Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/alinabuphoto
Social Media

Almost half of adverts posted by social media influencers not labelled as such, research finds

The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission today published its report on social media influencers.

ALMOST HALF OF commercial content posted by influencers is not labelled as advertising, a new review has found. 

The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) today published its report on social media influencers. 

The report found that 48.4% of the commercial content reviewed by the CCPC was not labelled as advertising in any way.

Poor levels of labelling relating to influencers’ marketing of their own brands was an area of particular concern identified in the research. 

The CCPC’s wide-ranging research also revealed that many consumers who bought as a result of influencer promotions feel they were misled in their purchases.

However, consumers said they can be reluctant to report such issues to a regulatory authority such as the CCPC, preferring instead to unfollow such influencers.

Consumers raised specific concerns around influencers promoting cryptocurrencies and other financial products, particularly when the influencer had no experience in the area.

The report found that just 10% of consumers trust the information provided by influencers. 

However, the research found that consumers are reluctant to use the word “influencers” in reference to personalities they follow on social media platforms, preferring instead to use terms such as “interactive celebrities”, “people of interest”.

That consumers did not readily agree that such terms were interchangeable with the term “influencer” suggests they may be overconfident in their ability to recognise influencer advertising and may be vulnerable to misleading practices, the CCPC said.

Consumers and influencers interviewed for the research agreed that clear guidance would be beneficial for everyone, particularly for more vulnerable social media users (for example, children and teenagers).

This research also suggests that requiring influencers to use a small number of tags, such as #advertisement, #AD and #PaidPartnership, would reduce inconsistencies in labelling methods amongst influencers, particularly for when influencers promote their own brands.

“This research shows that influencer marketing is constantly evolving and as such influencers and consumers alike need clarification in relation to the labelling of social media advertisements,” Kevin O’Brien, member of the CCPC, said.

“Platforms and brands must take greater responsibility for educating and informing their users and consumers, and must support influencers in clearly and consistently labelling paid content,” O’Brien said, adding that the CCPC will “monitor social media platforms for progress in this area”.

“It’s crucial that platforms, brands, influencers and agents understand their responsibilities and abide by the law. We will also work with the ASAI to develop guidance which will provide greater clarity in relation to responsibilities and requirements,” he said. 

Your Voice
Readers Comments
8
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel