TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Swap bolognaise beef for beans to help the world’s poor, says Oxfam

Oxfam Ireland says using beans as a substitute for meat once a week can help to save energy and restore the food balance.

Oxfam says buying Fair Trade products like coffee or chocolate can help small independent farmers in poorer countries.
Oxfam says buying Fair Trade products like coffee or chocolate can help small independent farmers in poorer countries.
Image: Toby Talbot/AP

MOTHERS PREPARING the family meals for a week have been advised to replace meat with beans or lentils once a week – a move which could help to “fix the world’s broken food system”.

The suggestion is part of a new worldwide campaign by Oxfam to address the world’s food imbalance, pointing out that the amount of food thrown away by people in richer countries is almost the same amount as that produced by all of sub-Saharan Africa.

The campaign follows a survey carried out among mothers living in urban areas, in which 73 per cent said they would like to know how to make a difference when shopping for food, and 83 per cent said they would be interested in using less energy when cooking.

Oxfam Ireland said the results of the survey – which also showed over three-quarters of respondents saying they would be happy to make changes like offering one meat-free meal a week – showed an opportunity to harness “the immense power of the individual”.

Chief executive Jim Clarken said the campaign hoped to get across the message that individual people can together be “a powerful force for change”.

“What we do in the supermarket or in the kitchen does matter. Small actions taken by enough people add up,” he said.

Oxfam’s five suggestions are:

  • Eating less meat: Oxfam says urban households in the US, UK, Brazil and Spain ate one meat-free meal per week for a year, the greenhouse gas emissions saved would be the equivalent of scrapping 3.7 million cars;
  • Reduce food waste: If one in six apples is thrown away, this adds up to 5.3 billion apples a year – the equivalent to 10 billion barrels of oil in terms of growing, trading and decomposing the apples thrown away;
  • Support small food producers: The welfare of 90,000 cocoa farms could be transformed if consumers bought two Fair Trade chocolate bars per month instead of an alternative;
  • Buy seasonal: Buying food that is out of season creates extra demand for it, which results in the use of more energy for storage and production;
  • Cook smarter: Simple actions like putting a lid on a boiling pot can cut energy use by up to 70 per cent.

“If enough people act, the reverberations will be felt right along the food chain,” Clarken said.

Oxfam International’s full report on the global food system can be downloaded here.

Read next:

Comments (29 Comments)

  • How about if we just eat and buy Irish produced goods? We aren’t helping those in Sub saharan Africa but it means our food isnt shipped halfway around the globe before it gets to our plates

    Reply
    • Couldn’t agree more. I have been consciously trying to buy only Irish, and it can be very difficult with the supermarket chains. But anyway, I got this delicious organic plummet of tomatoes from down the road… The flavour was so intense compared to the cheap crap from holland that obviously didn’t travel. Not only that the tomatoes
      Stayed fresher for much longer so I used them all.

      Reply
    • That may not have environmental benefit and could be harmful. There is some doubt over if “food miles” is actually a good thing to make your decision on because places that grow huge amounts and export them are generally more efficient (GHG emission wise) at it than say Ireland is compared to Spain outweighing the freight emissions. Holland burns huge amounts of gas to heat their greenhouses during the winter so a lot of their fruit would be quiet bad emission wise.

      Ailís, you may be confusing organic tasting good with the fact in your case it is much fresher. There is evidence that when you control for every other factor organic tastes the same as non organic.

      How wise economically it would be to pay more for Irish produce of certain products by becoming protectionist while we are a major food exporter ourselves of a few specific products which we are are best at producing is a whole other question.

      Reply
    • Niall, I don’t think I am confusing organic with fresher, since the packet stated the tomatoes were organic… Unless they can say that when it isn’t true! But these tomatoes came from a place down the road, and I fail to see how supporting that local business in order to have great tasting naturally produced food could be misguided. I should have said in my previous comment that holland tomatoes didn’t travel WELL as opposed to didn’t travel, and I also should have said that actually I am trying to buy Irish, crucially, when the goods are in season. Of course food tastes better in season. I know this because I grow some of my own and the taste is much more pronounced than the same product I might buy in a supermarket.
      I think self sufficiency is healthier, cheaper, less wasteful than this ridiculous game of exporting our goods only to import the same goods to sell to our own people. How that makes long term economic sense I don’t know.

      Reply
  • The first line annoyed me. Father’s can cook too you know…

    Reply
    • For what it’s worth – and it’s my own fault for forgetting to include it – Oxfam cited data (from the CSO, I think) suggesting that 98% of household shopping is done by the matriarch of the household. They said this was the basis for targeting mothers specifically.

      Reply
    • And for the pedantic record, people without children are quite capable of cooking too…

      Reply
    • The Oxfam source is nonsense about perceptions of who should do the shopping. The real figure is 30% of household shopping is done by men (http://www.nwci.ie/download/pdf/who_cares_october_2009.pdf)

      I might consider subbing beans into my bolognaise but unfortunately I am harbouring a penis in my pantaloons and as a consequence am not equipped with the the natural bean skills enjoyed by the fairer sex.

      Reply
    • I feel bad about derailing… Bee in my bonnet on this one. It’s just one of thise uber-annoying marketing strategies. I see it on ads all the time.. “Mums, buy this product” and it’s considered ok. Mysterious lack of, ‘Spinsters, buy this product’, or ‘infertile men, buy this product’. Seriously, how insulting is it to be defined solely by either your gender or your reproductive status?

      Men, women, people with our without children, and heck, even children themselves buy food and cook.

      And I think we all know that chucking food away is bad mkay.

      So, yeah, oxfam can go away and stop annoying me. Soz!

      Reply
  • Are fathers free to cook whatever they like?

    Reply
  • 10 billion barrels of oil for 5.3 billion apples? Seems a bit exaggerated.

    Reply
    • If I remember right from the last time I heard figures like that, they’re the total amount of oil used between fertiliser production (and the production of every other spray or chemical used) both in raw ingredients and in the power requirements of the factories where the stuff is made; the fuel used by farm machinery and to transport the produce; and in all the other direct and indirect processes needed to grow the produce and get it to your fridge (power for the fridge and lights in the shops, petrol to drive there and back, yadda, yadda, yadda).

      Sadly, not an overestimate and the numbers have been rising at an alarming rate since the 1930s…

      Reply
    • That’s basically 2 barrels of oil per apple. Two barrels of oil costs around $200. I’m fairly sure I don’t spend $199.50 on upkeep and maintenance of my apples.

      Reply
    • Of course you don’t… they’re in your back yard on the one tree that you don’t fertilise or spray for pests, you pick the apples by hand and eat them as you pick them.

      But when you have acres of apple trees, a limited harvest window, have to use mechanical means to spray, pick, transport, refrigerate, ripen (using ethylene gas), and when you also have to fertilise and spray a lot because you’re in an industrial-level monobloc farm, well, things work differently at that point.

      Reply
    • I’ll try to make this simple. If producing each apple cost 2 barrels of oil, apples would need to cost more than $200 in the shop. Otherwise selling apples would be a loss-maker.

      The only way an apple could be profitably sold for less than $200, is if most of that oil is consumed by me, after I buy the apple. Hence my comment.

      Reply
    • Here’s where the discrepency lies:

      King, R. (2009) 4-a-week: Changing food consumption in the UK to benefit people and planet (Oxfam GB) states that “Every tonne of household food waste is responsible for 4.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e).” The 979,171 metric tonnes of apples wasted by urban households each year therefore equate to 4,406,270 tonnes of CO2e. A barrel of oil results in 0.43 metric tonnes of CO2 (United States Energy Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. Calculations and references. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/refs.html#oil – accessed 21 June 2012.) and the emissions impact of these wasted apples is therefore equivalent to 10,247,138 barrels of oil

      So they’re being a bit free with the numbers, but when you add in the oil used to produce the apples and get them to market and get them to the home and store them, it’s not a horrible fudge.

      Reply
    • eh Cormac its 5.3 billion apples, not million..

      Reply
    • Apologies Cormac, see both figures are in billions now. Surely it should be 10 million barrels of oil?

      Reply
    • Mark, the fudge lies in assuming that one apple weighs one tonne.

      Reply
  • I am not buying into the apples and 10 billion barrels of oil wasted. Something way wrong with that argument.

    Reply
  • The point Oxfam are making is that growing animals and then killing them for food is not sustainable. To grow 1 kilo of meat requires more land and water resources than are needed to grow 7 kilos of wheat. If we want all people to have enough to eat then we need to stop eating meat and switch to vegetables. In addition there is carbon footprint differential between meat and veg since meat is a greenhouse gas source and veg is a greenhouse gas sink.

    Reply
    • It’s perfectly sustainable, just not at the levels and in the ways that we’re doing it.

      And remember – while it’s perfectly true that it’s healthier to eat less meat than we currently do (we evolved to a diet over the past few hundred thousand years that was not as rich in meat as ours has been for the past forty to fifty years); and while it’s perfectly true that the bhuddist practise of eating vegetarian for a day a week is cheap and healthy and frankly just as tasty* and nutritious when done right; it is also perfectly true that we have raised a generation who know so little about how to cook and what they need to eat in order to stay healthy that people can make money selling them books that tell them how to roast a chicken and to make a list before they go to the shop.

      When that’s your level of knowledge of nutrition, then talking about vegetarian or vegan diets is a bad idea because if you go off on a diet without complete proteins or with other imbalances, you will get sick, sooner or later.

      Honestly, if Oxfam really want to see this change (in Ireland at least), they’d be more successful if they lobbied to have home economics made mandatory and basic nutrition and cooking made a mandatory part of that subject and pushed to educate people on the basics. Everything else would follow from there.

      *Yes, tasty. Deep-friend mac&cheese; silken tofu scrambled eggs; honey-glazed carrots with chilli; pecan pie; apple cake; every kind of bread bar things like keema naan; All of these are vegan, not just vegetarian (well, maybe not the cheese…). If you can stand to be a pesco-vegetarian, add about ten million dishes with fish and seafood from whole baked seabass in a salt crust to kung pao prawns and everything in between. I love me a good thick juicy well-seared medium rare steak still pink through the middle; but that doesn’t mean it can’t taste good if there’s no cow, pig, chicken or lamb in there….

      Reply
    • And let’s not forget that meat is tasty.

      Reply
  • Well done Oxfam..the document deals with such an important issue…would advise everyone to read the full document and not just the summary..great to read such a thought provoking document…from here it makes so much sense..

    Reply
  • my problem is that most beans are absolutely tasteless and the prep time for them can take an age. I often have a no meet dinner but it will have vegetables that are quicker and easier to prepare then beans are. And don’t try to convince me that they are easy to prepare cause I’ve seen first hand the peeling and overnight soaking that’s needed so they can be used.

    Reply
    • Peter 19/07/12 #

      Oh man try Cassoulet French recipe from any region and you will be surprised how good it is

      Reply
    • yes Cassoulet, a dish where the beans (haricots blancs – a very bland bean) get all the flavour from the meet they are cooked with. Nice try Peter, throw out a another dish where beans are the main portion of the dish and has no meet in it to flavour the bean.

      Reply
  • Lid on pot is a good point. But you save more on energy and consequently bills using a microwave.

    Reply

Add New Comment