TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Gallagher complains to BAI over ‘game-changing’ tweet

Gallagher’s performance on The Frontline debate was seen as a game-changing moment in the Race for the Áras but he is not happy about his treatment by RTÉ.

Gallagher's performance on The Frontline was fatally damaging to his presidential hopes.
Gallagher's performance on The Frontline was fatally damaging to his presidential hopes.
Image: RTÉ/YouTube

SEÁN GALLAGHER HAS personally lodged a complaint with the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) over the now infamous tweet which his campaign claims was “a game-changer” in the presidential election.

Gallagher claims that RTÉ broadcast a fake tweet during the heated final televised debate on The Frontline programme and made no effort to correct it before the end with the series of events that arose from this fatally damaging his hopes of being elected the ninth President of Ireland last month.

He had been leading in the polls prior to the debate which took play three days before polling.

The 22-page submission has been sent to the BAI and has been compiled and signed by Gallagher personally it is understood.

The Sunday Independent yesterday carried extensive detail of the complaint which surrounds the events on the debate broadcast on RTÉ One on 24 October this year.

During a heated exchange it was alleged by fellow candidate Martin McGuinness that Gallagher had collected a cheque for €5,000 that was intended for Fianna Fáil, an assertion Gallagher denied.

Shortly after that, moderator Pat Kenny read out a tweet from an account purporting to be the official Twitter account of the McGuinness campaign which stated that the man who had allegedly given Gallagher the cheque would be appearing at a press conference the following day.

Responding to this Gallagher appeared to stumble with his answer and was jeered by the audience.

‘Game-changer’

The fallout from the incident would engulf the Gallagher campaign in the days that followed and exit polls indicated it was a deciding factor for voters who had previously intended to make the former Dragons’ Den star their first preference.

Despite the official Sinn Féin account tweeting a clarification to say it had made no comment on the matter, Gallagher says no action was taken by RTÉ to correct the matter.

He alleges that this was a deliberate attempt to conceal information which RTÉ should have known was false.

Gallagher’s former media advisor Richard Moore said recently that there were also questions surrounding the amount of time the debate focused on the independent candidate but having examined the timings of the debate it has been determined that there was no basis for making any formal submission on this matter.

Moore told TheJournal.ie today: “The main issue is the use of the tweet which wasn’t a Sinn Féin tweet, this was a game-changer for the candidate.”

RTÉ said in a statement: “This matter is currently the subject of a complaint to the BAI and we will be dealing with it through that process and that is the only way in which it can be dealt with it at this time.”

Read: Gallagher campaign to complain to BAI over hoax tweet on RTÉ debate >

Read: Frontline Gallagher tweet was from fake McGuinness campaign account >


Read next:

Comments (122 Comments)

  • People shouldn’t forget either his bullying attack on Glenna Lynch the following day (or his squaring up to Fionnan Sheehan when they passed each other on the way into Pat’s studio).

    He castigated her, questioning who she was, what her background was, what her motivations were-not knowing that she was listening, and promptly followed him on to the air, to clarify that she was an ordinary businesswoman, and in her usual expressive way, to ask the same detailed questions that Seanie managed to evade the evening before.

    While I’m no fan of SF, he then resorted to stilted and ridiculous language about McGuinness “loading de goon”, and “pooling de trigguh”. Laughable, amateur stuff.

    Reply
  • SMcB 28/11/11 #

    Seany Seany Seany … It was a simple question that was put to you by MMcG. If you had nothing to hide why did you make a haims of the answer? Surely you would remember if you met Mr Morgan or not? Most normal people would! Truth is when you talk so much sh1te you forget what youve said and the lies youve told.

    Reply
  • Was it not him having no idea what the truth was the main problem. If he told the truth, the lies would have been found out in time. Sean went from knowing nothing about this man to knowing his entire property portfolio in the space of a commercial break. It wasn’t only the tweet that was fake.

    Reply
  • I can imagine his frustration but where is he going with this? Games over spud

    Reply
  • “Envelope”, my favourite word of 2011. He he he he.

    Reply
  • Revealing the truth like that… How unjust!

    Reply
  • Ah feck off Gallagher – There is no smoke without fire and all that…

    Reply
  • Oh give it a rest Sean, it might not have been an “official” account but it revealed the truth…give a fool enough rope…

    Reply
  • Take it like a man Seanie. It’s over already.

    Reply
  • I think Sean Gallagher should get over it.he was found wanting when the hard questions were asked..he is just doing it to keep his profile in the media.after all he has now lost
    The dragons den gig.and there are no sports capital grants anymore so he can’t fleece any more gaa clubs. I can’t see too many people forking out to hear his motivational speeches now.

    Reply
  • The ends justified the means. We had a lucky escape. It still makes me shudder to think that so many people were prepared to vote for the de facto candidate of the party that led the country to the worst financial catastrophe in its history. Gallagher was the idiots’ candidate – “Let’s vote for dat nice man off de telly”. A politically and ethically vacuous chancer, whose biggest achievement was to paint himself as some sort of gargantuan entrepreneur.

    Reply
  • But didn’t the fella make a statement the next day anyway, so even though the source was dodgy the content was accurate.

    Reply
    • And he made a statement the following week saying he was wrong about the whole thing.

      Reply
    • Hang on a minute there …. He admitted collecting the envelope eh eh eh eh cheque himself on the front line that night …. game over and out !!!

      Reply
    • Find for me exactly where he admitted it and I’ll admit defeat here and now. Conversely, if you can’t find it, I expect the same courtesy from you. Making statements without being able to back them up is all too easy to do, and in this case it cost a decent man his reputation. What isn’t easy, is admitting you were wrong.

      Reply
    • Joe Bourke : You obviously have me confused with some one who gives a fuck . Read all of the above statements … There is your answer . You are a FFailure just like your mentor. Sean Gallagher was found to be a liar .

      Reply
    • Aggressive tone, swearing, name calling, pointing out answers that aren’t there, failure to back up a single point … Cheers, you’ve proven everything I initially said! As for spending time commenting on things that you admittedly “don’t give a f*** about”, bit strange?

      Reply
    • Only because I have outed You … Mc.. Oh and it is your comments I do not care for Mc…

      Reply
    • @ Joe. If Gallagher had just depended on telling the truth he could have answered easily and dealt with it on the night. Any fool can remember the truth.

      If someone asked me did I fundraise and collect envelopes for FF I could answer easily.

      Reply
    • @ joe bourke

      i personally think it was his stumbling between the word cheque and envelope that knackered him , nobody said nothing about an envelope only gallagher.

      And calling him a decent man is a bit rich after all the lies he told during the campaign ” me twenty acres as a farmer” etc.

      Reply
  • There are two separate issues at hand here:

    1.) Love him or hate him but McGuinness caught Gallagher completely blindside in a spectacular piece of manoeuvring. It cast aspersions on SGs past and was perfectly timed, showed McG as a seasoned politician and made SG look very naive and inexperienced.

    2.) The damage was done at this point but was exacerbated by the fake tweet. This was appalling journalism on RTEs behalf. It shows they have no handle whatsoever on social media and obviously no policy on the matter. What if an innocent person had been defamed in this manner? It should be bread and butter checking a source and would only have entailed asking one of McGs campaign team in studio.

    It makes them look extremely amateur at best and coupled with the other problems from Prime Time Investigates makes you wonder what’s going On at what should be the flagship for journalistic standards, I’m raging at what’s been done with my licence fee.

    Reply
    • More to it than just inexperience and certainly not naïveté on Gallagher’s part, anything but …. the phrase “caught rotten” springs to mind.

      Also think that the significance of the “fake tweet” has been overstated. It simply said that €5k cheque guy, Mr. Morgan, would give a press conference the next day, nothing more. As it happened, Morgan gave a statement through his solicitor rather than a press conference, so it wasn’t far off the mark.

      The “fake tweet” contained no new allegations, and was substantially true, even if its source was turned out to be dubious. It wasn’t defamatory, it didn’t say anything about Gallagher, but merely put pressure on him to ‘fess up, as his lies were likely to be exposed the next day if he didn’t, whether he liked it or not.

      No lies, no problem.

      Personally, I still think there’s a distinction between putting unverified, but potentially pertinent material to a candidate and using unverified sources in reportage – when there’s a direct right of reply an honest candidate can make nothing of false allegations in two sentences. Gallagher was unable to do this, because he’d been lying all along.

      Having said all of that, I do think that at least a cursory check into the tweet should’ve been carried out, even though RTÉ’s policy on live comments like phone-ins and tweets specifically says that the will not be fact-checked, it still would have been better practice.

      I’d also like to know how many FF appointees are on the BAI – can easily see this one being spun into a “poor Seán, set up by them nasty Sinners and RTÉ’s D4 cabal” story.

      Reply
    • The compliance committee is where I assume that this complaint will end up has 8 members. 4 are government appointees and the other 4 are appointed by the BAI (2 will be BAI staff). Not sure if the current Government has made any appointments yet. The people currently listed seemed to be appointed by Eamon Ryan.

      Reply
  • The tweet merely said “that man who gave Sean Gallagher the money will be at a press conference tomorrow”. That is not damaging.

    What was damaging was Sean Gallagher’s lie that he never solicited money for Fianna Fail and that he only invited 3 or 4 friends to the fundraiser. He disgraced himself on national TV and the following day on Six One with Brian Dobson.

    What disgusting brass neck all too common in FF politicians Sean Gallagher has. The fact this bagman still received several hundred thousand votes from the gombeen Irish electorate explains perfectly well to me why this country is being run by the IMF.

    Reply
  • Sean Gallagher is very foolish in not accepting he and only he was responsible for his defeat. Pat Kenny did a superb job in getting the truth from SG who took the irish people for fools, PK`s words will clear him of any wrong doing anyway he said “the martin mc guinness for president twitter account is saying that SF is going to produce the man who says he gave you the five grand” and if you think about that word by word it was true, PK didn`t say official account or SF press office. SG doesn`t talk about his own smears on Glenna Lynch on PK radio show the next day and only she rang in and wiped the floor with him that would have been left. All the do-gooders attacking Pat Kenny are playing to the gallery and PK did the state some service by exposing this grubby FF bag man. And Glenna Lynch was fantastic too. Pat Kenny will defeat Gallagher again if this case is taken

    Reply
  • He would do better to apologise for lying repeatedly to the public. He is only annoyed that he got caught.

    Ps this story was in here a few weeks ago.

    Reply
  • Still doesn’t change the fact he acted in the interests of Fianna FAILure and he solicited €5k for them from that particular businessman, he was found out doing what FF do and little brown envelopes rang alarm bells in many voters heads as soon as it became apparent that Gallagher was up to his neck in the FF culture which the electorate had so forcefully rejected at the last election. Must be looking to make a buck off RTE!

    Reply
    • That’s all this is about. Seanie is addicted to slurping at the taxpayer trough, and has the blood in his nostrils as a result of the Fr. Reynolds case.

      The highly unlikely event of RTE, ergo the taxpayer throwing him a bone or two would be nothing out of character for SG.

      Reply
  • How a deceptive FF’er such as this guy ever led the polls in the first place is what astounds me! Methinks the electorate are either a) stupid, or b) more stupid!

    Reply
  • What happens if the BAI find in favor of his complaint? Does the license payer have to pay him compensation for loss of potential earnings. Is that what this complaint is really all about??

    Reply
    • Silent P . No doubt this is what it is all about ! Will he give his alleged paymasters the compo then ???

      Reply
    • @Silent P. The complaint will be upheld (or not) against the station. Gallagher isn’t taking legal action (like the recent action against RTE) so there won’t be a financial settlement. He’ll get an apology (or not). However, he seems to have complained directly to the BAI. The first port of call is supposed to be the broadcaster. You can then go onto the BAI for further review if your original complaint to the broadcaster is rejected.

      Think Gallaghers complaint must be in the queue behind all the Sinn Fein ones. Think they were lodging complaints after the first debate. Busy times for the BAI.

      Reply
  • The man was and is a liar. He lost my vote. He was dishonest with the sons and daughters of eireann and I hope this complaint gets laughed out of the office. If he admitted it nobody would have cared.

    Reply
  • The term build a bridge comes to mind, but the ‘man’ is entitled to complain and we only have the budget to look forward to … I know I could do with a good chuckle at Uncle Festers expense . Grow a pair boy !!! Who told the Porkies? Envelope !!! I still laugh at that !

    Reply
  • You Lost also I hope dragons is finished also so Go Away Please.

    Reply
  • Stay away from dodgy diesel sean,

    Reply
  • It’s frightening how effective Sinn Féin propaganda still is.

    Reply
  • I find it sad to read the amount of people who are misled by the media in this country, exactly what Gallagher is fighting against. He knows the race is over and he lost. He’s doing this to try to highlight the appalling journalistic standards that exist in this country, and to try and ensure that this kind of despicable journalism doesn’t return in future elections. People attacking him over that either don’t see the huge influence media bias had on the result of the election or just don’t care that they always back the party candidates at the expense of the Independents who are already automatically disadvantaged from the second they enter the race.

    Did everybody commenting on this miss the fact that after the election result, Hugh Morgan (covering his own backside) immediately announced that it was Seamus Kirk and not Gallagher that he gave the cheque to?? Of course you missed it, because the media barely bothered to report it as it directly highlighted their agenda and the impact that it had.
    As long as so many people continue to remain oblivious to the likes of this, we will continue to have this sort of agenda laden media and will be deprived of a badly needed examination into our journalistic standards that even the UK is now getting.

    I fear that post Leveson, Ireland will find itself bottom of the pile in terms of standards in journalism if we aren’t there already.

    Reply
    • Ha ha ha ha ….. Gallagher The Good …. You will have him walking on water yet ! You are delusional if you think Gallagher is doing this for any thing noble. More like trying to line his pockets .

      Reply
    • Yeah because there’s huge money to be made in making complaints to the BAI (??!?) …

      Reply
    • 32.—(1) In this section “commercially sensitive information”
      means—
      (a) financial, commercial, technical or other information
      whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to result
      in a material financial loss or gain to the party to which
      it relates, or could prejudice the competitive position of
      that party in the conduct of its business, or
      (b) information whose disclosure could prejudice the conduct
      or outcome of contractual or other negotiations of the
      party to which it relates.
      (2) It is the duty of the Authority to so conduct its affairs as to
      secure that its revenue becomes as soon as possible, and thereafter
      continues to be, at least sufficient to meet its expenses.

      Reply
    • Is there a point to any of that or did you merely copy and paste a section of the Broadcasting Act in the hope that in some small way, it might vaguely relate to your original point … Copy and paste the bit where it outlines how exactly complainants “line their pockets” and it might have slightly more relevance to what you originally said.

      Reply
    • I copy and pasted it just for you Mc. I do not have time for spoon feeding you , you can check it out here ………… http://www.bai.ie/ .

      Reply
    • I fully understand the Act, spent an entire torturous module on it in college. What I don’t understand is what s.32 has to do with complainants gaining financial advantage from bringing cases to the Authority? It wouldn’t be spoon feeding, simply explaining the relevance.

      Reply
    • CMD 28/11/11 #

      I agree totally Joe. That is exactly the point. If that tweet had been about Higgins or mitchel Kenny would have thought twice about reading. But because Gallagher was independant he wasn’t seen as important. Its gas though to see Kenny – the great mcguinness hater, being made a fool of by “fake” sinn fein tweet. it’s not so long ago that mcguinness wouldn’t be let in the door of rte. How things have changed!

      Reply
  • RTE failed in a crucial aspect of journalism ‘trust but verify’ and they clearly failed to verify that tweet. A sloppy fact and one which certainly contributed to Gallagher’s downfall, he’s well within his rights to feel aggrieved.

    Reply
    • He was exposed as a two-bit liar…….. how that came about is irrelevant. If we were to play the PC game Kaiser Biff would still be Taoiseach!

      Reply
    • @Luke I would be inclined to agree. Furthermore the veracity of what actually happened was never fully explained. Of course the BAI moratorium or reporting kicked a day or two later then we had the election itself.

      It was a masterpiece of politics though! Having said that, Gallagher should have answers for it on the spot. That’s a part of being in politics.

      RTE did have a major systems failure (again) in not verifying the tweet.

      Reply
    • It’s very simple, folks.

      If he was telling the truth, he wouldn’t even have to think about the answer.

      He was caught out in dozens of lies during the campaign, I gather, to take just one example, he still hasn’t submitted his accounts to the CRO.

      For those wondering about the significance of the five thousand euro (or, up to, as Baldy Bertie put it), the reason for such a figure is that anything over that amount must be declared. Seanie, and his FF brethren, in their drive for openness and transparency, spent most of their time soliciting donations of €4,999.99c!

      Reply
    • @Ryan – in fairness every party engages in soliciting donations. What Gallagher did wasn’t unusual. They were (are) all at it. The mistake Gallagher made was making it sound that there was something wrong with it. It was standard fare, why deny it?

      Plenty of people behind in the CRO submissions – however I would agree if you are going for presidency you need to have that stuff in order.

      Reply
    • Evening Brian,

      No crime in being a member of a party, even if it is FF. No crime in soliciting donations either.

      I won’t touch on Gallagher’s business activities in any monetary detail, because there’s a book in it, one that his accountant probably has locked away securely, save to say that Gallagher committed to publishing his accounts in full-he has yet to do that. He did publish a bullshit P60 (IIRC it wasn’t for a full year, and referred to one company alone), that showed his earnings in the year of his marriage as around €200 a week, despite his lavish and no doubt expensive wedding in the same year, that would probably have wiped that out between the band and the hors d’oeuvres alone.

      In short, he has lied repeatedly about every detail of his life, even down to the couple of dozen acres his late father bought him to get him going, claiming they were his own. Contemptible. And that is the problem. He lied about FF. He lied about being an active member, and he remains one! He lied about his support for candidates in the last election. He lied about his ongoing fundraising. He lied about his motivation for joining the NE, and his membership of it, memorably claiming in one interview, and indeed one sentence, that it wasn’t about changing policy, but in the second half of the sentence telling us it was. He could not name one piece of significant legislation passed in the last seven years. He lied about an unpaid startup loan he received,. He decried negative campaigning, but threw sly little digs at the Shinners about loading guns and pulling triggers. He never heard of Morgan Fuels, when everyone in the border area could tell you exactly who they were (prominent GAA sponsors among other things), but remembered who Morgan was very quickly when confronted with the infamous tweet. He charged GAA clubs a kings ransom for filling in forms, and gullible startups €250 an hour to spout cliches at them. He went on Dragons Den as a benevolent investor, but invested in none. He pimped himself within FF as a confidante of Charlie Haughey. He took almost €900k in state loans in assistance for his ailing company, and drew down all bar €20k of that in the same year for two made up meaningless patents and an annual rent that would have bought the building in question. He claimed visual impairment held him back, but could tear around in a VW jeep without needing glasses. He claimed during the election to support unpaid subbies through his FF activities, despite defaulting on a number of debts himself.

      There’s definitely a book in Sean Gallagher, and had he actually succeeded in getting into the Aras, I have no doubt it would be written within six months, and we may well have witnessed our first impeachment.

      Reply
    • I should clarify for accuracy, the startup loan was not unpaid, IIRC it was for, as SG put it “twenty thousand, and I paid back nineteen”.

      He’s right, except he got £20,000, and paid back €19.000, thus making the amount unpaid six thousand instead of one thousand.

      Typical of the rehearsed spin SG put forth throughout, before, during, and as it turns out, after the campaign as well.

      Reply
    • He also claimed to have spent time in college in Maynooth yet had no qualifications on paper to show off. Which he would have done had he any .

      Reply
  • Theres two separate issues at hand here:

    1.) Love him or hate him but McGuinness caught Gallagher blindside in a spectacular piece of manoeuvring. It cast aspersions on SGs past & was perfectly timed, it showed McG as a seasoned politician and made SG look very naive and inexperienced.

    2.) The damage was done at this point but was exacerbated by the fake tweet. This was appalling journalism on RTEs behalf. It shows they have no handle whatsoever on social media and obviously no policy on the matter. What if an innocent person had been defamed in this manner? It should be bread and butter checking a source and would only have entailed asking one of McGs campaign team in studio.

    It makes them look extremely amateur at best and coupled with the other problems from Prime Time Investigates makes you wonder what’s going On at what should be the flagship for journalistic standards, I’m raging at what’s been done with my licence fee.

    Reply
  • where is my comment gone??…Has Seanie Gallagher infiltrated us??!!

    Reply
  • It was like a scene from craggy island. The whole campaign from start to finish
    was who could fling the most muck and
    who could hide all their skeletons best.
    Not one of them was worthy to stand in the shoes of great men and women before them. I can imagine the great Dev upstairs saying “whats a tweet?”

    Reply
  • CMD 28/11/11 #

    Two things need to be noted by some folk on this blog who seem intent on passing off school yard level of mudslinging as intelligent comment.
    1. The reason Gallagher was wrong footed on frontline was because the tweet was a lie, plain and simple. You can deal with an accusation that has a grain of truth, however bad it may be but you can’t deal with lies because the base keeps shifting. You can prepare against a thief but not against a liar.
    2. Gallagher will not gain financially in any way from bringing this case. He is doing it to ensure that RTE gets it’s act together like the BBC to deal with modern communication technology. It’s the same as the bill he and Fergal Quinn pioneered thru the Seanad to protect small contractors from being hung out to dry when big builders go bust. His own experience in both situations are being used to try to ensure it doesn’t happen to someone else maybe less well equipped to handle it.

    Reply
  • @Ryan Murphy Glenna Lynch is a friend of the Kennys and few others in Rte and her husband was involved in the MIcheal D campaign.

    Reply
    • If she were a man no one would wonder whether the wife was involved in politics. Pathetic FF tripe. Did you not notice the women in the audience own those guys on Frontline tonight. Tà Mná na hÉireann ag labhairt leis na fir anois!!!

      Reply
    • Her husband is not involved in any campagin and Glenna is not a friend of the Kennys, PK researcher had to tell him several times Glenna was on the line and pat thought was Glenda.

      Reply
  • Sean Didn’t Lie and never got a cheque.The cheque was put into Finna fails account in a fully legal way a few days before the event in question. Finna fail have backed this up with evidence showing when it was lodged.So Sean could of never gotten a cheque after this even if he dropped of a photo.Mr Morgan also admitted this the day after polling day.The only liar is the convicted terrorist and murder that is Martin mcguinness and Sinn Fein.Before the break Sean stated he couldnt remember as it was a few years ago.(I can barely remember what I had for lunch last week never mind something that happened a few years ago)The debate moved on and after the break the fake tweet came in and this threw Sean off with a hostile Pat Kenny and audience attacking him.

    Reply
    • Even if Glenna Lynch was a friend of Pat Kenny and everyone else at RTE it doesn`t make her points any less true or her questions any less effective,

      Reply
    • Sean did lie – he tried to distance himself from the party he was a central figure of, FIanna Fail. He lied about soliciting money for the fundraiser. He lied about the number of people he solicited money from.

      All of these lies tore apart his carefully crafted image of an independent candidate with weak and distant links to the party that ruined this country.

      Sean Gallagher lied again on Six One as he got caught up in his web. The problem with fibbing is you have to remember every exact detail. As Brian Dobson said ” Sean, the truth is always easy”. Unfortunately Sean did not know where he was in his lie.

      As unsavory a character Martin McGuinness is, he did the State enormous service that night by preventing a proxy- Fianna Fail candidate taking the Presidency. No wonder the British described him as “officer class”. All he said was “Sean, a man told me you took the cheque”. All Gallagher had to say was “a man told you, you’ll have to get better sources than that”. But unfortunately Gallagher was under so much pressure from his web of lies, he blurted out the truth about his central role in Fianna Fail and the mask slipped.

      Watching Gallagher crumble to pieces was a poetic moment. The attack was like watching an Exocet cruise missile penetrate the hull of a ship.

      Reply
    • It was one of those moments alright Sean macc. A moment in time – an “I’ll never forget where I was moment”. Pure class!!!

      Reply
  • I fully understand the Act, spent an entire torturous module on it in college. What I don’t understand is what s.32 has to do with complainants gaining financial advantage from bringing cases to the Authority? It wouldn’t be spoon feeding, simply explaining the relevance.

    Reply
  • Eileen cop on and stop making false claims

    Reply
  • Who is Joe Bourke?

    Reply
  • Me? How?

    Reply
  • Claiming Gallagher to be a Fianna fail man. You know he isn’t didn’t you look at the front line? Just keep your points to the subject

    Reply
  • OMG did you just ‘like’ your own comment?

    Reply
  • Im reading thejournal on my phone, showing 116 comments,only iv come across only 16? Anyone else seeing this?

    Reply

Add New Comment