TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Syria latest: UN human rights chief warns of ‘consequences’ for both sides

“The world does not forget or forgive crimes like these,” Navi Pillay said of reported atrocities against Syrian civilians.

A damaged car in the streets of Azaz, 32km from Aleppo.
A damaged car in the streets of Azaz, 32km from Aleppo.
Image: AP Photo/Turkpix/PA

UN HUMAN RIGHTS CHIEF Navi Pillay has expressed her deep concern over the increasing threat to civilians as the conflict between government forces and rebel fighters escalates.

Pillay is calling on all sides involved in the conflict to protect civilians and abide by their obligations under international human rights law – or face the consequences.

“Civilians and civilian objects – including homes and other property, businesses, schools and places of worship – must be protected at all times,” she said earlier today. “All parties, including the Government and opposition forces, must ensure that they distinguish between civilian and military targets.”

The human rights chief noted that under international humanitarian law, armed forces are required to give “effective warning” to civilians ahead of attacks.

She said that as-yet unconfirmed reports of human rights atrocities including summary executions and snipers killing civilians coupled with the reported build-up of forces around Aleppo “bodes ill” for the city’s residents.

“Such attacks are also continuing in other major towns such as Homs and Deir-ez-Zur. Already the consequences for civilians have been devastating, with many thousands killed and injured and between 1 and 1.5 million now reported to have fled their homes,” Pillay said.

Those committing atrocities against civilians “should not believe that they will escape justice”, she warned both the pro-government and rebel fighters. “The world does not forget or forgive crimes like these.”

Syrian ambassador defections confirmed by US >

Defections, Turkish roadblocks and a Russian outburst >

Read next:

Comments (16 Comments)

  • The future for Syria looks bleak! The United Nations can make comments about the situation there but it has absolutely no power to stop massacres or anything else. Assad’s days are numbered but once his ruthless dictatorship falls there will be all out bloody war between rival factions. Russia who armed Assad to the teeth over the years will switch allegiance to another tyrant so that it’s arms sales and influence in the region can be maintained. China will probably also back Russia’s new ally. The “West” will back and arm some other dictator wannabe. The various shades of Islam will fight each other with bomb and bullet and suicide attack, backed by Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq and Al Qaeda. Then there’s Israel! And Turkey! The ordinary people of Syria will be the losers caught in the middle of bloody mayhem. Sorry for my negative assesment but I can’t see much hope for any kind of a positive outcome.

    Reply
  • Russia and china cop on Assad must go and a Goverment of consent representing all the people be formed

    Reply
    • That is precisely what Russia and China proposed in the latest UNSC resolution, but USUK rejected their plan because it didn’t contain the Chapter 7 component permitting more humanitarian bombing.
      If Navi Pillay has any concern for human rights she should propose a Security Council resolution condemning the United States and its allies for giving material support to terrorism.

      Reply
    • mattoid 27/07/12 #

      I have no doubt that someone – most likely the US – is supporting the FSA, after all those weapons didn’t appear out of thin air, but do you have any evidence that France, Israel, the UK or anyone else is involved?

      Reply
  • What a joke. What kind of hypocrisy is that, “the world does not forget crimes like these”. The cheek of the UN. I wonder why it is saying this now. The UN is massively financed by the US and the US wants regime change in Syria. Hmmm… What about the terrible crimes against humanity being commited in Bahrain. Not much from the UN there. Oh yeah, the US has a massive fleet based in Bahrain and it doesn’t want anything ticking the boat there. What about Saudi Arabia. Nothing from the UN on the terrible situation there. What about the 150,000 poor souls killed in Iraq since the great humanitarians that are the US and UK went in there. What a joke of an organisation.

    Reply
    • All member countries in the UN pay dues. The USA being the richest country has paid the most dues. So yes the USA pays money to the UN but not in the way you think. You have a twisted way of looking at this.

      Reply
  • Here here Stephen. The German Federal Intelligence Service has estimated that close to 90 terrorist attacks have been carried out in Syria by All Qaeda and affiliates. ( http://edition.presstv.ir/iphone/detail.aspx?id=252950). A resolution against the US and UK for finding and supporting terrorism would be a motion.

    Reply
    • Thanks George, yes I’ve seen that. Bravo to those German media outlets that have acknowledged this – Die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung/Die Welt and Das Bild. Maybe this is opening up now. Hopefully the Editor of this outlet pays attention.

      Reply
    • It is important to remember that this conflict is being fuelled by interference from all of the major global players, and that dirty geo-politics is the primary motivation for all of the so called ‘member states’ of the United Nations. Nobody gives a shit about Syria and the Syrian people. Let’s not forget, Syria is a false nation, insofar as it’s borders encompass various tribal factions that were forced to exist under the dictatorship of a minority ethnic tribal group within poorly pre-defined post-colonial borders. The entire middle east is a nightmare collection of religious extremism and primitive tribal rivalry that has swollen in mportance since the dawn of the age of the false hydrocarbon idol. Shame on the human race!

      Reply
    • mattoid 27/07/12 #

      @Stephen
      Presumably you will also be applauding Der Spiegel, whose correspondents on the ground documented verifiable eyewitness statements from survivors of Houla that it was the Syrian regime and their militias that carried out the massacre of civilians there…

      Reply
  • I don’t think I have a twisted way of how the UN is funded and how the biggest donor has much more arm twisting potential. The UN only lately tried to warn of the danger of too much sugar in foods. But some phone calls from the food lobby group and quick plane ride by a US official and low and behold the UN never made the u turn in food policy. Anyway, I respect your opinion and your entitled to it.

    Reply
  • What a laugh

    Reply
  • @Mattoid re: Der Spiegel. In order to distinguish the difference taking place between these media reports I direct you to what Chomsky calls’ Manufacturing Consent’. You can choose if you want to fall under this control; that is your free will. Give your consent without evaluation. Allow others like Der Spiegel to control the message for you. But you will never know what is actually going on. You must learn what is the motive of Der Spiegel. Because you and the truth are it’s victims. The first casualty of war is truth! http://bit.ly/LSl1rA / http://bit.ly/MQbCQE

    Reply
    • mattoid 27/07/12 #

      Stephen your arrogance and bias is breathtaking! How can you congratulate certain media outlets for ‘getting to the truth’ when publishing stories which support your own viewpoint and yet when similar media outlets publish stories contrary to your worldview you dismiss it as lies and propaganda!

      Doesn’t it even occur to you that the Syrian regime and its Russian allies might also engage in propaganda to cover up the fact that civilians were massacred by their forces??

      Do yourself a favour and follow this link:
      http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/a-look-back-at-the-houla-massacre-in-syria-a-845854.html

      Take your time and read the documented stories of named survivors whose family members were killed. Ask yourself why Syrian army officers in the Houla area subsequently defected to the FSA if those very people had just carried out a massacre of civilians in their own town?
      Above all, ask yourself why the Syrian regime will not allow foreign journalists into the country to investigate the truth of what is happening on the ground. Truth is indeed the first casualty in war, but it is entirely within the power of the regime to expose any FSA ‘lies and propaganda’ for the world to see, and yet they refuse to do this. Why?

      Reply
    • mattoid 28/07/12 #

      Some information about Der Spiegel:

      “As of 2010, Der Spiegel was employing the equivalent of 80 full-time fact checkers, which the Columbia Journalism Review called “most likely the world’s largest fact checking operation”.”

      In addition, Der Spiegel has been a consistent supporter of Wikileaks – hardly the actions of a pro-US propaganda outlet, but don’t let that spoil your theory…

      Reply

Add New Comment