We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
A PILOT PROJECT in Dublin city to add shelves to the outside of public bins to stop people from rummaging through rubbish in search for unreturned bottles has been launched today.
A total of 80 shelves (40 on the northside and 40 on the southside) will be rolled out around the city in the coming days and the operators of the scheme, Re-Turn, intends to expand it to regional cities in the future.
It has become common in Dublin and other Irish cities to see people, particularly those who are homeless, fishing out plastic bottles and aluminum cans to bring them at a Re-Turn machine to collect the deposit.
In an effort to stop people from rooting through the rubbish, the shelves - or what the Deposit Return Scheme operators call ‘surrounds’ – will act as an area where people can chose to “donate” the bottles to others.
Countries like Denmark and Germany have introduced similar infrastructure.
CEO of the Re-Turn scheme Ciarán Foley told reporters today that he didn’t believe that the behaviour would be “inevitable” but did admit that his team had considered it a possibility, given similar actions were seen in other European cities.
He said: “It varies from country to country. We have seen it in some of the countries I mentioned, and they use this solution. But that’s not done everywhere.
“I guess we wanted to go live and see how things panned out. We also wanted to work with Dublin City Council to make sure that when we did it, we did it right for Ireland.”
It is also hoped that these shelves will also help to prevent plastic bottles and cans from being thrown away into general waste bins where they are not recycled. Additionally, it will give others a chance to collect the monetary deposit.
The bin surrounds have been manufactured by Hartecast, an Irish firm in Co. Wexford.
Welcoming the scheme, Lord Mayor of Dublin James Geoghegan said the project was to be launched in a “small part of the city” first and believes designs can be adapted in the future to fit more bottles.
“It’s always important to pilot the project first, see what the challenges are, and see can we do them a little bit better,” he said.
The Lord Mayor adding that it wasn’t to know if the behaviour would be encouraged considering the initial negative response with the rollout of the Deposit Return Scheme but defended Dublin City Council’s response.
He said the issue became prevalent during the summer and the Council moved to do away with plastic bin bags as rubbish had spread all around bins once they were ripped apart. He said he hopes that the shelves can be another way to respond to the issue.
Junior climate minster Ossian Smyth said he has taken bottles out of public bins before the collect the deposit and believes that this scheme will make that process easier.
“It’s a very simple innovation, it’s a practical thing, it’s good for people’s dignity, and it’s also going to help to increase the recycling rate,” he said.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I think the Westernized definition of “Women’s rights” and “gender equality” are making a mockery of the legitimate struggles women face in the world. In Saudi Arabia women aren’t allowed drive a car. That’s a REAL problem and issue to be addressed. FGM is a REAL issue. Moaning about perceived under-representation in politics/media, and demanding undemocratic measures to appease this perception is a Non-issue. Its Misandry.
Hi Tony – just to point out, the under-representation of women in politics/media is not ‘perceived’, it is a fact.
16 per cent of the Dáil is female. Even if you doubled that, you would still not have gender equality.
Ireland ranks 24th out of the 28 EU member states when it comes to the percentage of female political representation: http://ec.europa.eu/ireland/ireland_in_the_eu/impact_of_eu_on_irish_women/index_en.htm
The vast majority of presenters (80 per cent to 90 per cent) on Irish radio station are male, with women typically on early morning or weekend slots, outside of prime time hours.
Also, here’s Women On Air’s website, in case you missed the link above. They’re not calling for ‘undemocratic measures’, as far as I can see. http://womenonair.ie/what-we-do/
According to women on air 1 in 3 presenters are women and not 80 or 80 %.
Also, equality is about equal opportunity and not equal numbers.
In the Dail for example, women ran as Independents at a rate of 15% in the last election. There is no barrier to anyone running as an independent.
Yet, the main parties ran candidates at closer to 30% (depending on the party). Therefore the main parties are already running women at far higher levels women are putting themselves forward at.
In fact, I would think considering the vast membership of almost any political party is usually male, if anything I’d imagine if research was carried out on that front, we’d find women were dramatically overrepresented as candidates in parties.
Sorry Aoife. I phrased that wrong. I know that women are in a minority in these fields. I was having a go at the idea that these issues are perceived by some as real “feminist” problems that are due to intentional and institutionalised sexism.
And I used the Saudi example to highlight legitimate institutional sexism.
Actually female independents ran at 8% while Labour had 27% female candidates and FF & FG were at 15%. So the major parties are putting women forward at 2-3 times the rate women put themselves forward
But Aoife talks about “representation”. Are we to assume that to represent women you must be a woman? Would you prefer if Sarah Palin was your TD rather than Daniel O’Connell? If you vote for someone because of their sex you’re a sexist, it’s as simple as that. You’re also stupid. Women are fully represented in the Dáil, by the people they vote for
In my own opinion it’s more a quality issue than a quantity one. Bar Miriam O’Callaghan, Mary Wilson and even Claire Byrne, the vast majority of female radio presenters I’ve heard are pretty woeful.
They tend to have this ‘yay sisters’ attitude which turns male listeners off. Most focus on mundane vox pop stuff and tend to shy away from anything serious. True, some of this may be down to the selection choices of the station chiefs but come on, if you constantly choose to recycle people like Ruth Scott, Sile Seoige, Kathryn Thomas etc then you’ll keep getting the same perception.
There are plenty of women out there who can lead serious debate – just go and find them.
When Miriam O’ Callaghan stepped in for John something or other for months last year, almost every guest she had on were women.
Personally, I’d much prefer gender balance in the content of the shows. We can say with absolute certainty mens issues and the social issues and problems facing them are underrepresented moreso than anything on Irish radio.
Iam enjoying listening to Jennifer McGuire on 2fm if truth be told.
I mostly watch women on the internet.
Niall, why do you think male issues aren’t high lighted? Genuine question. There are loads of male djs and hosts that can high light them, why don’t they?
Aoife, they’re not interested in facts or statistics, only in their own prejudices
If I wasn’t interested in statistics I wouldn’t have provided them.
Dell, I know you didn’t address that to me but for what it’s worth….
I think if a male DJ were to highlight “men’s issues” with the frequency that, for example, The Journal highlights “women’s issues” he’d be called a misogynist and ridiculed by people like, for example, Susan Daly, editor of The Journal. (I say this because she’s already part of a group called The Anti Room that do just that). Google “what about teh menz” and see for yourself
Also, I think people just aren’t conditioned to see unemployment, murder, assault, suicide, death at work, imprisonment and all the other issues that disproportionately affect men as “men’s issues”.
Thanks Etienne. Good points. do you think that sometimes the ridicule (and I’m not condoning it!) comes because sometimes men will hilight their issues on the back of an article that are hilighting issues that are predominantly female problems. say fgm, If someone were to write an actual article on say male circumcision, would it be ridiculed? also, and this is what my original question stemmed from, do you think a lit of men do not like their problems being aired or hilighted or are afraid of being ridiculed by other Men? like “man up” or something like that.
We don’t highlight men’s issues because, quite frankly, it is unbecoming and the last thing we want is a male version of feminism.
Well, taking the second part first, and this is just my opinion, I don’t think it’s a factor because if an article addressed a problem that men face as a group then it’d be hard to tell anyone to “man up”. I do think that attitude stops individual men talking about their individual problems though
A bigger issue is that people in general just don’t realise that “men’s issues” exist. There’s no men’s rights industry, compare that to the number of clearly identifiable professional feminists. Look at the hostility the Male Studies course in the University of South Australia faced, frequently from graduates of Women’s Studies courses. That hostility is replicated any time someone opens their mouth about, say, bias in the criminal courts. As soon as you question the feminist narrative you’re called “a misogynist”. And no-one wants that.
Which leads me in to your first point; comments on “Women’s Issues” articles. I’ve often left comments asking for the male side of the story to be told. The usual response is “this story is about women, why do you always talk about men in stories about women?” There’s two answers to that;
1. It’s hard to comment on stories about men’s issues, because there aren’t any
2. The frequency with which stories about women’s issues appear create a false picture of the world which deserves to be challenged. Take #bringbackourgirls for example. Michelle Obama et al are quick to tell us that the kidnappings are part of a war on women’s education. That’s a lie. It’s a war on education in general. This is what Boko Harem do to boys http://www.mediaite.com/online/why-did-kidnapping-girls-but-not-burning-boys-alive-wake-media-up-to-boko-haram/ But on that occasion the hashtagtivists were silent, because it doesn’t fit the story they want to tell
While I’m at it, since you mentioned circumcision, did you see all those stories about boys dying after contracting herpes from oral circumcision? Me neither
But Stephen, how do you propose they get dealt with? People can not deal with problems they are unaware of. I’m not a feminist by the way, or at least I don’t think I am. The issues that Etienne hilighted are huge. personally I think there may be far too much emphasis put on gender when dealing with all issues from domestic violence to unemployment and single parent issues. But, as society tends to be content in separating issues by gender (no idea why) I think the male side of things also needs to be hilighted.
Thanks for the reply Etienne. as I’ve said before I personally think most issues should be dealt with without gender coming into it at all. why aren’t journalists writing the articles about male issues is my next question? I’m not asking these questions to antagonise, I genuinely am curious as it makes no sense to me. also I was aware what boko haram do and did to those boys and for the life of me I do not understand why the hell it wasn’t hilighted more! Do you think that as a society we tend to have a protect the female mentality and so people use that instinct/conditioning to further their own causes? so in the case of free our girls, they actually no more care about the girls than they do the boys but have an agenda of their own?
Well that’s just it, we used to talk about women who are raped, women who are abused as if the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius never mattered. And the new one is “male violence against women”. Language is chosen to paint a certain picture
We SHOULD be talking about PEOPLE who are abused, and violence by PEOPLE against PEOPLE. Sex should be as relevant as skin colour when it comes to the crimes and suffering of individual people
Yeah Dell, that’s exactly what I think. Well, I’m sure people do genuinely want those girls freed but look at how they’ve ignored what happens to boys in Africa. Certain people are willing to ignore the horrific murders of scores of children lest it alter the picture they want us to have
Yes, im not saying that most don’t have their heart in the right place, but I wonder why only the girls got the press? Personally I think that putting genders on issues actually makes some issues worse and creates hostility between the sexes.
You’re right. Here we are talking about the slant on the reporting instead of the crime itself
On a positive note, Etienne. As more publications begin to move online due to the inevitable death of print media, it’ll cause a major shakeup because I think we’ve finally hit a turning point and men, and those actually interested in equality, those with brother, fathers, and sons – simply won’t tolerate not being heard for much longer.
It’s already happening.
And men make up the majority of readers on news site all around the world.
Is it not true, men are more likely to be interested in politics than women which would mean that there be less female candidates signing up, should we just put unqualified people in? would you rather women just be elected based on their gender? what about merit??
Merit hence the word Merit should I walk into a job and say hire me i am a man? oh of course not id be labeled sexist! that is what women quotas, are just an upper hand for women to get things handed to them!
Radio is a commercial entity. If you’re good you’ll get the job and hold the audience, if not, you won’t.
Radio has always been primarily a male dominated area. We have some fine female broadcasters.
In fact, per hours worked Marian Finnucane is by far the highest paid in the country.
However, I take the ‘women on air’ group with a grain of salt. I’ve seen previous articles from them before and they are feminist, agenda driven, nonsense. They make no sense, the research is utterly skewed and they have no credibility.
For example, the most listened to current affairs programme in the country is Drivetime, and has a female presenter. Women on air makes no attempt in their research to account for the audience reach numbers. Mary Daly may reach more of an audience than 10 of the other male presenters combined. But they choose to ignore that entirely. Ludicrous.
Nah, this group cannot be taken seriously, and are more about jobs for the girls than anything.
Good post.
Do women want to listen to women?
Can we demand gender parity in teaching & medicine?
Its becoming increasingly possible for a child to go through their educational career with only meeting the odd male teacher .
Won’t happen in education because the female teachers will resist it.
There are deeper concerns though, and the DOE does actually have within its legal capability the power to discriminate on gender grounds if it is for the benefit of students (I heard a senior civil servant say that to Pat Kenny recently on air when talking about the lack of male teachers).
Remember how they seethed at being called a “feminised” audience? Who cares if it’s true!
Here we go again,change the record.
No I can’t imagine a female George Hook,thanks very much I am having me dinner.
Though come to think of it, I don’t think I’ve ever seen Hook in the same room as Joan Burton.
Too often intelligent men are left of the screen in place of big breasted bimbos trying to explain something they don’t understand.
Or other women that are not big breasted bimbos that can’t get a look in either. Remember when RTE wanted to drop the meteorlogical staff in favour clueless of pretty faces on the news?
There is only one way to fix this. It has to start with early education. We take all the boys aside and tell them and instruct them to take hair and shoes more seriously!
The keep out sign is probably there because all you want to talk about is gender inequality. If you don’t pick a different issue, what do you expect
Aoife why did you remove my sexist remark?? That’s being sexist towards me because I’m a man!
Gizmo, your sexist remark is still there.. Typical man, can’t find something right under your nose.. See what I did there? ;-)
I removed your sexist remark because… The clue is in the word ‘sexist’, Gizmo!
Fell I beg to differ, typical woman seeing things that aren’t there! And Aoife you’re on the ball this evening!
Dell!
Gizmo!
Gizmo, Seriously, if you are talking about the comment about the sandwich, that is still in the comments right in front of me, if it was something else then fair enough. maybe its a glitch with the app, often people say their comments are gone and they are still there on my app.
If you refresh the page they’ll disappear dell.
This positive gender based discrimination ticks me off. Women aren’t in politics coz they simply choose not to be, in vast numbers. Same as most men choose not to be air stewards or receptionists. Certain profiles suit the sexes.
Any woman who is in politics or hi rank biz or whatever, is there thru grit, vision and determination.
We are all created equal, just not the same..makes for a better world don’t ya know!!!
There’s no such thing as positive discrimination. There’s either discrimination or there isn’t
Whats stopping women in media, im of the belief that it should be the best person for the job, your asking why women are not how about start asking whats stopping women.
A ‘keep out’ sign? How are the men supposed to get their teas and coffees so?
Because the perceived glass ceiling is such an issue, to some sections of society, trumping all others by the sounds of it. why don’t the women of this country found a political party with the soul purpose of getting parity with males in every sector of irish life? U have roughly 50% of the vote, use it and stop crying ffs. If anything it will show these feminists how little support they actually have and maybe can get some peace!!
If that happened then men would need to form a male only party otherwise women would completely run the country. This would lead to even further antagonism between the sexes. Then the great war of Men vs women would break out and then our species would become extinct
The horror
I doubt that. The Women’s a Coalition in NI didn’t spark any such reaction
have a all female line up no one bats an eye
have a all male line up and everyone goes bat sh*t crazy
Why was Rabbite at this one ? With an event like this I think Joan Burton would have been an ideal speaker. Well she has such a calming , soothing voice . I’m sure her dulcet tones would have kept the delegates enthralled for hours.
Newstalk get a bashing for its “all male” primetime line up, so how come its JNLR show positive results? I would add Nora Casey to the quality talent list with Miriam, Clare and Mary but don’t know if there’s anyone else as good. As for positive discrimination, those who benefit from it will be found out quickly if they don’t have the talent.
Like Norah Casey!
I sit corrected
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say