Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
TODAY SAW SOME major changes to RTE’s current affairs journalists – but the broadcaster also announced a shake-up of its standards and guidelines for staff.
RTE editorial staff are to be issued with and trained in the new journalism guidelines which have been developed over the last three months and which apply to news, current affairs and factual programming. Here’s some of what the guidelines say.
(You can read the full guidelines here. Warning: it’s a PDF).
The guidelines stress that editorial staff need to be particularly careful when using information on social media sites from individuals:
Individuals post material, including pictures, audio and video, which may reveal information about themselves, generally for the benefit of friends and acquaintances. A balance needs to be struct between appropriate use of material may have unthinkingly put in the public domain and fairness to that individual and respect for their privacy even if they have become part of a news story.
The guidelines stress that great care should be taken when using any information from the internet and specifically social media sites:
As always, be wary of reporting anything second hand and look out for the possible hidden agenda. Corroborate wherever possible and check the identity of any contributor you intend to use.
Journalists are warned to verify stories that appear on other sites before running the story, and to attribute the source clearly so that the audience can access the information and its source.
Under a section called ‘Hoaxes and Spoofs’, staff are warned to clearly check the source of the information to avoid a repeat of ‘Tweetgate’:
Many websites and social media streams contain bogus information such as spoof news reports. Some campaign and activist sites mimic the domain name and design of an official source for reasons of satire or misinformation. You must take care to perform thorough provenance checks before using material from a website or a social media stream using for example, “about us” sections or “WHOIS”.
Staff are warned to look out for biased sources and out of date information.
The new guidelines spell out clearly who on the RTE staff has editorial responsibility for content: everyone.
All those involved in the creation of RTE content including researchers, reporters, producers and editors are required to exercise editorial responsibility for it.
Staff are advised that they must give proper notice of any editorial matter which is likely to cause controversy or have an extraordinary impact.
The Director General is described as the editor-in-chief for content broadcast or published by RTE – but the guidelines note that there are limits:
However, it is not possible or practical for the Director General to be involved in routine day to day editorial decision making across all of RTE’s output. The Director General’s editorial role is therefore primarily a strategic one, where he/she sets overall editorial priorities, standards and direction for the organisation.
A new Editorial Standards Board is to maintain and monitor the standards of content produced by the broadcaster. The Board will be independent, and will have responsibility to provide an assessment of the merits of formal and substantive complaints lodged against RTE programmes and output.
The guidelines state that the Board will also function as a separate resources which can be used to help assess and examine programmes before they are broadcast.
A large part of the guidelines is devoted to trust and accuracy, noting:
RTE exists to serve all the people of Ireland. Their expectation is that we will treat their interests, views and beliefs accurately and fairly; that we make our best effort to be truthful; that we do not favour one side or another of a contested issue; that we don’t represent vested interests; and that we have no personal interest in what we broadcast.
The standards stress that editorial staff have to do all they can to ensure that facts are accurate and presented in context, without misleading the audience.
We should try to witness events and gather information first hand. Where this is not possible, we should talk to first hand sources and, where necessary, corroborate their evidence. We should be reluctant to rely on a single sourcePage | 10 especially if the information from that source has been given on condition of anonymity. If we do rely on a single source, a named on‐the‐record source is always preferable
The guidelines note that the public “must have confidence in the integrity and independence of what they hear and see on RTE’s services”.
RTÉ must be editorially independent of government, business interests, political parties, trade unions, and pressure groups. There is no room for any perception that presenters, reporters or producers personally benefit from their decisions as to who participates in programmes, what products are featured and what issues are discussed.
Financial journalism is singled out as an area that should not be undermined by outside activities or financial interests of any journalists in RTE.
Journalists and presenters covering financial news have been instructed to register all their shareholdings, financial and business interests, and dealings in securities. Staff are also warned against engaging in insider trading or market manipulation.
In another area, the guidelines advise on what can and can’t be worn on screen:
RTE does not permit presenters to wear religious or political badges or symbols on screen which could be perceived to undermine impartiality.
The report also includes guidelines on fairness, public interest and privacy.
Doorstepping – an interview with someone who was not expected to be interviewed for broadcast – should normally be a last resort, the guidelines state.
It should not be used simply for dramatic effect.
Any proposal to doorstep someone must be approved in advance by the relevant senior editorial figure.
The guidelines stress that the best way to deal with corrections and clarifications is to respond quickly “and on our own initiative” rather than having to subsequently deal with a complaint.
If a mistake is pointed out to RTÉ and it is deemed to be of a relatively trivial nature, the programme will not refer to the mistake on air. However every effort must be made to avoid repeating the mistake again in subsequent broadcasts.
If the mistake is more substantial and the view is taken by the programme team that the public record needs amending, the programme or service responsible for the broadcast or publication of the inaccurate information will clarify matters as soon as feasible.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Maybe I missed it but where is the cost calculations and the length of payback on “Gary’s” investment??
@P.J. Nolan:
When the extra property tax is paid, probably never.
Some costings would be very informative
Yeah how much did Gary pay for all this great work can Joe soap worker afford to get it done
Right now 1/1000 or so is getting their house retrofitted at a quite astronomical coat. And good for them. But what if the majority in the future, by 2030 ideally; is everyone with a private house suddenly going to find ‘the money’ to retrofit?
And what I’d they can’t? What will be the ramifications? Pay more prop-tax, a slap on tbe wrist tax, sell up at a lower price and forced into the slavery of rent? Like trying to afford rent when you retire, what are the ramifications of NOT retrofitting, exactly? Please don’t inform me of grants – the home owner must pay the lion’s share.
Its like an ad from the government and Garys an actor, people cant afford to pay their mortgages and they peddling this rubbish , Ireland has little effect on the global climate crisis and yet they expect ye to fork out 50 grand to do up your house , just plant some lettuce on your windows be grand
Home energy upgrades are a complete racket that just line the pockets of contractors. We recently bought a house a few km outside the nearest town in Co. Wicklow. The house was circa 35 years old with single glazing, little roof insulation and an oil boiler. We got the windows and doors replaced (€28K) for security and comfort and insulated the attic (€6.5K) again for comfort and to hopefully reduce the heating bills. We looked at replacing the oil boiler but a heat source pump will cost circa €10K and for it to be any use, we need to insulate the walls. Internal is not a option due to the amount of time we’d be out of the house and the fact that a lot of the rooms are small so we can’t afford to lose 100mm of space. External costs between €40K & €50K. Estimates are that this would reduce our heaing bills by 1/3. Considering these are €3K p.a., that equates to a saving of €1K p.a. which means a 50-60yr payback. I’ll be long gone before that.
Well known who sponsored this article
Gary should tell us how much
Liam Byrne.
Anyone who has the ability to spend tens of thousands on major retrofit suggested in the article is worried about €50 or €100 more on property tax.
@P.J. Nolan:
Exactly.
Joke
Sponsored by SEAI .. cost cost cost going from D2 to A1 .. the one thing everyone wants to know how much Gary paid not included …I wonder why ???
I thought you can only avail of SEAI grant once if you’re considering doing it bit by bit?
have your say