Quijano’s testimony appealed to a powerful racial stereotype — that of black men as ‘violence prone.”

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented. “Having settled on a desired outcome, the court bulldozes procedural obstacles and misapplies settled law to justify it,” Thomas said.

Buck was convicted of killing his ex-girlfriend and another man in 1995. His case was among six in 2000 that then-Texas Attorney General John Cornyn in a news release said needed to be reopened because Quijano’s statements were racially charged. In the other five cases, new punishment hearings were held and each convict again was sentenced to death. Cornyn, a Republican, is now the state’s senior US senator.

Buck’s lawyers contended the attorney general, by then Cornyn’s successor Greg Abbott, broke a promise by contesting his case. But the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals said that it could find nothing in the case record to indicate the state made an error or promised not to oppose any move to reopen the case. Abbott now is the state’s governor.

One difference in Buck’s case is that Buck’s own lawyer, not the prosecutor, elicited Quijano’s testimony. Texas said the difference was reason enough to rule against Buck.

Buck’s lawyers had argued on appeal that the trial lawyer’s work was so poor that it violated the Constitution’s guarantee of competent counsel.

Roberts said that when race is a factor in jury deliberations, it does not matter “which party first broached the subject.”

Read: Starving teenage boy rescued ‘by chance’ after nearly two weeks at sea without food

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
18 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason McGwire
    Favourite Jason McGwire
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 9:30 AM

    Comments open ongoing legal proceedings?

    94
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute JJ O Riordan
    Favourite JJ O Riordan
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 9:33 AM

    He’s been sentenced. It’s a stay of execution, not a court case in the strictest sense of the word.

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason McGwire
    Favourite Jason McGwire
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 9:35 AM

    “The US supreme Court has ordered a new Court hearing”

    44
    See 7 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ChuckE
    Favourite ChuckE
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 9:53 AM

    US not Irish. Nothing said here will have any bearing on legal proceedings in the case as it is outside the jurisdiction. Blather away to your heart’s content

    40
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason McGwire
    Favourite Jason McGwire
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 9:59 AM

    Do they not have the Internet in texas?

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jason McGwire
    Favourite Jason McGwire
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 10:09 AM

    Story just posted about a murder in utah, comments closed due to ongoing legal proceedings.

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute DonaldsFriedChicken
    Favourite DonaldsFriedChicken
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 10:49 AM

    But she’s white!

    37
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Deborah Behan
    Favourite Deborah Behan
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 11:23 AM

    Comments were closed on a ticket scandal in Rio so they definitely have Internet there.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ciarán Masterson
    Favourite Ciarán Masterson
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 11:29 AM

    @Jason McGwire:

    Actually, the crime that took place in Utah is an attempted murder. Sadly, the victim might not survive.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave O Keeffe
    Favourite Dave O Keeffe
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 11:43 AM

    Guilt is not in question and there is nobody to be influenced. It’s just a sentencing hearing

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emmet O'Keeffe
    Favourite Emmet O'Keeffe
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 9:34 AM

    So, the fact that he murdered two people in cold blood has nothing to do with him being on death row.
    OH no.
    Folks just didn’t like the colour of his skin.

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Neal, not Neil.
    Favourite Neal, not Neil.
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 9:47 AM

    Nobody’s saying that.

    59
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave O Keeffe
    Favourite Dave O Keeffe
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 11:45 AM

    Literally nobody

    24
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fiona Fitzgerald
    Favourite Fiona Fitzgerald
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 1:11 PM

    Sounds like a crime of passion – difficult to defend domestic violence all right. But. If contemporary cases were sentenced to xx years in prison, and the defender urges that his client should be legally executed for the same crime, you have to question the reasoning. It’s almost as though they were singling him out to be put to death for no reason. Isn’t that arbitrary? I’m not against the death penalty for extreme cases; but he doesn’t seem like a serial killer or a sociopath. A retrial could be the reasonable thing to do here.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave O Keeffe
    Favourite Dave O Keeffe
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 3:43 PM

    A retrial is not necessary as its not the verdict that’s in question, just the sentence

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ciarán Masterson
    Favourite Ciarán Masterson
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 11:32 AM

    The headline is misleading. The Supreme Court has ruled that he is entitled to go back to a lower court and argue that he should have a new sentencing hearing; it did not order a retrial.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/22/politics/duane-buck-supreme-court-death-row-ruling/

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave O Keeffe
    Favourite Dave O Keeffe
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2017, 11:45 AM

    Yeah, that’s what this article says to

    6
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds