TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

Assange loses UK Supreme Court appeal against extradition

But it’s not over yet – the Supreme Court puts a two-week stay on the ruling to allow another defence argument.

Julian Assange speaking in London in February: the WikiLeaks founder this morning lost an appeal against an extradition warrant to Sweden.
Julian Assange speaking in London in February: the WikiLeaks founder this morning lost an appeal against an extradition warrant to Sweden.
Image: Lewis Whyld/PA Wire

THE UNITED KINGDOM’S Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange seeking to block his extradition to Sweden on charges of sexual assault.

The court ruled 5-2 against Assange’s claim that the Swedish public prosecutor was not a ‘judicial authority’, meaning it did not have the legal power to seek the extradition of a person from one EU country to another.

The court ruled that public prosecutions fell under the definition of a judicial authority under the Vienna Convention, which governs the terms under which countries can enter into international agreements, and particularly under its French translation.

The order does not take immediate effect, however: the Supreme Court granted a two-week stay on its ruling after Assange’s lawyers asked for extra time to consider the court’s ruling.

They claimed the arguments in relation to the Vienna Convention had not been made during the Supreme Court’s original hearings, and that Assange therefore did not have the opportunity to respond to such arguments.

The court granted a two-week stay so that Assange’s team could study the court’s written ruling and decide if it wanted to have the case re-opened.

Assange has previously claimed the attempts to have him extradited to Sweden are a front for a potential onward extradition to the United States, which has opposed WikiLeaks’ publication of confidential military logs and diplomatic cables.

Read: Julian Assange: ‘I may be biggest media victim since the McCanns’

More: Julian Assange plans to run for Australian Senate

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • He’s done some good things, but he also creeps me out.

    Reply
    • Yes. There is something not quite right about him alright. No doubt he will bore the arses off us now saying it’s a “conspiracy” by the “big bad Americans” & the like. Something about him doesn’t add up.

      Reply
  • alan 30/05/12 #

    i think he may have his mind on the fate of bradley manning

    the argument that if he is innocent he should put himself forward for trial is ludicrous, assuming as it does that this trial would be fair. given US involvment i would very much doubt it

    as a last resort, the only compromise may be a trial elsewhere in which there might be some chance of justice. but i don’t think that this can happen

    meanwhile, the killing of civilians by the US forces in afghanistan continues unabated (not an apology for other killers there but it has to be borne in mind

    Reply
    • He’s not on trial for political offences, though. He’s being tried for sexual assault. I would, just like most people, protest extradition to the US for political offences, but this is to answer unrelated charges.

      You seem to be arguing that the Swedish justice system will hold an unfair trial and convict him specifically due to American pressure, as there has been no accusation that the US would be involved in the Swedish trial except for extradition.

      “as a last resort, the only compromise may be a trial elsewhere in which there might be some chance of justice. but i don’t think that this can happen” – it’s a bit disappointing how casual you seem to dismiss this Swedish woman’s access to justice.

      Reply
  • It’s really, really difficult to secure a rape conviction for sexual assault. It seems that if he’s innocent, he should want to stand trial.

    He seems to complete discount the idea that Sweden could actually take sexual offences seriously.

    Reply
    • ” It seems that if he’s innocent, he should want to stand trial.” So by inference, if he doesn’t want to stand trial he must be guilty. I’d hate to be before you in a court of law.

      If you had followed the story from the start you would know that the whole affair stinks. The only reason that the Swedish want Assange extradited is so that they in turn can extradite him to the US over the wikileaks affair. There will of course be a show trial on the sex assault charge, it will collapse but Assange will then be held pending a US extradition request. He knows this and that is why he does not want to get extradited

      Reply
    • If and when they start the process to extrade him to the US, then I would object to that. But at the minute, all he is facing is a sexual assault charge in Sweden. I think all sexual assault charges should be considered and taken seriously. You seem to have no consideration for the rights of the woman in Sweden who has possibly been assaulted. I do.

      Do you have an alternative solution as to how he can face justice for the sexual assault claim or do you think it should be ignored? I don’t have an issue with Wikileaks, but I have an issue with the fact that people seem to believe this possible sexual assault is totally irrelevant.

      Reply
    • Nick I like you take all sexual assault seriously so here is a link (I haven’t read the full article yet) http://thesydneyglobalist.org/archives/2017 and tell me if these alleged assaults seem out of the norm? Woman A lets him stay for a week, woman B said “she couldn’t be bothered to tell him one more time”. WTF? The Brits won’t extradite Assange but I bet the Swedish will and as Alan points out all he will get will be the Bradley Manning treatment.

      Reply
    • I work with survivors of sexual assault, so I hear views like this all the time. Women react to rape in a variety of ways, a lot of women stat with rapist partners for a long time. you seem to gave decided he is innocent without wanting the case to be heard. I want it to be taken seriously.

      Is this being pursued because he is who he is? Maybe. But it comes down to how important you think it is for a rape trial to occur. I think every accusation should be taken seriously, regardless of political implications.

      Reply
  • “There will of course be a show trial on the sex assault charge, it will collapse” – I would hate to be in a court of law in front of you. You seem to have made up your mind that there’s no possibility he could have done it.

    Reply
  • alan 30/05/12 #

    i am advocating a trial. a fair one in which both parties can present their case free of outside interference. do you have a problem with this? nobody si denying anybodys right to jutcie. on the contrary, i am trying to think through how justice for all can be obtained

    i mention manning because it is clear that the US authorities are not overly concenred with justice in his case. i think it would be fair to assume then that, without casting any doubt on the swedish judicial system, pressure would be brought on swedish authorities to assure assange ends up one way or the other in the US

    Reply
    • You’re probably right about American pressure, but if you then say that him avoiding trial for something he may very well have done is the solution, you argue that he should be above the law. I disagree with the idea that because I agree with his political views, he should be immune from facing any consequences from anything he may have done.

      Reply

Add New Comment