Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The People's Convention and their posters in Cork City Hall. Twitter/Fiona Donnelly/ Cork 96FM
Cork

Council meeting called off AGAIN as protester refuses to leave chamber

The People’s Convention are in a row with the council over posters. One member of the group wouldn’t leave this evening, and the meeting was cancelled.

Updated at 10pm

A MEETING OF CORK City Council had to be abandoned this evening, after a protester occupied the chamber and refused to leave.

Members of The People’s Convention have been occupying Cork City Hall since this morning.

The activists are in an ongoing dispute with the council over the removal of their posters from poles in the city – and claim that the situation has come to a head in recent months.

Protester Diarmaid Ó Cadhla entered the chamber as the meeting was supposed to begin at 5.30pm, and said he wouldn’t leave.

The session was abandoned, after first being suspended for fifteen minutes.

Speaking to TheJournal.ie, councillor and former Lord Mayor John Buttimer said that in such situations it’s “virtually impossible to proceed” with a meeting.

Gardaí attended for a time, but were in an “invidious position” according to Buttimer. Due to the presence of the other protesters, they couldn’t predict what might happen if they made an arrest, the Fine Gael councillor said.

Buttimer said that members and council management would now have to make a decision on how future meetings would be conducted – stressing that the ”health and safety of staff” would have to be taken into account.

The council now has a huge backlog to get through, he said – and waiting until the next scheduled fortnightly meeting in two weeks’ time would not be ideal.

Poster dispute

Speaking to TheJournal.ie earlier, Ó Cadhla said the protesters were demanding their “legal rights”.

Today’s action was being staged, he said, ahead of an anti-water charges protest being planned for this Saturday, organised by in part by The People’s Convention.

Ó Cadhla claimed that notices advertising this protest have been removed by the Council and that that the group were not informed of the removal.

We are demanding our legal rights, we have the legal entitlement to posters. They say we are putting them up on in private property.

Asked what kind of “private property” they were referring to, Ó Cadhla said that it may be ESB poles. He argued, however, that “since the foundation of the State” such ESB infrastructure has been used to advertise political events.

Cork City Council have previously stated as part of the long-running dispute that, “there is no absolute right to erect posters for public meetings, events, campaigns or commercial activities.”

The council argue that, while notices for public events are exempt from litter laws, prior authorisation must be given by a property owner before the notices are erected.

A statement last year set out the council’s position on removing posters:

There has been a growing trend of posters being erected, in particular, on lamp standards, traffic poles, etc. There has been a perception that as these are in a public realm that there is freedom for all to use them for displaying purposes. This is not the case. Whilst display of meeting posters within certain timeframes is not an offence the Local Authority, in the absence of advance authorisation, s entitled to remove such displays.
Additional reporting, Daragh Brophy.

Read: Gardaí called to Cork City Council after water protesters storm meeting >

Read: The people’s poles: Local election candidates want more poster time >

Your Voice
Readers Comments
145
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.