Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 12 °C Thursday 24 May, 2012

Column: We need a new politics – and here’s how it might work

Image: existential_departure via Flickr

THE DEPTH AND nature of the economic crisis has dramatically reduced trust in politics.

Moreover, according to the RTÉ exit poll on the day of the 2011 general election, the main reason people voted the way they did was because they felt angry and let down by politics. As a result of this growing disconnect, individuals and groups have emerged in the civic space to give voice to calls for reform and renewal.

We the Citizens was one such initiative. It was set up for just one year to explore whether our democracy could be enhanced by a more participatory form of democracy, between elections. The model it tested was a citizens’ assembly which is a form of deliberative democracy.

Based on an idea raised initially by members of the Political Science Association of Ireland and funded by the Atlantic Philanthropies, We the Citizens has proved that deliberation works. Give a randomly selected cross-section of people objective information and the time to deliberate, not only do they make informed decisions, they also feel a greater connection to the democratic process. This form of democratic engagement is being used successfully elsewhere in the world. We the Citizens has proved conclusively that it can work in Ireland.

On 25th and 26th June this year, one hundred people of all backgrounds and from all over the country, independently and randomly selected, came to the Royal Hospital in Kilmainham, Dublin, to take part in the pilot Citizens’ Assemby which we organised. Each brought to it their own life experience to addressing some of the big questions facing Ireland in 2011.

‘The results were conclusive’

To ensure that any of the changes and effects observed were as a result of the deliberative process of the Citizens’ Assembly, a comprehensive series of polls were conducted by independent polling company Ipsos/MRBI. The results were analysed by our own academic team and were conclusive.

As a result of their participation in the Citizens’ Assembly weekend, the Citizens’ Assembly members showed significant shifts of opinion both in terms of feelings of trust and interest in politics, and also with regard to key substantive issues in politics. Participants had become me more aware of the complex trade-offs to be made in coming to political decisions.

An important part of the integrity of this pilot Citizens’ Assembly was the concept that the agenda be set, not by a group of academics, but by the people of Ireland. To do this, We the Citizens organised seven meetings around the country in May and June 2011 in Kilkenny, Cork, Galway, Blanchardstown, Tallaght, Letterkenny and Athlone. The prominent themes to arise from the seven events were collated and helped to determine the agenda of the Citizens’ Assembly, an agenda which was truly citizen-led.
Ireland has changed and people are looking for new ways to engage in the civic and democratic life of their communities and their country. That was the message we heard as we travelled through Ireland this summer of 2011.

To those who say that people, who are not members of political parties or of advocacy or sectoral groups, could not have anything meaningful to offer to political decision-making were not on the journey which We the Citizens undertook this year. What we found was that a great deal of common sense is generated when people of all backgrounds get together to work things out. People came together at our events, not because of vested interests or political persuasions, but as individual citizens willing and ready to contribute to the future of our country. Many of them had never before considered connecting in this way.

Certainly, many who attended our events were rightly angry about the economic and social crisis they did not create. But significantly, they were ready to park that anger, to step up and become part of the solution.

We the Citizens’ report, published this week, provides a manual for any government, group or organisation on how deliberative methods can help give citizens a greater influence on decision-making and policy formation.

‘There is an appetite for national renewal’

We want to stress that a citizens’ assembly is not intended to replace our representative democracy, rather to enhance it. It must be set up for a specific purpose, and once that purpose has been achieved, it ceases to exist. In other words, the assembly cannot and should not act as another House of the Oireachtas; its work and membership is limited by time and purpose

A citizens’ assembly can be used nationally, regionally or locally. What is important is that citizens have a voice, not just a vote.

The regional citizens’ events and Citizens’ Assembly showed that despite the blows which have shaken our economy, society and political system, there is a strong spirit of determination among the people and an appetite for national renewal. Participatory democracy can and should be part of this drive for national renewal.

We are grateful to every man and woman who engaged with We the Citizens at our events around the country, at our pilot Citizens’ Assembly in Dublin and online through our website and social media. We owe it to them and to all citizens to ensure that the Government and other political parties see the value of this form of participatory democracy. After all, this model would support politics at both national and local level.

Above all, it would help to restore trust.

We the Citizens will step down at the end of this month. However, we are already encouraged by the response from the Government. In launching our final report this week, the Tánaiste, Eamon Gilmore TD, described the We the Citizens’ research as ‘heartening’ and said that it ‘provides valuable lessons for how we can improve our democracy in practical and meaningful ways’.

The citizens’ assembly model may well become part of the political fabric, sooner rather than later.

Independent Senator Fiach Mac Conghail is the chairperson of We The Citizens.

Read Next:

Comments (27 Comments)

  • Glyko Symoritis 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    After all these decades of parliamentary representative Democracy, nearly everyone realises that this system does not work and it has nothing to do with Democracy. There is only one real Democracy and that is Direct Democracy from the people for the people with the direct participation of all.The experiment of it started about 2600 years ago on Ancient Greece, it was not perfect but it set the foundations for something bigger, something more Human centre! A lot of things came in between since that moment in human history ( feudalism, empires, parliament) but now the time is right to kick start the whole thing back again all together. For freedom, justice, equality for me and you and the fellow next to us. Direct Democracy that is the answer!

    Reply
    • Sean C 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      What your advocating here Glyko is Anarchy, and before the red thumb brigade go berserk, there are two dictionary definitions for Anarchy. I’m not talking about the one that means lawlessness, I’m taking about the one that means absence of central government similar to what they have in Switzerland. It has merits but I’m not sold on it, I’d like to hear arguments on it’s merits.

    • Sean O'Keeffe 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      I agree wholeheartedly with your point Glyko. Ireland has been poorly served by representative democracy and the electorate needs greater input into decisions that effect their lives.
      http://www.directdemocracy.ie/about-us/our-objectives.html

    • Paul Mallon 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      The first benefit I see is it’s not the current system! :-D
      I definitely see this as a positive step, obviously not entirely how the country should be run. These types of initiatives, along with more control for local councils, would be heading in the right direction.
      Sending people to jail for white collar crime would be nice too. That’d help.

  • Kev Dunne 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    very commendable. seen this working in a tv documentary about venesuela. unfortunately irish politicians seem more interested in serving. Europe and themselves than us. I think the idea of a motivated, informed and engaged populace is terrifying to them.

    Reply
  • Henry Rawlinson 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    This is essentially sortition, analogous to the way in which juries are selected and in my opinion should replace representational democracy which is essentially 166 inefficient and unqualified political puppets acting as 1 drunken fumbling dictator! Sortition was a fundamental tenet of democracy that has been lost. Give randomly selected people, not motivated by outmoded potical persuasions or investstment interests the Oireachtas and they will, as has been proved by this experiment, revolutionise this country. However as this is a pipedream, I want to ask, as We the Citizens is not a political org, is it possible for Michael D higgins, esteemed president, to lend support to this movement, and I wonder are Eamonn Gilmore’s words sincere??

    Reply
    • Dara McHugh 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      Sortition would definitely be a step forward, but I think what Them the Citizens are advocating are consultative bodies, not decision-making ones. So the decision-making power would remain with the Dail, the Government and the ECB (in reverse order :-).

  • hibernia2011 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    even if a new party comes along with a new fairer way of implementing democracy, the Irish way of thinking is a selfish one, i.e what can I personally get out of voting for a particular person. we never see the bigger picture. Our own individual psyche will have to change. unfortunately I can’t see this happening. gombeenism to prevail. hope I am eventually proved wrong.

    Reply
    • Hanly Sheelagh 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      Hibernian, I believe you are right. A lot of people vote on economics – what will he/she/they put into my pocket? People are not interested in what a party or individual stands for other than that. The don’t query the philosophy or the credentials of candidates. along with people in that category, we have the followers of people and parties without thinking. I think when and if we get back to normality, people might have learned something.

  • Réada Quinn 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    Read the article and love the idea of ordinary people getting together. Too much ego sometimes associated in the whole political party thing. Reminds me of a book I read re a small utopian island which advocated small localised government where committees made decisions for the common good! Could it be Ireland? I’d love to live there. :)

    Reply
  • Sean Claffey 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    I’m all for this kind of system.

    Reply
  • lisa duignan 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    We the Citizens support the bank guarantee.

    Reply
  • Glyn Carragher 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    Interesting experiment. We certainly need to have a much closer look at how our parliamentary system works. The whole idea of a “parties” is certainly not working, it is in essence a group of sheep all voting in the same direction with a complete absence of individual comment or opinion. There can be no informed debate when no matter what is proposed by the opposition it will be voted down by the “majority” government. We need to have a parliament where elected representatives can vote according to the wishes of those who elected them and not according to un elected advisers, political spin doctors, senior civil servants and party whips/leaders.

    Reply
    • Réada Quinn 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      The party whip is the single biggest impediment to a true democracy IMO. Bloody ridiculous that representatives aren’t allowed represent without a whipping.

  • John Conniffe 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    “The Rise and Rise of Micheal Rimmer” great ( if hard to find ) film showing hot direct democracy is one step away from dictatorship… ( Not that I personally believe this. )

    Reply
  • Tom Neville 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    Intriguing article but reminds me hugely of the debate about Fiat currencies and returning to the Gold Standard, or the reintroduction of the punt.

    Just because something is flawed, it doesn’t necessarily make that the alternative must be better. In many senses it’s a bit like the quote from the Life of Brian where he says “You’re all individuals” to which the crowd inUnison responds “Yes we’re all individuals.”

    Society is a very diverse group and so any form of direct democracy must incorporate such diversity. Take social welfare forexample. I earn a good wage but still get children’s allowance. I feel this is unfair. Yet I know of many who earn more than I who think children’s allowance is sacrosanct. To represent both viewpoints a compromise must be reach and therein lies the flawed beauty of representative democracy.

    And that’s even before we get into the good stuff such as economic policy. And then there are lots of things which the some citizens don’t care about but which, in cold light of day, require sophistictaed debate. e.g. the Corrib Gas Field.

    It’s a good intention, but the flawed system which exists should not be replaced with an even more flawed system, however noble the intentions.

    Reply
    • Paul Mallon 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      I think we the citizens would know exactly what to do with the Corrib gas field.

    • Tom Neville 16/12/11 #
      Report this comment

      Exactly why direct democracy needs to be flexible. You obviously have very strong views (though I can’t tell what they are). But other citizens will have different views from you and me.

      That’s why direct democracy is unwotkable.

  • Ryan Allen 16/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    “Participants had become more aware of the complex trade-offs to be made in coming to political decisions.”

    Best point in this excellent article for me. Pity the commentators on here and in the media weren’t more aware of the same complex trade-offs.

    Reply
  • Manus Magee 17/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    A new politics fronted by Mr. Mac Conghail a Fine Gael appointed Senator! A new politics from We the Citizens so-called “citizens’ assembly” where the agenda was preset by a conservative academic elite think-tank. A new politics consisting of a glossy report to government from the We the Citizens so-called “citizens’ assembly” which recommends property and water taxes! A report which recommends that a citizens’ assembly be absorbed into the coalition’s proposed Constitution Review Convention. A new politics? I don’t think so.
    Elite well funded groups such as the university academic group who set up We the Citizens are part of the problem and are definitely not the solution. If they really wanted meaningful change they would have followed the citizens’ assembly model from British Columbia which put its proposals to a referendum and not to government.
    People who want change should support grassroots groups such as Occupy, Second Republic, Claiming our Future, etc. They are all pushing for meaningful change in different.

    The struggle for freedom from oppressive elites is only beginning.
    Manus

    Reply
  • gerard fenniman 17/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    what we need to recognise first of all is what’s wrong with our democracy, and that is simply that it was never set up to cater to the Irish people in the first place, it is the hand-me down of a colonial system design to meet the recquirements of the ruling class, what ireland needs is an Irish system of government, unfortunately we have another government clearly more interested in looking east than west and will continue to do so till given a reason to turn around!

    Reply
  • Manus Magee 18/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    It doesn’t matter what direction the present crowd of politicians we are stuck with for five years look.
    There is a stranglehold in the Constitution article 46.2
    which lays down that only the governement can put amendments to the Constitution.
    How can we create a new system of government?
    That is why the We the Citizens’ powerless citizens’ assembly model is a pipedream.
    The only way for change is from the bottom up. The politican turkeys will not vote for a Christmas which would involve radical change to our Westmisinster style system of government.
    We need to get behind those groups who are working outside of the system with the aim of creating a new politics.
    It comes down to people on the streets and not going away – without that the political Golden Circle still hold the all the cards.
    Manus

    Reply
  • Paul Mott 20/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    new systems begin with a solid high wall with those traitors to the state standing in front of it blindfolded. you may include bertie, brian, seanie, fingers et al. start anew from here.

    Reply
  • Manus Magee 20/12/11 #
    Report this comment

    Could a high enough wall be a redesigned political system with real accountability?
    Solid governmental systems redesigned by the people themselves like in Iceland after their country went bankrupt.

    I don’t mean redesigned by obediently following neat briefs, lecture notes and informative questions generously supplied
    by We the Professors.
    (aka We the Citizens)

    Reply

Add New Comment