TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Spain will make a formal request for bank bailout of up to €100 billion

Spain is braced to become the fourth eurozone country to ask for assistance – but its bailout will not come with a programme for austerity.

Image: MARKUS SCHREIBER/AP/Press Association Images

Updated 19.24

SPAIN’S FINANCE MINISTER Luis de Guindos has told a new conference in Madrid this evening that the country will be the fourth member of the eurozone to require a bailout.

He said the Government will formally request financial aid for its troubled banking sector. However, he added that there will be no economic conditions placed on the State as a result of the bailout. Conditions will be limited to a clean-up of the financial sector.

The eurogroup has confirmed that the loans will come from eurozone sources, the EFSF/ESM, and not the International Monetary Fund. It is understood that the IMF will have an oversight role but will not actually contribute any money. In a statement, the eurogroup said that the monies will be scaled to provide an effective backstop covering all possible capital requirements which will be covered in the upcoming reports by the external evaluators and international auditors. Those reports are expected in just over a week.

The loan amount must cover estimated capital requirements with an additional safety margin, estimated as summing up to €100 billion in total.

According to AFP and El Mundo, there will be no austerity plan forced on Spain in return for the bailout. A eurozone official said such a macro-economic programme was not necessary.

The eurogroup added that Spain has already implemented “significant fiscal and labour market reforms and measures to strengthen the capital base of the Spanish banks”.

Beyond the determined implementation of these commitments, the Eurogroup considers that the policy conditionality of the financial assistance should be focused on specific reforms targeting the financial sector, including restructuring plans in line with EU state-aid rules and horizontal structural reforms of the domestic financial sector. We invite the IMF to support the implementation and monitoring of the financial assistance with regular reporting.

Pressure mounted on Spain in the past week to ask for help after the IMF’s latest report indicated it could need in the region of €40 billion to sufficiently recapitalise its banking system. A conference call between the eurozone’s 17 member countries’ finance ministers and IMF chief Christine Lagarde was held this afternoon, lasting about two-and-a-half hours.

The confirmation of an imminent request for help from Spain was welcomed by the eurogroup this evening. It said it is willing to respond favourably to a formal request expected shortly.

- Additional reporting from AP and AFP (© AFP, 2012)

Earlier: Spain bailout could reach €100billion, say sources>

Read: the full statement from the eurogroup>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (42 Comments)

  • welcome to the club

    Reply
    • It’s a different club. Spain are not taking the bank debt as sovereign debt. They learned from our original mistake whereas we compounded ours with a yes vote.

      Btw. Wasn’t that supposed to be ratified this week? Haven’t heard a dickie bird about it being ratified.

      Reply
    • Irish voters decision to ratify the fiscal compact will prove to be the greatest own goal in the history of Ireland since ratifying the Act of Union.

      Lorenzo Bini Smaghi outlined the EU/ECB case for expecting Irish taxpayers to bear the full cost of the banking collapse.

      ‘The principle of ‘no taxation without representation’ should work both ways. If taxpayers have the right to share in decision-making, they must also accept the consequences,’ Bini Smaghi wrote.
      ‘As long as the accountability of supervisors to taxpayers is primarily a national affair, then there is a high risk that taxpayers will foot most of the bill. They should not complain when it actually happens,’ he added.

      Irish taxpayers are liable for the governments & regulators negligence and incompetence according to Smaghi. No whisper of a rebuttal from the same negligant elite regarding the ECB’s role/complicity in the banking crisis. In fact, the ECB were more culpable in the Irish crisis than has been recognized to date. The negligant political elite happy to sit idly by with their thumbs in their mouth including Honohan. The only party that seemed to recognise this were the IMF.
      Anyway, Spain has been spared this shabby treatment. Maybe their elite can show a bit more wit and spine than ours.

      Reply
  • Going to be one or two more in the club

    Reply
    • By the end of this Germany and France will be in the same boat.

      This is just a slow train crash.

      People look at Greece and go damn lazy Greeks. Well this is a Eurozone wide problem and only when people admit that, will we be able to get on to resolving it. Resolving will be a very painful and monumental process.

      If ye think that people are over hyping this crisis. Look at the consternation that little Greece has caused, and yet Spain is over 7 times larger. It’s banks are 10 times larger in loans, it has a significantly higher unemployment rate that Greece. It’s banks are dealing with more empty units than all of America has.

      The Euro circus rolls on, to its inevitable demise.

      Reply
  • Greece, Portugal , ireland ,Spain and when Italy finally gets there later this year will we see an end to the euro as it looks now it might b a good thing or disastrous who knows

    Reply
  • If spain receives money for its banks directly, bypassing the soverign, and the same is not done for Ireland retrospectively, the government should push out the promissary note repayments due dates indefinitely and cancel any further payments to unsecured unguaranteed bondholders. To do any less would be treasonous.

    Reply
  • just as I expected. One rule for us and a different one for Spain. We need to tell the EU to F*CK OFF.

    Reply
  • Apparently Brian Cowen has had a press conference in Clara to reiterate that Spain’s banks are fully capitalized until the middle of next year. *joke*

    Reply
  • mart_n 09/06/12 #

    So just like what happened here, a ‘memo’ is leaked, government denies/downplays the contents, and a dew days later announces that it’ll be seeking a bailout. They must take people for complete fools. The term ‘leaked’ has lost all meaning.

    Reply
  • The elephant in the room is that Spain wants the money for the banks from the banks BUT they don’t want it as a sovereign loan

    Reply
    • Fagan's 09/06/12 #

      That is the way it should have been done here but Lenihan and friends did not want the EU/ECB sticking their noses in to the toxic banks here. The list of who was loaned what, and at what rate, is said to read like a FF dinner dance attendance sheet, all at very favourable rates.

      Reply
  • oh so our banking debt has to be paid by the soverign but spains doesnt..we really have been duped by the EU. Every passing day i get more eurosceptic!

    Reply
  • Lucky we have a super strong articulate Leader who will fight our corner and demand that we get the same terms as Spain! Oh wait we don’t we have wimpy scaredy pants Kenny!

    Reply
  • So Spain’s banks get the dosh and no austerity. Different rules apply so for us. I wonder will we ever find out if the EU pushed us to blanket guarantee our banks. If so we need a new deal.

    Reply
  • I was in Spain last month and every thing is cheaper than here. We went to a good restaurant and for 6 people it was only 26 euro for 3 course dinner tea and cake afters. In this country it would cost 85 euro.

    Reply
  • here we go again :)

    Reply
  • No forced Austerity plan, good job we waited to vote on the austerity treaty… wait…oh!

    Reply
    • Spains debt to GDP is still quite low so they don’t really need that much austerity as they can still grow enough to offset their deficit, the difference between them and us is they weren’t stupid enough to guarantee their banks.

      Reply
    • We didn’t vote for an austerity treaty, we voted for a stability treaty.
      The Spanish are seeking funds to bail out their banks, not their budget, hence no new austerity measures.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 09/06/12 #

      Spain have implemented quiet far reaching austerity. They are heading for 30% unemployment this year. If they had additional austerity, then they would collapse quiet quickly.

      Spain hasn’t a bad old economy, however it is stuck in the Euro which makes it very hard for it to grow out of this crisis.

      Spain’s banks are shot through and through though.

      Every happy family is alike, but every unhappy family is unique.

      Spain has some good points, but there are no’s coming out of it, that are truly frightening.

      Basically the 12th largest economy in the world is insolvent and unable to meet its borrowing requirements in the market. Italy has some great figures and yet it still is in a slow decline, trapped in the Euro, which is too strong for it.

      Yipee we live in interesting times.

      Crap we live in interesting times.

      Reply
    • We had relatively low debt and the means to reduce our budget deficit on our own terms until we socialised the bank debt. Our politicians screwed us then and screwed us again with the Austerity treaty

      Reply
    • Btw Ben Gunn, Stability??? Tell that to the Spanish!

      Reply
    • Spain 1 – Ireland 0

      Reply
  • Brian lenihan, bertie aherne and Brian cowen are responsible for Ireland’s economic mess.

    Reply
    • You need to extend your list.

      Reply
    • @ Ciaran these politicans were incompetent, economically illiterate, arrogant and in Aherns case corrupt. However, Irelands economy would still be in crisis even if none of these 3 ever set foot in the Dail.
      Here’s why.

      In 1971, the gold standard system, established at Bretton Woods, was abandoned in favour of a fiat currency system with the US dollar positioned as the global reserve currency. This allowed the US to bridge funding gaps, caused by the cost of funding both the Vietnam war and the ongoing Cold war with Russia.
      The world benefitted greatly from this momentous decision.
      Firstly, the US, liberated from the monetary shackles of the gold standard, could finance enhanced military expansion/adventurism without subjecting American voters to onerous levels of taxation.
      Secondly, fiat currency offered enhanced economic capabilities to central planners (governments, central banks). The volume of currency supplied into the economy could be increased to stimulate growth (monetary easing) during recessionary episodes. This was particularly opportune for nations like the US & Britain as their domestic manufacturing industries were in decline in the 1970’s. In both these nations, uncompetitive businesses were allowed to fail as any economic impacts were, or would be, mitigated by a, soon to be, thriving banking and financial services sector courtesy of the enhanced monetary capabilies now available to central planners.
      An anomaly of fiat currency is it’s requirement for constant monetary expansion and it’s propensity to generate credit fuelled booms and debt. As fiat currency holds no intrinsic value, to ensure monetary stability all new currency is issued as debt. Central banks issue new currency to governments and Market participants as collaterallised debt. To allow for repayment of this new currency (debt) the volume of new currency must constantly increase (constant monetary expansion). Needless to say, the rate of monetary expansion has increased exponentially over subsequent decades.
      http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse/chapter-8-fed-money-creation
      While governments issue bonds to their central banks to access new currency, Market participants faced increasing difficulty sourcing, the expotentially increasing quantities of securities required to access new currency. The danger of a collateral drought were that the wheels would come off the accelerating fiat currency merry-go-round.
      In the US, this problem was overcome by issuance of toxic securities. In many cases these were facilitated by the expanding subprime mortgage market.
      European banks, as well as trading in toxic securities also, accessed collateral via the government bonds of nations, whose creditworthiness had recently been enhanced, such as Greece. Also, newly created collateral courtesy of credit-fuelled property booms in countries such as Spain and Ireland.

      http://mises.org/daily/6065/The-Fiasco-of-Fiat-Money

      Chris Martenson is a former VP of Pfizer’s

      Reply
  • Only €100billion? Take 200 to be sure, to be sure!

    Reply
  • Welcome to the club.

    Reply
  • @Brendan can’t be a bad thing look what’s happened since 2002 pure balls. Fudge off Merkell an Germany

    Reply

Add New Comment