Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
A 29-YEAR-OLD woman who killed a man who hired her as a prostitute when she was 16 is receiving a swell of support from celebrities.
Cyntoia Brown has spent the past 13 years in prison and will not be eligible for parole until she is at least 67.
This week celebrities such as Kim Kardashian, Rihanna, Le Bron James and Cara Delevingne have given public support to Brown and are using the hashtag #FreeCyntoiaBrown.
The system has failed. It’s heart breaking to see a young girl sex trafficked then when she has the courage to fight back is jailed for life! We have to do better & do what’s right. I’ve called my attorneys yesterday to see what can be done to fix this. #FreeCyntoiaBrownpic.twitter.com/73y26mLp7u
He would explain to me that some people were born whores, and that I was one, and I was a slut, and nobody’d want me but him, and the best thing I could do was just learn to be a good whore.
In August 2004, a 43-year-old man called Johnny Allen picked up Brown in his truck and drove her to his home where he showed her guns and the pair then got into bed.
Advertisement
Court documents reveal that Brown had thought Allen was reaching for a gun when she pulled a handgun from her purse and shot him.
She then took Allen’s wallet and two of his guns before going to a hotel where she was later arrested.
Cyntoia was tried as an adult and the jury rejected her claim of self-defence, handing down a life sentence.
A documentary about her life “Me Facing Life: Cyntoia’s Story” was part of PBS’s Independent Lens series broadcast in 2011.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
118 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Lily: Well 2 wrongs don’t make a right. Did the victim know the girls age? Or are you taking it for granted he did? Either way it’s the pimp is the real criminal. The fact she robbed the man after she killed him raises questions like was this guy caught in a sting with the girl and the pimp and it went wrong? Who reports getting robbed by a hooker
@Clever Jake: I never defended the deceased, if he was alive I would hope he would get a similar sentence to his killer. All I know is she killed him and robbed him, if it was self defense why did she rob him? If I killed someone defending myself my first taught would be get somewhere safe not get his money then go somewhere safe. But look if it makes you feel better putting words in my mouth knock yourself out.
Those men keep pimps in jobs (with their desire /requests for young girls) without their custom there would be no pimps! Pimps take advantage of young vulnerable girls, but their customers are equally as bad!
The prosecutor paints the man as an innocent victim, he was far from that!
Get somewhere safe! She just killed a man she didn’t have much options. Safe? No where was safe for her. She went back to her pimp. One could only imagine it’s because he was the only person their for her in recent times and she was dependent on him. As a vulnerable kid he groomed / coerced her into submission either by fear or by gifts. He manipulated her into believing she needed him and only him.
It’s a cruel twisted scene she probably felt safer with him than on the street. She could have meant to run but got scared. Your mind can do funny things when you panic, I presume she did panic.
@Clever Jake: look I’m going off the facts in the article, it doesn’t even say he had sex with her, maybe he found out her age and said no so she shot him for the money. A jury who heard all the facts found her guilty, not me I’m just going off the article I read, we’re you at the trial?
@Lily: Totally agree with you, they keep the pimps in business. What that man was planning on doing was wrong on so many levels and he should have to face justice but he can’t because he was MURDERED. I didn’t decide this the jury the girl was before decided this but you seem to know everything because Rihanna hash tagged it, come off your high horse and write to the courts instead
Actually I went and looked up a few other news sites. I find your comment insulting as I dont follow hastags or Rihanna.
I’m putting myself into the kids shoes, I can’t imagine any 16 year old wanting to have sex with loads of old men, I can see some doing it out of a necessity but mostly being coerced, or threatened into doing it. Some are hooked on drugs as a way to make them dependent.
Have you seen the film based on real life events called ‘The Whistleblower’ it’s horrific. And gives true representation of what it’s like to be pimpped out.
What she needed was real help. Yes she killed him and she was only 16 so no I don’t agree with the sentence I think her sentence has been served. She’s paid her price.
@Lily: Well if you are talking about the sentence it is way way over the top. As I said I’m only commenting on the article here and going off the facts in it. It says she is not a victim or a sex slave. Look at the end of the day I agree with you, just not here I don’t think she shot him in self defence. Now to be clear I’m not defending peados, no punishment is good enough for them and I hope they all die screaming but the law is the law and in this case she was guilty.
We are allowed differences of opinion, with a name of ‘let free speech live’ you should really encourage differences of opinions ;)
Some say she was a sex slave, the prosecutor says she wasn’t. He also said the victim was innocent, something I would have to disagree with! It says he paid to have sex with her. Fact! No one disputes this. It says she was 16. Fact no one disputes this. The age of consent is 18 in Nashville. Fact!
The law today says that no one under the age of 18 can be charged with prostitution. That they are in fact exploited children and are victims of sex trafficing . Fact!
If she were tried today it would not be the same verdict!
@Brendan Fogarty: Again Brendan only going off the facts of the article. That is what the prosecution said not me. Do you know more about this case than the prosecution?
@Lily: I’m actually enjoying our little debate, I don’t think I told you shut up or anything so not sure why you think I’m not encouraging free speech? We have a difference of opinion, which is no big deal, I agree with a lot of what you said and disagree with other points, which is what debate is all about. Even if I 100% disagreed with you I would still want you to put your opinion forward. If we don’t listen to people with different views and opinions our minds would never expand.
@Clever Jake: ah the old I have run out of valid points so I will call you a name, good one. Try racist in your next comment, that is always a great comeback.
@Clever Jake: oh so it’s the whole justice system, you’re changing your argument there. You make lots of assumptions about me. You seemed to be getting upset because I have a different opinion to you. Why are you upset, tell me why does a random stranger with a different opinion to you upset you so much? If you want to get personal with me drive on, not my bag though I prefer to stick to the topic. But if you sleep better at night because you got to put words in my mouth and call me names, well good for you vent on me as it’s water off a ducks back to me.
@Clever Jake: Where did I defend him? Did I question the scenario? I sure did, but say it’s ok to be a peado? Nope but it looks like you’re on the celebrity bandwagon with a closed mind. You think you know more about the case than the jury who heard all the facts and convicted her. You seem to think you no more than the prosecution and the DA who brought the murder charges forward, why do you know more than them? Your last comment was about racial injustice and now we are back to you putting words in my mouth, peado defender blah blah.
@Clever Jake: No doubt the American justice system is f’ed up and it is probably nigh on impossible in some states for foreign or black people to get a fair trial, totally agree with you. But you think asking a question to establish some facts is defending a peado which is not the case. He hired a prostitute (not a fan but not the issue) I only wanted to know did he actively go looking for a young girl or did he pick up the first girl he found not knowing her age? The answer to that question makes a big difference to me and my opinion. Hollywood is a cesspit and I don’t need hypocrites telling me what is right and wrong.
I will never understand the american legal system eligible for parole at 67, what a sentence to give a 16 year old, Thing is american thinks tough justice works, all the evidence is , it has not effect on law and order. Were she white, might have had a different outcome.
@Dave Murray: not so sure too many white 16 yo olds go to jail for over 50 years, But I am sure if your white and its alleged you a pedophile you can get elected to congress, imagine allegation like that against a black candidate.
@Dave Murray: it’s a pretty well established fact that black people are more likely to be found guilty, are more likely to get tougher sentences and are also more likely to get the death sentence than white people tried for similar crimes.
@Dermot Lane: That is true. But when you do a regression analysis, it turns out that socio-economic group is a far more important factor than race. And having a decent lawyer makes a bigger difference than either.
I will never understand the american legal system eligible for parole at 67, what a sentence to give a 16 year old, Thing is american thinks tough justice works, all the evidence is , it has not effect on law and order. Were she white, might have had a different outcome. ??????????????
@Clever Jake: ok Jake I’ll give you a chance to redeem yourself and not look like a big idiot. How can you say I’m am part of the KKK or far right because I called Daithi a racist bigot after his comment? Do tell, this will be interesting. An insightful comment from the far left is on the way. Don’t let your peeps down now. Make it good.
@Dave Murray: Exactly. Education and upbringing more relevant then skin colour. Unless of course you are just waiting to turn every issue into skin colour.
@Dáithí Ó Raghallaigh: it’s probably more about being poor than being black. It’s true that poor people can’t afford the same level of “justice” that comes with hiring a big shot lawyer. However the statistics show that blacks commit a disproportionate amount of murders in the US.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States
@Dáithí Ó Raghallaigh: This is the kind of case that’s probably not a good idea to get embroiled in. Neither you nor I have all the facts that a jury has. And celebrities should definitely stay out if it. If there was a mistrial then that’s a different matter.
@Clever Jake: as I thought, you make no sense. You have no idea what you are talking about. Just a troll with nothing to add to any conversation. Epic fail at redeeming yourself.
Well I see some of the celebrities have obviously had the benefit of reading the case file and cross examining all of the witnesses…. Really entertaining to observe how public opinion on social media sticks to a story….
@Fiona deFreyne:
On the face of it if she hadn’t have stole his wallet and a couple of his guns I’d agree. You’d have to question what did she want them for?
@Fiona deFreyne: ???seriously?? so she could go out and murder again….the “victim” here is the guy down the graveyard…not this murderer that some celebrities have take a shine to
Thats really a bit dumb to suggest she shouldn’t be prosecuted for murder. On what basis and who would decide when someone should or should not be prosecuted for murder? However, I do believe that the sentence is too harsh and doesn’t appear to have taken all the factors into account. But like you and everyone else, I am only reading bits about this on social media and do not understand all of the facts.
@cormac o neill: but you’re ok with a 43 year old man sleeping with a 16 year old girl? In the US, in most states if not all, that would be considered statutory rape. I’m dubious about the prosecution’s case that it was a premeditated crime and she certainly was justified in shooting him if it was in self defence, quite plausible if this guy wanted to keep get rid of a girl he’d just raped but even it was premeditated, I have very little sympathy for the “victim”. That’s not a justification I just don’t think 43 year old men who prey on 16 year old girls should somehow be regarded as victims.
@Conor Kennelly: in the US in most if not all states 16 yr old’s are sexually active. It’d be tough to prove statutory rape. Agree he was 43 so it’s a bit sick but she was a prostitute who I’d imagine could easily have passed for 18. Way I’m reading it he hired her, showed her some of his possessions and then went to bed where she decided to kill and rob him. Does not sound like self defence and men do not deserve to die for hiring a prostitute. I think she is where she is supposed to be.
@DaisyChainsaw: Same people who if any other guy had been found with a child “prostitute” would be demanding his balls be cut off or that he should be shot..
No way , she’s a murderer and the hug a thug ,do gooders and celebrity morality police department are jumping on what’s seen a just cause for publicity and solical media likes.
@JayK: Firstly you are assuming he knew what age she was. She was the one that was on the street propsitioning men to rent her for sexual activities. I would very much doubt he went specifically looking for a sixteen year old girl nor would have likely asked her for proof of age. Secondly she herself was armed illegally. She went with him to his house of her own free will. Whether she had planned to rob him from the start we don’t know. But what what we do know is that she produced her own gun, shot an murdered this man. Then stole his wallet and two guns and fled the scene. If it was as she claimed Self Defence, then why have the sense of purpose to steal from and flee the crime scene. Yes he was guilty of soliciting a prostitute but in no US state does that crime involve a Death Sentence
@Clever Jake: Firstly no sex took place so nobody was raped as you put it. Secondly unless he specifically looked for a girl that was under age then your accusation that he was a paedophile is unfounded. Nor would he have known if she was selling sex under duress. Her testimony was that “She thought he was reaching for a gun”. We only have her word on that statement. For all you, I or anyone else knows She may have went with him with the intention of robbing him at gun point. And She did take the time to rob the body and take two further guns. If you just shot somebody would you have the presence mind to go looking for things to steal? But because you have no cognizant rebuttal argument, you try, like others to make it personal instead of reviewing the facts as they stand.
@Clever Jake: And a little addendum. The victim was shot in the Back of the Head while laying face down. Sounds more like an execution style killing than a case of self defence.
@Clever Jake: her age is nothing to do with it . She was a prostitute who shot her John in the back of the head . The fact she was 16 is sad and not right but it does not condone murder and as for the dead ‘John ” ,he brought the whole situation on himself.
@Clever Jake: Again you are accusing the victim of Paedophilia. Yet during the trial the was no evidence was produced by the defence that he was a paedophile nor that he specifically looked for under age girls. Secondly the victim was shot in the Back of the Head at close range while he was laying face down. This alone disputes her claim of self defence. She then had the presence of mind to take the victims wallet and two guns which she later sold. She also had arranged to meet others in a car park after the murder where she sold the victims guns before returning to the hotel where she was staying. Now looking at the facts and her actions on the night, the Jury came to the conclusion that this was a Robbery Homicide and not as was her claim of self defence.
@Clever Jake: There was no evidence that he had a gun anywhere near him when he was murdered. He was shot laying face down with both hands under his head. These are the actual facts of the case not assumptions and speculations that you are providing. It was a Jury that listened and weighed up the evidence and found the the Prosecution had proven beyond reasonable doubt that She had murdered him before robbing his corpse, home and car. And I will ask you again where is the evidence that he specifically sought out someone under age. His crime was to solicit a prostitute for sex nothing more. And unless you can provide proof that he had a history of seeking underage girls for sex or specifically sought out a 16 yr old girl on that night for sex your constant accusations are victim blaming
@Mick Jordan: stop arguing with jake we all know how clever he is and that he knows much more about this case than the judge, jury and prosecution who heard all the facts because he read a article on the journal. and If you disagree with it means you are a paedo
@darrell fahy: Killing heterosexual males seems to be no crime anymore. I start to think Muslim migrant turning Europe into califat may be not bad idea…
He was paying to have sex with a 16 year old child. If you were that girl shooting him and running off with his money would have been SURVIVAL INSTINCT! An escape route from the pimp, from her dire situation.
@Lily: The victim was shot in the Back of the Head while laying face down. Not exactly a threatening position. That is where her Self Defence claim falls down. After the murder she took the victims car and drove to a car park where she was picked up by two others. She sold the victims guns to to them before being dropped off at her hotel. Does that should like the actions of someone traumatised after killing someone in self defence?
@Mick Jordan: be careful. You are actually putting facts into the discussion . Let’s stick to half baked emotive sweeping statements . Your insistence on looking at the case and the actual events will not be tolerated.
She was forced into having sex with a man she didn’t want to have sex with. Protected herself by shooting him and taking his money so she could escape from the pimp. All acts to ensure her survival, self preservation, self defense!
@Let free speech live: Ok, so after she shot the paedofile, you think she should have just returned to her pimp??..You think she could have gone her own way??..Its not like the pimp was giving her a salary, health insurance and a pension plan… ffs her only way to survive was to take the dirty paedos money and run for it!!…Disgusting, despicable people on here claiming he was a victim in all this.. he’s a dirty paedofile, I am delighted she gave him a bullet in the skull!!
@Lord Clanricarde: So many assumptions, where you getting all your facts from because it ain’t this article. People like me should be tracked by Gardaí because I don’t agree with you, brilliant looney left at its finest. You are working off the assumption he was a peado and deserved to die(they all do) but maybe he found out her age and said no out I’m not doing that with an underage girl get out. Maybe she thought sh 1t Kut throat will beat me and bang he is dead and she has the cash. Is that scenario at all possible to you?
@Lord Clanricarde: oh also the law says he is the victim not me, are you not law abiding? Btw you are the one victim blaming not me. #notjusticebecausecelebssayso.
She need to be in a psychiatric hospital not prison or free. she needs guidance and care in a controlled environment with Alot of help and stability. Don’t free but help her as this is not a person that is capability for every day normalities and it would be be wrong to think otherwise.
@Gemma Whelan: She shot a man lying face down on a bed in the back of the head then robbed him and sold his belongings. That doesn’t sound like she needs mental help, but is where she deserves to be.
Seems to me straight forward case. She killed and robbed her client. End of. A lot of kids run away and fall into prostitution, few kill there clients. Bad for business. Then comes along the celebs bitching about a poor black girl. She’s a killer and in America she got her just deserts
@David Gannon: Prostitution is illegal to begin with… This is not as straightforward as you’d like to make it seem. She has done a long sentence already and has become a model prisoner in the mean time.
@Peter Brophy: So you don’t believe in rehabilitation in some circumstances? Considering what she went through before the murder and now that she has become a model prisoner a mentor to other prisoners and she is now working on getting her masters. It seems like she could be an asset to society and may be helpful to try and help young girls who are in the same situation as her when she was younger. It costs a hell of a lot of money to keep these people in Jail, that money could go to programmes for at risk youths.
America is an insane country, a notch above NK. Just look at its friends and allies! What she did was wrong, but, two wrongs never make a right. I was reading that in some US state two unarmed Burglars were confronted by home owner who forced them to kneel and shot dead one dead when cops came in. The suriving burglar was found guilty of MURDER! 75 years, yes the land of the free and home of the brave.
Murder is murder, she did it and she’ll be punished according to the law. So called celebrities need to live in the real world not fantasy ville….. morons
So based on all this, someone can claim rape, then murder the alleged rapist and then should not be tried for murder !!
So this ‘defense’ is only available in sex abuse type cases or what ?
A person bullies/ beats up someone else, causes horrific lifetime injuries to another, this person then kills the perpetrator ,… so should that person be not tried for murder ..
Of course they should
Woman teacher molests/rapes a young boy, later the boy kills the woman teacher, suppose the same defense applies !!…. Not
I don’t know the case and can’t really say if she should be released or not. Her sentence seems very long though. There doesn’t seem to be much consistency on sentencing in the US. It’s hard to make sense of it all.
O well, if the celebs say she should be released then so be it. Realistically, if she lived in Ireland she would have been released long ago. However, if the shortened version of her situation is to be believed and given her young age when the crime was committed, I think there is a case for giving her a second chance
So she had her own firearm in her own purse that she shot a man dead with? Trafficked from where? Why didn’t she use her own firearm on the “pimp”? So many unanswered questions that need to be answered before she garners any sympathy?
China to slap extra 34% tariffs on all US imports in retaliation to Trump measures
1 hr ago
29.6k
95
taken on a new role
Watch: First trailer for Liam Neeson's The Naked Gun reboot is released
18 mins ago
665
3
Live Blog
US stocks drop sharply as EU considers response to Trump tariffs
19 hrs ago
49.1k
71
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say