TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Romney raises $35m more than Obama in June

Mitt Romney raised $106 million in June while Barack Obama raised $71 million.

Image: AP Photo/Michael Dwyer

REPUBLICAN MITT ROMNEY raked in $106 million (€86 million)  in June, his team announced today, trouncing President Barack Obama by $35 million (€28 million) and asserting a second straight month of campaign fundraising dominance.

Romney and the Republican National Committee now have $160 million (€130 million) in cash on hand, the campaign said, as the candidate gears up for a fierce four-month White House battle against Obama.

The $106.1-million haul last month by Romney and the RNC is a record for 2012 and well above the $71 million announced by Obama’s re-election campaign, which was the president’s best result of the year, topping the $60 million he raised in May.

“But we still got beat – and not by a little bit,” Ann Marie Habershaw, chief operating officer for Obama’s re-election campaign, said in an email soliciting new donations.

“Romney and Republicans raised more than $106 million, not even including money to pro-Romney super PACs,” she said, referring to the independent political action committees which can raise and spend unlimited funds to support candidates, although they cannot directly fund a campaign.

“If we lose this election, it will be because we didn’t close the gap enough when we had the chance,” Habershaw added.

Obama lags behind Romney when it comes to super PACs. Wealthy conservatives are said to be funneling huge sums into such outside groups that support Romney’s agenda.

May was the first full month in which Romney emerged as the clear winner of a grueling Republican primary race, paving the way for him to step clear of party rivals and out-raise Democratic Obama for the first time.

Obama received donations from 706,000 individual donors in June, while Romney received funds from about 560,000 individual donors.

June’s figures were significant for Romney in part because they showed a dramatic increase in grass-roots donations, turf that Obama has broadly dominated.

Romney received more than 536,000 donations of less than $250 in last month, compared to 297,000 donations under $250 in May.

“This month’s fundraising is a statement from voters that they want a change of direction in Washington,” Romney Victory finance chairman Spencer Zwick said in a statement announcing the June numbers.

Romney, who holds a campaign rally Tuesday in Colorado, is reportedly holding fundraisers in the tony resort town of Aspen on Monday night.

Despite the fundraising advantage, Romney’s team has insisted it is Obama who is currently spending more on getting out his message.

In a memo dated Sunday, the Romney campaign said it has been outspent $46.2 million to $17.0 million on advertising since Romney won the Republican primary race in April.

That figure however does not include the money spent by super PACs on advertising.

The pro-Romney issues advocacy group Crossroads GPS announced Friday it had purchased a $25 million ad blitz in nine battleground states to attack Obama’s record on jobs and the national debt.

- © AFP, 2012

Roe v Wade, Obamacare and Super PACs: US election terms explained >

Krugman: Elect Mitt romney and the US will have an Irish recession >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (35 Comments)

  • 536000 donations of 250 or less… Does anyone else find it extremely disturbing that regular American are paying hard earned cash to grease the wheels of their own democratic system?!

    What a strange and worrying arrangement the American people have with their elected “representatives” (with this kind of money being thrown around, it would be naive to think American politicians in any way represented the average person in their constituency)

    Reply
    • Fallacy of the commons- the cheater wins so not cheating on moral grounds simply loses.In this case if on moral grounds you don’t ‘grease the wheels’ you lose. On a side point Obama built his campaign last time on micro donation $5 or $10 dollars from millions, actually not a bad way of funding a campaign as anyone who could afford a pint could support the campaign.

      Reply
    • $250 is not a lot of money. People give what they can afford.

      Reply
    • @Declan – So you’d have $250 / €225 to hand over to fuel Enda/Micheal/Eamon or Gerry’s election machine?… Good man yourself.

      *Pat on the head for a loyal citizen*

      Reply
    • Dublinlad, I never said I would hand over $250! My point was/is “people give what they can afford”! Btw what has Enda got to do with this?

      Reply
    • Oh dear…

      You said $250 was not a lot of money? Very sweeping statement. And Enda is involved because this thread mentioned that people on average gave $250 per head to the election machine, and since you said it ‘isn’t a lot’, I mentioned, would you have an issue paying a similar amount to the various leaders election machine?

      Reply
    • No Dublin lad you are making the sweeping statement! This article is about campaign financing in the USA. So it has nothing to do with Enda and co. Stay focused.

      Reply
    • I agree that 250 isnt an enormous amount of money but its not the amount that I have a problem with. We’re not talking about donations to charity here, we’re talking about donations to a system (irrespective of political allegiances) that should inherently be free. I know these are obviously completely voluntary but it really bothers me that a country that sees itself as a bastion of freedom and democracy runs on a system that requires substantial injections of cash, from Joe Bloggs to giant corporations, to put a candidate into office.

      Its not for me to assume what the founding fathers of the United States had in mind when they forged the document that is now the modern US constitution but I sincerely doubt it is this.

      Reply
    • My point was/is “people give what they can afford”!

      What a banal point.

      Reply
    • Nokia, why don’t you take your “bullshitvik” revolution elsewhere!

      Reply
    • Why don’t you take your centrist banality elsewhere before you put us all to sleep.

      Reply
  • Unfortunately money rules the world. It’s usually the party that has the biggest purse wins.

    Reply
  • Its a pity that democracy becomes so polluted by money.

    Reply
  • I still think Obama’s gonna just gonna say “I. Got. Bin Laden” Game over.

    Reply
  • Not crying,whats with the attitude dial it back a bit and your point of veiw may be worth considering.But from what i read its USA all the way and F*** the collateral damage.

    Reply
  • @Ed I may be naive as you so patronisingly put it but if corruption is endemic and across the board then why pick out America the syrians were sticking two fingers up to everyone and Europe did nothing it took the Americans to scare Assad now the end is in sight for him during the Bosnian war the Dutch UN troops stood by while the Muslim men and boys were murdered and thrown in pits it took the Americans to bomb Belgrade into action.Europe did nothing that monster Saddam used chemical weapons on his people in the past.I agree that interference in another country creates problems but there are two sides to the story I don’t know everything I’m not privileged to have access to top secret documents but perhaps the Americans wanted to sit on Iran through Iraq so what they are genuinely worried about a nuclear bomb in the hands of fanatics and I don’t blame them I would love to think we could all live in peace but so far that has not been possible so the world needs policemen and right now it’s America protecting us from outright madmen look at the monster in libya Gadaffi look at the monster Stalin look at hitler look at all the evil in our world drug pushers and drug cartels organised crime gangs the world needs strong democracy’s to protect the citizens the Americans were extremely helpful to the peace plan in Ireland and I’m sure the british were more than encouraged into action by America this is a country that saved western Europe during second world war and when they were finished beating the Germans into surrender they helped them rebuild the country into a peaceful democracy when Europe and the world were threatened by the soviets it was America that protected the world from the communist lunatics.so no I don’t have a conspiracy theory against America history and my 41 years has taught me that America is the good guy in a very dangerous world and the world is so dangerous that America needs the big guns to protect us all would you rather live in china where they can just tell people to get out of the way of a motorway or would you rather live in Russia where corruption is so bad that even the police are stealing from ordinary people or how about living in a country where if you speak out you disappear the USA has encouraged the move to democracy in china and Russia I agree not everything is perfect with the system but I’d rather America running the show than a lot of others.yes I can see that 60000 people have died in Iraq but how many died with Saddam how many are dead in Syria now is all of that Americas fault I don’t think so it’s all about how you see things and I see a lot of monsters in the world so does america that’s why they meet them at the fight every time to stand up to the bully’s and win the fight

    Reply
  • I hope Obama gets a second term he is not a bad president and the world feels a little safer with him in the white house.

    Reply
  • @ Ed I don’t know what you are talking about I don’t think the Americans would fly planes into the twin towers and kill their own people. I think you have read to many fiction novels. I think the problem is religious mania and a lack of education and even where education is present the crazies are just better educated crazies.nI think America has got some interesting alternative agendas yes but I also think they are going to look after our interests better than the Chinese or the Russians and I’d love to see your expression if Iran got the bomb.nI just hope we can trust the Americans to counter terror on our behalf.nI am a happy supporter of America and I just wish we were in club USA instead of being stuck in Yoyoland with no federal currency to help us out of hard times. What ever the arms industry is I’m just glad the Americans are better armed.I’m sick to death of anti American crap from people.Thanks to America we are not all speaking German today.nSo piss off with the conspiracy theories I will gladly let the Americans in my door anytime.There is hardly a country in the Muslim world that is not living in poverty and most of that is down to a religion that keeps women down and subservient to men. So America is fine with me even with agendas.nYou probably have some kind of a human rights agenda a load of crap what about the human rights of women in these rubbish dump countries.

    Reply
  • @ John Ryan what a load of crap he inherited a war and anyway what about all the innocent people murdered on 9/11. If it were up to people like you we would all be overrun by terrorists and lunatics. If it wasn’t for America we would be fighting for our own lives against the fanatics. It’s our innocent or theirs and I would prefer America in charge of things thank you very much.nI would also prefer a democrat in the white house rather than run the risk of having a Christian fundamentalist republican looking for guidance from Jesus Christ who incidentally came from the same region all the lunatics come from.nSo it’s a bloody good yes from me for Obama and I hope he does get a second term.n

    Reply
    • Stefan. You do know the war on terror is a manufactured war to justify massive military and security expenditure and control. If you believe their are terrorists everywhere trying to blow up your plane hen your a moron. Obama is a bank sponsored liar, as is Romney. Neither give two flying folks about your safety or freedoms. Wake the hell up and stop falling for the propaganda.

      Reply
    • Stefan sorry to ask you this but you ever wonder why the twin towers were attacked,your right alot of innocent people died that day,i believe in the region of 60,000 Iraqi people have died since 9/11 my figure might be on the low side.Imo America’s interference in the affairs of other countries has brought alot trouble to their own homeland.

      Reply
    • Don’t know how people can blame The US for Shiites killing Sunnis & Sunnis killing Shiites? That nonsense has resulted in more deaths than anything the US has done.

      Reply
    • Reg after the Americans toppled Saddam they disbanded the Iraqi army making a lawless situation worse.Even commatators in the States have agreed this was a mistake.

      Reply
    • @ Reginald

      Well, before the US invaded they weren’t killing each other so I think I will blame the US.

      What the f*ck gave them to right to ‘remove’ another head of state? Do China have that right too? Iran?

      If not, why not?

      Reply
  • RDX862 09/07/12 #

    Remember people “YES WE CAN” “CHANGE”

    Friday, June 20, 2008

    Sen. Barack Obama reversed his pledge to seek public financing in the general election yesterday, a move that drew criticism from adversaries and allies alike but could provide him with a significant spending advantage over Republican rival John McCain.

    Obama will become the first major-party presidential nominee to reject the public funds, passing up nearly $85 million in taxpayer money and instead looking to the 1.5 million donors who contributed to his primary campaign. Given his groundbreaking success in raising money in the Democratic primaries, estimates of how much he could collect for the general-election run to $300 million or more, a sum that would allow the senator from Illinois to compete even in traditionally Republican states.

    “It’s not an easy decision, and especially because I support a robust system of public financing of elections,” Obama said in a video message to supporters, circulated yesterday morning by his campaign. “But the public financing of presidential elections as it exists today is broken, and we face opponents who’ve become masters at gaming this broken system.”

    Under the public financing system, which was established in the wake of the Watergate scandal, candidates are barred from raising private funds or spending their own money on their general-election bids. The lump sum they receive from the Treasury is the only money they can spend once they are officially declared their party’s nominee.

    Reply
  • money well spent *cough*

    Reply
  • whoever wins will spend approx $1bn for a job that pays $400k a year. I think its easy to see who the real winners are. big business who fund the campaigns and who then have the victor in their pockets

    Reply
  • @ Norman you don’t have to be sorry about anything.nBlaming the Americans is too cool for school fcuk the hell off.nThese iraqis were murdering each other a long time before the Americans ever got involved and always will it’s tribal with them but it becomes everybody’s problem when their issues start to encourage Iran to get the bomb. Nobody can trust Russia not even the Russians and America has been fighting Russia through this region for a long time. Now the cold war is over the Russians being totally corrupt allowed dangerous weapons loose throughout the region.nI just hope when world war 3 starts the Americans will be ready to unleash hell.nSo cry all you want about Americas agenda I’m glad they have one.

    Reply
    • Stefan. Your opinion of the world is naive beyond description. Power corrupts and that applies across the board. The US government is corrupt beyond repair and the idea that a federal reserve printing money to bail us out is laughable. You know nothing about basis economics

      Reply
  • Would have though that was the Dems…Hollywoods wallet an all.

    Reply
  • I hope Obama makes it…can’t stand that other smug f***er Romney!!

    Reply

Add New Comment