TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Government link with Denis O’Brien is ‘overhyped’ – FG Chairman

Charlie Flanagan has sought to play down the link between the government and the businessman but did say there needed to be “clear blue water” between ministers and anyone implicated by the Moriarty Tribunal.

Denis O'Brien (File photo)
Denis O'Brien (File photo)
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

FINE GAEL CHAIRMAN Charlie Flanagan has said that the link between the government and businessman Denis O’Brien is “overhyped” but acknowledged that there needed to be “clear blue water” between both parties.

Taoiseach Enda Kenny’s recent appearance with O’Brien, who was implicated in the findings of the Moriarty Tribunal, on the New Stock Exchange has put the spotlight on the party and therefore the government’s relationship with the telecoms tycoom.

Flanagan was speaking in the wake of comments to the Sunday Times that there needed  to be “clear blue water” between the party and O’Brien but he insisted that he was not referring to “any specific link”.

“It’s assuming there are links, there may not be. People are reading a lot into photographs. The Taoiseach makes a fair point in so far as you can’t dictate who takes a photograph of who,” he told TheJournal.ie.

Flanagan said that “people are taking about Denis O’Brien in the same breath as Pádraig Flynn,” referring to the former minister and EU Commissioner who was found by the Mahon Tribunal to have received a corrupt payment.

‘Media perception’

The Moriarty Tribunal found that former Fine Gael Communications Minister Michael Lowry had an “insidious and pervasive” influence over the awarding of a second mobile phone licence to O’Brien’s company, Esat Digifone, in 1996 and that Lowry received financial payments from O’Brien.

O’Brien rejected the tribunal’s findings when it reported a year ago. Flanagan pointed out that he had never met the businessman in his life. He said that he had raised the issue with members of the cabinet although declined to comment further.

The current Laois-Offaly TD said the current focus on the party and the government’s links with O’Brien were a result of “media perception” and not that of the public.

Flanagan said: “No member of the public has said to me that Enda Kenny orchestrated a photograph with Denis O’Brien or Enda Kenny was seen with Denis O’Brien. This thing is overhyped.

“Having said all that, it’s my belief and I use the word ‘clear blue water’ between anybody who is the subject of poor Tribunal findings in Moriarty.”

He added: “I would say all this can feed into a perception. I believe therefore that there should be clear blue water between current ministers and Denis O’Brien. That’s my belief.”

Read: Government says no decision yet on whether Denis O’Brien gets invite to forum

Read: Taoiseach’s appearance with O’Brien on NYSE ‘shouldn’t have happened’ – Martin >

Read next:

Comments (36 Comments)

  • He would say that wouldn’t he.Enda doesn’t know who he will appear with yet Sherlock knew precisely who was to be attending an event he spoke at.Maybe Enda should find out how Sherlock manages to do what he can’t.

    Reply
    • As the old saying goes! “Bloods thicker than clear blue water” !!

      Reply
    • If Enda was going to have a debate with O’Brien on the NYSE balcony then of course he’d know in advance but the Taoiseach meets with dozens of people everyday that haven’t given prior notice.

      Reply
    • I don’t buy it David whats his staff at if they don’t have the information as to who is attending these events.

      Reply
    • Not defending anyone here but it was the NYSE. Sherlock’s thing wasn’t. Like it or not O’Brien is still a big name. The NYSE invite who they want. Enda and his team had no say in it and had no right to dictate who he was there or not. He obviously couldn’t refuse the invitation either.

      Reply
    • @David

      The way you’ve described that I’d be more concerned with the security of our Taoiseach than who he was pictured with in New York!

      Reply
    • @david
      I asked you a question on a different story last night but you didn’t answer me. I would appreciate a response if you wouldn’t mind, thanks.

      Reply
    • @Thevoice I’ve blocked email notifications from TheJournal. Trying to get myself off this site. Wasting my time tying to convince all the Shinners and ULAers on this site :)

      Reply
    • @David
      Here It is again.

      Could somebody please give me one good reason why I should be paying more tax because other people made criminal mistakes?

      Reply
    • Is there 2 David Higgins or did you just change your photo? And don’t run away hiding from the journal before you answer my question.

      Reply
    • How many times do I have to tell people on this site that I use both twitter and Facebook here. Click on my name and you’ll see it :)

      The answer is that you shouldn’t have to be paying more tax and Enda made it clear in his state of the nation that the vast majority of people aren’t responsible for this crisis. However when you come into office with a massive budget deficit, you have absolutely no other choice but to fill it with tax rises and spending cuts that effect all. It’s mathematically and economically impossible to do otherwise.

      Reply
    • Jay funk 04/04/12 #

      @ david there are always chooses, how about burning bond holders?

      Reply
    • The benefits of burning bondholders wouldn’t be realised until about 9 years down the road. It’d have made no difference to our current budget deficit. Nonetheless I think it should have been done.

      Reply
    • @David

      You only have to tell me once. There are other ways. What your party is trying to do is mathematically and economically impossible, people have no money to spend and you insist on taking more money from them, the number of people claiming social welfare has risen everyday since you got into power. Your party have broken every promise they made pre election. Here are a few:

      1. FG/Lab voted against Budget 2011. Now it seems they are only too happy to take ownership of it.
      2. They were going to burn the bondholders. They now refuse to impose losses on the billions of unsecured, unguaranteed senior bondholders at Anglo & Irish nationwide.
      3. Varadkar said not another red cent would be put into the banks. I think they put in €19bn last year (not sure bout that one)
      4. They signed a USI election pledge to reverse the €500 increase in the student services charge in Budget 2011. They refused to do so once in government.
      5. FG promised “Fair Care” and Labour promised Universal Health Insurance. Fair Care has disappeared and in government the 2 parties have admitted that the insurance proposals will not happen for at least 10 years.
      6. “There will be no more ‘golden handshakes’ for public servants that have failed to deliver”- According to their manifestos. Big playoffs for senior civil servants continue.
      7. FG pledged they would cut the number of junior ministers to 12. Once elected they appointed 15.
      8. Fine Gael pledged to abolish 145 quangos. By end of Feb 2012 they had created 3 times the number they abolished.
      9. Ministerial advisors will be subject to salary caps. Most ministers advisors have breached the cap.

      We could have saved a lot of money if you’s had of kept your promises and please stop with excuse that you this isn’t FG’s fault, you had plenty of people sitting in the dail all the time so you’s are as much to blame as anyone else.

      Reply
    • If you think that Kenny and his staff didn’t know who he was photo-opping with at the NYSE then you’re seriously naive, regardless of what YFG shills like David say to the contrary. What would I know though, I’m just a slow-witted leftist.

      While I’m here, David could you procure a lock of Enda’s hair for me?

      Reply
    • I couldn’t make an comment on weather to burn the bondholders or not because the public don’t know who they are or what type of investment they made but If I gambled on something and it lost, I wouldn’t expect to get my obey back never mind getting millions of interest along with my losing bet

      Reply
    • “The benefits of burning bondholders wouldn’t be realised until about 9 years down the road.”

      How long before I see the benefits of what FG are doing???

      Reply
    • “The answer is that you shouldn’t have to be paying more tax and Enda made it clear in his state of the nation that the vast majority of people aren’t responsible for this crisis.” David Higgins

      So why are the vast majority of people paying for it? Why aren’t the people who were most responsible for it paying it?

      Reply
    • @thehiggmeister sure didnt enda also tell everybody we ALL went mad! two faced. :)

      Reply
    • @thevoice

      “…….people have no money to spend……”

      (While I appreciate what I’m about to say may seem like a blanket statement I would also hope that those reading it will also appreciate the point I’m trying to make)

      Lots of these same people will have plenty of dough to spend on getting pissed once a weekend and will always make sure they buy fags too.

      The Household Charge, whether we like it or not, is the law at the moment. People will be liable to penalties and eventually fines. The can’t pay won’t pay campaign morphed into “don’t want to pay, won’t pay” campaign.

      It diluted the message that the people who genuinely couldn’t pay wanted to get across. I don’t believe that half the country couldn’t pay though.

      The rest of your point I agree with entirely. I’m sick sore and tired listening to the same bloody excuse trotted out by a FG/Lab member that they inherited this problem and can’t do anything about it. We know they did inherit the problems we now face but christ they didn’t have to make all the promises they did. They would have got elected into power anyway. People wanted rid of FF and didn’t need the promises they gave as a carrot.

      FG/Lab knew all about the problems before the election. If they had simply said they were going to do what they are now doing people would have been happy to vote for them because they would have given the assurances, that while bloody difficult, they would do their best for this country, put on the green jersey, get the shoulder to the wheel (and any other tired cliché you can think of) and do the best for the people.

      But now all it looks like they are doing is feathering their own nests and that of other strategically linked ‘interests’

      #rantover

      Reply
  • clear blue water equals fine gael murkiness?

    Reply
  • Excuse me please for this comment but it is my arse. Another waffler!

    Reply
  • @David Higgins and Paul Carr, are both of you so naive to believe this crap that Enda didnt know O’Brien wouldn’t be there??? Enda is great at saying one thing and showing his other face when abroad and then pleading the “Paddy didnt know” argument back home. It is a fact that O’Brien got ESAT Digifone from the Irish people for a fraction of what it is worth. FFg’s own bank accounts from the time of going into power in this time period, went from almost 1 million in the red to 3 million in the black in the space of 6 months. Kenny was a minister at thge time, but let me guess, he didnt know where the money was coming from. It is simply a case of FFg are FF nua. If Bertie made these claims, then you would have the blind FF party faithful claiming that their Taoiseach was innocent. When are FFg/FF/Labour supporters going to open their eyes to the corruption that is ongoing in this country. When are they going to stop defending the indefensible. How many more 10 year tribunals at a cost of 100′s of millions of Euro to you, me and everyone else, before you start realising these parties are corrupt to the core. Moriarty, Mahon both pointed fingers at FFg/Labour and FF. And we still see their treasonous faces making excuses, and bullshitting us at every turn, because everyone knows “Paddy is a gobshit and will believe anything we are told”.

    Reply
  • CMD 04/04/12 #

    So is Mr Flanagan saying that he believes Denis O’Brien is entitled to the benefit of the doubt because he disputed the findings of the Moriarity tribunal but Bertie and Co shouldn’t get the same treatment even tho they are disputing the Mahon tribunal. I’d say it’s fairly sure the only difference in FF and FG is, FF were in power during those past 10 years or so and FG weren’t. Didn’t have the opportunity for scamming that FF indulged in.

    Reply
  • As far as I know the NYSE bell tolling was organised by Ireland Inc. of which Denis O’Brien is a major backer. It is inconceivable that FG/Kenny didn’t know he was going to be there. Anyone who believes otherwise is naive in the extreme.

    Very interesting article by Elaine Byrne on political corruption in last Saturdays Irish Times. She clearly outlays the effects of corruption and how it influences the decisions multinationals and investors make about where to locate their business & money. In the Esat Digiphone case she shows how Motorola pulled out of Ireland as they spent millions on the bidding process for the 2nd license only to find out the whole thing was decided on cronyism.

    Their pull out resulted in the loss of 800+ jobs. That’s the cost of our political leaders being corrupt.

    Right now the markets are watching Ireland closely and when they see Enda Kenny on the same stage as Denis O’Brien the only conclusion they can draw is to learn the lesson of the Motorola case and stay the hell out of Ireland.

    What Enda Kenny did damages our reputation as a place to invest, at a time when he was supposed to be improving it he did the exact opposite. He went fawning around New York for a few days shouting “Ireland is open for business” but every banker, broker, analyst and investor saw him on that stage with Denis O’Brien and we all know that actions speak louder than words.

    Reply
  • Careful what you say about Enda’s ‘blind date’ , apparently he loves a good barrister & some journalists shy away from his ‘dark side’ as he is he could be their future employer. Listening to a radio presenter yesterday on one of his stations throwing bouquets at him was such a let down.

    Reply
  • pagan 04/04/12 #

    Will the Galway tent be making a return.After all FG/Labour are the same as FF in all but name.

    Reply
  • Just typical!!!! Same old waffle. This FG crowd just make me sick. Clueless!!!

    Reply
  • whatever you say charlie, whatever you say……

    Reply
  • FG’s claim that how were they supposed to know who was going to be there is utter bollocks. The event was organised by a company associated with O’Brien and Enda’s people would know in advance who was going to be there – for both political and security reasons. FG/Lab also invited O’Brien to the Global Economic Forum a few months ago.

    To believe FG’s version of events you have to believe the Taoiseach regularly attends events that are organised by anonymous people of whom the government/civil service have no knowledge and that Enda simply rocks up, smiling and shaking hands with randomers, having no idea who’s going to be there.

    In that case I might as well invite him to a ‘Global Investment Conference’, not mention it’s being organised by left wing and community groups, give him an earful and doughnut him with an anti-household charge/Shell to Sea/No the Austerity treaty banner. I wonder would he be so willing to smile and have his photo taken in that situation?

    Reply
  • Jay funk 04/04/12 #

    @ Journal,

    Has anyone put in a freedom of information request regarding Enda, NYSE and Dennis?

    There must be paperwork, relating to who the NYSE, I doubt this was organised by a chat down the pub, does the Taoiseach and his team not have some security and protocols that they follow, he or his team must of seen the list of those attending the event?

    If Enda knew Dennis was going to attend this event and he still attended it shows very bad judgement and leadership. I agree he cant tell the NYSE who it invites but he can choose not to go to an event?

    Reply
  • Is the allegation that Lowry was fawning all over O’Brien during the tendering process, trying to garner ‘advisor benefits’ for himself – and so O’Brien is the villain for allowing the process be tainted in that way and ultimately won the tender by responding to the path laid out by Lowry?

    Reply

Add New Comment