We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Ralf Kleemann/Shutterstock

Landlord fined €12,000 for refusing to accept rent allowance from Latvian woman

The tenant said the landlord left her in a position where she could not avail of the HAP scheme for a period of over twenty-three months.

A VETERAN LANDLORD has been ordered to pay a renter €12,000 compensation after he was found to have refused her rent allowance because she is Latvian and relies on social welfare supports.

In the case before the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), Adjudication Officer, Ewa Sobanska has ordered landlord, David McCarthy to pay Valerie Enners the €12,000 after finding that he discriminated against her on the race ground under the Equal Status Act when refusing to accept Enners’s Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) scheme towards her rent.

Sobanska also ordered McCarthy to pay the €12,000 – the maximum allowed is €15,000 – after finding that he also discriminated against Enners on the housing assistance ground when refusing to accept her HAP scheme payment.

Sobanska stated that McCarthy’s refusal to participate in the HAP Scheme has had the effect of placing Enners “in a detrimental financial situation”. 

Sobanska stated:

I am satisfied that it exacerbated the distress she suffered and the quantum of the compensation should reflect that.

Enners told the WRC that McCarthy’s acceptance of the HAP scheme payment “would have reduced the impossible financial pressure she suffers”.

She claimed that McCarthy left her in a position where she could not avail of the HAP scheme for a period of over twenty-three months. 

She stated that as a result, this had a damaging effect on her family, both financially and personally. 

Enners asserted that, as she was unable to avail of the HAP Scheme, she had to meet the shortfall with loans.

‘Good person’

In support of Enners’s case at the WRC, an Irish neighbour of Enners gave evidence to state that she commenced renting from McCarthy in October 2016 and McCarthy completed the necessary HAP forms for her at the time and that she has been in receipt of HAP since.

As part of her case, Enners presented audio evidence where she recorded on a mobile phone a conversation she had with McCarthy.

During this conversation, McCarthy made statements to the effect that he would sign the forms but the Local Authority won’t take it.

At the WRC hearing, McCarthy argued that he has tenants of some 20 different nationalities renting. 

He also claimed that he has 33 HAP recipient tenants. 

McCarthy exhibited a spreadsheet showing that 9 out of 17 units in the estate Enners resides at are occupied by non-Irish nationals  – seven different nationalities.

McCarthy also stated that he has 35 years of experience as a property landlord. 

He stated that he has a number of tenants on social welfare and various rent allowances. 

He said that he had no reason not to sign Enners HAP forms.

In respect of the allegation of race discrimination, McCarty stated that there are probably about 20 different nationalities renting property from him. 

He argued that as long as they are respectable and pay the rent he has no problem with that. He noted that Enners is a “good person” and he has “no issue” with her.

Director of Advocacy at Focus Ireland, Mike Allen said today:

Focus Ireland welcomes the outcome of this case which adds to a growing body of case law in which tenants have demonstrated that their landlords have discriminated against them because of their reliance on social welfare supports. 

“The fact that the penalty, in this case, is near the maximum allowable shows an increasing willingness of the WRC to use its powers and reflect the harm that is done to tenants by this form of discrimination. Greater awareness of such cases will be of benefit both to tenants and landlords.”