TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Child benefit to be ‘cut first and reformed later’

The government is coming under fire for ‘another broken promise’ – a €10 cut in child benefit across the board.

Image: Photocall Ireland

THE GOVERNMENT IS planning to announce a cut in child benefit of €10 per child in the forthcoming budget.

Newspaper reports today reveal that the cut will be made regardless of the age of the child or the number of children in a family.

Transport Minister Leo Varadkar has indicatedt today that the cut will go ahead in place of any reform of the child benefit system.

He told RTÉ’s News at One that while reform would be ideal and a plan is being prepared by Joan Burton and the Department of Social Protection, reform takes time. He agreed that a policy of ‘cut first and reform later’ is being implemented.

The government had insisted last week that headline social welfare rates would not be cut in next month’s budget, however draft budget documents seen by TheJournal.ie indicated that social welfare is to be heavily targeted.

In February Labour took a shot at Fine Gael plans to cut child benefit, saying it was a burden that families could not afford. In response Fine Gael said that child benefit would be left untouched for the first few years, before slowly reducing allowances paid to better-off families.

Fianna Fáil spokesperson on Social Protection Barry Cowen said that the full extent of Labour’s pre-election cynicism is being exposed, calling plans to cut child benefit “another broken promise” from the government.

Cowen highlighted Labour’s ‘Every Little Hurts’ campaign and the party’s insistence that cutting child benefit was a deal breaker for them.

Budget leaks: Social welfare to bear burden of cuts, Government tells EU

February: Labour attacks FG in child benefit newspaper ads

Read next:

Comments (126 Comments)

  • Children benefit to children of Irish workers who are not domiciled in this state should NOT be recipients of Children Allowances

    Reply
    • True – if they are not living here, they should be claiming off the state they are resident actually in.

      Reply
    • Totally totally agree, it’s a joke! Children should be living in the state in order to be entitled. Likewise the way everybody, no matter what their income, is automatically entitled to child benefit. I got it and while I’m not rich, I could have easily done without it, whereas some others not so fortunate depend on it!!! It needs a major overhaul and I don’t think this is the way to go about it.

      Reply
    • I don’t see why taxpayers should subsidise people who want to have kids anyway (and yes, I do have kids). The government shouldn’t interfere in the choices people make, unless those choices are illegal. The less government interference we have, the lower our taxes will be and the more people will want to “generate” rather than just put a hand out.

      Reply
    • Because today’s children are tomorrow’s tax payer’s. Remember that when you are in your dotage and enjoying your free travel pass and healthcare. Look up what support children get in Finland for example. That’s a progressive society!

      Reply
    • Totally agree, day after day I see employees having forms filled in for kids that don’t live in Ireland, they claim! My Kids are sick and I pay 60 per child at the doctors, and they are entitled to medical cards too.

      Reply
    • so if you’ve worked hard all your life payed taxes and through no fault of your own are forced to lets say move to london to work on a construction site ,leaving your wife and x amount of kids behind,those kids born and raised in ireland should not recieve child benefit in this economic climate?

      Reply
    • @ Raymond: I think you’ve misread the argument Johnny made. If the kids aren’t living in Ireland then they shouldn’t be receiving child benefit in Ireland, from the Irish government.

      Reply
  • Eastern European economies are thriving because of the child benefit from here going there. €140 gets a lot more there than here as you’re all aware. And we can’t just stop paying it because it’s against EU law.

    Sure earlier in the year when a possible cut here was touted a polish minister came out against it…! Some neck

    Reply
    • Stephen, surely you have no idea what you are talking about. “Eastern European economies are thriving” because of the Irish child benefits – LOL – sure. Yeah, child dole from Ireland makes everyone over there minted and swimming in luxuries yeah right…. Children clothes in Poland are more expensive than in Ireland, food just about the same (maybe bit cheaper, not much), toys – more expensive than in Ireland, etc. etc. Yeah, 140 a month is real fortune all right :) Also where there is worker working in Ireland he is entitled to get whatever they give, regardless where the children are and accept the fact, this is EU rule and not just in Ireland, but concerning every other country. So if your kids are spending some school time or perhaps visiting family abroad, maybe you should report yourself to the authorities you want to have child benefit stopped for that time, as they’re not here, good idea Stephen? Also another fact you missed is how many immigrant children are actually living outside the state, I don’t think it’s that many in fact, most would be here with their parents anyways. It’s typical story to turn around taxpayers attention and direct their anger at in fact almost meaningless subject. SW should rather check all the people living HERE who scam the system, this is where real loss is…

      Reply
  • Cut first, reform later! I wouldn’t want to be elderly, infirm, young or disabled trapped in a fire with this lot. Think they have their priority order askew.

    Reply
    • For goodness sake, how does a democratic system works? It takes YEARS to reform. Legislation changes are much more complex to implement than a simple budget cut. We are broke NOW.

      FF kept shoving child benefit up up up up up. Was it only me at the time thinking ‘that will bite us in the ass’ in a few years? Are people now all for the daft FF policies that bankrupted us?

      Reply
    • Child benefit is considered when working out social welfare benefits. This possible cut will affect those that can’t afford it. Simple. For me anyway.

      Reply
    • If they do go ahead with this, social welfare payments should increase by same per dependent child. Wouldn’t take YEARS. P Wurple.

      Reply
  • Oh yes such a great idea taking it from the people who need it the most. People who were in jobs supporting their children but due to the theft and dishonesty of the rich in this country have no longer the luxury of doing so. Some families need as much as they can get just to pay for a roof over their heads. Why attack the children it should be means tested. If we can afford to still bail out the likes of the thieving bwankers and let them still walk away with a pension. Or the idiots like Quinn who still wouldn’t need to claim CB even after claiming bankruptcy. What the hell is wrong with people. Right now it doesn’t benefit out future destroying more and more people’s lives. Lets take it from the bastards that stole from us in the first place and still are while we sit back and
    Watch . Hey let’s just knock on their doors and hand over what little pennies we have left. The people that agree are obviously children less and obviously are very fortunate to have an income. Not sitting looking at their children while they sleep knowing you have to again send them to School in the morning in the same shoes that leak. or the parents that cry everynight because they know this time next week they could possibly be homeless. These same parents that worked 24 7 the same parents that paid the same tax as every one else.

    Reply
  • My wife and I had a discussion today, we have two beautiful children. We want to have 3 but based on financial pressures we both feel we can’t afford it. In that financing their welfare and education as well as paying increasing taxes, direct and indirect. I resent that I have to make decisions like this based on recession that has a majority stake in the banking failure and crisis.

    Reply
    • @mark unfortunately you are not the only family faced with this dilemma. It is sickening to think that your whole life is being governed by idiots in the Dail and Reichstag. I empathise with your situation completely.

      Reply
    • How did they do it years ago Mark when everyone had large families.A lot more poverty and shortage of food then but providence always provides.The world will not end if you decide to have another child far from it.The benefit system down south is the best in Europe and yet some are never happy,some in the world are dying because they have no clean water,count your blessings folks its not all bad.

      Reply
  • why do people in this country constantly knock those of us who are contributing to the future of our nation and the human race in general. no children = no future! without cb my family would struggle and require aid from the state . yes cb is state aid but and this is a big but me, my wife have NEVER claimed any other sw benefit..yet the lijes of pat kenny joe duffy et al get the same payment as us, not to mention politicians on ?92000 per annum plus expenses. REFORM system NOW!

    Reply
  • Whatever argument you make about CB, the fact is that the wrong people are suffering for others mistakes. I thought we had enough of Injustice and lies. This government made a pact with the people that they were going to make those responsible pay in return for a precious prize. Our Vote. Ive seen none of that. They betrayed many thousands who put them where they are within a blink of an eye. They are all sitting there now on their throne in the dail being paid bloody well and with a guaranteed huge pension. Thanks to us. None of these cuts will affect them in the slightest. In this country you can lie and cheat people at a moments whim because apathetic fools known as tge Irish people bury their heads in the sand or moan away uselessly on morning Radio. Don’t put up with this

    Reply
  • means testing childrens allowance is the only fair way to go

    Reply
    • Yes, but it is easier than that – just tax the child benefit and as when someone starts a new job the benefit should be taxed with emergency tax until some of that individual’s credits are transferred to offset the tax on the child benefit. Then people who earn 50,000 a year would get much less child benefit but still get some and the whole system would merge with the taxation system and therefore would not require an expensive and new means-testing system for every family in Ireland.

      Reply
  • I think it would make sense to gauge your eligibility to receive the payment by the amount you earn. I dont see how a minimum wage earning single mother gets the same child payment as someone who earns 100k a year. Also while we’re talking cuts, why don’t we view the records of foreign nationals and cut their overall payments relative to the amount of tax they’ve paid or time they’ve actually worked. Why are we allowing people to come to this country and scrounge?

    Reply
  • How about reducing payments to better-off families NOW?

    Reply
  • Dee 20/11/11 #

    Were all just siiting back taken these cuts. there be more cuts announced and more arguments and good ideas from public but government will just cut Away they should get down on to the shop floor with the rest of us and see how we all struggle instead of sitting in ther offices collecting ther big wages they have not got a clue about worrying wer the money is coming from next to pay the mortgage or household bills

    Reply
    • But they would argue that they were ‘down here on the shop floor’ before going in to the Dail and you would say they are no different. I would say that this country is heading in the same direction as Italy and Greece unless we do either of two things – 1. Get our finances in order and not be dictated to by the IMF et al or 2. Burn the bondholders and start printing our own money and get as far away from Merkel and Sarkozy as possible before we are under the control is a dictatorship. If that happens, we will see cuts to child allowance etc in a different light.

      Reply
  • Kev Mak 21/11/11 #

    The VAT increase will indeed cost jobs as more people will cross over the border and what little they have will be spent there.Retailers were looking at a bleak enough run up to Christmas, because thats the name of the holidays,by the way, without this added burden. A massive knock-on effect will be felt by so many and once again,those unfortunately often used words, those that can least afford it will be hit again,come out again. It will be foolish to think that the riots in London recently would look out of place here, as I feel a surge of resentment and futility begining to swell.

    Reply
  • Disgraceful, just disgraceful. There are plenty of well off families who absolutely do not need to get state subsidies to support their families yet happily collect their child benefit and add it to their stash. On the other hand there are infinitely more families struggling to survive who DEPEND!! on this payment simply to provide food for their children.

    This payment should have been means tested as a matter of priority to stop the well off depriving the needy. Instead the rich may have to cut back on their car valeting each month while poorer families go hungry.

    Austerity obviously does not apply to the haves in our society, only the have nots. Shame on you all!!

    Reply
  • the govt have been very disappointing since taking power. Fairness has gone out the window. flat reduction in child benefit and this proposed VAT increase which will hit everyone equally and close plenty of shops and pubs etc……. couple that with the flat rate property tax etc… there’s no imagination and the wealthy continue to dodge the bullets. It’s sickening !

    Reply
  • If labour allow this , they can kiss my vote goodbye, as I now see them as protecting fat cat unions. It is simply sick.

    Reply
  • Fizi…Thriving was obviously an over statement, sarcasm pal. I know there an EU law protecting child payments… I did say if you read my post again. I said eastern European countries never specified Poland, you did… I’m fully aware Poland isn’t the cheapest place in the world for toys, clothes and food. But other places like Latvia, Lithuania etc are considerable cheaper than here so €140 would stretch more than here.

    Reply
  • No Neil. Not hatred. Disillusionment and exasperation with my people and your wrong assumption just amplifies my point. What morning radio show are you on tomorrow?

    Reply
  • Kev Mak 21/11/11 #

    Across the board cut to Child Benefit rather than stopping the benefit to middle-high income earners is lazy,two-faced and certainly cowardly.For those shouting that it shdnt be there in the first plce,you miss the point that nobody should have to be deprived of feeding their children.Nobody chooses to bring a child up in poverty,we dont all live in areas which may still offer jobs.Minmum wage tries to ensure you dont need state help.We shouldnt have to struggle through life just to prove we can either. The cuts are inherently wrong.

    Reply
  • @ Andrew alot of people did plan their families and were financially secure then were shafted and left with nothing had their livelihoods stolen from them. What about them Andrew what category do you put then into your comments are arrogant and ignorant you are obviously not in the desperate position with or without family but im guessing not

    Reply
  • Martin oh please look at the bigger picture you are so not, and are no way near forking out for the same cost of living as the south everything across your board is cheaper everything from school fees children’s health dentistry road tax insurance food mortgage rates why do you think so many people from south shop in the north. Don’t comment on-stuff you really have no clue about. If we all could have the same rates as you we could all live with less

    Reply
    • Dee living in Derry i know lots of people from across the border who tell me they dont have to work as the benefits are so good down south.Wake up its going to ruin the republic paying for this lunacy.Look at child benefit almost double what we get and yet all you do is whinge.As for high prices the republic is happy to flog off tourists with over inflated prices like food and drink.Dont make me laugh.

      Reply
  • it would seem i misunderstood your point,in that case i would actually agree.

    Reply
  • Fine Gael the party of Stealth taxes, candy takers and child enslavers have learnt nothing since the 1980’s (VAT on children shoes) and neither have we as we voted (well not me) them back in. Fine Gael need to be stopped on this one are Labour going to do it? Labour are the new Green party and will suffer the same faith once Fine Gael go down in flames.
    Oh just in case people think I only want to slate the government I have a few solutions to our current economic problems:
    1. Have a referendum on Public Sector Pay, set the top rate at €100k per year and a sliding scale after that and no one can earn more than it. (I know the argument is that we will not get the best people into state jobs if we do this, but do we have the best people at present?)
    2. Reduce the Dáil to 26 TD’s one for each county as the majority only speak party lines we don’t need more.
    3. Reduce corporate tax to 11% and then a sliding scale if corporations fund and educate colleges to produce work ready graduates.
    4. Minimum wage / Social welfare cannot be cut unless the top civil servants take a 1.75 to 1 reduction.
    5. Cut Civil Servants expenses to zero and let them provide value for money arguments for getting a single cent of the money back.
    6. End all golden handshake payouts to civil servants (This means breaking contracts, or so it is claimed but I argue changing Social welfare / minimum wages without agreement is breaking contracts with people who signed on to work at that rate. So break the contracts and let them sue in front of a jury of their peers.)
    7. Tax the wealthy their fair share.

    Reply
    • How about reducing and reforming welfare payments? Do u want to add that?

      Reply
    • Its all that terrible FG who are doing the cutting. They really are terrible aren’t they?

      Oh wait… What’s that – Joan Burton of LABOUR is in Social Protection?

      Reply
    • @ Ryan. We have noticed how generous FG were to give 2 out of 3 of the big spending Depts to Labour. How convenient. Their intention to obliterate the Labour vote in the next election is cynical.

      Reply
    • Firstly we don’t have the wealthy to tax…..and the very few will leave if we do, and spend their money else where

      If you reduce the top rate of pay in the civil service to €100k will the rest have to take a proportional cut to keep the motivational factor to work harder to get promoted

      Why not reduce the the minimum wage, currently it higher that other EU counties and is a barrier to people seeking work and creates a black labour Market

      The only sensible thing you wrote was reducing Corporation Tax

      Our solution is very simple, don’t pay the risk taking bankers, that would solve most of our issues

      Reply
    • CSEC BIO 20/11/11 #

      @Pa Foley I do have a plan for reforming welfare payments. I think most of the money should be on a voucher system for people who have been on welfare for 2 or more years. The vouchers should cover the basics like home, food and heating with a maximum of €50 cash. But suggesting this before a fair system is put in place is dangerous as Fine Gael will implement this without the other more important reforms. Fine Gael pick on the young they should pick on the institutional elite and the job for the boys culture which they are currently embracing.

      Reply
    • @Johnny Zillion Tax the wealthy, it is listening to this crap that they will leave the country if asked to pay their fair share let them leave! Why not cut the minimum wage? BECAUSE WE PAY MORE FOR EVERYTHING IN IRELAND THAN THE REST OF THE EU! Bring prices in line with EU prices then I have no problem with cutting the rate, but when we are being RIPPED OFF I have a big problem. We spend most of the time looking at cutting costs not at GETTING VALUE. If we looked at getting value then there would be no need to cut child benefit.

      Reply
    • We saw where Labour and Fine Gael got a few of their chums onto the benches of the Courts lately. My ears are ringing with the shouting about Judicial independence since the referendum.

      The cronyism continues!http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/1114/1224307527505.html

      Reply
  • so easy to see the people without kids naieve fools ye havent a clue

    Reply
  • Do people realize that they voted in a Government that can’t govern on the basis of promises that they cant keep. The best that this Dail can give us for the next while is a bit of a laugh like when the ‘house’ is regaled by the sartorial elegance of ‘Ming’ and ‘Wallly’ is looking for a bit of time out for the footie!

    Kenny and RTE give the Roman Church a bit of a well deserved kicking because that’s allright now – the Bishop of Rome has no say in Brussels and Merkozy calls the shots. All is not so bad though, the Roman Church defiled our children, the ‘trioka’ will only starve them.

    Reply
    • Pay back your debts John and get on with it,Stop blaming the Catholic church for all your woes.No one was complaining when Europe poured billions of euros to help Ireland in the eighties and nineties,now its payback time.Yes Kenny and RTE have nothing to worry about with their huge wages but then again its coming out of your pocket……..sucker.

      Reply
  • With the latest news (here) that there will be at least another €10 cut to child benefit again for every child in the country and the fact that last February Gilmore promised that Fine Gael would have to abandon plans to slash child benefit if it was to have Labour as a partner in Government – the question arises with me: does Gilmore actually have the guts to stand up to Kenny and FINALLY say “your not turning me and my party into another version of Fianna Fail’s Green Party in power!”

    Regardless of how one feels about cuts to child benefit – how many more u-turns will Gilmore accept like a good little lapdog to master Kenny?
    Seriously! Is Gilmore once again going to eventually meekly accept his masters latest u-turn and follow his bidding and broken promises?

    Good god! Enda Kenny will bring about the downfall of the Labour party Like Fianna Fail did also to the Green Party while they were in coalition also!
    Honestly, I can see Labour going the same way as the Green Party at this rate.

    This latest u-turn/broken promise was/is a core promise not between FG and the people but a core power one between FG and Labour.
    Will Gilmore find some guts and not be stripped of this basic power sharing promise?

    It’s only my own opinion but I feel it does matter about how true and sticking to deals/promises, our leaders make.
    It goes to the heart and credibility of our nations head and how serious can his word be further then taken and trusted by those elsewhere.

    Just over six months ago, on the day he became Taoiseach, Kenny promised that “honesty” would not only be his Government’s best policy, it would be its only policy.

    Then at his party’s think-in in Galway (September), Kenny said the people don’t want waffle from the Government and he will “level with the people”.
    He most certainly isn’t even doing that with his cabinet members – never mind the actual public!

    Reply
    • Get real, we are broke and cutbacks need to be made…if we had a Government with Sinn Fein, The Socialist Party and People before Profit, the cut backs would be exactly the same and we would all whinge about broken promises and these parties demise, wishing them to be
      replaced by the latest noisy radical grouping, who when they get power will do exactly the same…..we have no choices

      Reply
    • I am real. If the word of our top man cannot be trusted by his own people, his fellow government ministers, never mind the public – how can we expect foreign government ministers never mind business people looking to invest/set-up elsewhere, to take our government serious?

      You do realise that this is only ONE of many u-turns by this government don’t you?

      …And what does it say to the credability of the word of FG, never mind Labour who are just FG’s lapdogs – as the Greens were to Fianna Fail and look how that ended up!

      Reply
    • Just read the bit at the end where you talk about waffle. Seems to sum up your rant pretty well….

      Reply
    • You have to remember what age Gilmore is. He’s waited around for decades to be in government, and now that he’s in, I seriously doubt that he’ll come out. The same goes for the rest of his cabinet… Look at the age profile of most of them. The political reality is that Gilmore, Rabbitte, Howlin and Burton will probably be retiring come 2016, although Gilmore and Howlin probably could make another stab at it. Even still, if they give up power now, they won’t taste it again.

      I see individual Labour TDs making a cut and run for it in the mean time, like Willie Penrose. A wholesale pull out of government will either happen late in the day or not at all.

      Reply
    • Anyone remember this: http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/2918/labourad.jpg

      Amazing how quick things change once they get into power!

      Reply
    • @ Kelly, his flowery populist prose is like something a Fianna Failer would come out with, alright!

      Look, no one likes the economic reality-but cuts have to be made. Those who would drive a stake between Kenny and Gilmore with ham fisted essays are only opening the door for Fianna Fail to get back in again, and indulge in auction politics that we can ill afford, every November.

      Reform is necessary, and will happen.

      Reply
    • This IS NOT about child benefit alone. I don’t want to see Labour go the way of the Green Party.
      I’m not a Labour supporter but if they become as ineffectual and as pawns to be played around with as the Green Party did under Fianna Fail, they will go down the same route of destruction.
      …And if that happens, the chances of Fianna Fail getting back in increase dramatically – and THAT I do not want!

      Reply
  • CB is a payment to the mother. Married,single it makes no difference .This is a direct attack on every mother and child in the country.
    To those who have said having kids should be decided by wealth are clueless, kids are born out of love. I feel sorry for does who look at wealth,they must have had a very loveless childhood.
    The issue here is we voted in a new government to replace the previous wasters. We were lied to by FG & LB so that they could get elected. They say that their hands are tied by the IMF but they knew this when they promised so much during the election. There term will not last long,mark my words.

    Reply
  • cimada 21/11/11 #

    I’m not going to read everyone else’s comments because I feel too many people cry poverty. I’m sorry but if things like a freaking 50cent prescription charge mean you cannot afford your medicine youre not trying very hard. The money has to come from somewhere. Rent allowance fuel allowance child benefit medical card school uniform grants education grants back to education. I’m sorry but it doesn’t pay to work. I don’t get any of the above except a GP visit card I earn 270 euro a week working. I don’t get anything else and I pay my own rent etc. I paid for my own masters and degree no grants etc and there is no work. Everyone suffers here. I would be better off on the dole. That’s so wrong. Stop crying poverty. Take some responsibility it’s not easy but in terms of benefits there is probably no where in the world you would rather be.

    Reply
    • Kev Mak 21/11/11 #

      @cimada, you sound like you have no children, possible single,living in a bedsit or at ur parents more likely with a minmal outlay in reality.At present you proberbly havnt a real clue about the situation parents and morgage payers are in.Thankfully thats a good thing for you.Long may you be blissfully ignorent and just put up with all that is taken from you.Good luck on that and hope not to see your face in a crowd chanting slogans to save a hospital or because you no longer have a job.

      Reply
  • Paul 20/11/11 #

    I don’t think people should have children unless they can afford to have them, don’t think it’s logical for a bankrupt State to support people like doctors, Lawyers & millionaires children! Should definitely be means tested at the least!

    Reply
    • Support having children – yes. Supporting everyone at the same rate – yes too. Why to punish people who earn a lot and pay lot of taxes same time? Why would they have to provide to all leeches not bothered to get good education and good job? I think too many socialists on this forum :)

      Reply
    • It’s not always the case that people have kids when they can’t afford them. A lot of people had children and have unfortunately lost their jobs in recent times and have had to rely on social welfare to get through. I agree that social welfare needs major reforms and fraud needs to be tackled but it just seems to me that the government are hitting the wrong people. I also think children’s allowance should be means tested

      Reply
  • @ cimada You dont have kids you don’t have a
    Mortgage I think most people could live by themselves and pay rent on your earnings most people who have a mortgage and have children have to live on your wage could you do it then

    Reply
  • Again… Personal responsibility, having children is a choice, if you can’t afford to feed kids you shouldn’t be having them.

    I actually think its the opposite middle income people seem more inclined to invest it in their children’s well being. Lower income families drink, smoke or gamble it away. Let’s replace it with more money being spent on free childcare places, more readily available public healthcare for children and a lower vat rate on healthy food.

    Reply
    • Lower income families struggle to pay bills and feed kids…im lower income and I dnt drink, smoke or socialise. Dont tar everyone with the same brush.

      Reply
    • Very well said Joanne! I’m a loan parent and I don’t smoke or go out or spend money on luxuries! Its far too easy to tar everyone with the same brush! There are people out there who take advantage of social welfare and a lot of fraud going on but I don’t believe for one second that all lower income families can be lumped in with people like that. The majority of lower income families I know are struggling and this cut will really hurt them!

      Reply
    • So Andrew, I assume you’ve done some research into the spending habits of lower and middle income families to come out with a statement like that. Otherwise it would just be baseless garbage. But couldn’t be that surely…..

      Reply
    • Andrew that is a dispicible generalisation…

      Reply
  • Are you single Martin if so your damn right 104 should do you just like it should for the single people here put in ratio with our cost of living but could you live on 104 with three children and a mortgage

    Reply
  • Irish solution to an Irish problem …..

    Reply
  • Tara 20/11/11 #

    @ Andrew

    You asshole…..

    Reply
  • Where have my earlier comments gone?
    Why does the Journal censor do much??????

    Reply
  • So your saying it’s justified to take another 10 pound of people who are already facing severe hardship while the people who put the country in this mess are still thousands upon thousands of wages not including pensions not including expenses for hair cuts

    Reply
  • Call me cynical, but the thought just occured that maybe, they are trying to bring down this government and replace it with a new EU approved emergency parliament ,just like Italy and Greece, With let’s say Peter Sutherland reluctantly brought in to sort us out.

    Reply
  • we need a revolution, and sorry to say its not happening, i cant afford my mortgage lost my job, but we have politicians making more than any other in countries that are not as broke as us, they need to cut their pay in half, then pass down what we need to budget,,, we have to do something, we cant afford our government, dont the germans look at that, we need someone to advertise a revolution in a paper an ad on tv and see how many will turn out, this country is in crisis from paying banks, rent allowance should be cut first, i as homeowners went from 750 a week to single parents 218, and i am still trying to pay my mortgage, elec, insurance and feed my kids,, not asking for nothing, but we need to start at the top, if they are their to lead, they need to lead, if its a job get a real one not on the back of tax payers, they should not make over 100,000 a year and never mind expenses, we need to shoot the entire lot of them and start with business people , who can run a business and maybe a country, as what we have are a joke, and lining pockets should be done away with ,, can see them doing it when we can afford to, but we cant, give us jobs that can pay our way, and we can afford to pay tax and pay you, till then,,,,, wish we had back bones and stood up for ourselves against traitors to our country,, or is it ours anymore,,, cut the top first and look at your welfare then, but know that will never happen greedy cows up there,

    Reply
  • Is political comment coming from the Joan Featherstone who declared that she wouldn’t vote in the Presidential election. I think it only fair that those who absent themselves from a democracy and its workings should then be denied a voice of any sort in future political debates.Joan please keep your views to yourself.

    Reply
  • Ok – can someone explain “child benefit” to me? Why as a taxpayer am I subsidising someone to have a child? Why does the state pay people to have children? It is absolutely absurd – I am married and hoping to have a baby in the near future but that is my choice, like buying a car or going on holiday – I expect to pay for my choices. I don’t expect a state subsidy, it is archaic, outdated catholicism and should be scrapped totally, not reduced by a tenner. The well known ‘mickey money’ is a pure piss take and no-one is entitled to it !

    Reply
  • A person with 2 kids will still get €260 a month…10kids €1300 … Budget!

    Reply
    • It is actually worse than that. Subsequent children actually get more.

      Reply
    • It comes to 1686 per month for ten children.

      Reply
    • Yes an what abount families with one child that are relying on that €140 to buy the clothes and fuel to keep their child warm and only have €300 to buy food, pay for what is supposed to be a free education. You obviously look down on those who are vulnerable so why dont you stand back and take a good hard look at yourself and count yourself lucky that you arent relying on it instead of making smart comments about people who need this money through no fault of their own.

      Reply
  • It’s clueless to consider planning how you might provide for your children before you pop them out? Because in my mind that’s the difference between parenting and breeding.

    Reply
    • Take a look at the dole queues Andrew. And how much they have increased since the recession started. All of those people who had jobs before this recession hit probably said yeah, lets start a family. I’m working, everything is ok. Circumstances change. These people are now struggling to feed their children through no fault of their own. Should they now just give them back because their planning didn’t work out? You seem to be of the opinion that people just “pop out” children and worry about looking after them later. But that is not the case at all. If people were to sit down and consider every scenario that might happen before they have children then the population would be dramatically reduced. No-one can predict the future, you can only hope it will be a good one. Unfortunately, for a lot of people, the future now looks bleak.. And I’ll say it again, through no fault of their own.

      Reply
    • How dare you , use that term with regards my children and the children of this nation . I am disgusted by your LACK OF BREEDING . Andrew Telford , or maybe you are just a troll!

      Reply
    • Eileen, dont listen to Andrew, he is just another FF/FG/Labour croney, willing to sell his Mother to protect his own income.

      Reply
    • That’s what unemployment benefits are for… were not debating the dole here. Were debating a payment to women to subsidize their having children. It’s archaic from the 1960’s when women couldn’t earn an income themselves and weren’t valued in the job market, when they couldn’t legally pursue the father of their child for support, when domestic violence was common, when women wouldn’t get the dole if there partner was working and we needed make sure a mother got something to feed her kids before the father could blow the families income on alcohol.

      Those circumstances don’t exist any more… the same way public servant’s don’t need an hour of on a friday to cash their paychecks.

      It’s a remnant of the past that’s now just handing out money and indebting us all further. I stand by my original position. Wind the benefit down and replace it with more money for children’s healthcare, more free childcare places, more social programs for disadvantaged kids and less vat on healthy food. Where it can actually impact the welfare of children.

      Reply
    • ”Those circumstances don’t exist any more…” You haven’t got a clue .People are suffering ,

      Reply
    • Evidence please?

      Reply
    • Andrew … You are a troll. Go read all of the above posts.

      Reply
    • Evidence? Statistics? Facts? Income Demographics? X many starving children, Y families who can’t afford food and shoes for their kids?

      Reply
    • I actually think its the opposite middle income people seem more inclined to invest it in their children’s well being. Lower income families drink, smoke or gamble it away. Let’s replace it with more money being spent on free childcare places, more readily available public healthcare for children and a lower vat rate on healthy food.
      Evidence? Statistics? Facts? Income Demographics?
      Answer your own statement !

      Reply
    • Sigh…

      Me:”think”… “I think”… “I am of the opinion that” If I were intending to preach an absolute truth I would not have explicitly expressed that it was an opinion”

      You: “You’re clueless, people are suffering”

      A statement… A fact… an absolute

      But regardless my time is enough wasted. It’s not my position to bring your literacy up to scratch. That’s what my taxes are for. Or rather the taxes of my grandparents were for. Mine are for teaching your kids to read, grateful or not…. Good evening to you madam

      Reply
    • Andrew @ Hillarious. Had such a laugh at your attempts to come across as if you know what life is about ..Your arrogance is probably the best laugh I have had all day. And you have still not given ANY evidence to the dispicible generalisations you have been spouting all evening. I suppose you never benefitted from Child Benefit , because Andrew you were never taught in manners or social graces .

      Reply
    • Andrew, whilst I agree to a certain extent with your points that the benefit should be directed more at the children your opinion about the child benefit coming into existence in the first place is a little off. Yes, it was to benefit the mothers who were discriminated against in society but there were plenty of wealthy women around in the 1960’s too. The mistake the Government made was wondering “how can we introduce this payment and not have the rich screaming discrimination too?”. So in was introduced for every child, no matter what their social background. Which was wrong. But it was written into legislation and now they can’t get out of it. Without the rich kicking up about it.

      I agree about the childcare. More should be done to provide childcare to give women the incentive to get out to work. I’m at home with my two children (they are below school age) and believe me I would love nothing more to get back to work some days! I worked all my life until I had them. It is hard work with toddlers 24/7 and some days you feel like you’re losing your mind! But the childcare cost for the two is extortionate. It would cost me a weeks wages. I would prefer to spend my time with them when they are young, time goes by so quick and when they are in school, I will go back to work. Believe it or not, mothers want to rear their children themselves, spend the quality time with them when they are young and learning.

      The Government now needs to change the legislation regarding Child Benefit and the fairest way possible is to means test it. It is no longer fair for people to receive this benefit who simply do not need it. The definition of benefit is help or aid. The wealthy do not need help or aid. The less well off do.

      Reply
  • Child benifit is a joke to begin with it should be scraped then lower V.A.T…. And scrap the airline tax to get tourists over here to adopt some freckled orphans

    Reply
  • Big deal… people will just have to budget better. Why exactly should the state pay for people to have kids?

    Reply
  • Martin every tourist town in the world are the same their income is based on a few months a year what do you think it’s one price for tourists and regular price for residents cop on. I lived in England 20 odd years and Ireland 17 I know how much of a difference the cost of living is. I agree single people on dole here get far too much. My daughter if on dole would get 20 euro less than if I were on dole with 3 small children bills and a mortgage and that’s her living at home. It’s the families that have been targeted people trying to keep their heads above water. Please do no comment on something you know little about as you have not or will not experience the hardship that these families are going through. Don’t assume you know what your talking about and that others talk rubbish. It’s the thieving bastards of this country that will inevitably destroy. And it’s the poor that will suffer. I would love you to tell the parents of a family due to be homeless To cop themselves on.

    Reply
  • Well, it does look as though ex-Goldman Sachs’ employees are beginning to infest European democracy. Sutherland in Ireland; Monti in Italy, etc.

    Reply
  • Stop whinging folks,the republic pays the best benefits in Europe,140 euros a month down south for child benefit lucky to get 50 pounds up north.Stop bloody crying poverty ,the free state will soon be totally bankrupt paying these huge handouts. I pity the workers who will have to pay to much tax for these luxuries.188 euros for a single person down south ,while a married couple up north gets 102 pounds,thank your lucky stars again the best welfare in Europe exists in the republic.

    Reply
  • Jeff 20/11/11 #

    Why not stop Children benefits (Mum pocket money) altogether & increase the dole & cut tax ?.. Simple.

    Reply
    • Mum pocket money ???

      Reply
    • Increase dole? Are you serious? We already have some of the highest unemployment benefits in Europe. We need to encourage people to work, not encourage them to stay at home. Exactly the same with child benefits and a tax system that discourages both parents from working (it’s less bad than it used to be, but that’s hardly a glowing endorsement).

      I’ve every sympathy with people who are out of work and struggling to make ends meet, but unless we encourage people to start businesses, even modest ones, the lack of jobs will go on and on.

      Reply
    • EM 21/11/11 #

      I rely on child benefit to help balance the account before the mortgage gets paid. We’d be fucked only for it. It’s far from pocket money.

      Reply
    • The childrens benefit I get Helps towards shoes and coats for my children. The football club fees ,schoolbooks and uniforms.Far from ‘pocket money’ .

      Reply
    • Enda Kenny’s wife may see it as pocket money but I certainly don’t!! I only wish I could!!

      Reply
  • Well Dee im unemployed now after paying taxes for 32 years and believe me 104 pounds a week on benefits is nothing compared to the fortune paid down south.Be thankfull for your best welfare system probably in the world.

    Reply
  • Mickey mouse money yeah or even monopoly money, buy gold & silver.!

    Reply
    • Mary, my children are gone past child allowance and I never got the kind of child allowance that is now available. If I had difficulty with ‘the government paying me to have children’ I wouldn’t apply for it and I wouldn’t go around ranting against the catholic church which has absolutely nothing to do with it.

      Reply
    • I really DISLIKE that term for child benefit . It puts all mothers on a cheap level. Every one has a mother !!!

      Reply
  • Mickey mouse or monopoly it’s all the same useless piece of paper. Buy your gold & silver instead.!

    Reply

Add New Comment