TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Cameron: “The fightback has well and truly begun”

Speaking in the Commons today, the British prime minister said the army would not be drafted in to help deal with unrest, but said police would be given extra powers.

Image: PA Wire

BRITISH PRIME Minister David Cameron has addressed the House of Commons today on the government’s response to several days of serious civil unrest in English cities.

Cameron said the unrest was not down to “politics or protest”, but theft.

He said there would be a full investigation into the death of Mark Duggan, which sparked the unrest after a peaceful protest in Tottenham on Saturday, but distanced Duggan’s death from the subsequent chaos:

[I]t is completely wrong to say there is any justifiable causal link. It is simply preposterous for anyone to suggest that people looting in Tottenham at the weekend – still less, three days later in Salford – were in any way doing so because of the death of Mark Duggan.

“Keeping people safe is the first duty of government,” Cameron told the Commons, before saying that was clear that too few police had initially been deployed to tackle the unrest. “The tactics they were using weren’t working,” he added. He said police treated it as a public order issue rather than crime, but said police have been facing a new “unique” challenge: people looting in different places at the same time.

The 16,000 police officers deployed to the streets of London earlier this week will remain in place over the weekend, and all police leave planned for this week and weekend remains cancelled.

Cameron blamed a street gang culture for the unrest, but also pointed the finger at parents who don’t know or care what their children have been doing. Crime has a context, he said, and children are growing up not knowing right from wrong. Cameron said that local authorities and landlords have the power to evict the perpetrators from social housing, but said the government would consider whether this ability should be strengthened.

He said that people who saw smashed shop windows as an opportunity to loot would also have to face the law.

Social media

Cameron said CCTV images were being used to ensure that people would not escape justice; courts will continue to sit through the night to deal with the high numbers facing charges over the unrest.

Speaking of how social media has apparently helped looters organise, he said that the “free flow of information can be used for good, but it can also be used for ill”. The government was working with police, intelligence services and “industry” to check if it would be “right” to block communication via certain services being used for criminality.

The prime minister announced that police would be granted extra powers allowing them to ask people to remove face masks if they suspect that person is involved in criminal activity.

He also said that the introduction a curfew was under consideration.

Meanwhile, planning restrictions on shops adding shutters to their premises will be reconsidered.

Compensation

Cameron said that the government would provide compensation to people who suffered damage to their property under the Riot Damages Act, even if they are uninsured. They have 42 days to submit claims, and businesses will also be able to apply for funding from a £20 million High Street support scheme.

The cost of the damage, he said, is expected to run to over £200 million.

Watch: The House of Commons debate on England’s riots >

Read: Riots force Spurs’ Premier League opener to be postponed >

Read: ‘Vigilantes’ protect areas of London as David Cameron feels pressure >

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • And what about all the people using the exact same social media to organise the clean-up? The technology and the media aren’t the problem, they’re just a tool that anyone can use, for good or ill. Might as well ban cars to stop drunk driving.

    Reply
    • Good point. They’re using the same social media to identify criminals, but it’s just easier for them to blame something else rather than admit they were completely unprepared.

      Reply
    • Yes they were completely unprepared,why would they have been expecting this ?Also they were stand offish the first night it happened because if they werent they would have been accused of being heavy handed.

      Reply
    • It’s understandable they probably weren’t expecting a riot from their own citizens, but as a nation that has been to war within the past decade I would have thought they’d have some kind of plan of action for mass panic or crowd control. Being accused of being heavy handed should be the least of their concerns when a group of knuckle dragging thugs were burning down people’s homes for a few rolls of carpet. It took three people’s lives for them to spring into action.

      Reply
  • »»»»The government was working with police, intelligence services and “industry” to check if it would be “right” to block communication via certain services being used for criminality.

    Nonsense, Cameron is talking through his @ss here. The civil liberties groups in Britain and Europe would be up in arms.

    Reply
  • Sorry Mr. Cameron but a simple desire to loot and steal does not explain co-ordinated action in several British cities. Britian obviously has huge numbers of disaffected citizens who are quite willing to attack the police for any excuse.

    Reply
  • The points made by Stuart Doyle and Lostintallagh are indeed valid. Individuals are responsible for their own actions and should be held accountable. Nevertheless, those in the position of leadership must shoulder some of the blame. When people are put into a position of leadership and things go pear-shaped on their watch the ultimate responsibility lies with with them, whether they manage a business or a country. After all, that is the very essence of leadership.

    Reply
  • For the past number of years, young people have been listening to their leaders telling them that, their future looks grim. They have been hearing that what they have to look forward to is, austerity. They hear of education, health and benefit cuts. What do leaders expect. Take some resposibility.

    Reply
    • @Philip ,if this came about from an unemployement march or a march against government policey then you could say they have to take some responsibility for pushing the people too far to cause the reaction.However the idiots who were involved in these riots and looting were not doing it out of protest but out of sheer desire to cause havoc and destruction.They also saw it as a great oppertunity to get that 40inch telly they could not have been bothered to try working to get.

      Reply
    • Philip, I don’t see how young people hearing that their future looks grim can lead to GROWN MEN rioting in the streets. It’s easy to blame the youth of these cities but many of the rioters were not young people.

      You say to the leaders “Take some resposibility”, I say to the person with a brick in his hand “What do you have to gain from smashing up your local shop, a place that’s probably struggling to make ends meet as it is.”

      Suggesting personal responsibility is a much more powerful tool than blaming a bunch of old men in suits.

      Reply
    • @stuart.
      day in day out these young kids are bombarded with advertising of things they cannot afford and probably never will. from the 40inch tv you mentioned to latest Nike Air Jordons.. They feel the urge to possess these luxury items but unlike others are unable to afford them with the lack of decent employment.
      This builds resentment towards a society they are trying to live and fit into. Thus this resentment sometimes boils over and erupts with trajic consequences. No School, hospital or any church were damaged in the riots. They attacked and looted commercial centers.
      Oppurtunistic looting aquiring the latest gadget, the HD tv’s and so on.
      We live in a consumer society and a lot of people are being marganilised in it.
      These types of incidents will happen again. This old parable may explain it.
      A man had a problem with Ants coming out from under his fridge. He would stand on them each day, however, each day the ants would come back. He tried chemicals and posion which helped for a while but soon the ants would return. He was fed up. He decided to look at deeply at the problem. He cleaned inside and outside of the fridge, he then looked at the back of the fridge. To his suprise he found a rotten piece of fruit lying there. He removed the fruit and soon the ants disappeared. He regularly cleans and upkeeps his kitchen.
      thanks

      Reply
    • @Philip, I give you that you don’t really know what you’re talking about.

      Reply
  • Have you ever thought the English feel the same!

    Reply
  • Mr C is a venal public relations manipulator he doesn’t care one way or another, he simply calculates every word with the sole objective of achieving and retaining power at any cost. I suspect he doesn’t really like people very much.

    Reply

Add New Comment