TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Argentina to lodge UN complaint today as UK denies ‘militarisation’ of Falklands

There are growing tensions between the two nations ahead of the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War.

Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez speaks during a national address while standing in front of a Falklands Islands' map at Government Palace in Buenos Aires.
Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez speaks during a national address while standing in front of a Falklands Islands' map at Government Palace in Buenos Aires.
Image: Eduardo Di Baia/AP/Press Association Images

ARGENTINA’S FOREIGN MINISTER will lodge an official complaint with the United Nations later today over what his country says is the militarisation of the seas around the Falkland Islands.

Hector Timerman will make the complaint to the presidents of the Security Council and the General Assembly in New York later today amid growing tensions between Britain and Argentina over the tiny South Atlantic islands.

The islands are controlled by Britain but Argentina disputes this and claims that the British government’s decision to send its destroyer, the HMS Dauntless, to the region is an act of “militarisation”.

President Cristina Fernandez asked her British counterpart, prime minister David Cameron to “give peace a chance” earlier this week.

Britain has denied the claims, a Downing Street spokesman told BBC News: “We are not militarising the South Atlantic, our military posture remains the same.”

It comes ahead of the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War where Argentina briefly occupied the islands before Britain defeated the military government of the time in a ten-week long war.

“Hector Timerman will meet with Ambassador Kodjo Menan, president of the United Nations Security Council to present the Argentinian complaint against the militarisation that the United Kingdom is carrying out from the Falkland Islands in the South Atlantic,” a foreign ministry statement said.

Fernandez is reported as having told journalists yesterday that Timerman was en route to New York to complain “about the militarisation and the introduction of nuclear arms in the zone.”

The arrival of the HMS Dauntless in the South Atlantic is just the latest in a series of developments that have sparked tensions between the two countries.

The Queens’ grandson Prince William has also been deployed to the region in his role as a search and rescue pilot. Currently around 1,700 British forces are stationed around the islands as they have been ever since the 1982 war.

In another development, the top football league in Argentina was renamed after a naval ship, the General Belgrano which was sunk by the British during the Falklands War with the loss of over 320 Argentine servicemen.

Argentina to complain to UN over UK ‘militarisation’ in Falklands region

Explainer: What’s going on in the Falkland Islands?

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (21 Comments)

  • Argentine leaders have been using the Falklands/Malvinas as a political prop to bolster a sense of national pride for years. Christina isn’t stupid enough to cause a war with Britain over a tiny island, but she’s smart enough to increase her profile both at home and globally by seeming to take on the “man”. She’s clever that one.

    Reply
    • It’s not about a few tiny Islands! It’s all about the rights to vast minerals and oil that might be in Antartica!!

      Reply
    • Shane 10/02/12 #

      If there are minerals there you think they would have been found by now!

      My opinion is that the brits use the falklands as much as Argentina use it
      To drum up support. Thatcher did it in the 80′s. Needless war. Holding onto colonial prowess in a place thousands of miles away from Britain. Give it independence neither uk nor argentina.

      Reply
    • Shane (and others) it’s not about ‘independence’ or mineral rights – its about the right of self determination of the islanders to remain British. They want to remain as they are, without the Argies invading or Britain turning its back on them.

      Reply
    • Its not to do with Antartica as that is protected from development by international treaties.

      However it is speculated that there are oil and mineral reserves in the seas around the Falklands and companies are moving to exploit this resources. Because the islands are British, Britain can potentially claim a 200-mile zone around the Falklands (and South Georgia) as a exclusive economic zone. That also applies to the sea bed as well. So potentially there is a lot of money at stake.

      Hard to see though what Argentia can actually do about this. There is no doubt that the Falkland Islanders consider themselves to be British and therefore want to remain part of that country. One has to respect their right to self-determination. After all its a principle that we in Ireland have agreed to with regard to any future solution in Northern Ireland

      Reply
    • According to my good friend Wikipedia, because it has such a small population, only about 3000 people, the UN have said it’s too small to be a viable independent nation. And most of the inhabitants are of British descent, speak English and are happy to remain as they are.

      Reply
  • Can we not put politics aside for a few moments and just gaze at the lovely Christina ?

    Reply
  • Its not about oil, minerals or self determination. Its about strategic sheep purposes.

    Reply
  • Cant see this being taken seriously.

    Reply
  • Seems like perfect sense from Britain seeing as what Argentina has done in the past plus their extra presence may be a welcome for the Falklands residents. I’m sure they don’t want a repeat of what happened last time Argentina wanted to take the islands.

    Reply
  • Reg 10/02/12 #

    I think Ms Fernández needs some lessons in diplomacy. Making nationalistic speaches and stiriing up the crowds is a very dangerous pastime. Standing in front of a map of Falklands coloured with the Argeninian flag will not endear her to the people that she is trying to win over.

    Reply
  • Do you really think Britain cares about a couple of thousand Shepards that live 10000 miles away? If those islands had no economic worth, they’d have left years ago! As if Maggie Thatcher would’ve been allowed to go to war with Argentina if it was only about people!! Get real.

    Reply
    • The oil hadn’t been discovered 30 years ago .. and check your facts and you will find that the British government actually did try to offer Argentina shared sovereignty, but it was blocked by the islanders themselves..

      Reply
  • The Argentines clearly believe in self-determination for themselves but not for the Falkland Islanders. The UK shouldn’t even dignify this rubbish with a response.

    Reply
  • Given the attitudes here, it is clearly time for Britain to call in the billions they have spent propping up the clod-hopping cousins across the Irish Sea. That’ll pay for a whole fleet of aircraft carriers.

    Reply
  • ?

    Reply
  • Elrat 10/02/12 #

    Revenge for Madonnas “hand of god” !

    Reply
  • Have a Facebook vote here, folks. Choose one of the following:

    The Falklands/Malvinas are:
    -Argentinian forever!
    -British forever!
    -Let the people decide
    -I don’t care

    http://www.facebook.com/questions/335778986467007/

    Reply

Add New Comment