Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Jr images

'To only support print journalism is bizarre': Criticism levelled at Fianna Fáil's 'Print Journalism Unit'

Fianna Fáil has proposed to establish a Print Journalism Unit to secure the future of print journalism.

FINE GAEL TD Noel Rock has criticised an idea from Fianna Fáil which would see the establishment of a fund to aid newspapers in Ireland.

The Dublin deputy said that there should be no preferential treatment in Irish media in response to Timmy Dooley’s proposal to establish a so-called Print Journalism Unit, within an expanded Broadcasting Authority of Ireland.

The proposal was announced earlier today by Dooley, who is the party’s communications spokesperson, as a means to secure the future of Irish print journalism.

Rock believes that these proposals have not clearly been thought out, specifically referring to changing consumer habits and how more people obtain their news online.

In a statement issued after a press briefing by Dooley, Rock said:

The desire to support quality journalism is laudable, but to only support print journalism is bizarre.

Rock makes reference to the Reuters Institute Digital Report 2018 which found that people rely more on the online version of newspapers as their main source of news (44%) ahead of the print editions (35%) – but this is behind television (56%), social media (53%), and radio (45%).

It pointed out that the decline of print newspapers continues, falling from 40% in 2017 to 35% in 2018.

The same report found that among online brands, TheJournal.ie is the most popular (34%), followed by RTÉ News Online (33%) and Irish Independent Online (30%).

“Quality journalism provided only in an online context would be excluded entirely under these proposals. Is that fair use of public funds? What about independent broadcasters and online websites who offer the country and their communities good journalism? Why exclude them?” Rock continued.

The motivation behind these proposals may be good but we are left with far more questions than answers. Whatever initiatives are taken in relation to the media need to reflect modern realities and be future-proofed.

Under Fianna Fáil’s proposal, the remit of the proposed unit would be to disper­se grant aid to support newspaper publishers in providing public service content and to deliver schemes to support the work of print journalists at both national and local level.

According to Dooley, the proposals will “secure the future of quality print journalism in the country for generations to come”.

“Many print newspapers see their work being shared widely and freely on digital platforms. They receive no payment for this content, and this needs fixing.

Newspaper journalists research and fact check – this costs money. Those reusing their work must pay for that, otherwise, we risk seeing newspapers go bust.

Dooley has proposed that 6% of the digital advertising levy could be imposed on all digital advertising sales in Ireland, a market which was estimated to be worth around €500 million in 2018,  yielding around €30 million.

“This levy would ensure that the success of online platform does not come at the cost of independent public interest journalism,” Dooley said.

Reacting to Dooley’s announcement, Susan Daly, Editor of TheJournal.ie, welcomed any move towards supporting for quality journalism but said the Fianna Fáil proposals are ”myopic and unsustainable”.

“Public service content is not the sole responsibility or remit of the state broadcaster and a handful of print publications, nor should it be,” she said.

“All reputable media organisations in Ireland are keenly aware of the challenges faced by shrinking advertising revenues and the proliferation of disinformation on numerous platforms. However, Deputy Dooley’s assertion that ‘newspaper journalists research and fact check – this costs money’ is archaic and exclusionary.

“As the sole IFCN-verified (International FactChecking Network) news outlet in Ireland, the online-only TheJournal.ie is only too aware of the cost of providing such a public service.”

Daly said that proposing to extend funds exclusively to organisations with a print arm would create an anti-competitive environment in an industry where the content of every large print publication is also carried on its digital platform.

“To suggest funding such grants through a levy on digital advertising is baffling, to say the least. This would have the potential to not only represent a double penalty on quality digital news outlets, stifling growth and strangling innovation, but it would also damage the new business models of those very print-origins organisations who is proposing to support,” Daly said.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
23 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lucy Nevins
    Favourite Lucy Nevins
    Report
    Sep 16th 2011, 8:45 PM

    Can’t see this happen in any shape or form!

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Toast Rack
    Favourite Toast Rack
    Report
    Sep 17th 2011, 12:28 AM

    Why? Any logical reason, or just populist begrudgery?

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Conroy
    Favourite David Conroy
    Report
    Sep 17th 2011, 1:09 AM

    Well, if it does, I hope he makes €380 million profit, and that he uses it (all) to pay off his debt to NAMA. Now that I don’t see happening.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rachel Walsh Howe
    Favourite Rachel Walsh Howe
    Report
    Sep 17th 2011, 12:10 AM

    Is there not enough empty apartments already

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Toast Rack
    Favourite Toast Rack
    Report
    Sep 17th 2011, 12:30 AM

    You must mean ARE there not enough? To which the answer is no, not enough of sufficient quality in the appropriate areas. Duplexes in Co Roscommon – well now that’s a different story which only the wrecking ball can truly answer.

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frank2521
    Favourite Frank2521
    Report
    Sep 17th 2011, 1:54 AM

    I don’t know which is worse the planners(bad name) continuing to grant permission for developement or mcGuiness for President.
    I do know – it’s the planners, they cost more than the terrorists and the drug dealers combined. The country is ruined as a result of bad planning decisions.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute jackass ireland
    Favourite jackass ireland
    Report
    Sep 17th 2011, 5:17 AM

    Dead on. These people are a law unto themselves and put the ass in jackass. No one takes them to task over their bullshit decisions. Wholly unqualified and completely incompetent.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frank2521
    Favourite Frank2521
    Report
    Sep 16th 2011, 11:45 PM

    I hope it dosnt happen – more brown envelopes. Will any planner ever be prosecuted for their part in granting permission for developments in Ireland.
    One can only assume it is corruption when you see the evidence of developments built in flood zones etc. It is that or pressure from TD’s or Councilors either way one orbthe other should be in jail and should be ashamed to show their face in public.
    I think corruption and collusion is common in our councils. We need whistle blowers to stand up.

    10
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds