TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Column: It’s time to privatise RTÉ and the DAA. Offload them now.

The two troubled semi-states are living in fantasyland, writes Aaron McKenna. Why should we keep them there?

Aaron McKenna

RTÉ AND THE DAA have not been covering themselves in glory this past week. The two semi-state companies have been putting on a show highlighting all that can (and usually does) go wrong when you marry the public and private sector, and get the worst of both.

They have also been providing a timely reminder that the state would be well advised to get rid of many of these ‘companies’ to save itself financial complications, market distortions and embarrassment.

The trouble in RTÉ of late is well flagged. The organisation is losing €50 million a year and adding to its deficit by way of record libel compensation bills. The DAA has been shown up by the European Commission for failing to run a secure ship, and the organisation is carrying €1.2 billion in debts run up on white elephant projects.

The two are fine examples of the high flying hubris of our semi-state sector. Tumultuous organisations that are financially incontinent yet persist in spending over the odds on everything from presenters to infrastructure. They proceed through life in the single-minded assurance that, as state-owned enterprises, they are above the petty concerns of mere mortals.

RTÉ uses its position as recipient of the license fee to prop up its commercial businesses. The rates that the company can command are above what most commercial competitors can claim because RTÉ gets to sell the whole package. For a business to be successful it needs scale: The more programming you have, the more channels and kudos in your possession is linked to your ability to compete.

In RTÉ they simply have to wake up in the morning and the license fee has provided a solid foundation, no questions asked. This is a market distortion that props up the business, yet they still manage to bleed money thanks to a dysfunctional and inefficient public sector way of doing things.

‘The DAA won the competition because nobody else was stupid enough to take up the task’

Where Ryanair and low cost flights felled Aer Lingus’ monopoly on air travel in and out of Ireland, the DAA continues to enjoy the protection of the Department of Transport in its ongoing grandiosity. It was Government support that pushed through Terminal 2, which I find extremely pleasant to travel through thanks to its very short queues at nearly all times, despite cheaper (and free) options being on the table for building of a low cost terminal.

The DAA won the competition to run T2 because, well, nobody else was stupid enough to take up the task in a free falling market. The organisation is stuffed with directors who trace their patronage back to political parties and is in an ongoing war with one of its chief customers, Ryanair, over its management and costs. Say what you like about Ryanair and its PR style, they do run a profitable business without crippling debts and their concerns are worth listening to.

Aer Lingus had to fight a battle and a half to break free from its publicly owned legacy after privatisation. The current CEO, the no-nonsense Christoph Mueller, has been having success with a hard nosed approach to all the public sector hangovers that have no place in a business struggling to be profitable.

If you read the 2010 annual reports for the DAA and RTÉ (it’s May 2012, but no 2011 reports are yet forthcoming – Aer Lingus has its out, though) it’s striking how they both bleat about the falloff in government supported funding.

‘The semi-states tend to be afflicted by delusions of grandeur’

The DAA want the regulator to allow it to have fees analogous to gold-plated international hub airports like Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Paris CDG despite the fact that even the flag national carrier is a low cost airline that needs low cost facilities. RTÉ bemoans the fall-off in government funding as compounding the fact that the private sector can’t reach to pay its stiff commercial rates.

The semi-states tend to be afflicted by delusions of grandeur, backed up by their ability to run up huge debt bills on the assumption that the state will always bail them out. Not alone content to build T2, in 2008 the DAA outlined plans for a €4 billion investment in “Dublin Airport City,” featuring 600,000 square meters of office space and 40,000 square meters of retail and hotel space.

Any successful enterprise will tell you that one of the keys to long term profitability is to focus on your core business. The DAA (one of the A’s stands for ‘airport’) was essentially pitching itself to become a massive property developer. Even had the boom had continued to get boomier, an airport authority has no business in property speculation and even less capacity to pull it off successfully.

Our semi-state companies are spoiled little brats who expect to be allowed to compete in and distort private sector markets without having the same responsibilities or handicaps of normal organisations. They run themselves in a dysfunctional fashion, failing in their core missions regarding things like editorial control or terminal security, let alone profitability.

They are quick to go back crying to government when they need a hand up, a hand out or a hand to slap their competitors with. They can also be a huge embarrassment to government, sucking up political oxygen at a time when we have better things to worry about.

‘The only reason to keep them is so the relevant ministers have somewhere to send their cronies’

The state should offload the DAA and RTÉ. The only reason to keep them is so the relevant ministers have somewhere to send their cronies. Government has no business in producing Fair City or running a shopping centre with stringent security. The two bodies should be cast to the market and raise some funds for something useful, with government retaining its interest in the key infrastructures like landing rights and radio spectrums.

RTÉ could be gotten rid of with a few rules put in place beforehand in relation to the concentration of media ownership, which are overdue anyway. The key output of RTÉ that people worry about is the current affairs and news programming, which could be supported by tendering a government grant for programs like Prime Time to more than just RTÉ.

Take the funding out of RTÉ and offer it up competitively for others to produce the high quality programming, and let them run competent organisations and decide if they really want to pay €500,000 a year to the presenter.

The DAA debt bills make privatising it more difficult, but worries the country would be cut off if it were privatised are silly. Indeed, the Irish government in the past has been plenty injurious to access in its support of the Aer Lingus ticket monopoly. Allowing a bloated public sector organisation to heap costs onto flying hardly helps either. Owning the DAA doesn’t keep our skies open so long as there are aircraft with passengers looking to come to Ireland.

The only alternative is to try and reform the bodies ourselves, something government is singularly not good at doing. And with potential buyers out there, why bother? Government should stick to its core business and get on with providing education and healthcare and the like.

Aaron McKenna is a businessman and a columnist for The Journal. You can find out more about him at aaronmckenna.com or follow him on Twitter @aaronmckenna.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (77 Comments)

  • A government tender for current affairs programming? Surely this is a parody.

    There are plenty of faults within RTE and it’s systems, but under no circumstances should anything happen to either impinge upon it’s integrity as an independent broadcaster, nor it’s ability to provide programming which is not commercially viable but is in the public interest. What a ridiculous suggestion.

    Reply
  • Stop the licence fee and make them compete!

    Reply
  • tim 19/05/12 #

    I hear bono got a few bob he might be in the market.

    Reply
  • Another “private sector good – public sector bad” thesis. So we sell good strategic business (agreed they may need reform – what company doesn’t!) owned by Irish Citizens at fire sale prices to foreign vested interests whose allegiance lies elsewhere; the state for its part buys bust private entities, like Anglo, AIB, BOI, EBS, Irish Nationwide, Irish Permanent and all the junk properties in NAMA.
    RTE runs Tv and radio channels, excellent web services, an orchestra etc. Excluding Vincent Brown, Tv3 is not exactly a run away success: ITV is 80% rubbish – imagine suggesting they privatise the BBC!
    Mary O’Rouke FF privatised Eircom in 1999 which was paying €500 million in profits to government each year – the company was stripped to the bone subsequently and is now bust. Let’s not mention Greencore Ltd Your thesis is ideological and incorrect.

    Reply
    • limofax 19/05/12 #

      Well said David. RTE should never be privatised. Yes it has screwed up lately and that is why the scandals are all the more shocking as we are used to the high standards it has produced over the years. RTE needs to be audited and reformed but the last thing we need is another TV3. RTE has a duty to the state to provide balance. When all televisual media is privatised in a country, the political debate becomes more one sided (in most cases right wing) and damages genuine debate and democracy. I would agree with slashing the wages or even dumping some of their overpaid stars like Ryan Turbidy and Joe Duffy who would find it hard to earn the same wage elsewhere and are crap!

      Reply
    • Citing the example of Eircom’s profitability in 1999 is irrelevant. The question is, do the intangible benefits to our society from non-profitable ventures (e.g regional interest RTE stories, or more highbrow media) justify the higher costs and wastage typically associated with the public sector?
      That’s essentially the question; implying that the public sector is typically profitable is ludicrous.

      Reply
    • Very well said.

      Reply
  • Shut down RTE.

    Reply
  • RTE is a flaming disgrace of nepotism and Dublin / London bias that forgets that the rest of the nation exists. shut it down or sell it off and abolish the license fee

    Reply
  • Am I reading the Daily Mail? Any one can write at length bitching about the obviously bloated and poorly run semi states, and how private companies would do a better job. Sure isn’t that what the trokia want! Try having a shot at how we’d reform them? Getting tired of business people/politicians still trying to convince us that we should let the markets sort everything out when we live in an age where the all evidence says otherwise.

    Reply
  • pagan 19/05/12 #

    Ok.A few pointers on the DAA.
    The airports were all separated by our last government yet the DAA is saddled with the debts of cork with its new terminal and Shannon with a debt of 100 million.It’s no wonder Shannon airport is jumping for joy after getting debt free with a stroke of a pen.
    As for T2 in Dublin it did not cost 1.2 billion as has been stated in above article and by Ryanair.That figure is the total cost including New runway,up grade of T1 and ramp airside,roads etc.Some of these projects have been put on hold.T2 was ment to be built in 2000 but was stopped by the PDs who had a vested interest in a certain low cost airline.T2 is built for the future not for today.
    Yes the DAA is top heavy with mangers but it is getting its house in order.I don’t see many other companies absorbing debts of sister companys who then have a get out of jail free card when it comes to money.

    Reply
  • RTE should be not be privatised. Given a good shake up, absolutely! But not privatised. What I want to know is, if it’s semi-state, why can’t the government step in to alter the exorbitant salaries paid to presenters and broadcasters? I’d happily go on air every afternoon + listen to the woes of your average Joe Duffy caller for a fraction of the amount!

    Reply
    • It is fine to say these organisations should be shaken up or reformed and that is obviously correct.

      The problem is that it is extremely difficult to reform an organisation that cannot go out of business and where jobs are strongly protected. It is even worse in situations like RTE and DAA where there is absolutely no room for growth. There is just very little impetus for change.

      It can be done, but It requires very talented people and the work of running these things is not really all that rewarding. Then you are into paying people big salaries to get them to stay and the merry-go-round starts all over again.

      Reply
    • Scarr 19/05/12 #

      @tokidoll – I could be wrong on this but pat kenny et al are not actually employed by rte, they are contracted. My understanding is that kenny gets a hefty salary but that would also pay for his production crew and researchers etc, that’s why at the end of the show he says something to the effect of ‘this is a pat kenny production for rte’. but having said that rte could offer him 30k a year when his / their contract is up for renewal in theory.

      Reply
  • Yes particularly RTE we have carried them for far too long.

    Reply
  • I’ve resolved to never buy anything from Komplett.ie again because of this ideological bile. I can’t respect the views of somebody who’s every column has the exact same premise around which he shapes an argument. We get it Aaron, you’re not a fan of the Public Sector, but if I wanted to read this kind of rhetoric and lazy ‘analysis’ I’d just pick up a copy of the independent.

    Reply
  • Privatising the DAA is a good idea but the idea of privatising RTE is simplisitic at best, it could never make money in such a small country and it has so many public service responsibilities.
    Everyone knows it needs a massive overhaul and restructuring.

    Reply
  • It is certainly time to trim the payouts to the presenters. When I read that one Sunday morning presenter gets 500k for basically reviewing the papers with a bunch of friends, I wondered how much more ludicrous could things get.

    Reply
  • Privatise both of these bloated incompetent companies immediately. If they were privately owned they would have gone bust years ago except for the fact that you and I bail them out year after year.

    Reply
  • If you want to watch privatised RTE you’re so welcome to TV3 & ITV. I get fantastic value for my TV LIcence fee, most of it from radio and the web. RTE gets lots wrong but on balance it is an indispensable service in my life . On balance it proves with each day’s output that it knows what “public service broadcasting” means.

    Reply
  • So right

    Reply
  • Discussing RTE and the DAA in the same vein is misleading.

    Some cheerleaders of privatisation are being paid by vested interests to promote the idea in the media.

    Is this the case with this article?

    Reply
  • Dave 19/05/12 #

    Aaron, sorry to say, but your lack of knowledge of the aviation industry and the actual situation regarding fees and facilities at Dublin airport is showing. You talk with the same tired old clichés as Michael o’leary about “gold plated” this and that. Aer Lingus do not want low cost facilities a la Ryanair. Neither do any of the other airlines flying to Dublin (except Ryanair). The fees at Dublin are nowhere near CDG, FRA, LHR etc.

    T2 was sorely needed when being built, but then the economy tanked and traffic dropped. Hardly the DAA’s fault.

    This simply reads as more of the same old tripe about every public body being bad, every private one good. While I agree in many cases, I do not in all cases. Besides, the DAA has delivered profits throughout its lifetime unlike many other a state body. Are they perfect? No. Are they as bad as you make out? No.

    Reply
  • Privatising RTE and DAA would be a good start.
    How to deal with the Frankenstein’s monster of the state sector Nama?
    Another fine article from Mr McKenna.

    Reply
    • ending public service remit programming across television and radio would be a cultural and civic disaster.

      Mr McKenna is a dogmatic ideologue, who refuses to accept the validity of the states role in certain matters pertaining to our infrastructure and culture.

      The DAA may well function as a private entity – but the idea of ending public service broadcasting in the republic is a horrible, horribly crass idea. It has no cultural or social merit. And RTE is a cultural social institution. Its not an under-performing plastics assembly factory – it’s the Irish state broadcaster. You need one of those.

      Reply
    • You’re just a bit dogmatic there yourself twobirds.
      Fact is Irelands state/semistate sector will have to be dragged into the 21st century eventually.
      Maintaining high cost/inefficient institutions is a luxury this country can no longer afford. In addition, it is unjust to continue to impose to burden of these institutions on families that are now hard-pressed to meet mortgage repayments, feed and cloth children. While they continue to pay obscene salaries and persist with financial incontinence.
      The broadcasting world has changed beyond recognition since the licence fee was introduced. RTE’s Market share is now minute by comparison due to satellite broadcasting, streaming etc. Their continue demand for more funding isn’t justified. The apron strings of licence fees and government subvention must be cut.

      Reply
    • “Irelands state/semistate sector will have to be dragged into the 21st century eventually.:
      that statement actually doesn’t mean anything – you’re proposing to end state broadcasting.

      “Maintaining high cost/inefficient institutions is a luxury this country can no longer afford.”
      The state can and must afford any number of objectively inefficient or non-profit making things. Hospitals tend not to function like hedge funds.
      It is the state’s role to view the greater good, and hold long term goals for the betterment and general well being of the society. The cultural contribution afforded by a state broadcaster is inarguable. For the commercial alternative – again, kindly please look carefully at TV3.

      “RTE’s Market share is now minute by comparison due to satellite broadcasting, streaming etc.”
      Laughably incorrect – across Radio and broadcast, current affairs, Soaps, and Sport, RTE boasts a fairly gigantic market share, it is especially impressive in radio considering the ferocity of competition – RTE in general terms can capture upwards of 50% of the viewing public with its peak viewing broadcasts and stuff like The Late Late.

      Any broadcaster in the world would kill for the market share RTE has.

      Broadly speaking RTE is an Irish institution and is held as such by the citizenry, while right wing idealogues such as yourself and the columnist revel in the notion of tearing down public bodies for the creed of open markets, you simply are at the fringe: while you are entitled to your opinion it holds absolutely no weight. You are well outside the commonly shared Irish position on this. RTE stays. No amount of right wing market dogma is going to change that.

      Reply
    • Twobirds, I fail to see how you could justify the inflated cost of RTE’s cultural enlightenment to the tens of thousands of struggling Irish families. Many of whom could spend the licence fee money on essentials.
      Is this a case of let them eat cake?

      Reply
    • putting forward a ridiculous “nation starves” argument as cloak and justification for your own right wing market ideology will not wash. let them eat cake my ass.

      its three quid a week for two television channels, a host of radio services, comprehensive web service with catchup also available in the UK, the national concert orchestra, and the direct and indirect employment of thousands upon thousands of people.

      It won’t wash Sean.

      Reply
    • Twobirds, if RTE is so popular, has such a large Market share and is such good value, why not fund it through voluntary contrbution rather than criminalising the least advantaged members of our society? Who would rather feed their children rather than paying Tuberty/Kenny’s obscene salaries.

      Reply
    • A state broadcaster is a state broadcaster – its funded by the citizenry.

      why aren’t courts, schools, and post offices voluntarily funded?

      the market in Ireland simply is not big enough to support a fully functioning national broadcaster – you end up with hollowed out crud like TV3. So RTE is semi-state – there is an annual subvention from the citizenry, which goes together with the amount of advertising revenue RTE can generate. Its sensible – if the station was solely sourced from public funds the cost to the taxpayer would be far higher, but equally, the scale of provision of service provided by RTE, including the real engineering heavy lifting and outside broadcasts, election coverage, permanent correspondents in the UK and the US, a full radio service, investment in a running digital archive for every tax payer to access – this scale of operation is literally impossible with the kind of advertising revenues you can generate in a market the size of Ireland.

      It is in situations like this that the state comes in – but you know all this anyway, you’re not making substantive points about the make up of RTE – you’re a right wing free market ideologue – you want to see the end of RTE as a state broadcaster never mind the consequences. As I say – you, and the columnist are pretty much on the fringe.

      Reply
    • You’ve pretty much skirted around the question there twobirds.
      The most disadvantaged members of our society are not criminalised or imprisoned for failing to pay a licence fee to our courts or post office.
      If RTE’s service is as valued as you claim. Why not fund it through voluntary funding? If the quality of service offered is as high as you claim this would allow RTE to raise funds outside the state. So this would mitigate against the size of the domestic Market.

      Reply
    • you’re just cheaply using the notion of disadvantage to invalidate public bodies requiring public funding, its a very weak argument, because its obvious you are using it as a crutch for your basic neo-liberal beliefs – you’re an adam smith free market guy.

      you have no real concern for others only insofar as you feel they are being impinged upon by the state. You scream fringe neo-liberalism – don’t get me wrong – thats all fine, have fun with that, but you should try to formulate your own arguments, rather then repeatedly returning to an extremely weak “but what about the poor children” argument.

      Its like a weird variation on an ad hominem argument, you’re basically saying for the third time now – but what about poor people who can’t afford to pay the equivalent of three pounds a week? which is a joke – your economic burden argument is facile, as citizens we are required to make an incredibly wide range of payments to that state for a whole range of functions, provision of passport, public transport, state broadcaster, you only return to your incredibly weak “but what about the poor starving babies” because you feel it gives you a way to demand an end to the public broadcaster with out having to come out for who you are intellectually – you’re an adam smith slash the state guy – and you’re simply in the wrong country for your intellectual view point.

      Reply
    • let me put it more bluntly – the notion of voluntary contributions to state bodies betrays your basic point of view, presumably, you do not see that that as the citizenry, we have a combined obligation to fund the public bodies, the courts, the schools, the land registry, the national orchestra, the national theatre, the state broadcaster –

      your view point screams distrust of the state, and the state’s role – you see the free market as the answer to all questions – I happen to think you are completely wrong, and recent events in america would seem to bear me out, but as an Irish citizen in the Irish republic, you may think as you will, but if you buy a television, there is a legal onus on you, to provide the equivalent of three pounds a week to support the state broadcaster, the radio service, the digital service, and the national orchestra.

      Its not up for discussion. It is a collective obligation on the citizenry as enacted by law, by their elected representatives when the state broadcasting system was set up. Argue the merits of the station as you like, complain away – but if you have a television, you have a common legal obligation to as a citizen, to support the state broadcaster.

      Reply
    • In 2006, 31 Irish citizens were imprisoned for non-payment of the tv licence.
      In 2007, 32.
      In 2008 54
      In 2009 62
      Last year 132

      I make no apologies for advocating a liberal social and economic view, but your view is clearly fascistic.

      Reply
    • “You have to have public service remit programming- it aids the society and culture.”
      “you have a common obligation to as a citizen, to support the state broadcaster.”
      Twobirds, the basis of your rhetoric is that it’s right because the state says it’s right.
      You are ideologically opposed to any idea of voluntary funding of RTE and have not yet presented a coherent reason why this should not be considered.
      You flippantly dismiss the hardship this compulsory levy places on Irish families and the alarming increase in the number of our fellow citizens who find themselves criminalised and imprisoned because it.
      You are the definition of a fascist.

      “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”
      Benito Mussolini

      Reply
    • Twobirds, you have left yourself down badly.
      Your schoolyard rhetoric has descended from my views and Mr McKenna’s were not valid because they are ideologically right wing views. Yet, when I point out, that it is in fact, it is you that hold extreme right wing views, then the sum of your rebuttal is that I am an idiot and my rhetoric is sludge.
      Still you have not presented a cogent answer to the question; Is it just to criminalise increasing numbers of our fellow citizens for failing to fund the state broadcaster?
      In the fascist world you occupy the answer is of course yes.
      I advocate liberal democratic principles and say it is not.

      Reply
    • Two birds, I do not countenance the advancement of fascist principles. However, I believe that it’s only fair to point out that you do yourself and your cause a disservice by advancing increasingly infantile rebuttals.

      Reply
    • Hi folks, thanks for your comments. I’ve had to remove a few from this thread – our comment policy forbids personal abuse of an author or other commenters so please stick to the issues. You can have a read of the full policy here: http://www.thejournal.ie/comments-policy/. Thanks!

      Reply
  • Mr. McKenna is talking a right load of manure in my opinion. Also, on his website, he openly likes to bash the public sector so again journal.ie are giving column inches to a biased viewpoint. A state broadcaster is not called a state broadcaster for nothing you know.

    Reply
    • Why do we need a state broadcaster? It’s not as if they’re any better at keeping us informed than other media outlets. I could live with paying a tv licence if I thought the money was being used in an efficient manner! To see it wasted on buying rights to broadcast English and champions league football is disgraceful! Nearly everyone can watch this stuff on other free to air channels! As for the crazy money we pay some of their staff! Bloody hell! Pat Kenny, Joe Duffy and Marion Finnucane! It’s fantasy land stuff! How it’s been allowed to continue during recent times defies belief! It’s Ireland allover. Austerity and hard times don’t apply to the elite! I hear Joe Duffy complaining about USC contributions on a regular basis! That man probably pays more in USC than most of us have to live on. It’s a scandal!!

      Reply
    • A state broadcaster receives a public sector obligation payment in order to produce homegrown programming. To be fair to RTE, they make some wonderful programs (and some poor ones to be fair) which a private operating model could never achieve. If a private company were to be involved, all they would be concerned with would be viewing figures (i.e. get the very most people to watch your station and maximise revenue through advertising). This would (in my opinion) result in the dumbing down of the TV we watch. If we take TV3 as a good example, where is the value in programs such as Ireland’s Pampered Pets, Hen Nights, Tallafornia, New Dream Debs 2011 and Boozed up Irish Abroad?

      Reply
    • To be fair nucky (god how I dislike this politicians line)……

      RTE use the best part of licence fees for huge salaries. It’s a sham! State funded broadcaster but their also allowed advertising revenue! Sham!

      Reply
    • Vincent Browne isn’t on small money in TV3, high media salaries aren’t just found in RTÉ

      Reply
    • TV3 don’t get a slice of our tv licence!! They are viable all through advertising revenue alone. RTE are supposedly a state broadcaster funded as such & with our fee’s so tell me why exactly are they allowed hold a monopoly and take in advertising revenue!? So tell me why we pay licence fees again??
      Oh yes to cover the extortionate salaries nothing more. It cost pittance to produce nationwide in comparison to pat kenny’s yearly salary!!

      Reply
    • nucky is right – RTE deserves the kicking its getting – but the republic needs state funded broadcasting. Its important. No one would argue the point in relation to radio – and there are far more compelling commercial market alternatives in radio.

      The only example we have of a commercial pure play in Ireland is TV3 – and to call that unappealing doesn’t do it justice.

      the license fee should stay – we just beat RTE around the ears to reform and spend it better. that said I agree with hiving some real money off to community media/tv projects.

      Actually another way to look at this is to look at the example of TG4 – TG4 was brought about by the minister for the Arts. It was a state action to try and cement Irish in media, production, children’s programming, and Sport.

      By any measure it has been a fine success – TG4 directly and indirectly employs thousands on the west coast, and trains an endless run of twenty somethings in media, technical, production and post production.

      And it has churned out a mountain of very good docs. TG4 factual is an extremely good strand. same goes for sports. Also short films, new voices, Plays live to broadcast experiments – you name it.

      The commercial sector would never, will never see the worth in something like TG4 – or a top flight RTE factual piece like Birth of the Nation. You have to have public service remit programming – it aids the society and the culture. We can afford it, and it is important.

      Reply
    • David, can you tell us how much you think vincent browne is getting paid by TV3 please?

      Reply
  • liam 19/05/12 #

    Public service broadcasts can be part of any licence issued by the goverment to
    whichever station buys broadcasting rights

    The licence fee is another tax .RTE the real TV spongers

    Reply
  • Yup… We can call it the Eircom solution 2.0

    Reply
  • Yeah sure, privatise everything. Sure, didn’t libertarianism’s “Laissez-faire markets will solve all society’s problems” help us out plenty during the famine? If the state isn’t invested at least a little bit in the market, we can guarantee it will not attempt to regulate itself until things go arse up. If the state exists as regulator to those services in a de facto way, I would support their privitisation. Then again, I’d do anything to see Home and Away, Fair City and The Doctors taken off the air…

    Reply
  • I hope so.

    Reply
  • you know – the journal can feel like a very right wing place sometimes. And Ireland is not a very right wing country.

    the columnist is well off the beat of Irish people’s thinking with regard to RTE. He’s close to being fringe dogmatic.

    Reply
  • Tokidoll 19/05/12 #

    @ Antoin So what do you think the solution is?

    @ Scarr Really? Did not know that

    Reply
    • @tokidoll the solution at DAA is to split the thing up and put the terminals in competition with each other. Franchisees would operate them and would ultimately lose the franchise if they made a mess of it. Other aurport functions would be similarly contracted out.

      The answer for RTE is in the ‘publisher broadcaster’ model which Michael D Higgins pioneered at TG4. Program making can be contracted out. At the same time the public service remit needs to be rethought. What is the remit really, beside subsidising TV production with licence fees?

      Reply
  • howzat 19/05/12 #

    Right Ryan were funding highly inflated wages in rte which is the real sham

    Reply
  • Scarr 19/05/12 #

    Look at the latest offering from tv3 – Dublin housewives…. 5 middle aged, vacuous, over done , over tanned wannabe divas, have staged, insincere cat fights for your entertainment. Yeah privatising seems like a great idea.

    Reply
    • Tuberdy! Highly over paid individual. That’s where the fees are going not on the production value of the late late, which is low standard anyway probably due to the cost of presenters! Now why is the state broadcaster allowed to collect revenue from advertising when it gets government funding AND licence fees!??????? It’s a sham, and if people had a choice nationwide RTE would be a goner! And over 80% of staff are all on a contract basis!

      Reply

Add New Comment