TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

In-cell sanitation, abortion and immigration discussed at UN human rights review

Alan Shatter takes questions from other UN members on Ireland’s work in progressing its laws protecting human rights.

IRELAND’S PROGRESS IN introducing in-cell sanitation in prisons, legislation permitting abortion under certain circumstances, and reforming its immigration law have all been examined at a review of Ireland’s human rights law today in Geneva.

The United Nations’ Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of human rights review saw other UN member states make recommendations to justice minister Alan Shatter about what Ireland could do to reinforce its human rights standards.

Shatter told the review, in Geneva, that a referendum amending the Constitution to guarantee the rights of the child would be brought in the New Year, while Ireland was also considering recommendations to recognise Travellers as an ethnic minority.

“Over the next few months Ireland will give the fullest consideration to the comments and recommendations from member States with a view to making a full response at the Human Rights Council early next year, when the final UPR report on Ireland will be adopted,” Shatter said.

“I also want to assure you that Ireland is fully committed to the UPR process. We view it as one of the outstanding achievements of the Human Rights Council.”

Delegates from the UK and Finland had asked Shatter whether national bodies would be created to monitor the conditions in prisons, which are required before Ireland can ratify the Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention Against Torture.

Those countries, along with delegates from the Netherlands, also asked how Ireland would improve the protection of children’s rights and whether Ireland could formally recognise non-traditional family setups.

Many Scandinavian countries raised the issue of Ireland’s abortion laws, calling on Ireland to bring in legislation clarifying the circumstances in which abortion may be lawful, as required by the X Case and the case at the European Court of Human Rights last year.

Other countries urged Ireland to change its current immigration laws allowing asylum seekers awaiting residency to be given the right to work, should they be able to find an employer.

On the topic of sham marriages – which had been raised by a number of Eastern European countries – Shatter acknowledged there was a problem of “impressionable young women” being attracted to Ireland and being paid to participate in such marriages.

“We need help, insofar as some of these women are travelling to Ireland from Latvia and other countries,” Shatter said, asking their native countries to make a greater effort in dissuading women from participating in such marriages.

The minister had earlier emphasised Ireland’s commitment to human rights as being “based on the bedrock principle that governments, no matter where they are in the world, must always act with the honest intention of respecting the rights of the individual and human dignity.”

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • The conditions in Irish prisons are awful, not surprising this was brought up as an issue however I also won’t be surprised if nothing is done about it.

    Reply
  • Well said Diego I would put 20 of the scumbags the vast majority that is in one cell to cut the cost down and any foreigner I would deport after even if he has an Irish wife or child they can go with him

    Reply
  • Freudian slip
    Contravene

    Reply
  • dj moore it is easier for 2 non irish to marry in this country than it is for 1 irish and 1 non irish because of a loop hole,but 1 of them must be from another european country.then they can go for their visa to stay and claim all entitlements.where as an irish person who marries someone outside of europe has to produce all documentation and still might not get a visa for their spouse.only last week a friend of my family married a lovely girl from africa and they told me the crap they had to go through and they have been together 7 years

    Reply
  • Shatter got a nice dig in against Iran. :-)

    Reply
  • Hi
    I stand corrected. Of course ireland does not detain people against their will or try to take their property, whether that is land or trees. Of course ireland would not introduce any kind of id cards for any citizen.
    Of course ireland does not do anything that would intravene human rights.
    Phew, i hope i got that in quick enough before the thought police are notified!!

    Reply
  • The idea of Scandinavians or anyone else telling us what we should or shouldn’t do about abortion is outrageous.

    Reply
  • Human rights is a laughable concept in ireland. We dont have any, not unless you have friends in high places or can find a solicitor that hasnt got an eye out for improving his own career by shafting you. This is a joke!!!

    Reply
    • Trying writing or saying that statement in Iran, Congo, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, Saudi, Zimbabwe etc and see what happens. At least here in Ireland we don’t have to carry ID cards, have summary detentions, “disappear”, have our land taken over without compensation, torture and so on. Personally I’d take Irish Human Rights any day of the week, they may not be perfect but by and large they are a hell of a lot better than the rest of the world.

      Reply
  • eilis 06/10/11 #

    Ireland without abortion is the safest country in the world in which to be pregnant as shown by the latest international findings (Report on Maternal Mortality by World Health Organisation, UNICEF, UNFPA, and the World Bank, 2007)

    Women are safer in Ireland when pregnant than countries like Britain and Holland, which allow abortion on demand. It is most unfortunate that those seeking to have abortion legalised here would have us believe that the opposite is true.

    Reply
    • Can you explain to me why “abortion on demand” is unsafe for pregnant women?

      Reply
    • The inclusion of abortion as a “Human Right” only serves to devalue and distract from the other items on the agenda and greatly damages the overall credibility of the report. Some of the other points appear to be valid – particularly those relating to Prison conditions – though I don’t think you’ll find much support for allowing asylum seekers to work and I would have thought that the bigger problem with sham marriages was with impressionable young Irish women rather than impressionable young Latvians…

      Reply
    • I doubt it’s that simple Eilis, there are plenty other factors involved in Maternal Mortality than just abortion on its own. Between 1952-1954 there were 153 deaths of women from abortion http://tiny.cc/31cnj . Between 1985-2008 there were 17 deaths. In that same period there were 24 miscarriages and 87 ectopic pregnancy deaths. I’m neither for or against abortion myself but it is going to be brought in here at some stage ( thank the EU for that) whether you like it or not.

      Reply
    • Eilis forcing Irish women to travel abroad for an abortion is against human rights. We are the only country in Europe where an Irish woman has to travel for such a precedure whether you are pro-life or pro-choice is irrelevant the fact of the matter is why should Irishwomen have to pay more i.e. travel costs plus the added stress etc. than any other European woman? Not fair our abortion law is very hypocritical.

      Reply

Add New Comment