TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Sunday 26 May, 2013

Shortfall in greenhouse gas emissions target may cost Ireland €300m

Six countries – including Ireland – are not on track to cut emissions as required under EU law: the cost of compliance will be great.

A member of protest group Stop Climate Chaos outside Leinster House in late 2011.
A member of protest group Stop Climate Chaos outside Leinster House in late 2011.
Image: Niall Carson/PA Wire/Press Association Images

IRELAND MAY HAVE to spend up to €300m over the next eight years to fulfill its obligations under an EU climate law because the country’s policies and plans are not strong enough to help it achieve the necessary reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

The government will have to buy millions of so-called “carbon credits” to offset each tonne of CO2 by which it exceeds its targets, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has warned.

Under a 2009 EU law, member states agreed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from sectors including agriculture, transport, buildings and waste by 10 per cent on 2005 levels over the period 2013-2020. It is up to national governments to implement policies and measures to limit emissions from these sectors.

Richer countries, measured in terms of GDP per capita, took on higher targets and Ireland is at the top of the table with an obligation to cut its emissions by 20 per cent over the period. Just two other countries, Denmark and Luxembourg, have a 20 per cent obligation.

The targets were proposed by the European Commission in January 2008 and agreed by EU ministers in December that year, a few months after Ireland entered recession.

Not on track

Six countries including Ireland are not on track to make the required emissions reductions. The six will miss their targets even if all their existing and planned carbon mitigation policies are fully implemented, the European Environment Agency warned in October 2012.

In a report published last month, the EPA confirmed that Ireland will miss its targets within five years. Buying carbon credits to cover the resulting shortfall will cost anywhere between €50m and €300m, depending on what further steps the country takes to cut its emissions in the relevant sectors. The cost of compliance may be even greater after 2020, the agency warned.

Environment minister Phil Hogan published a draft climate bill last week, setting out some ways that the country may go about cutting its emissions. But the absence of any emissions targets from the bill was criticised by environmental groups including Friends of the Earth and An Taisce.

EU countries have not yet agreed overall decarbonisation targets for beyond 2020 but the European Commission has proposed cutting emissions by 80 per cent on 1990 levels by 2050. The UK has already signed an 80 per cent target into law.

Green groups had hoped to see such a target in the Irish bill too, arguing that it would act as an incentive to the current and to future governments to take action on reducing emissions. In its report, the EPA also recommended that Ireland adopt long term targets, arguing that these would provide businesses with the certainty to make low-carbon investments.

Read further articles by journalist Valerie Flynn>

Read next:

Comments (26 Comments)

  • Slow and expensive planning doesn’t help the cause to be fair, but their are loads of people trying to start up energy projects, money and grants are hard come by

    Reply
  • Glen 05/03/13 #

    Carbon Dioxide is a natural, odourless, colourless gas. Plants need it to photosynthesise. CO2 is produced by the respiration of all living organisms. It is an important greenhouse gas, warming the Earth’s surface to a higher temperature to enable life. In 2009 CO2 global concentration in the atmosphere was about 0.0387% or 387 parts per million.

    The UN estimates for 2008 CO2 emissions due to human activities place Ireland at 0.15% of worldwide emissions. The EU emissions were 13.98% of worldwide emissions.
    Ireland’s emissions as a percentage of the EU is 1.04% however Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions on a per capita basis were the second highest in the EU in 2009. This is due in part to the high role of agriculture in Ireland’s economy. Energy (22%), agriculture (30%), and transport (19%) accounted for just over 70% of Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2010.

    Everyone is agreed that the only way ahead is through sustainable development and actively polluting the environment is crazy. But the ‘climate change’ thing has become more about politicians and governments being seen to ‘do something’ amongst almost hysteria with the result that we have wealth distribution schemes (carbon trading, cap & trade etc) guaranteed to make bankers rich.
    Rajendra Pachauri, head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has acknowledged a 17-year pause in global warming.

    The Chief Commissioner of the Australian Climate Commission stated “If the world as a whole cut all emissions tomorrow the average temperature of the planet is not going to drop in several hundred years, perhaps as much as a thousand years because the system is overburdened with CO2 that has to be absorbed and that only happens slowly.”

    Reply
  • Paul 05/03/13 #

    Meanwhile China spews out mega amounts with no regulation. Us fools are getting fined for our little bit of polution. EU climate rules are crazy.

    Reply
  • Liam 05/03/13 #

    Or we could leave europe and save ourselves 300 million

    Reply
    • Or the elephant in the room, Irelands alarming dependence on fossil fuels. The nuclear argument had been around since the 70′s. Experrs have warned for d decade s now that we will face energy poverty if we don’t look towards clean and cheaper nuclear energy. Wind is not the solution. It’s the warning signs just like the property bubble that everyone is happy to ignore until it’s too late

      Reply
    • @cholly: No we shouldn’t look towards nuclear energy. Other countries are currently in the process of shutting down nuclear plants. There are lots of other possibilities of green energy in this country without ever looking at nuclear!

      Reply
    • Good point Cholly…nuclear would work really well here since we would only need one station and it certainly is the most reliable of all energy sources available at the minute.

      Reply
    • Oliver, for every County that is looking to deactivate a power plant, there’s 10 counties looking to expand into nuclear energy or increase their nuclear output. Ireland is in an incredibly stable part of the world. We are not directly involved in any wars, nor would there be any realistic terrorist threats on plants, no earthquakes, tornados, volcanoes, tsunamuis etc… green energy is great and I would always promote it but it can never meet our energy needs alone. With demand for oil from the Asian market increasing every year and production of oil decreasing, it’s only a matter of time before we find ourselves in a very difficult position, but sure the then government will blame the previous for ignoring the warning signs and the circle of life will continue

      Reply
    • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium-based_nuclear_power

      A new form of Nuclear Power plant which is cleaner safer and nearly impossible to weaponise the waste. It also has a much much lower radiation level -”a chunk of Thorium is as dangerous as a bar of soap”.

      Reply
  • One of the biggest cons ever pulled besides the church is the myth of global warming they had to change the name from climate change because nothing was happening.

    Reply
    • Any other conspiracy theories you care to share with us? Unfortunately their is over whelming evidence to show that climate change is not a myth and a very real problem facing humanity

      Reply
    • Paul 05/03/13 #

      Climate change has been around for hundreds of millions of years. It is completly natural.

      Reply
    • Earth’s climate does change naturally however, all evidence shows that humans are causing the planet to heat up faster than any time in the past. Environmental refugees ate going to be a huge headache in the future. Its actually quite frightening to think people don’t believe it.

      Reply
    • Put simply, it doesn’t take a genius to realise that we can’t just keep pumping poisonous carbon dioxide into the environment like we have been doing since the industrial revolution. The earth has a breaking point, I’m no hippy but that coupled with deforestation etc is causing climate change and killing earth.

      Reply
    • Yea there was a second shooter.

      Reply
    • global warming is the actually the incorrect term, climate change has been recognised as more appropriate due to extremes in weather patterns around the globe not solely warmer temps ..,our mean temperature will rise by a degree or so due to climate change, but all that means is we will get wetter weather due to the gulf stream blowing rain systems over us…the hotter the Atlantic get the more clouds are formed and therefore it will piss cats and dogs over Ireland more regularly.. its funny that 99.9% of the worlds scientists still are playing along with this conspiracy theory (sarcasm)

      Reply
    • It took millions of years to create all the oil and gas and yet only took humans 200 years to deplete nearly all of it.

      Reply
  • MrKnow 05/03/13 #

    Well that’s going to be a rise in carbon tax, energy and motor cost will increase because of this bulls#%t!

    Reply
  • Our ministers will all be staying home for st patricks day so,because they are all so concerned about global warming and harmful emissions,how many of our tds cycle to work,and where will this €300 million fine go to? Where will the money come from ?

    Reply
  • Global warming is a natural phenomenon sped up slightly by man
    I think in these bad economic times in Ireland it should be sidelined.
    what Ireland emits is minuscule in comparison to the USA and china who aren’t involved
    Besides with a little global warming we could have weather like the south of France

    Reply
  • The government had great energy schemes going up grading central heating systems from coal to oil and they scrapped it put loads of us out of work

    Reply
  • Carbon credits are a stupid idea. Unless you’re Goldman Sachs.

    Reply

Add New Comment