TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Obesity or stem cell research could win Nobel Prize

The first of the 2011 Nobel Prizes will be announced tomorrow. These mice took part in obesity studies in New York, which could win a prize for the scientists involved.

A pair of mice, who were part in the obesity studies at Rockefeller University in New York
A pair of mice, who were part in the obesity studies at Rockefeller University in New York
Image: AP Photo/The Rockefeller University

TWO SCIENTISTS WHO unlocked some of the mysteries linked to obesity or a professor who figured out how to make stem cells without human embryos could be candidates for the medicine award when the first of the 2011 Nobel Prizes are announced tomorrow.

The prize committees don’t give any clues — they even keep nominations secret for 50 years — but winners usually have won many other awards and distinctions before they are considered for a Nobel.

Canadian-born Douglas Coleman and American Jeffrey Friedman have won several prizes for their discovery of leptin, a hormone that regulates food intake and body weight, and could be in the running for the coveted prize worth $1.5 million.

Last year, Coleman, of the Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine, and Friedman, of Rockefeller University in New York, received the Lasker Award, often seen as a precursor to the Nobel, for having shown that obesity is frequently linked to metabolic disruptions, or the lack of leptin, rather than being a self-induced problem.

Stem cells

Japanese Shinya Yamanaka, another potential Nobel candidate, offered the world of regenerative medicine a breakthrough with experiments showing that stem cells can be made from ordinary skin cells. The discovery led to a leap in stem cell research, reducing the need for using human embryos.

Yamanaka won the Lasker Award in 2009 and this year shared Israel’s Wolf Prize. One out of three Wolf award-winners in chemistry, physics and medicine have also won a Nobel Prize.

Yamanaka, of Kyoto University in Japan and the Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease in San Francisco, could share the prize with British cloning pioneer John Gurdon or Canadian stem cell researcher James Till. Till discovered blood stem sells, which have saved the life of many thousands of leukemia patients.

“Gurdon’s cloning technique and Yamanaka’s stem cells are highly interesting in the field of basic science,” wrote science reporter Karin Bojs of Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter, who has stood out as a leading Nobel guesser over the years. “But so far, not a single sick person has been cured with these discoveries. It is therefore possible that Yamanaka and Gurdon get to share the prize with Canadian James Till.”

Bojs said other possible candidates for the prize are the American-French trio Ronald Evans, Elwood Jensen and Pierre Chambon for their research on nuclear hormone receptors, and American David Julius for his discoveries of the molecular mechanisms by which the skin senses pain, heat and cold.

“It will be awarded to fundamental discoveries that leads to an understanding of the human body and, or treatment or prevention of illnesses,” said Nobel Prize Committee Secretary Goran Hansson, declining to give away more details.

He said there are so many Nobel-worthy achievements in medicine that it can be hard to select a winner.

Cloak of secrecy

In an unusual leak last year, a Swedish newspaper revealed the jury’s selection — British test tube baby pioneer Robert Edwards — before the announcement. The committee has since applied even stricter rules on keeping their discussions and documents surrounding potential candidates secret.

But that doesn’t keep people from making predictions.

The scientific department of Thomson Reuters, which analyzes high-impact academic papers to make predictions, suggested U.S. scientists Brian Druker, Nicholas Lydon, and Charles Sawyers, could be awarded for work related to Gleevec and Sprycel, drugs that transformed chronic myelogenous leukemia from a fatal cancer into a manageable chronic condition.

Its predictions also include Robert Langer and Joseph Vacanti “for their pioneering research in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine,” as well as Jacques Miller, Robert Coffman and Timothy Mosmann for their discovery of two types of blood cells and their role in regulating immune responses.

The Nobel Prizes date back to 1901 after a will left behind by Swedish dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel, and medicine winners are typically awarded for a specific breakthrough rather than a body of research.

The other award categories include physics, chemistry, literature and peace. The economics award isn’t technically a Nobel and was established by Sweden’s central bank in 1968.

The prizes are handed out every year on 10 December, on the anniversary of Nobel’s death in 1896.

Read next:

Comments (9 Comments)

  • The mouse on the left looks a bit like Brian Cowen after a night out.

    Reply
  • “obesity is frequently linked to metabolic disruptions, or the lack of leptin, rather than being a self-induced problem.”

    That is the scientifically accepted conclusion which may lead to a Nobel prize.

    Reply
  • Hmm.. Mysteries surrounding obesity?

    There is no mystery. Just bad food choices. Some people have medical conditions (such as hypothyroidism) which cause them to retain weight more than others, but obesity is not a medical condition it’s down to what you eat..

    And most people have no idea just how significant that is, hence they stuff themselves full of calorie dense nutrient void food.. No wonder they’re always hungry – they may as well be eating cardboard swamped in MSG for nutritional content! In spite of all those calories many obese people consume – they’re getting about as much nutritional value as those kids on the concern ads do..

    Then there’s food vs chemicals.. Read the ingredients list on foods – how many of those crazy chemicals can you even pronounce never mind know what they are.. And some of the additives and sweeteners added liberally to foods are really quite dangerous, with side effects ranging from weight gain to hormone disruption to cancer.

    Sadly, the subject of human nutrition is an extremely important and similarly huge subject.. And one not given much precedence, doctors aren’t even given adequate nutritional training.. This may be why they are so stumped on the causes of metabolic diseases!!

    Reply
    • There is huge mystery still to be unravelled in relation to obesity. It’s true that if calories in > calories out then weight will be gained however the underlying mechanisms and drives relating to desire to eat and the metabolic regulators of how this food is metabolised still drives significant research. Obesity has a stronger hereditary link than heart disease or breast cancer

      Reply
    • The hereditary link in relation to obesity has more to do with the parents diet and physical habits during the creation of the egg and sperm than one specific gene.

      Reply
    • Marko 03/10/11 #

      @Gerard I agree.

      Reply
  • There are many people who are suffering from the obesity, irregular food and insufficient sleep may cause overweight which in tern causes obesity. My brother was suffering from obesity three years back, then after proper diet and exercise he is became normal today.
    http://www.fightobesity.net/

    Reply

Add New Comment