Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 18 °C Wednesday 23 May, 2012

Fine Gael website defaced by Anonymous ‘hacktivists’

Visitors to www.finegael2011.com were this evening presented with this message, posted by members of the Anonymous collective.
Visitors to www.finegael2011.com were this evening presented with this message, posted by members of the Anonymous collective.

Updated, 13.37, 10/1/11

FINE GAEL’S NEW WEBSITE was last night defaced by the anonymous hacker group ‘Anonymous’, which replaced the party’s new ‘tell us what you think’ campaign with a holding page telling visitors that the party was censoring submissions.

The site – launched amid much fanfare on Tuesday – had loaded as usual for web users, before users saw its content disappear and be replaced with a message issued by two members of the Anonymous collective, reading:

Nothing is safe, you put your faith in this political party and they take no measures to protect you.

They offer you free speech yet they censor your voice.

WAKE UP!

Furthermore, the page’s title changed to read: ‘The problem with politicians is they lie’ – a play on the party’s own message, that politicians talk too much and listen too little.

Examination of the site’s HTML code suggested that the malicious code appears on the site when it tried to display a user’s comments about how Ireland could be ‘fixed’, loading a string of JavaScript code which when made the Anonymous-branded page appear in place of the intended site.

The malicious code was housed on a server in Samoa, under a domain registered anonymously. The Anonymous group is more widely known for its occasional campaigns against Scientology, and more recently for orchestrating attacks on the websites of companies that had withdrawn funding services to the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.

The site has now been removed altogether; visitors now are instead presented with a holding page which indicates that the site’s webmasters have temporarily deactivated the site entirely.

On Monday afternoon the party confirmed that the details of 2,000 of its users had been compromised by the attack.

Fine Gael’s ‘traditional’ site, which had remained active at finegael.org, also remains offline at the time of writing; this also appears to have been a reactive move from within the party itself.

On Friday TheJournal.ie reported that the new website was based on servers in Miami, meaning that none of the Dáil’s political parties had their main websites based within Ireland.

The site’s US-based hosting had also raised concerns within the blogosphere about the party’s compliance with the Data Protection Acts, and whether their transfer of personal data to a host outside of the EU was being done on a compliant legal basis.

The website was amended later in the week, allowing users to opt-out of party communications.

2,000 users’ details taken in Fine Gael website breach >

Read Next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • Bernard McNerney 09/01/11 #
    Report this comment

    Would Anonymous really be bothered with hacking FG’s website?! Bigger fish out there?

    Reply
  • Liam Corcoran 09/01/11 #
    Report this comment

    This is hilarious

    Reply
  • Report this comment

    This is brilliant- I couldn’t be happier. Fair play on the up to date journalism at 10pm on a sunday night!!! thats dedication

    Reply
  • Mark Pender 10/01/11 #
    Report this comment

    Really come on there is better people to hack like the gorverment

    Reply
  • Michele Neylon 10/01/11 #
    Report this comment

    The hack story gets worse over time: http://blacknig.ht/111

    Reply
  • Elaine Edwards 10/01/11 #
    Report this comment

    The concern was not that FG might have acquired personal details without having to abide by the same data protection rules as it would have if the site was hosted in the EU. That’s incorrect. The point is that FG DOES have an obligation to ensure the integrity of the data, regardless of where it’s processed. The problem appears to be that it did not have any legal basis in place for passing the data it was collecting to the particular entity in the US that was collecting it. In other words, if FG can prove it wasn’t acting against the law in collecting at least some of the data last week, then it needs to produce the evidence to the Data Protection Commissioner.

    Reply
  • Yog-Han McMahon 10/01/11 #
    Report this comment

    Bull. I dont think this was anonymous at all. Or at least, was done on their own accord without some other incentive. All FG wanted from this website was market research information, not debate. They got that, and the side-show of Obamising Enda Kenny wasnt working so they had no reason not to take it down. Seems too convenient.

    Reply
    • David O'Keeffe 10/01/11 #
      Report this comment

      I’m not sure what to make of things. As far as it appears, there are no mentions on official Anon sites, IRC or Twitter accounts, etc.

      It doesn’t seem like something that Anon would target, but I wouldn’t rule it out?
      Anyone able to shed light as if it’s *truly* and officially Anonymous.

  • Liam Phelan 10/01/11 #
    Report this comment

    Ebaums did it.

    Reply

Add New Comment