TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Assad appeals for dialogue to end Syria conflict

The Syrian President said he would soon give details of his plan which calls on foreign countries to stop funding the armed opposition.

File photo of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
File photo of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Image: Aijaz Rahi/AP

SYRIA’S PRESIDENT BASHAR al-Assad in a rare speech today called for a national dialogue to end the 21-month conflict, but stressed he would not talk to those who have taken up arms against his regime.

Describing the Western-backed opposition as “slaves” of foreign powers and admitting that Syria was in the throes of a “real war”, the president urged opponents at home to join his regime in ending the bloody conflict.

He spelled out a transition plan, insisting however, that any decision must be purely Syrian and ratified by referendum, including a “National Charter” that would be agreed on in a national dialogue conference.

Assad said his government would soon give details of his plan, which calls on foreign countries to stop funding the armed opposition, followed by an end to military operations by the regular army and a mechanism to monitor both.

“Regional and international countries must stop funding the armed men to allow those displaced to return to their homes… right after that our military operations will cease,” he said.

After that the government would step up contacts to convene a national dialogue conference with regime opponents “from inside and outside” the country, who do not take orders from abroad.

“We will dialogue with the masters (of their decisions) not the slaves (of foreign powers,” Assad said to wild applause from crowds packed into the Dar al-Assad Centre for Culture and Arts in Damascus.

National charter

According to the initiative, the conference should draw up a “National Charter” that will be the reference document for the political and economic future of Syria.

“This charter will be put up for a referendum vote,” Assad said.

After that new parliamentary polls would be held, followed by the creation of a new government, said Assad.

But he stressed for all this to happen “there must be agreement at the national dialogue conference.”

“Just because we have not found a partner, it does not mean we are not interested in a political solution, but that we did not find a partner,” he told the audience.

He said the conflict was not one between the government and the opposition but between the “nation and its enemies.”

“The one thing that is sure that those who we face today are those who carry the Al-Qaeda ideology,” Assad said, repeating previous assertions that “foreign terrorists” are behind the uprising in his country.

“There are those who seek to partition Syria and weaken it. But Syria is stronger… and will remain sovereign… and this is what upsets the West.”

“Defend the nation”

Assad last spoke in public on June 3 when he addressed parliament in Damascus. In November he gave an interview to Russian television in which he dismissed suggestions he would go into exile, saying said he would “live and die” in Syria.

Since then he has not commented on the conflict which has ravaged his country, killing at least 60,000 people in the 21 months since an anti-regime revolt erupted in March 2011 according to UN figures.

In his speech today, however, he came out fighting, appealing to all Syrians to join together to defend the nation.

“Everyone must defend it… the attack on the entire nation… every citizen who is aware… and refusing to join solutions is taking the nation backwards,” he said.

The president, who was frequently interrupted by chants of “With our soul with our blood we sacrifice ourselves for you O Bashar”, stressed throughout his speech that the Syrian people must decide their future alone and accused foreign powers of interfering in the conflict.

“Any initiative we agree upon is based on sovereignty… and a national referendum,” he said, describing the vote as a “sort of guarantee” to preserve the country’s interests.

Assad said his country was also open to “advice” from abroad but “does not take orders”.

“Foreign initiatives can help us on two levels: on the political level and to fight terrorism… by stopping arms and armed men from entering Syria,” he said.

In closing remarks that drew thunderous applause, Assad said: “I am from the people and I will continue to be one of the people. Positions come and go but the nation remains.”

- © AFP 2013.

Read:Car bomb in Syria kills at least 11 people>

Read next:

Comments (64 Comments)

  • Liam 06/01/13 #

    He can call on foreign countries to stop supplying weapons to his opposition all he likes, but both sides hate each other, whoever “wins” this conflict will be in a position to exact terrible crimes against the people they will have defeated, and the U.N. Will as usual complain and do nothing of any worth and the innocent people have and will continue to suffer as a result.

    Reply
    • The UN was subverted and incorporated long ago by the coalition of the wilful’s self-selected ‘international community’.
      They are just the cloak on the PNAC daggers.

      Reply
    • B Lowe 06/01/13 #

      You are right Liam. If the elected Syrian government and Syrian security forces are defeated then terrible crimes will be committed against the people they have defeated. This is why we should hope this proxy invasion of Syria by Western countries using proxy terrorist groups is defeated by the Syrian government.
      If it succeeds, the West will divide Syria up into different regions based on ethnicity and religious groupings and it will send in its corporations to plunder Syrian national resources. Society will break down and lawlessness will take hold. Islamic religious fanatics will commit terrible war crimes and it will be absolutely horrible.
      I hope the Syrian government can defeat these terrorist groupings and then real change can occur in Syria.

      Reply
    • Completely agree with all the above comments. It’s a shame the controlled media especially the Associated “Free” Press (it must be free because it’s in their name) give us the information they want us to believe. RTE news repeaters are constantly telling us how terrible Assad is with no mention of the horrendous war crimes of the sponsored rebel side.

      Reply
    • @B Lowe. How can you call it an “Elected Government” when its a one party state. And power was handed from father to son?

      Reply
    • Am i right or wrong in believing that most if not all Christians in the region support Assad? if i am right, that tells me all i need to know about the opposition.. i can’t understand why the west are backing what appears to be another fundamentalist takeover of an Arab country.. but i could be wrong..

      Reply
    • B Lowe 06/01/13 #

      Jamie, your exactly right. The Christian population of Syria supports the Syrian government. In actuality the vast majority of the population supports the Syrian government. But you will not hear that on Western media outlets, you will only hear a narrative that supports the West game plan.
      The treatment of Syria by Western press is running along the same lines as the treatment of Libya by the press. 95% of the population supported Gadaffi but you didn’t hear that, instead you only heard about valiant, heroic, democratic uprising. This was a clear lie, told to a gullable public. In actuality Libya was invaded by proxy forces along with hundreds of Qatari ground troops disguised as rebels.
      It is good that Russia is deploying a fleet off the Syrian coast, as they will not allow the Western/NATO gamelan to be played out without resistance.

      Reply
    • B Lowe thanks for that. my understanding of what happened in Libya was that the colonel wouldn’t play ball with the banks, so they had him murdered? and now Egypt has the brotherhood in power! there’s something they’re not telling us what?

      Reply
  • What I don’t get is whenever a leader in a country offers elections it is rejected by the rebels. If they are so sure the majority of the people want Assad gone, then why can they both agree to run free elections. I’m very suspicious of the rebels here. What are they afraid of.

    Reply
    • I dunno, maybe a dictator who has shown that he is willing to kill large numbers of unarmed protestors isn’t exactly the most trustworthy to administer elections. Especially now seeing as the rebels are scoring more and more (questionably successful) victories and regime forces are on the decline.

      In the end it doesn’t matter if elections are held now or not. Loyalist fighters will continue if Assad loses. The rebels will if he wins. And religious extremists are going to keep exploiting the weakened state no matter what the outcome.

      Reply
  • Razan Ghazzawi is Syrian and a revolutionary socialist. Bring your pro-Assad garbage to her and see how far you get.

    https://twitter.com/RedRazan

    Reply
  • Well his life is pretty much over anyway. Ultimately he will be taken from power, then to the human rights court he goes.

    Reply
    • More likely a judicial murder as with Saddam and Gadafi, and any who oppose the PNAC reconfiguring and balkanisation of the post-Ottoman imperial arrangement of the regional borders.
      Then Operation WMD Mk II for Iran.

      Reply
    • Like Gaddafi he may end up with the handle of a knife up his bum.

      Either way, he seems to be in denial that he is on the way out.

      B Lowe’s seeming belief in the benignness of the ‘elected’ (*snort*) regime and genocidal security apparatus is either touchingly naive or extremely sinister.

      Reply
    • Those were not ‘judicial murders’, that term means an execution after due process, the death penalty imposed by a court.

      Saddam and Ghadaffi were simply murders. Crimes. For which nobody is being sought.

      Reply
    • True, Karl..perhaps judicious would have been a more appropriate term.

      Reply
    • For a moment there I thought Karl said:

      “Saddam and Ghadaffi were simply murderers”

      Which would have been true, of course.

      Reply
    • Perhaps, if you were simpleton enough to prefer simplistic analysis and selective spin.

      Reply
    • Actually Saddam’s was also judicial…never mind the premeditated rigging, the forms were rigorously applied, so we’re all nice ‘n’ legal. Bit like how King GW took the throne via the bro’s Florida court.

      Saddam swung
      Like a pendulum do
      Not for what he did
      More for what he knew

      Reply
    • Far worse things happened in Abu Ghraib under Saddam than after him. You do realise that you don’t have to pick sides like a five year old supporting one team and haaaaating another? It is possible to see an appalling figure like Saddam for the animal he was and still oppose US imperialism.

      Reply
    • I despised Saddam even when Rumsfeld was delivering the chemicals for his war against Iran and it was impossible to get a letter into our press ‘watchdogs of democracy’.

      The London based New Scientist magazine was one of the few sources prepared to expose what was going on.

      I am not some knee-jerk arriviste.

      Reply
    • Fair enough, Damien. Sounded like you were defending him before.

      Reply
    • Nope..but he did try to reform after his old man died..it was never a one man regime(none ever is)..and had been making some progress..

      Its the PNAC reconfigurations and full spectrum totalitarian dictatorship of the neoliberal corporatariat I’m trying to keep track of, with all their false-flag low-intensity proxy feinting and jivings.

      Lotsa shadow-boxing. The ‘first casualty’ is long perished and cremated.

      Reply
    • @Damien

      The irony is that Bashar is a neoliberal through and through. His ‘reforms’ were very much of the neoliberal variety.

      In any case all this began as an unarmed revolution and it was the jackboot of Bashar’s police state that made widespread violence inevitable.

      Reply
    • The violence is long premeditated and planned. Turkey and Saudi have hegemonic intent and ambition being stoked by Nato and Israeli resource interests.

      Syria is a minor detail in the PNAC global plan that goes back to Rome and beyond. Imperialism is nothing new, it is just increasingly biocidal given our technologies.

      Get a grip.

      Reply
  • John H 06/01/13 #

    Definitely one of the most confusing and mis-reported conflicts that I’ve tried to understand. A small bit of research beyond the usual sources show how brutal and manipulative the rebel forces are. Assad himself, from what I’ve read has pretty much inherited a role he never wanted, and isn’t really in control. Is there any truth in this? I won’t pretend to know very much about what’s happening in Syria, but it’s far from black and white.

    Reply
  • B Lowe 06/01/13 #

    John Stone, why would he go to the Human Rights court? What exactly has he done except defend the Syrian nation from terrorist attacks, which is the right of any sovereign nation.
    John let me explain to you the reality of the Syrian conflict and not the propaganda that is fed to people in the Western hemisphere. The Syrian conflict begun when legitimate peaceful demonstrations where hijacked by foreign mercenary/Islamic fighters sent in by the West which also included countries such as Qatar,Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
    Since then, thousands upon thousands of mainly foreign Islamic jihadists have been armed and trained in Turkey and sent over the border into Syria with Turkeys full permission. These foreign Islamic jihadists have been called the Syrian “rebels” by Western media, as if they were part of some spontaneous romantic uprising against oppression.
    The so called “rebels” are committed downright horrific human rights abuses and war crimes. They have executed countless innocent civilians, they have targeted and beheaded people based on religion, they have very extremist groups operating among them such as Al Nusra and Al Qaeda elements. They have only recently stated that all Russians and Iranians in Syria will be viewed as legitimate targets for execution. This is a war crime and it does not get the slightest coverage in Western media outlets. The head of the newly internationally recognised Syrian oppostion group has said the new Syrian state will be an Islamic one.
    We are being sold a lie re Syria and it needs to stop. Just look at the article above where the Syrian president stated that any effort at a peaceful deal will have to be voted on by referendum. What a shining example of Syrian nationalism.
    John, if anyone would go the Human Rights court it would be Obama for killing hundreds of innocents each year in drone strikes. It would be Blair and Bush fir directly killing millions of Iraqi children through sanctions, sanctions which they knew were having a direct effect on the civilian population.

    Reply
    • Perhaps for ordering the massacre of his own unarmed civilians and peaceful protesters, or are you forgetting that bit?

      Reply
    • Is it ok to massacre unarmed civilians as long as they’re not ‘your own’, mattoid?

      Reply
    • Amnesty and HRW have said that both the army and armed opposition have committed war crimes.

      Reply
    • mattoid 06/01/13 #

      No Damien, its not OK to massacre any innocent civilians.

      Reply
    • and is it ok to sponsor subversion and terror by sectarian bigots in neighbouring countries because multicultural stability is anathema to the fundamentalists in Saudi, Israel and behind the scenes neoliberal thugs running these expanding Nato resource wars?

      And do regimes have any right(indeed even responsibilities) to defend themselves from such subversions?

      Reply
    • This debate’s been had a million times here. All the points of the pro-Assadists are well dealt with here:

      http://www.thejournal.ie/in-pictures-a-year-of-fighting-in-syria-715626-Dec2012/

      Reply
    • A million times, eh K?

      You are obviouly a meticulous statistical follower of the forensic detail.

      Reply
    • ‘A million times’ is a term that means ‘a lot’. I suspect you don’t come to the table in good faith, Damien. You should read the other thread though. It’s all thrashed out. I don’t think Bashar’s speech today changes anything a jot.

      Reply
    • Couldnt have said it better myself.

      Reply
    • I don’t come in faith at all.

      I come in healthy scepticism…and have been following this since Assad senior was butchering.

      Reply
    • @B Lowe

      Reply
    • @B Lowe Here we go again with the same old story from you. Let us go back to the beginning then, before the uprising in Syria, and ask was Syria a free and democratic country as you claim? The answer to that question is NO (no matter what criteria you use). The people of Syria had very little freedom under the current regime, a report from Freedomhouse.org classifies Syria as Not Free see
      http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2009/syria?page=22&year=2009&country=7713
      So B Lowe, when did Syria become democratic? Was it after the Syrian security forces decided to use lethal force on unarmed demonstrators? Was it after before the Syrian police beat and tortured teenage boys for writing anti government graffiti? When did Syria become democratic? Where is the evidence of democracy in Syria at anytime in the recent past? The Syrian government has kept the country in a state of emergency since 1963. There is no evidence of Syria being a free or democratic country in the recent past, in fact, it is one of the most oppressive countries in the world. This oppression is self imposed by successive Syrian regimes to ensure that the status quo remained. Are you claiming then that the Syrian people were happy with the status quo and that there was no appetite for political reform from within Syria. There were no foreigners involved in the peaceful drives and demonstrations for reform, it was the brutal reaction of the regime to the demonstrations that opened the floodgates. There are many interested parties involved now because of the regimes brutal overreaction to the legitimate peaceful demonstrations by the Syrian people.
      I honestly do not know what you would classify as free and democratic, but I am sure that the standards of freedom and democracy in Syria would fall well below your principles. Mr Assad is fooling no one but himself with his plan, he has let the genie of violence out of the bottle and this plan will not do anything to put the genie back in. Unfortunately and I hate to say this, the future for Syria remains bleak.

      Reply
    • Bombing bakeries when there’s a large group of civilians outside is a war crime in most peoples books.

      Reply
    • To say that it started after the peaceful protests were hijacked by “foreign elements” is patently false.
      The regime firstly banned said peaceful protests and when they did not comply with the ban the police and other state security forces opened fire on unarmed civilian demonstrators. All of which was captured on video for the world to see. And only after the regimes brutal suppression of the peaceful protests did the resistance begin.

      Reply
    • And said ‘resistence ‘ consists of…?

      Reply
    • Damien. The vast majority of those involved in the resistance are Syrian although now there are foreign jihadists involved because the Western powers were far to slow in supporting the uprising. If the Americans and the EU had supported the resistance with hardware and finances from day one the resistance would not have had to reach out to these lunatics.

      Reply
    • Mick this was being set up long before they even hit Iraq…its not classified. It was announced in their overt PNAC program.

      You really need to dig a little deeper into the patterns. Its running for centuries.

      Reply
    • Damien I think you are letting your “healthy skepticism” get the better of you. If you think that a political think tank has that much global power. It’s like saying that Illuminaty are real and influencing global politics.

      Reply
    • Was it Eisenhower’s overactive imagination brought the military/industrial comlex into being?
      Or did he perhaps witness it’s expansion in the course of his genralship during the global conflict of ’39-’45?
      And has it shrunk or expanded since?

      Are you unaware of nato’s explosive extensions since the end of the ‘Cold War’?
      From outer space to cyber space, and pole to pole, the the program is rolling out. It does not need fancy theories of cabals; thats how power and empire function, always have.
      Its nothing novel.

      Reply
    • Damien do you actually believe that? Have you any idea how it appears to those of us that don’t have your “Healthy Skepticism”. I would think a healthy dose of realism may be the order of the day.

      Reply
    • B Lowe 06/01/13 #

      Oh Mick, I’m trying not to fall off my seat here with laughter. You seriously believe the West was slow to support the armed uprising as you call it. That is absolute lunacy. The West instigated the armed actions from the very outset. They were supporting them from day one.
      It is only down to the bravery and heroes of the soldiers in the Syrian Army that these armed terrorists have not succeeded in toppling the Syrian government. I have been hearing for months of the final battle for Aleppo or Damascus or the capturing of the same army base for the fifth time, all that is rubbish. The armed terrorists have suffered defeat after defeat at the hands of the Syrian security forces and it is only in Western media outlets that the narrative of the successful rebels is spewn about. The only times the so called ‘rebels’ win a battle is when Al Nusra is leading the attack.

      Reply
    • Heroes of the Syrian Army. Hmmm. And I would suppose you would say the same about the way the Iraqi military behaved when they dropped nerve gas on the Kurds and may they were all “Brave Soldiers” that crushed the Tianamen protest too.
      You have a very strange sense of constitutes bravery.

      Reply
    • Dose of reality Mick?

      So there is no military/industrial complex, Ike was naive, Cheyney’s ties to Halliburton/Bechtel and the rest of the Bushwo/men to big oil is coincidental….oh and Saddam had those WMDs..but he shifted them to Iran.

      That your ‘reality’?

      And how many times do you need telling it was Pharma Rumsfeld supplied the nerve gas?

      Reply
  • There are clear unanswered questions and obvious media bias and propaganda.

    Who exactly are these rebels? And who do the represent? Are they foreignly funded and trained?
    Israel and the west have been interfering as much as possible for as long as I can remember in every Middle East country, fermenting problems and disruption. The question of why? The only act out of self interest so what is the interest they want?

    Transposing the events into a western country and imagine the results. Armed militias carrying out terrorist attacks, sponsored by foreign governments….what would USA do, what would the UK do?

    I’m not saying the current government is the best, but I would like to know more accurate details rather than spin and propaganda.

    Reply
    • The “Syrian Rebel” is a very loose term at the moment. From what I see “rebel” seems to include the Free Syrian Army which is fighting for democracy (but is in no way a unified belief system), religious extremists from all possible walks of faith and foreign forces operating in Syria. It’s a very blurry definition that doesn’t do justice to the complex situation.

      Western media would have you believe that all fighters are either the bad guys in the regime or the good guys who are the rebels fighting entirely for democracy. Russian and Chinese media (with B Lowe as their local spokesperson) would have you believe that it is entirely good guy regime versus evil religious nuts and foreign mercenaries. Both are easier for the majority to understand than the various shades of grey that Syria is right now.

      Reply
  • I think the headline is grossly misleading. This was a speech of vengeance and death. It offered nothing more than that.

    Reply
  • For the thousands he has killed and all the children he’s executed, he needs to die by the knife himself. Put him in the streets and let the people rip he and his cronies apart.

    Reply
  • he kinda looks like Bob from “Bob’s Burgers “

    Reply
  • Ah shut up.

    Reply
  • And you should grow a brain, Declan.

    Reply

Add New Comment