TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

As it happened: The Children’s Referendum count

We keep you up to date on commentary and local results as we await an official national result from the Dublin Castle count centre by mid-afternoon.

Justice Minister Alan Shatter and Children's Minister Frances Fitzgerald at the final result announcement in Dublin Castle.
Justice Minister Alan Shatter and Children's Minister Frances Fitzgerald at the final result announcement in Dublin Castle.
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

WELCOME TO THE count of ballots in the Children’s Referendum. There was a low turnout yesterday – possibly creeping just above 30 per cent – on the proposal to amend the wording of the Constitution which relates to children.

As a result, we expect to be able to bring you an official result from the Dublin Castle count centre by mid-afternoon at the latest.

In the meanwhile, stay with us as we bring you commentary and local results…

11.11 – A quick round-up of the count so far? It looks likely that the amendment to the children’s referendum will be passed – but by a slimmer margin than had been expected.

Children’s Minister Frances Fitzgerald said this morning on RTÉ Radio 1 that while referendums/referenda* traditionally fail to attract a high turnout, a turnout that just scrapes past 30 per cent indicates that it is an issue the Government will have to work out in future.

She said that the likely ‘Yes’ vote meant it was “a historic day for the protection of children”.

(*Wondering whether it’s referendums/referenda? Gavan Reilly has previously thrashed this out here if you’d like to amuse yourself this morning.)

11.19 – Back to that low turnout. Early tallies show that Donegal South West is leaning towards a ‘No’ vote, as are some areas of cities that are traditionally low-income areas.

Is this a protest vote against the Government? Donegal, you might remember, has been the county with the lowest rate of compliance with the household charge – only around half of the 65,331 eligible homes have paid it there.

John Waters was claiming this  morning that the achievement of the ‘No’ campaign to which he belongs has been “spectacular”. It appears that he believes it was his arguments and those of his fellow ‘No’ advocates that swayed many people despite there being “no poster, no advertising, compared to the massive campaign of vested interests… to bully for a ‘Yes’ vote”. Oh.

11.20 – Mind you, John Waters, that doesn’t explain why one voter in Cavan spoiled their ballot by writing on their slip of paper:

We want fair play for Seán Quinn.

As far as we know, Seán Quinn is not a minor, and probably doesn’t have anything to do with the substance of the amendment under vote.

11.28 – It’s not just the polling stations that had tumbleweed blowing through them this weekend.

This was the scene at Dublin Castle at 10am this morning:

countcentreinside

(Pic: Susan Daly/TheJournal.ie)

The lack of bodies is understandable though – as it is the national count centre, there will be no official overall result announced there until the rest of the country finishes counting and sends their final results through.

11.38 – What happens in a defeat? Well John Waters says:

I am not conceding defeat or being magnanimous. I spoke the truth. My argument doesn’t change because it has been defeated.

He also mentioned the possibility of a challenge to the vote, should the result turn out to be a ‘Yes’.

Certainly, the last-minute Supreme Court ruling on Thursday, which upheld the Mark McCrystal challenge to the Government’s website and booklet on the referendum as being “not fair, equal or impartial” must be an ongoing concern to those in power.

Dearbhail McDonald, the Irish Independent’s Legal Editor, predicted “huge sighs (of) relief” in the Government if the poll is passed, considering their “blunder”:

dearbhail

The spectre of a legal challenge, should the margin by which the referendum is decided be as narrow as it seems it will be, had not entirely dissipated.

11.39 – By the way, that Donegal South West ‘No’ vote? It has been confirmed.

No: 56.47 per cent.

Yes: 43.53 per cent.

11.48 – A second official vote in from Tipperary South and it’s incredibly tight, but in favour of the Yes vote:

Yes: 54.17

No: 45.83

11.51 – Notwithstanding that children’s rights are obviously a very serious issue, we couldn’t resist a chuckle at this quick response to news of the Tipperary South ‘Yes’ vote:

polle

(via @dotski_w/Twitter)

11.56 – Interesting post from solicitor Simon McGarr on his blog this morning in which he attributes low turnout and a decline in support from earlier predictions for the Yes side to “a complete breakdown in trust”. He writes:

Anyone who appears to be part of the establishment- Journalists, politicians, campaigners, senators, solicitors, barristers- will not be taken at their word. The other side of that is that people who are completely outside the mainstream are given a hearing frequently unwarranted by the merits or lunacy of their arguments.

The post is worth a read – do you agree with him?

12.08 – Now. Isn’t this an interesting nugget from RTÉ… The station is reporting that a tally of postal votes for Wicklow – which are cast earlier in the week, and therefore before the Supreme Court upheld the challenge to how the Government disseminated information on the referendum – showed a much higher vote for ‘Yes’ than the votes cast all of yesterday did.

Did the Supreme Court ruling change some voters’ minds? Did it lessen trust in the Government and therefore in the ‘Yes’ vote they were lobbying for? Or do Wicklow postal voters just have a different outlook than those who were able to get to a polling station yesterday? Hmmm.

12.12 – Alex White, Labour TD for Dublin South and Minister of State in the Department of Health, said that he personally had heard people say that the Supreme Court judgement on Thursday actually had the opposite effect on their vote. He said this morning:

I’ve had some people who have said the opposite. I heard people say to me that they were concerned it would affect the result and make sure they would go out and vote ‘Yes’.

Did this happen to you? Did the Supreme Court decision have any impact on how you cast your vote yesterday? Or indeed if it affected your decision to go out and vote at all? I’d love to know – get in touch in the comments section.

12.17 – Meanwhile, strong words for Donegal from Labour Dublin City Councillor Rebecca Moynihan. She might be implying what we suggested earlier on this liveblog – that Donegal is beginning to get a reputation for protest voting. Is that a fair assessment? This is what Cllr Moynihan had to say:

rebecca

(Via @RebeccaMoy/Twitter)

12.21 – And, as if they heard her, Donegal North East has just recorded an official ‘No’ to the amendment:

Yes: 41 per cent

No: 59 per cent

12.50 – Would you like to see the results of the tallies completed so far? Of course you would:

Carlow-Kilkenny - Yes
Yes: 59.2
No: 34

Cork North Central - Yes (just about)
Yes: 50.09
No: 49.91

Cork South Central - Yes
Yes: 59.5 No: 40.5

Donegal North East - No
Yes: 41 No: 59

Donegal South West - No
Yes: 43.53 No: 56.47

Galway East - Yes
Yes: 59
No: 41

Kerry South - Yes
Yes: 57
No: 43

Kildare North – Yes
Yes: 66.3
No: 33.7

Limerick - Yes
Yes: 59
No: 41

Limerick City - Yes
Yes: 61
No: 39

Longford-Westmeath – Yes
Yes: 55
No: 45

Sligo-North Leitrim - Yes
Yes: 56
No: 44

Tipperary North – Yes
Yes: 56
No: 44

Tipperary South – Yes
Yes: 54.17 No: 45.83

Waterford - Yes
Yes: 56
No: 44

12.55 – The latest result has one of the highest margins so far, in favour of passing the amendment:

Clare - Yes
Yes: 61.7
No: 38.15

13.04 – Remember we mentioned that RTÉ said a ballot paper in Cavan had been spoiled in favour of leaving a message of support for jailed Seán Quinn?

Luke ‘Ming’ Flanagan, independent TD for Roscommon/South Leitrim, says that he has been in the count centre in Roscommon and that it’s happened there too, on three ballot papers:

luke

(via @lukeming/Twitter)

13.07 – Where are we on the local counts? RTÉ political corr David McCullagh is tapping his toe. He must have a nice dinner waiting for him:

mcd

(via @mcculld/Twitter)

13.12 – Two more results go for the ‘Yes’:

Galway West – Yes
Yes: 62.2
No: 37.8

Roscommon-South Leitrim – Yes
Yes: 52.92
No: 47.08

13.15 – It looks like Louth is in with a ‘Yes’ vote – and it’s narrow enough:

Yes: 53
No: 47

13.23 – Meanwhile, there appears to be a controversy about people on the ‘No’ side not getting a fair hearing on various media – RTÉ “chose” to use John Waters most frequently, claims Alive magazine editor on RTÉ’s News at One radio programme.

Is this the case? Did you think that there were particular ‘No’ campaigners that we heard too much from, to the detriment of others on that side who might have had different arguments?

13.28 – It looks like we’re getting closer to endgame, folks. Laois-Offaly and Kildare South in, and the Dublin count centres are starting to flow their results now too.

Laois-Offaly – Yes
Yes: 53.7
No: 46.3

Kildare South - Yes
Yes: 57.8
No: 42.2

Dublin South Central - Yes
Yes: 54.9
No: 45.1

Dublin Central - Yes
Yes: 58.7
No: 41.3

Dublin North East
– Yes
Yes: 60.1
No: 39.9

13.44 – The remaining three Cork results are in:

Cork East - Yes
Yes: 56.1
No: 43.9

Cork North-West – Yes
Yes: 57.4
No: 42.6

Cork South West - Yes
Yes – 56.6
No – 43.4

13.55 – The rest of the Dublin counts (and one Co Dublin one….)

Dublin Mid West - Yes
Yes: 55.21
No: 44.79

Dublin North
– Yes
Yes: 64.8
No: 35.2

Dublin North Central – Yes
Yes: 63.3
No: 36.7

Dublin North West
– No (small margin of 137 votes)
Yes: 49.61
No: 50.4

Dublin South – Yes
Yes: 73
No: 27

Dublin South East – Yes
Yes: 71.9
No: 28.1

Dublin South West – Yes
Yes: 51.9
No: 48.1

Dublin West
– Yes
Yes: 61
No: 39

Dun Laoghaire - Yes
Yes: 71.9
No: 28.1

14.01 – All we are waiting for now is the final result from Meath West.

These are the others we hadn’t previously posted:

Cavan-Monaghan – Yes
Yes: 53
No – 46.14

Kerry North/West Limerick – Yes
Yes: 53.6
No: 46.4

Mayo – Yes
Yes: 53
No: 47

Wexford – Yes
Yes: 54.8
No: 45.2

Wickow - Yes
Yes: 60
No: 40

Meath East - Yes
Yes: 59.8
No: 40.2

14.04 – Here comes Meath West… so the final overall result is in.

The YES vote is passed by 169, 868 votes.

The Yes was 58 per cent; 42 per cent went for No.

14.10 – Those percentages in votes?

615,731 YES

445,863 NO

14.24 – In case you wondered in Meath West (you probably aren’t), it passed the referendum:
Yes: 53.26
No: 46.74

14.29 – The number of spoiled votes – despite the fans of Seán Quinn in Cavan and Roscommon (see our earlier postings on that) – was pretty low on a national basis. Of the 1,066,239 votes cast, there were just 4,645 spoiled votes.

But this has to be one of the most inventive ones. It has a condom stapled to the ballot paper, with the handwritten words:

If you can’t care for them don’t have them.

Sam Boal of Photocall Ireland spotted it at the CityWest count centre in Dublin.

14.45 – Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore has been busy today – he was on BBC1′s Sunday Politics this morning and on the RTÉ Radio 1′s This Week. He is “disappointed” at the turnout and echoes Children’s Minister Frances Fitzgerald in her musings that the Government needs to look at why referenda turnout is generally so low.

This one was particularly bad though – a 33.5 per cent turnout and the lowest since the referendum in 1996 on refusing bail to certain people accused of serious crimes.

The Tánaiste has been saying today that he wondered if Saturday voting didn’t actually work. He said:

It may well be that people’s voting pattern works better with their working pattern than it does with the routine families have on a Saturday.

And yet, political science experts Jane Suiter and Theresa Reidy of PoliticalReform.ie have outlined why they believe Saturday voting is not the cause of low turnout (or at least not the main cause).

14.59 – Whatever the multitude and complexity of reasons for the low turnout, those who did vote would probably agree with Sineád O’Connor:

sineado

(via @NoMansWoman/Twitter)

15.17 – The ‘Yes’ side have been quick off the mark with their reaction. Naturally, it’s pretty positive.

We’ll be looking into what comes next – and who exactly turned out to vote – over the course of the afternoon so stay with TheJournal.ie.

Thanks for being with us.

Read next:

Comments (175 Comments)

  • Almost 70% of the electorate didn’t bother voting for one reason or another and that in it’s self should be sending a message.
    I wonder how many of the 70% will moan & groan about the results.

    Reply
    • John 11/11/12 #

      A very dumb, backward and ridiculous people who vote yes or no because of a poster. My guess is that 90% of those who voted didn’t understand what they were voting for. Are there a more ignorant stupid people in the world?

      Reply
    • Meh 11/11/12 #

      Low turn out maybe due to a wait and see approach, as experienced in recent previous referenda, there are some who may decide , well regardless of a Yes vote or No vote , will the government respect the outcome or will we be asked to vote again till we get it right.
      Messing around with democracy and flouting its principles leads to apathy.
      Its not the People who don’t understand what they are being asked to vote for (the usual retrospective viewpoint for low turn out or opposition vote to the Government view of the day), it’s the gradual erosion of inalienable rights for the majority in society by these vox pop referenda that tick an idealistic box, but in reality don’t do what they say on the tin.

      Reply
    • I’m ashamed to say I’m one of those 70%, I didn’t vote but that was because I was busy up until 6pm, and my vote is in Dublin North City while I live in Dublin South (about 90 minutes luas, walk and dart away each way). I was too lazy, admittedly.

      I would have voted Yes because I agree with the proposed amendments to the Constitution, and would not jeopardise the rights of at-risk children because of what transpired to be a one-sided campaign by the government. I’m delighted that the Yes side is winning out, if only barely, and am hugely disappointed that so many people used this referendum as a protest mark against the government and the actions of a morally bankrupt gambler in Sean Quinn.

      Reply
    • John 11/11/12 #

      You didn’t vote so your opinion means nothing

      Reply
    • @ Holly Fawcett
      Only in Ireland could someone who couldn’t be arsed to vote feel they then have the right to express disappointment with the perceived reasoning of those who voted one way or another.
      As John said your opinion on the subject means nothing.
      The mind boggles!

      Reply
    • #John- there are a number of airports dotted around the country. Similarly there are many, many ports. If you don’t like the Irish people, feel free to avail of these facilities and leave. Thing is, there are an awful lot of them on this island. I’ll personally help you build a curragh.

      Reply
    • John 11/11/12 #

      Oh Vincent, wow! You’re such a proud patriotic Irish man, I bet you voted yes in Lisbon to

      Reply
    • #John….white noise- that’s all I’m hearing from you.

      Reply
  • Just as an aside and a neutral stance (for once in my life) I congratulate those that actually got out and voted.
    Regardless of your choice I respect the fact you got out and made the difference.

    Reply
  • It’s a disgrace that in a democracy that around 70% of the electorate can’t be bothered to vote in something as important as a change to the constitution. How hard was it to read the amendment and make an informed choice and spend a a minute casting your vote?

    Reply
    • Look at some of the areas with the lowest turnouts. Hardly surprising when you list them.

      Reply
    • Because we live in a democracy it means people have the right NOT to vote if they choose so……..

      Reply
    • Why bother? Experience (as oppose to just making carp up) tells us that:
      - If they want to, the government in this country (whatever party, we’ve seen it from all of them) just works around the vote (or court case, or whatever other means the electorate uses) to do whatever they want.
      - If they don’t like the result, we’ll see the referendum run again later anyway.

      And then there’s all the Supreme Court fun this time round, which had to leave a lot of people wondering what the heck was going on.

      And *then* there’s the point that only a nutter would vote no given the question anyway, and if they outnumber us when only 30% of us show up, we’ve got much larger problems than not passing an amendment that most people working with abused children would say doesn’t go far enough anyway.

      Reply
    • Stephen what the government has forgotten is that the children that live in Ireland and born in Ireland are already covered under the law as they are Irish citizens.
      This is a government department trying to cover up its mistake at failing the the children in their care. this so call referendum was to change our Constitution which already covered the Irish citizen,
      It is well documented that children have been taken (ripped) from their families for nothing and it has taken decades for the parents to clear their names, but those that took them never apologies.
      This referendum was a shambles either way it goes, it does nothing to help the family unit just covering their arses and no doubt the next child in the government care to die they’ll wash their hands of that too.

      Reply
    • Thomas 11/11/12 #

      Green Monkey is quite right, the right to vote is also a right not to vote. That choice is part of what people fought for, if we must vote then it is no longer a right but an obligation
      On the other hand, I’m with Stephen on being disappointed that this issue did not matter enough for people to participate in direct democracy, but that doesn’t make them a disgrace

      Reply
  • Difficult to see how a court challenge to the result would succeed. I think the low turnout argument would not succeed, the fact that the no vote looks like it will be realitively high for those who did vote weakens the unfair disadvantage argument, perhaps fatally. Would a challenge to a referendum result be a precedent?

    Reply
    • What about the yes votes prior to the court judgements the postal votes of wicklow brought in more yes votes prior to the court than the entire votes cast yesterday according to this page. No please tell me this cannot be challenged.

      Reply
    • I think that is clutching at straws, on the balance of probability how many would have changed their mind? given the size of the postal vote probably not enough to effect outcome. The only grounds for an appeal in my view would be that it was carried out incorrectly from a procedural viewpoint. Apart from the funding issue which has already been dealt with by the Supreme Court there is I suspect little else procedurally to appeal the result on. In any event in Western Democracies there is a great reluctance of the judiciary to interfere in any way in the electoral process once an election has taken place.

      The great irony of the governments incompetence on the funding issue was that they put the required result from their point of view in greater doubt than if they stayed out of it.

      Reply
    • There are 2 requirements for a challenge. The first one is the procedural issue that the Supreme Court has already found against the Government. The second one is that the procedural issue has to have has a “material” effect on the outcome. The fact that the % of Postal Vote YES voters was dramatically different from the final outcome is, I believe, the material effect required. Don’t look at the number of voters, look at the %. Remember, the final tally of YES votes was 58% to 42% for the NO side.. This means that a swing of 9% would have resulted in a NO vote. The postal votes for Wicklow were 84.4% in favour of the amendment, while 15.6% were against. However, from what I can gather, the Yes vote there was around 64%, a swing of 20%! (Voting figures not accurate but the best I can do at short notice).

      Reply
  • Did the guy spoiling his vote in Cavan put the fada on Sean?

    Reply
  • Michael – how is this a case of the tail wagging the dog because 15% of people are changing the constitution on behalf of the other 85%?
    Firstly, the turnout looks to be about 30%, so they are the ones who decided
    If the other 70% showed up to vote, they could have had their say too
    Decisions are made by those who show up!

    Reply
    • That’s precisely my point, we don’t have a choice on whether we vote or not. We must vote, so it’s not a choice, it is an obligation. The vested interests WILL vote, politicians and their families will vote. These are the parasites feeding off the rest of the Nation, suckling at the breast of the State, they will be taken care of for life, and then will have enough left over to take care of their families for generation to come. The apathy among the rest of the Nation is indicative of a major problem, yet it is a problem that works in favour of the the vested interests, so it will not be looked at or dealt with. The System is broken, and the only way we are offered to fix it is by using the System which is broken. They have to gall to say “The State as the Guardian of the Common Good”.

      Reply
  • Our Constitution itself was approved in a referendum turnout less than 50% — so it came into force with not much more than 25% of voters saying YES.

    Reply
  • Conspiracy theory time….
    Why did we use pencils to vote?

    Reply
  • Noel O'D 11/11/12 #

    This referendum throws up a major flaw in the way we run these votes. I say this for two reasons. Firstly due to court decisions, balance to both sides of an argument has to be given (and rightly so in my view). However anybody with any view is able to make any statement, regardless of it having a basis in fact. I would love to see some independent system of fact checking to monitor the claims made by both sides in a campaign.
    Also the apathy which the low turnout reflects is a sad reflection on society. Not sure what can be done about this. I do think however that maybe the issue of referenda and the way we hold them is something that should be looked at by the constitutional convention.

    Reply
  • ill be watching with baited breath!! tick tick tick tock

    Reply
  • No matter what the outcome lets hope it raises our awareness of the lack of care and security that our state has in regards to children in care. It’s not like they have a great track record after all. They can cut allowances and slash budgets yet can still fork out 1.2 mill to persuade us to vote yes??

    Reply
  • just thinking about cllr moynihan’s Twitter comment regarding if Donegal are “in or out”. surely that’s democracy at work if Donegal decide to vote no on any number of referenda?

    Reply
  • How can the donegal vote and tipperary vote be exactly the same in percentage opposite yes and no granted but exactly the same percentage.

    Reply
  • the state has a bloody long child abuse record

    Reply
  • In response to that latest, Susan; the SC ruling didn’t change how I voted, but it did change the conclusion I drew. I believe in the referendum, but I also believe that it’s a political sideshow as the government feels the pursue of unpopular policies. I wouldn’t go so far as to describe the closeness of the result as a watershed, but it’s certainly strongly indicative of the weaknesses of centre-Right governance in this economic climate from a popularity standpoint.

    Reply
    • How? FG and FF are over 50% in popularity.

      Reply
    • The answer is in the question Luke; FF are resurgent, having been whitewashed in the last election and tribunally condemned for endemic corruption. Fine Gael were dealt a strong hand in representing one of few tangibly viable political entities in the last round. As it stands, look at the landscape: We have four parties, two large and centre-Right, two satellite and varyingly left. With unpopular policies coming thick and fast, FG are in a far more precarious position than polls might suggest. I go into it in more detail on my blog at http://www.perspectivesbyjack.com if you want to have a look.

      Reply
  • A Yes vote will be challenged. The low turnout and government misuse of public funds will give a strong case for it to be overturned.

    Reply
    • if we were in a fair society it will be overturned but there is nothing fair about this government

      Reply
    • Low turnout can’t be used. We all knew it was happening and if people didn’t understand it they should’ve just voted no. If people wanted to protest in a clear way they could’ve spoiled.

      The website could be a challenge though.

      Reply
    • They may be a legal challenge but I can’t see what grounds would be used to suggest a reason for overturning the result.

      - We’ve had lower turnouts in previous referenda so that can’t be used as an argument.
      - Despite the Supreme Court agreeing that the Government website shouldn’t have used public money they didn’t use that argument to stop the referendum. Therefore it would be strange if they used the same criteria to subsequently nullify the results.
      - While the result is close its not as close as some previous referenda (which was passed by less than 9,000 votes) and that result wasn’t ever challenged.

      Reply
    • Missed a bit in my last point. It was the 1995 Divorce Referendum which was passed by less than 9,000 votes.

      Reply
    • @Jim, I was thinking that there could be wiggle room to make a stronger challenge when the SC publish their full ruling in December. I support the amendment but it’ll be interesting to see how firm is the ground it’s on.

      Reply
    • Ciaran, I’d be surprised if there was wiggle room in the judgement or enough to make for a successful challenge to the result. While it would have been a huge decision to suspend the referendum I think that if the Supreme Court had thought that there was a possibility of the result being successfully challenged at a later date because of something in their judgement they would have made the call to suspend as that would have been the least worst option.

      I have no doubt that some people may consider a challenge but I just don’t see it being successful if it goes ahead. But we will wait and see.

      Reply
  • Yes! It begins!

    “Sheep”, “Sheeple” and cries of how the country is doomed, as predicted yesterday evening. Brilliant!

    Once again the special people on TheJournal.ie are reminded of how they’re a tiny minority on the outskirts of society, and once again they exclaim that everyone else is wrong and they’re right. Love it.

    Reply
    • John 11/11/12 #

      Are you ok in the head like?

      Reply
    • EP 11/11/12 #

      Ah seans at it again today eh…Still ranting about something youve no interest in eh sean?or do you just leave comments in order to be patronising and insulting to others. ?special people?, what exactly does that even mean? Good result today in my opinion, lets hope it can have real positive effects on the lives of some young people in ireland.

      Reply
  • Recount…….. I said RECOUNT.
    Kildare North: Yes Yes: 66.3 Yes: 33.7
    No one voted no or spoiled their vote.

    Reply
    • Just incase you think these are the Rantings of a mad man you would be right but apart from that, the above tallies is what I copied and pasted, there was no “no” count, this has been corrected. Can’t blame journal staff they are too busy keeping an eye on the trolls.

      Reply
  • exactly Mike! this goverement is bla bla but do nothing to change it, they,re called matters! I live in hope of a no vote!!

    Reply
  • The government are “delighted” that people made the right decision and are planning to celebrate !!!!!
    Sweet Jeasus almighty is it possible to be any further removed from reality ?.
    Over 70% + the people that voted no have just sent a firm message.
    I wait with baited breath on a supreme court challenge on the entire referendum and this shambolic government getting the kicking they deserve and will get.

    Reply
    • I don’t see how 70% apathy is a clear message. Spoiling or voting no would’ve been but to claim 70% voter apathy as some kind of victory for the ‘no’ side is a bit odd.

      Reply
    • @Mike – I didn’t bother voting and I’m a supporter of our government. Don’t try and take not bothering voting as people voicing their discontent with the government, because it’s not, it’s because people genuinely couldn’t have cared less about the proposal on the table.

      Reply
    • Here we go again lumping the people who didn’t vote as NO supporters. I would suggest that there were many people who were broadly in favour of the proposals but who maybe weren’t 100% convinced enough to go out and vote for them.

      Without any statisical analysis on the non-voters you simply can’t say they were all NO supporters.

      Reply
    • Mick 11/11/12 #

      70% plus did not vote no…speak facts not bull my man…its always the way to go.

      Reply
  • Can anyone tell me why they insisted on using pencils for voting and not pen ????????????????????????

    Reply
  • The SC ruling definitely changed my mind …. I was always going to vote however I lost all trust in the govt after reading the SC verdict !!! Then I felt stupid for having any faith in them in the first place!!

    Reply
  • Surely one reason for the low turnout has to be the number of people on the electorate not currently in the country. half the electorate is spread across the world, I know I would have voted if I was home.

    Reply
  • Joe Shaw 11/11/12 #

    So Donegal needs to decide if it’s in or out? Perhaps if the government treated Donegal like it was part of the Republic, not Northern Ireland, then we might feel like our votes were making a difference to the overall picture. Atrocious roads, no proper public transport, no rail services, people being made travel into the North to receive cancer treatment, sub-standard water network, Garda stations being burgled because they are inadequately resourced, etc. etc. The lack of these things might go a long way to explain why Donegal is seen as a “Protest County”. I wonder will there be much decision as to weather the Labour party is “in or out” at the next election?

    Reply
  • When the postal vote in Co. Wicklow which was cast before the High Court decision is higher, would that not mean that there would be a possiblity of their being an appeal should the referendum be passed?

    Reply
  • If there was a referendum to abolish the household charge Donegal would probably vote no!

    Reply
  • Reg 11/11/12 #

    Was unable to vote yesterday but it’s looking like enough of the sensible majority have represented my view.

    Reply
  • Unfortunately, the early indications are that it will be a Yes vote. Hope I’m wrong but it’s not looking good.

    Reply
    • fingers crossed it is!!!

      Reply
    • Where do you get early indications from ?

      Reply
    • Neil
      You were always going to be in a perverse minority ……….John Waters, Dana, Kathy Sinnott etc.

      Reply
    • Ian – early indications were from RTE site and several national and local radio stations. Garry – I may be in a minority but don’t dare call me perverse. Losing hundreds of vulnerable kids in ‘state care’ and running an unconstitutional and illegal referendum campaign – now that really is SICK.

      Reply
    • Kathy Sinnott? That long term campaigner for rights for disabled children. You refer to her a sperverse?

      Reply
    • Spot on Sean Beag – just a base, lowest common denominator type contribution, with no basis in reality.

      Reply
    • Neil – please don’t take this the wrong way, I mean it as a genuine question; do you believe that organisations like the ISPCC and Barnardos would support this campaign if they saw the potential to harm children?
      Also, had you considered that the legislature – i.e the government – have no control over the constitution once amended, it’s interpretation is the sole preserve of the judiciary under the principle of the separation of powers? So interpretation is unbiased, not politicised.
      These were my reasons for voting yes. What do you think?
      -Jack

      Reply
    • Meh 11/11/12 #

      @perspectivesbyjack “So interpretation is unbiased, not politicised.”
      Judiciary is politically appointed and self-serving, regarding ISPCC and Barnardos , regardless of their stated aims, they can’t exist without their inflated salaries (funding from the State) and covering up their misdeeds of the past. There are still folks who remember The Cruelty Man (ISPCC) and sure Barnardos in the UK were letting Jimmy Saville do sleepovers.
      Unfortunately the voluntary sector is as voluntary as the wage caps/cuts they’d take.
      There were other voices to be heard but they didn’t get funded. Regardless of the outcome Yes or No this was a sham of biased manipulation.

      Reply
    • Mick 11/11/12 #

      Neil, you mentioned nothing about it being illegal when you thought it was going to be close earlier today. now that you know the result it’s illegal. This just says it all about you.

      Reply
    • Perspectivesbyjack – u made an articulate contribution, most of which I disagree with. The ISPCC and Barnardo’s do good work and I think Fergus Finlay is a thoroughly decent man. On this issue they are misguided and are taking a naive Utopian view which is unwise. Separation of politics from judiciary is a wonderful concept which in Ireland is not often adhered to. The Labour Councillor in Dublin should cop on and stop bullying her fellow citizens. The people of Donegal deserve huge admiration for the way they are standing up to this cowardly govt.

      Reply
    • @Meh: The Minister for Justice- who I’ll grant you doesn’t have an exemplary record – appoints the judiciary on the mandate of the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board. However, the government has no mandate to remove judges or target their pay as per the Federalist Papers.
      In terms of NGOs, they called on the government for this referendum, not the other way around. There’s an argument to be made for the government’s having jumped on the political bandwagon, but the pressure came from the other end.
      And with all due respect, that’s a crude reference to a horrific case that’s neither relevant or necessary. Saville operated within a large number of organisations, and to suggest that any of them were complicit in his paedophilia would be to grossly misrepresent them.
      The campaign could have been handled better, yes. But in the end, nobody was stopping the No campaign from putting forward a coherent counter argument, of which I heard little.

      Reply
    • Eh Mick – I never made any reference to a close vote, so get ur facts right. The matter of illegality was clarified on Thursday not today, so cop urself on or just go back to bed.

      Reply
    • Mick 11/11/12 #

      What, the website or the campaign? You will find my friend that it was not the campaign…speak in facts my friend, not bull, it’s always the way to go. (And man up and move on…it’s over. )

      Reply
    • Mick – I am speaking in facts, not I hasten to add because u wish me to. U are the one living in cloud cuckooland. It may, in fact, not be over – the Yes campaign was unconstitutional and a challenge to the now expected outcome would be refreshing and justified. Cheerio ‘friend’

      Reply
    • Mick 11/11/12 #

      Yawn

      Reply
    • Meh 11/11/12 #

      @perspectivesbyjack

      Crude reference there is factual, its to demonstrate that Institutions and Organisations can get it terribly wrong and are more inclined to, as they don’t have the personal and accountable role in these kids lives. The blind eye turned doesn’t indicate complicity, but it does show how Organisational culture will be more prone to sweep things under carpets than bravely stand up and speak out(which sort of is complicity). The Church were the same, (let us handle the hard case stuff in society, we know best). The Church/State were hardly complicit in the systematic abuse of children were they??

      As for the Judiciary If you did a survey of the family and political links you’d find it’s all one happy clique stretching back to the Civil War.

      Reply
  • Hi Susan,

    Can you clarify the Dublin North West result because the Irish Times are reporting it as a NO vote with same percentage (just reversed)?

    Reply
  • well doesn’t it say it all when john Burton stands up in st Mary ( with his 138k annual penion Plus chairmans salary) and says we should have forgiveness for those who put us where we are as they we inexperienced…. the low turnout show we know they are inexperience.

    Reply
  • people voted with no experience of the powers called the HSE & fixed advertising of a yes vote campaign

    Reply
  • very easy to get the right result is right wen you use pencil to cast your vote

    Reply
    • @Jim – Hahahahahahahahahaha

      Maybe it was the aliens who did it? Or the New World Order?

      Stick on the tinfoil hat, Jim, they’re coming for that massive brain of yours!

      Reply
    • Illuminati etc….

      Reply
    • Have you every actually being to a count centre Jim? Becuase I have and I wasn’t watching a lot of people with erasers rubbing out NO votes and remarking them YES. Nor was I seeing a lot of ballot papers that looked like they had been altered the previous night.

      Do you seriously think if the Government (or whatever malign influences you believe it) has the capability of carrying out such a change overnight. And lets face it, if they were going to fix the result do you think they’d let it be so close?

      Time to either stop trolling or actually wake up and join the real world.

      Reply
  • Did Kildare north only have a yes vote?

    Reply
  • meant to say they,re called marters predictive texts

    Reply
  • all i can say is God help the future generation of children in Ireland, life may never be the same . No their lives Will never be the same and not for the better .

    Reply
  • Interesting to see working class areas,where the largest concentration of terrible parents can be found,voting no.

    Reply
    • Terrible parents exist across all areas and classes.

      Reply
    • @Deborah – This may be true, but it’s not middle and upper class kids finding themselves in state care so while their parents may not be great, they’re not the type who need to have their kids taken from them for their own safety.

      Reply
    • Not all children who end up in state care are there as a result of bad parenting either

      Reply
    • omg WTF DUBLIN are you serious. There are people of every social status abusing and neglecting their children and the state have a huge part to play in helping people who are not able to cope and that does not mean go and take their kids into care. more money is needed for supports and prevention in this country instead of wasting it on cures. What about the kids that every materialistic thing in the world except love becasue their parents buy their affection. These kids grow up more damaged in head but if they are dressed nicely and well fed and attend school no one cares if they are lonely or unloved or messed up in the head. There are problems in all walks of life.

      Reply
    • Meh 11/11/12 #

      This little portion of the comments is unbelievable.
      Middle Class parents do fail their kids, kids of Middle Class parents get themselves into the care system for all sorts of reasons. Sinead O’Connor was in the “care” system for stealing when she was a teenager and she was as middle class as you can get, even had the dipso mother thrown in for stereotypical good measure .
      To say working class areas voted No for the reason you suggest is moronic. I’m sure we could all live up to Middle Class standards with Middle Class opportunities, sure we’d have no social problems at all.
      I’d say ordinary decent hard- working “class” folks generally have Family Values to the fore, they depend on their families in a more genuine way , because “money and snobbery” is too false and off their radar to be taken seriously as a value system to live by.

      Reply
    • Childhood sexual abuse is actually more common amongst the wealthy (slightly). The typical arguement made is that in nighbourhoods that live close together, people are more aware of what’s going on in other households, which is why abusive parents in working class areas are more targetted.

      Hopefully this amendment can begin a culture change where all children are looked after.

      Reply
    • @ S?an N? Bhriain both my parents were from very upper class families and I ended up in state care. The ability to look after your children does not depend on class, social services are just more reluctant to remove children from wealthier parents who can afford to litigate.
      And I was never returned to my parents unlike many “lower class” children I knew personally whose parents just needed help or guidance with parenting so your comment is somewhat misguided.

      Reply
  • if the note vote is carried does that mean the referndum will be ran again till we get the right answer…… joke of a country!!!!

    Reply
  • can someone tell me if the turnout is less than 33% the result is void?

    Reply
    • Hi Brendan,
      Susan here on liveblog duty. No, there isn’t a minimum threshold of votes here so whatever the end result is, is the one which will be carried.

      Reply
    • No

      Reply
    • Ridiculous isn’t it? 10 to 15% of this nation can change the constitution for the other 85-90%. All these people talking about we have a choice to vote or not! The tail is wagging the dog here, and will continue to do so…

      Reply
    • @Michael Gaffney – Unless you’re suggesting compulsory voting legislation then decisions are made by the people who do their civic duty irrespective of which way they vote. People make a choice to vote YES or NO but people also make a choice whether they vote or not.

      I voted YES but I have more respect for people who voted NO (even though I disagree with them) than the people who just didn’t bother to vote.

      Reply
  • The Irish always favour the side of the government. When you have a nation of sheep ull have a government of wolves.

    Reply
  • Red Ed 11/11/12 #

    It is truly a sad day for democracy. They should be ashamed of the result of an illegal referendum. I can only assume that the low turn out has something to do with Lisbon 2. Tge people now know that if the government do not get the required vote they will just keep doing it until they do. Democracy is dead!

    Reply
  • Time and time again the Irish prove themselves to be a nation of sheep. Pathetic.im ashamed to be irish.

    Reply
    • No Shane,
      It’s actually quite simple. On this occasion, and by the sounds of your comment, on other occasions, the majority of voters in this country didn’t agree with your view.
      They made their own decisions.
      Just because you don’t agree with them, doesn’t make them sheep.
      What gives you the right to call the majority names, just because they don’t agree with you?

      Reply
  • As William Butler Yeats charged, “Ye have disgraced yourselves again! ”

    Yet a great NO Vote in the face of a Yes campaign by the entire political establishment, all the media , all the charitable institutions spending money on a huge nationwide poster campaign. Personally I give money to charity to help people , not for to be spent on political campaigns, so thumbs down to Barnados in particular.
    Well it’s all una voce now with the political establishment and the media united against the people, a very dangerous situation in any country.
    Following upon the Supreme Court judgement against it this referendum was contaminated and the Ministers responsible for that contamination and justifying it even now, Frances Fitzgerald and Alan Shatter, should be asked for their resignations.

    Reply
    • Yeah! Thumbs down to Barnados, a childrens’ organisation for actually trying to give information on a referendum on childrens’ rights. I mean who do they think they are?

      The only disgrace here is your unwillingness to accept the democratic decision of the people who voted and you’re willingness to insult those who don’t agree with you.

      Reply
    • There was little democratic about this referendum, read the Supreme Court judgement
      on it .
      Shatter should go because of his contempt for the Supreme Court judgement against this referendum spending.

      But nothing will happen to him or Government Golden Girl Fitzgerald. even though the Taoiseach had to ride in at the last minute to save the referendum Yes campaign from their ineptitude.

      Reply
    • @Michael I agree.This result is a disgrace.Nothing democratic about it.People were BULLIED to vote yes by charities like Barnardos acting with the Government.

      Reply
    • Why is that every time we have a referendum the losing side claim the winning side were bullied or frightened or coerced into voting for it. Perhaps if you stood back for a second you might consider the fact that what actually happened is that people thought about the issue and then simply didn’t accept the viewpoint that you espoused.

      I appreciate that if you really believe in something then its very disappointing when that view is not accepted and I have been on the losing side of some referendums so I know what it feels like. But I have had the grace to accept the result and not insult those who have chosen differently by pretending that their voting wasn’t done in good faith but because of some malign reason.

      It shows a terrible lack of maturity and acceptance that you can’t accept that this is the democratic process in action. You just didn’t get the result you wanted.

      Reply
  • thats why ireland is in so much trouble, people cant even get off their asses and vote, but kids and their kids will pay for this, and no one else,, good bye to fostering,, hello to adoption, americans were always partial to irish kids, they may have only lost 198 kids in ten years, but now they can loose loads more, why do people listen to liars and thieves,, oh and anyone lose a job for spending 1 and a half million for the yes vote by fg,,, nope leeches

    Reply
  • I think our next referendum should be to scrap referendums.

    After all we elect our politicians to govern and legislate on our behalf and the Oireachtas is where important constitutional decisions should be made.

    Entrusting it to an often ill-informed electorate who use it simply as anti Government protest vote is wrong and not truly democratic.

    If we didn’t have these requirements then I’m sure divorce would have been in before 1997 and issues like abortion would have also been resolved as influences of the church and pro-life groups would not be as strong .

    Reply
  • Red Ed 11/11/12 #

    It angers me that people didn’t vote because alot though that if its a no vote they will have to vote again. That alone tells me that the government controls the vote now and add to that being found out by a Supreme Court and ignoring the outcome despite the fact that postal votes were already in and votes from the islands. Isn’t it obvious that the people do not control this government voted for by uneducated zombie sheep.

    Reply
  • Got a Text tonight sudgesting that a, maybe the (only?) reason for Low Turnout (20% in St.Josephs N.S. Carlow is what I was told when I canvassed the 4 Voting Rooms) is that a LOT of people didn’t know what it was all about, what they were voting on. This infuriates me. The amount of information out there that is widely available is infinite. The minimum was the booklets that were put through ever
    y door of every abode in Ireland by the Referendum Commission. There were countless pieces in the Papers (both local and national), on the Radio (again both Local and National) and on the Television with debates on Frontline, Prime Time, Vincent Browne etc. If ye’d access to t’Internet the Ref Com Website, Journal.ie, Bulletin Boards etc. were full of information from BOTH sides of the argument. There is/was no excuse for not being informed on the issues involved. And blaming Politicians isn’t good enough no matter they be Independent of Party. This was a Referendum that affects Children. Your’ children. Children across Ireland. Children who haven’t been born yet. Yet people have chosen NOT to Vote because they “didn’t know what it was about”? There was more than enough time to do so. There’s Irish people living abroad who would love the opportunity to have cast their’ vote yet people in Ireland who had the choice, chose not to? FFS Like.

    Reply
  • Personally I didn’t vote – I was very much on the ‘yes’ side, but was out of the country yesterday. Also, I shouldn’t have a vote in referenda as I don’t have Irish citizenship – although I do get my voting card every time!

    However, if this isn’t too hypocritical, I’m shocked at the number of people who didn’t vote at all because they ‘couldn’t be bothered’ or ‘didn’t really know what it was all about’. There are sometimes genuine reason- I’ve had trouble getting to my polling station before with work and child are commitments – but as a general rule there is no reason not to get out and vote.

    It wouldn’t take long to read through the material that was sent through your door, and the Internet is a fantastic resource (apart from some of the ridiculous arguments we heard – ’10 reasons to vote no’, comprising of lies, half truths and specious arguments, springs to mind), so there is no excuse for not knowing the facts.

    I do believe that the high level of apathy is not indicative of a large support for a ‘no’ vote, as many have suggested, rather that many people were so confident of a positive result that they didn’t feel the need to go out and vote – a dangerous, but, as it turned out, correct assessment

    Reply
  • i take it those figures are the actual amount of people that voted as opposed to the %?

    Reply
  • why did I get a thumbs down for asking a question?

    Reply
  • We don’t have a choice on whether we vote or not. We must vote, so it’s not a choice, it is an obligation. The vested interests WILL vote, politicians and their families will vote. These are the parasites feeding off the rest of the Nation, suckling at the breast of the State, they will be taken care of for life, and then will have enough left over to take care of their families for generation to come. The apathy among the rest of the Nation is indicative of a major problem, yet it is a problem that works in favour of the the vested interests, so it will not be looked at or dealt with. The System is broken, and the only way we are offered to fix it is by using the System which is broken. They have to gall to say “The State as the Guardian of the Common Good”,

    Reply
    • Actually I would respectfully suggest that its the opposite case. Generally those who are more motivated to vote are people who are against a proposal because they have a cause and a reason to vote.

      Reply
  • I just can’t understand why people aren’t more concerned about this referendum, it’s entirely possible if we pass this referendum that the government can just come in and take our kids. I, for one just don’t know where it ends. It’s part of a huge creep of referendums that has happened in the last decade starting with Nice and Lisbon designed to turn our government into an all powerful body that controls every aspect of when we sleep, eat and live. They’ve deliberately pushed the catholic church out with some clever media and now they’re looking to create a religion of bureaucracy.

    Reply
    • @ zaza Is this the same church where clergy systematically abused children and covered up clerical abuse? Whose this ‘they’ you speak of who pushed the church out? Nobody ‘pushed’ them out zaza, they have done a marvellous job wrt their own negative advertising. By the way this amendment does not mean the government will come and snatch away people’s children. Thankfully the majority of the electorate who did vote did not succumb to such sensationalist nonsense and voted yes.

      Reply
    • @Zara, I don’t believe the government or the EU has any plans to control when people go to sleep or have their lunches.

      A bit of perspective on your part wouldn’t go astray.

      Reply
    • The government could already come and take your kids if you were abusing them. Damn the government for not letting you beat your children in peace!

      Reply
  • I did not vote for a number of reasons, the main one being that it was totally unclear what I’d be voting for or against. I simply do not understand what this referendum was all about…….This voter was too ignorant about the issue to vote one way or the other.

    Reply
  • WHAT IS WITH ALL THE DOUBLE YES TALLY’S

    Reply
  • WHY HAS KILDARE NORTH GOT A YES YES TALLY

    Reply
  • Zzzzzzzz

    Reply
  • Where is the Laois and Offaly vote tallys.

    Reply
    • Probably just not in yet. Tallies depend on a number of criteria. Firstly how many people the parties can get to a count centre (and I reckon there probably weren’t many people willing to give up their Sunday to do it) and secondly, how quickly the counters in the count centre process the boxes.

      Reply

Add New Comment