TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 2 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Room for improvement in penalty point system

No reason why we can’t save more lives, motorist and driving safety representatives tell Oireachtas committee on transport.

Image: Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland via Flickr/Creative Commons

THE PENALTY POINTS system is still in need of improvement, despite a halving in the number of road deaths since it was first introduced a decade ago.

Addressing the Oireachtas Transport Committee on the penalty points system, Noel Brett of the Road Safety Authority said that the measure of succcess should not be the number of people caught but the number of those deterred from dangerous behaviour.

“Last year 186 people were killed on Irish roads”, down from 411 in 2001 he said, making Ireland the third safest in Europe for deaths per billions of km. But “for a civilised society that is still too many. If we were the best country in Europe the figure would be 140. There is no reason why we can’t save more lives.”

The Committee was discussing proposals put forward by the Minister for Transport Leo Varadkar to change elements of the current penalty points system. Minister Varadkar’s review include proposals that penalty points be increased for 11 offences including those linked to the most dangerous driver behaviour such as speeding.

Calling for an increase in points for speeding offences to three penalty points in line with Northern Ireland and the UK, Conor Faughnan of the Automobile Association (AA)  called the penalty points system a “huge success.”

However, not every proposal brought forward by the Department of Transport should be enacted immediately, he said.

In reference to a proposal from the Department that speeding should become more than one offence, he said that although reasonable, “the AA does not believe we can do this yet. We first have to fix the problem of poorly set speed-limits that pepper the network.”

For example, the N4 that runs from Dublin to the Northwest is a two lane highway with an 80km per hour speed limit as it leaves the capital. However, in Roscommon is becomes a “one lane boreen” with a 100km per hour limit.

Ireland has moved up to 5th place in Europe for road safety from 6th in 2011.

Changes to points system will see increased penalties for speeding, using phones>

Read next:

Comments (42 Comments)

  • Paul 19/09/12 #

    Forgive me for nit picking but I’d like to know if all 186 were motorists. Seems I heard of at least 2 pedestrians killed on the roads. And can you give penalty points to unlicensed motorists and morons walking or cycling on M roads as I’ve witnessed on many occasions

    Reply
    • Paul, spot on.
      I’ve lost count of the times that I’ve come across cyclists 2 abreast on country roads.
      They will say by law they can be 2 abreast, however they should be more concerned with the laws of physics.
      1 1/2 ton car V’s bicycle…. no contest

      Reply
  • Id say a lot more has to do with the system of driver education , improved road network ,the nct and that cars themselves getting safer rather than the penalty points system.

    Penalty points for speeding should only be looked at after the speed limits are all fixed, the fact that doing 60 outside a school at 3pm and doing 140 on the m50 at 2am carry the same penalty is madness.

    If motorway/ DC speeds were dynamic and based on conditions and the limit on the likes of the m7 and certain parts of the m50 was raised to 160km/h , and the 30km zone scrapped in dublin then I would support looking at the penalty points system.

    Reply
  • The AA are wrong where they state that speeding “should” involve more than one offence. It does. In certain circumstances speeding could involve careless or dangerous driving.

    Reply
  • The RSA need to liaise with the relevant Medical Bodies to determine what proportion of the 211 deaths involve young males without third party vehicles where on detailed examination there is a high suspicion of suicide . This then need to be tackled in a specific manner with proper funding as the enforcement of road safety regulations won’t do any thing to prevent these tragedies happening to the degree that they do. Perhaps the Journal could take a useful role here in terms of verifying the extent to which this may be occurring. The numbers are not likely to be small unfortunately.

    Reply
  • “Last year 186 people were killed on Irish roads”, down from 411 in 2011
    Last year was 2011, and if 2010 was meant the figure was 212 not 411.

    Ive no doubt the penalty points system has had an effect on making our roads safer, but surely it can’t be
    given all the credit. in 2002 we have motorways to the level of a bypass of the odd town. Now we have point to point motorway systems across the country. The network itself would have to take alot of the credit for making our roads safer. That and the crack down on drink driving.

    Reply
  • 12 penalty points for being a chav driving a Honda Civic. Automatic disqualification. A huge part of the problem solved.

    Reply
  • I just did some maths; you are 8 times more likely to die in Cavan due to a road accident than if you are in Dublin!!!

    Reply
  • Reduction in deaths on the road has nothing at all to do with the quality of our infrastructure being improved? Look at the per county statistics, back end of nowhere counties with crap roads have higher deaths than those with plenty of motorways / dual carriageways? Thought so.

    Reply
  • Of course if the RSA had their way everyone would get penalty points just for opening their car door. Imagine, if we had all drivers off the road we’d be the best boys the whole of Europe!

    Reply
  • If only we had more Gardai to enforce them!

    Reply
  • Maybe if they when and got all the ADIs to teach people how to drive properly instead of teaching them to pass a test. It seams to be a big money making racket with a smoke screen of road safety.

    Reply
  • “Minister Varadkar’s review include proposals that penalty points be increased for 11 offences including those linked to the most dangerous driver behaviour such as speeding”

    So speeding is more dangerous than drunk driving, not wearing a seatbelt, dangerous overtaking, use of a mobile phone, or careless driving?

    Reply
    • Speeding (ie. breaking the speed limit on a particular stretch of road) would be considered careless and dangerous, in my opinion. Speed limits are in place for a reason. A collision at high speed is much more likely to result in fatalities as I’m sure you are aware, as is a car striking a pedestrian at high speed.

      Reply
    • The sentence says “such as”. In other words speeding is one of a list of things and not the only thing the constitutes “most dangerous driving behaviour”.

      Reply
    • I know collisions at high fatalities are more likely to result in road deaths, but the blanket assumption that on a given stretch of road 60kph is fine but 65-70 is careless and dangerous baffles me. Some stretches of road are 80 zones where I wouldnt dream of going over 60, but some 60 zones should be 80 zones. In fact some do change limit when you cross county borders. We could just reduce the national speed limit to 50 and road deaths would plummet to near 0 (if it was enforced) but if we did so it wouildn’t automatically make someone driving at 55kph on the N2 a dangerous and careless driver.

      Reply
    • @ Brendan
      Drink Driving is a chargeable / summons offence!! Only until recently did they bring in a lower level that was dealt with by fixed charge! The upper limits all still get prosecuted in court!

      Reply
  • I agree with the AA about the standardisation of speeding limits across the country. In and around Dublin there are some ridiculous limits which need to be sorted.

    The N4 is a perfect example. I drove it from Junction 4 (Leixlip/Adamstown) to Junction 1 (M50) yesterday. That’s a distance of around 5km. It is an 80kph limit for a three lane dual carriageway. I tried to stay at the speed limit and in the left lane. In the few minutes I was on the road I was overtaken by a couple of hundred cars and trucks. Therefore every single one of those were technically breaking the law and would have incurred penalty points if there had been guards on the section of road.

    Reply
    • damian 19/09/12 #

      Yeah valid point, but in that section that are entrances and exits that are quite close together…

      Have you ever tried to enter the N4 coming from Liffey Valley (in the direction of city centre) and try and get across 3 lanes to get into the M50 Southbound exit lane? It’s a very short distance to do it in even when cars are approaching you at 80 KM/H, imagine if that stretch was 100 KM/H…. It’s about traffic calming there after coming off the 120 KM/H M4. I agree though, that it should drop to 100, then 80, rather than 80 right away…

      Reply
  • Aka101 19/09/12 #

    A speed limit is the max your allowed drive on a specific road. Not a target. If a rural speed limit is 80kpm doesn’t mean u drive at 80. You drive to the road, traffic and weather conditions.

    Reply
    • I hope that comment wasnt directed towards me. I agree with you completely. Many rural roads have speed limits of 100km which if people did try and do would be incredibly dangerous. I am talking about roads that were national roads eg N8 but became regional roads after being bypassed. I have never once heard of a guard spending the day at a dangerous bend in order to speak to or fine those taking the corner too fast for dangerous driving. Speed doesnt kill people inappropriate speed does.

      Reply
  • RSA is a revenue collecting under the pretence of safety. improvement in car safety and better road infrastructure has had the biggest difference in saving lives.
    RSA has obsession with speed fines
    NCT is a tax under the pretence of safety test when it is back dated to cars anniversary and a test for a year(s)
    RSA need to focuse on road safety instead of revenue generating.

    Reply
  • They really need to look at where speed checks are carried out. To me they are always on long wide straight roads where d speed limit is strangely low eg n4 or even M50. Also have a problem with them treating d old now bypassed roads as accident blackspots to justify d white vans. I live on one and while it used to be dangerous since d bypass accidents dropped almost 100%. dont even get me started on d 2 penalty points got on d same bypassed road coz they decided to change its speed limit to 80 before changing it back. do I deserve a refund? If someone in jail for something that becomes legal would be released….

    Reply
  • Wish they would tackle the Irish habit of pedestrians crossing roads when they see a “gap” in traffic instead of at the lights , we must have spent a small fortune on traffic lights putting them up in dublin in particular at every conceivable place and yet people habitually cross where it suits , too lazy to walk the further 25 yards to cross and laugh at the concept of green man , spot fine for jay walking might reduce the thousands of injured pedestrians each year now that we chastised the motorists with points , ramps 30 zones and speed traps ad nauseam.

    Reply
  • With the way the countryside is being built up with one-off housing every road will soon be in a 60kph or 50kph zone… that’ll solve it.

    Reply
  • Do we actually need the RSA any more? And all the other govt ads telling us how to safely use a tin opener?!!!
    Budget cuts are needed dammnit let’s start with these quangos

    Reply
  • Here’s a link to the per county death statistics / ratio http://twitpic.com/aw9v7b

    Reply
  • I agree that speed is a killer but the RSA want to reduce speed but as far as I know they do not have the authority to set the speed limits on the road as this is still held with the Councils and NRA. I have been on roads and just because they are a National Road the speed limit is 100KPH and it should be max 80KPH and then I have been on roads that are 60KPH which could easily be 80KPH. Basically people can lobby to get speed’s increased or decreased for their local agenda and safety is not key to the speed limit.

    I also think the road deaths are down due to the fact our roads have improved (motorways), vehicles have improved with saftey features such as ABS etc and the NCT has made people change the attitude they have towards vehicles and get the car fixed.

    Reply
  • Look if there are no guards enforcing the points system then the system will not be seriously effective.
    It is obvious to everyone that you will not see a guard going after the so called boy racers and people who are speeding around urban areas are happy to sit on the motorway picking off cars to get the quota in.
    The guards are not doing their jobs as they couldn’t be bothered with the paperwork.

    Reply

Add New Comment